Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 17 Dec 2002

Vol. 559 No. 5

Adjournment Debate. - Disadvantaged Areas.

I am grateful for the opportunity to raise this matter and thank the Minister of State for coming in to reply. I, with Deputies Connolly and Ó Caoláin and Senator O'Brien, yesterday visited the part of County Monaghan that is not included in the severely handicapped scheme. I advise anybody else who has time to pay a visit and see the injustice that has been done to that area that it would be time well spent.

It is no exaggeration to say that for 30 years, many small farmers in this area have lost thousands of pounds. The only reason that could be offered in response to my question on 23 October was that commission officials expressed concerns that any proposal to change the classification of a certain area or areas could open up the prospect of a wider examination. It is extremely unfair that the people of the parishes of Aghabog, Corcaghan and the surrounding areas – 16% of the total area of County Monaghan – should be left out of the scheme.

A survey was carried out way back in 1989-90 into income and other factors in the area. It is clear that most of the area left out qualified under the criteria in place at that time. In the townland of Ardaghey Kill, the State owns 123 acres and Lord Rossmore owns 17. There were two surveys, according to the records, but we cannot find out how the two properties could be surveyed. I did not think it was possible to survey a tree. In Cornaglare, the State owns 43 acres, a lake occupies 22 acres and five farmers own ten to 27 acres each. Only two were surveyed. Drumuck consists of 149 acres, with nine famers owning nine to 24 acres. Only one was surveyed. Lislynchan comprises 144 acres, with six farmers owning three to 26 acres. One was surveyed. Tonagh comprises 75 acres, with six farmers owning three to 25 acres. Two were surveyed.

This is an indication of the small farm structures of these areas, yet they are classified as having risen above the farm income survey criteria of the time. Most interesting of all is Drumlinney part A, comprising 230 acres, with ten farms and 29 acres devoted to forestry. No survey was done here, yet this townland is being used by the Minister for Agriculture and Food and Department officials to claim that it is blocking others by forming a barrier between existing townlands. Drumlinney part B comprises 80 acres owned by six farmers. None of them was surveyed either. When we visited the area the other day it was clear that one of the farmers, who keeps hens in pens, had to carry out drainage work so the land could carry hens, let alone cattle.

There are 321 acres in Liscumiskey, 77 of which are forestry. There are 16 farmers of whom two were surveyed. Part of the lands I owned were in Mullagreenan and Drumgarley before I moved to where I live now. The farmers there are good dairy farmers but they had to have their cows housed throughout this summer. They are not allowed into the scheme either.

I will conclude by mentioning a farm at Freemount, Cootehill. The land surrounding the farm, owned by one family, is classified as severely handicapped but this farm was left out. Half the farm floods on a regular basis. An injustice is being done to this group of farmers. Today they get area aid but for a year they received nothing. The land is difficult and the farms are small. The Department officials have admitted that most of the ground in that area qualifies. When the last tranche was designated the best land was included. The south of the county is good land and it is designated severely handicapped. The land in the north of the county, around Smithborough and Glaslough, is also good land and is severely handicapped.

How can the Minister not bring this matter to Brussels? It is vital that this be done immediately and that justice be done where a major injustice has existed over the last 30 years. I beg the Minister, at this late stage, to bring this issue to Brussels and have the land reclassified. It was done before and there is no reason it cannot be done again.

When the disadvantaged areas appeals panel was commencing its examination of areas for reclassification in 1992 it was decided, following agreement with the farming organisations, that the panel would base its recommendations on data gathered in the 1989 survey. This data had been used in the previous fourth review to select areas for reclassification, based on an income criterion of less than 40% of national average income and at least 40% of the working population being engaged in agriculture. It was agreed that if the income limit was raised to 60% and the working population limit was disregarded, the data would allow selection of a significant number of additional areas. A further condition was that the land must be rated at four or less on a quality scale of 0 – 9 and also that selected areas must adjoin existing more severely handicapped areas. The Deputy will agree that this has been standard practice when reclassification occurred in any part of Europe. The land has to be linked to an existing area.

Freemount is linked on three of the four sides.

Using these criteria, the appeals panel selected an additional 30% of County Monaghan for reclassification as more severely handicapped, bringing the total more severely handicapped area of County Monaghan to 73% of the total area of the county.

It is 100% in Galway.

It is a severely handicapped area in Galway, with the Shannon flooding it as it pumps down from the Shannon pot.

It is some of the best land in the country.

Following a further re-check, some additional areas were added in 1998 which were approved by the European Commission in February 1999. These additional areas brought the total more severely handicapped area of County Monaghan to 85%. The remaining 15% of County Monaghan cannot be reclassified as more severely handicapped on the basis of the data contained in the 1989 survey.

Officials from my Department met informally with European Commission officials in May 2002 and raised the question of reclassifying areas currently classified as less severely handicapped to more severely handicapped. It would not be possible or acceptable to the European Commission to use other criteria, such as proximity to the Border, as a means of re-classification. If consideration were to be given to further reclassification, it is unlikely that this could be confined to a part of the country to the exclusion of other areas. A more widespread survey could open up the possibility of the current classification of disadvantaged areas being re-opened.

It is possible because an injustice was done.

Weather conditions during the summer led to difficulties for farmers in many parts of the country and that is the reason the Minister, Deputy Walsh, arranged for the highest ever payout of compensatory allowance and premia in mid-October last. In so far as County Monaghan is concerned, the number of farmers benefiting from the disadvantaged areas compensatory allowance scheme has increased from about 3,500 to 4,000 in 2001 due to the changeover to an area based payment system. Overall, about 3,100 farmers in County Monaghan gained an average of €971 annually under these new arrangements.

That is what they were losing previously.

The Government is committed, in the programme for Government, to examine, in conjunction with the Commission, the possibility of extending the disadvantaged areas classifi cation to the entire BMW region. While this commitment relates to an extension of disadvantaged areas rather than to re-classification of existing disadvantaged areas, both issues can be formally raised with the European Commission in the context of a review of the CAP rural development plan in 2003. The Government is concerned to ensure, however, that a re-opening of the debate would not lead to a wider review of disadvantaged areas generally.

I listened with great interest to the case made by the Deputy. I am pleased that he and his Oireachtas colleagues have visited this area of County Monaghan. We will take note of what has been said in this debate and continue to negotiate during 2003. Let us hope there will be a positive conclusion in the interests of the entire country.

The Minister should visit the county.

Top
Share