Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 13 Feb 2003

Vol. 561 No. 3

Schools Building Projects.

Scoil Íosa is also called Malahide community school and, apart from the fact that it is in my constituency, nationally it is a particularly special school. Its size is phenomenal, being the third largest community school in the country, but it also provides facilities for a wide range of abilities. It has the only follow-on facilities for children with special needs in that area. The largest ACLD, dyslexia and remedial units in the country are depending on Scoil Íosa for children going from primary to second level. There is significant demand for places there and it is not easy to find alternative accommodation.

Unfortunately, the capital investment programme for 2003 has halted the progress being made towards a larger replacement building for Scoil Íosa. I am begging the Minister of State to give this school the go ahead at the quarterly review stage, or before then. I know I will be joined by many others in making this request. The Minister of State should take into account the chronic difficulties that are being caused by having to tell over 43 applicant pupils that have been granted places, that those places will now be withdrawn. The importance of the replacement building was recognised by the previous Ministers for Education and Science, Deputies Martin and Woods. I hope the current Minister, Deputy Noel Dempsey, will recognise the work as being urgent.

The situation is tragic for those affected, particularly for families where a child may be moving on from primary level, yet cannot now join his or her brother or sister in the secondary school. In case the Minister of State suggests providing pre-fabricated classrooms, the current facilities are so dilapidated that a number of pupils cannot use the toilets. The school building is generally dilapidated. They are people with chronic special needs. I spoke today to the mother of a boy who is dyslexic. He is in an excellent local ACLD unit but if he does not get a place in the Malahide community school she said she may as well send him to Trinity College because he would be completely at sea without the support facilities for a child with special needs. He is being told that he cannot have a place. His parents are frantic with worry and are in a desperate situation. They will either have to pay for grinds or stay up late at night trying to help him. They will have no quality of life. That is the situation facing many pupils who are affected by this freeze. I ask that the situation be reviewed in particular cases where there is a clear humanitarian as well as educational need.

I am aware of another case where the medical situation of the parents themselves is so difficult that they cannot travel or bring their children to another school and it is not possible for the children to be sent to another school. I hope this matter can be resolved without the country getting itself into further hot water. The Government has had to face parents in the courts because constitutional entitlements to education were being denied to their children. Children with special needs are being victimised most particularly. They are the very children who perhaps come from a disadvantaged background and are then told that they should go to a grind school for their education. Instead of facing up to that basic inequality this decision accentuates the inequality. Those children that can go to the secondary school down the road which does not have special needs facilities will do so but children with special needs who cannot go anywhere—

An Leas-Cheann Comhairle

The Deputy should conclude now.

—will be left at home or go to grind schools and they will be in a worse situation than they are in at present.

Freagraím sa díospóireacht seo ar son an Aire Oideachais and Eolaíochta. Mo bhuíochas don Teachta an deis a thabhairt dúinn an cheist seo a phlé ar Athló Dáil Éireann.

In June 1998, the school authority of Malahide community school made an application to my Department for an extension of the school accommodation. At that time, the Department and the school's management authority agreed a long-term projected enrolment of 1,050 pupils. A schedule of overall accommodation was prepared by the Department for agreement by the school authority. Subsequently the school authority indicated that it considered a long-term projected enrolment of 1,200 pupils was more realistic and appealed to the Department to revise the figure of 1,050 to 1,200. The Department acceded to this request following a review of the demographics of the area.

A full design team comprising a consultant architect, consultant quantity surveyor, consultant structural engineer and a consultant mechanical and electrical engineer, was appointed in August 2001 following an open competition that was advertised in the Official Journal of the European Communities, to plan the redevelopment of the school. A meeting of the design team, officials of the Department and representatives of the school's management authority was held in September 2001 at the Tullamore office of the Department to discuss the brief for the project. At this meeting, the design team was instructed to fully and comprehensively explore all available options for the redevelopment of the school including the possible rebuild option. The design team was further instructed that it should liaise with the school's management authority and as far as possible have due regard to the wishes of the school when framing the optimum strategy for the school's redevelopment.

Further integral elements of the optimum strategy were outlined, namely, achieving value for money, the projected life span of a refurbished portion of the building and the possibility of a phased delivery of the project. The stage one and two reports relating to site suitability and the outline sketch scheme were submitted to the Department on 21 December 2001. These reports outlined eight possible options for the redevelopment of Malahide community school. Following detailed analysis of all options, the ultimate preferred option became the complete rebuild of the school on the existing site. The planning process has progressed to stage three – developed sketch – with a stage three report due to be lodged with the Department shortly. When stage three has been completed and accepted, the design team will be allowed to apply for planning permission for the project, a process that inevitably will take a number of months. Unfortunately, due to current budgetary constraints the project will not progress beyond this point in the current year.

The Deputy will appreciate that at all times the Department has worked in close co-operation with the school's management authority to achieve the most favourable solution to the school's accommodation needs. I would like to point out to the Deputy that there has been substantial investment in this school over the past number of years. Specifically, a re-roofing project was carried out at a cost of €365,521.47 and drainage works were carried out at a cost of € 292,016.27.—

The Minister of State has made no mention at all of special needs. It is not an ordinary school.

Temporary accommodation has also been provided.

Top
Share