Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 7 Dec 2006

Vol. 629 No. 2

Order of Business.

It is proposed to take No. 15b, motion re referral to joint committee of the Criminal Justice (Drug Trafficking) Act 1996; and No. 26a, Financial Motions by the Minister for Finance [2006] — motion 6 (resumed).

It is proposed, notwithstanding anything in Standing Orders, that the Dáil shall sit later than 4.45 p.m. tonight and business shall be interrupted not later than 7.30 p.m; No. 15b shall be decided without debate; and the following arrangements shall apply in respect of the resumed debate on No. 26a: the speech of the Taoiseach and the main spokespersons, or a Member nominated in his or her stead, for the Fine Gael Party, the Labour Party and the Technical Group, who shall be called upon in that order, shall not exceed 40 minutes in each case; the spokespersons for the Technical Group shall be confined to a spokesperson for the Green Party, Sinn Féin and the Independents; and the speech of each other Member called upon, who may share their time, shall not exceed 30 minutes in each case.

There are three proposals to put to the House. Is the proposal for the late sitting agreed? Agreed. Is the proposal for dealing with No. 15b, motion re referral to joint committee of the Criminal Justice (Drug Trafficking) Act 1996, without debate agreed? Agreed. Is the proposal for dealing with No. 26a, Financial Motions, agreed? Agreed.

I have a number of questions for the Taoiseach. I understand that 14 matters will come before the House without debate next week. A total of eight of these are motions back from committees without debate, while the remainder are before the House but are not to be discussed. This is not acceptable and the Taoiseach might like to deal with it.

It is perfectly obvious from the recent study that the prison system is not working and is breeding new crime and misery for the society it purports to serve. This party produced a fines Bill on a number of occasions which was voted down by the Government as far back as 1998. The study shows that 85% of those who have already done time for not paying fines will reoffend in some way. We have a situation where criminals are running loose from prison.

Does Deputy Kenny have a question appropriate to the Order to Business?

I understand that up to 300 prisoners are out on early release and have not gone back.

Does Deputy Kenny have a question relating to legislation?

Yes. Will the Government introduce a fines Bill which will deal in part with this issue? If the Taoiseach finds that the pressure of work on the Parliamentary Counsel is such that he cannot do that, I would be happy to reintroduce the fines Bill drafted by Fine Gael, to be amended by Government if that is appropriate.

Under the legislation governing the Taoiseach's appointment of Ministers of State, will the Minister of State at the Department of Health and Children, Deputy Tim O'Malley, who is not here, go today to the parents of Jordan Kelly and deal with the situation?

The matter does not arise under the Order of Business.

It does arise under the Order of Business because the Taoiseach appointed him in terms of competence. The fact is that for four years, those parents have been given tablets, a sheet of paper and told to raise their child.

The matter does not arise at this stage and there is no provision for Leaders' Questions on Thursday. Deputy Kenny has made his point. I call the Taoiseach to reply to the first two questions.

If there is any compassion or sense of competency, I ask the Taoiseach to advise the Minister of State, Deputy Tim O'Malley, to go down in his State-sponsored car to those parents and speak to them today.

That is not a matter for the Order of Business.

The Government Whip advises me that they are examining the issues raised by the Opposition Whips relating to next week and are trying to reschedule things. The fines Bill is due this session. It is still on target to be published this session.

A Deputy

What?

It is due to be published this session, which is up to the start of the next session.

Does that include the Enforcement of Court Orders Bill?

The Government co-operated with me at the beginning of this year in putting through a Private Members' Bill to reform the coroner service. However, in November of last year, the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform stated the heads of a comprehensive new coroners Bill would be published to facilitate discussion. When will it be before the House?

Does the Taoiseach intend to make any appointments to the positions of Minister of State before the end of the session? If so, when is he likely to make them?

The heads of the Bill to update the Coroners Act 1962 and reform the coroners service have been drafted and approved for some time. I am told it should be due early in 2007.

I will turn my mind to the other issue soon.

Could the Taoiseach be any more explicit than "soon"?

Christmas time.

Does yesterday's budget not confirm that the Government——

The Deputy is not in order.

My point is actually about promised legislation.

The Deputy should come to the legislation.

In my preamble, I would like to say that the Government is——

The Deputy will have an opportunity during the day to say what he would like to say in his preamble. The budget will be debated all day.

The Taoiseach wants to hear what I have to say.

The Deputy is out of order and should refer to the legislation.

There is a new alignment alright.

Through the budget yesterday, the Taoiseach tried to ingratiate himself——

The Deputy should come straight to the legislation.

——regarding climate change. He and his Government are clueless regarding climate change. The carbon fund Bill is promised for next week but only because of pressure from the European Union.

The Taoiseach on the carbon fund Bill.

Does this not demonstrate the Taoiseach's lack of commitment to the greatest challenge facing humanity?

We cannot have a debate on the Bill. There will be an opportunity all day to debate the budget.

The Taoiseach will not even tax his friends in the SUVs.

The Taoiseach on the legislation.

Why the tardiness and lack of commitment?

Next week.

A Deputy

A bit of coal for the stocking.

In light of the information on the increase in the price of cigarettes that the Taoiseach shared with us yesterday in the debate on the financial regulations, which has the potential effect of achieving a 2% reduction in usage, is there legislation to complement the effort to dissuade an increasing number of people from smoking tobacco? Will it be part of the health Bill? Will the Taoiseach, in light of the limited impact of the measures exposed by the information he provided last night, bring forward the Bill as a result?

(Interruptions).

I do not believe there is a need for any legislation — we have regulations. The Deputy should not discount a reduction in consumption in the order of 100 million cigarettes.

That is a fair amount of cigarettes.

Imagine if they were in the Deputy's boot.

If that is only 2%——

Allow the Taoiseach without interruption.

It is 100 million cigarettes.

——some 98% remain.

Given that the Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources broke his silence on the issue of gas and electricity prices while in Hanoi and disclosed that he had met the suppliers and expressed his concern thereon, will he indicate whether he will meet the suppliers again to express further concerns and inveigle them to reduce their prices so they will be in line with those that prevailed before the increase in October?

The Deputy should ask a question appropriate to the Order of Business.

He should facilitate other Members of the House in this regard and indicate when the relevant legislation, which is promised——

I suggest the Deputy submit a question to the line Minister.

I refer to the relevant legislation. We should all have an opportunity to air our views.

The Taoiseach on the legislation.

What is the position on the minerals development Bill?

It has nothing at all to do with energy prices.

The Minister can break all the silences he wants to then.

It has nothing at all to do with energy prices.

Bring it forward and let us hear the Minister's views.

Is Deputy Durkan giving out about the fact that the prices were reduced?

The Taoiseach on the minerals development Bill.

The Minister's views are at variance with those of some of his ministerial colleagues. When he breaks his silence in Hanoi on the tannoy once more, he should come into the House and tell us about it.

(Interruptions).

Allow the Taoiseach to answer the question.

Next year.

An important new record was set this morning when it took two hours and 25 minutes for the 39A bus to come from Ongar to the city centre, a journey of 12 miles.

That does not arise on the Order of Business.

It did not arrive at all.

Any crash, big or small, around north-west Dublin creates instant gridlock for 20 miles.

Has the Deputy a question on the Order of Business?

We are still on the Order of Business and will be moving on to general financial statements later, when the Deputy will have an opportunity to raise these matters.

I refer to the Dublin transport authority Bill. I will not ask the Taoiseach whether he is embarrassed by the catastrophic infrastructural void the day after the budget.

The Deputy can raise those matters later. I call the Taoiseach on the legislation.

Massive resources were available for emergency action. When will emergency action be taken to save our people from a breakdown?

I did not hear the Taoiseach's reply because it was not delivered——

If the Deputy would stop interrupting when the Taoiseach is called, he would hear the reply. I call the Taoiseach on the legislation.

This session.

If the Taoiseach stood up and replied properly and maybe addressed the critical issue that has our people on the verge of breakdown——

I call Deputy McManus.

——we might get some action here.

Allow Deputy McManus, who has been called, to speak.

The best emergency action would be to get rid of this godforsaken Government.

(Interruptions).

Allow Deputy McManus to speak, please.

The Government will not buy its way out of trouble with taxpayers' money.

(Interruptions).

Deputy McManus is waiting patiently and I ask Members on both sides of the House to allow her to contribute.

I am all for a little Christmas cheer.

Hospitals around the country have run over budget and are now receiving revenue funding from the capital fund. My understanding, on the basis of experience gained not long ago in this House——

Has the Deputy a question on legislation?

A decision to address this must be taken in this House. Will the Taoiseach state whether a resolution is required in this regard?

I have no notification for any resolution on this matter.

I did not ask whether the Taoiseach had notification but about the transfer of funding, owing to capital moneys not being spent because of Government incompetence, to make up the shortfall in the hospitals arising from the lack of funding on the revenue side. Does this not require a resolution of the House?

No legislation is promised.

We will proceed to No. 15b.

This is a matter for this House.

The question has been answered and the Taoiseach stated no legislation is promised.

Does the Taoiseach expect there will be a resolution in the circumstances I have outlined to him?

It does not arise.

It arose last year.

It would be important. The Government got into a bad tangle last year.

We are proceeding to the next item. I suggest the Deputy submits a question to the appropriate Minister.

Top
Share