I propose to take Questions Nos. 129 and 130 together.
Section 3(6) of the Immigration Act 1999 requires the Minister to have regard to a range of eleven different factors, including humanitarian considerations, in determining whether a deportation order should be made. It applies therefore only in cases where the making of a deportation order is contemplated. The obligations imposed on the Minister arise whether the person in question is a failed asylum seeker and whether he or she has made representations of any sort. Furthermore it applies whether or not the person made representations of any sort to the Minister prior to commencement of the Immigration Act 1999.
As a reflection of these realities, statistics are not maintained on the matters raised which would distinguish former asylum seekers from other classes of non-national or which would distinguish cases where representations have been made from other cases. What I can say however, is that there is no legal obligation on the Minister to respond to representations made by a person prior to the making of a deportation order. There is of course, in the vast majority of cases, an obligation on the Minister to give the person an opportunity to make representations. I can say however, that 281 persons have been given leave to remain in the State following consideration of the case under the provisions of section 3(6) of the Immigration Act 1999 since its commencement.