Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 10 Nov 2004

Vol. 592 No. 2

Road Traffic Bill 2004: Second Stage (Resumed).

Question again proposed: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

A survey this year by the National Safety Council among others found that seven out of ten drivers believe it acceptable to drive at ten miles an hour above the speed limit. This is a worrying finding. The survey also reveals that 40% of drivers believe it is acceptable to break the speed limit on local and regional roads, which account for 60% of fatal accidents and the majority of fatal accidents where speed is a factor. A total of 47% more males than females consider it acceptable to break the speed limit on these roads. Reacting to the results of the survey, Mr. Eddie Shaw, chairman of the National Safety Council, stated:

Clearly many of us in this country consider "real speeding" to be driving in excess of the speed limit by more than ten miles per hour. This is a killer attitude as there is no such thing as safe or acceptable speeding.

I fully endorse Mr. Shaw's comments.

Mr. Shaw also pointed out that doubling a car's speed from 20 to 40 miles per hour does not just double the destructive capacity of the car, it increases it by a factor of four — if a car hits a person at 40 miles per hour, it hits him four times harder than a car travelling at 20 miles per hour. Travelling at 60 miles per hour, a car impacts nine times harder than at 20 miles per hour. This is the brutal reality we must face. We must all drive more carefully and slowly. We must leave a greater distance between ourselves and the car in front and we must be alert for vulnerable road users such as pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists, the very old and the very young.

I welcome the new road safety strategy for 2004-06. This strategy is the blueprint for the next two years for the work of all agencies involved in road safety. The last road safety strategy, which ran from 1998 until 2003, more than met its main objectives of reducing fatal and serious injury accidents by 20%. This new strategy hopes to improve on that, with a 25% reduction in road collision fatalities compared to the average annual number of fatalities between 1998 and 2003 by the end of 2006. The targets in the speed enforcement areas are especially welcome.

I appeal to everyone to be careful and to slow down. Every weekend we hear of the number of accidents and deaths that bring only sorrow, sadness, bereavement and upset to so many families. People in the prime of their lives, with a great future ahead of them, are sadly losing out due to tragic and needless accidents.

A driver should not worry about what everyone else will do because he or she could be the driver who crashes. He should mind himself and his passengers, drive carefully and make sure he is not the driver who crashes. Unfortunately, in numerous cases, the driver who worries about everyone else's driving ends up in a fatal accident.

We must drive carefully and slowly. It is better to arrive late and alive than on time and dead. I fully support this Bill. I welcome the fact that the NRA is working with the Garda Síochána and the Department of Transport to prepare an implementation plan for speed cameras to meet the strategy.

I welcome the opportunity to speak on this important legislation, much of which is housekeeping. I have often spoken about the matter of real importance in the Bill, speed. The Bill addresses certain administrative functions for the gardaí regarding traffic offences, the out-sourcing of certain functions and the fixed charge system, and covers the supply of vehicles to minors. This innovative Bill presents an opportunity for us to focus on the tragedy inflicted on so many families as a result of road accidents and it will be speedily passed. The Minister, Deputy Cullen, and the Minister of State, Deputy Fahey, are well aware of the views of Fianna Fáil members on road traffic legislation and the need for change.

Speed is the major cause of death on the roads. In some cases, speed limits are so inappropriate that I wonder why there is no limit other than the national speed limit on our county and regional roads. This legislation allows for the amendment of those speed limits, an important innovation because the system until now did not make sense.

Many of our roads are inferior. In the Border, midlands and western region, there is a shortage of investment in the national primary and secondary road structure. I am disappointed more progress has not been made on some of the major road projects in County Roscommon when there have been so many accidents. Work is needed on the N5 and the bypass for Ballaghaderreen. The N61 should also be upgraded and Athlone and Boyle bypassed, with an interchange for the proposed Athlone to Ballinasloe motorway. Extensive realignment is needed on the road from Athlone to Roscommon, particularly at Knockcroghery. It is difficult to believe the condition of the national secondary routes in County Roscommon. The N60 and N63 are seriously deficient in standard. As we enter the final years of Objective One status in the BMW region, these roads should be upgraded.

Debate adjourned.
Sitting suspended at 1.30 p.m. and resumed at 2.30 p.m.
Top
Share