Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 28 Jan 2009

Vol. 672 No. 3

Adjournment Debate.

Accident and Emergency Services.

Prior to the last general election, the then Taoiseach, Deputy Bertie Ahern, gave a public commitment to the people of County Clare. Fianna Fáil candidates in that election gave the same political commitment in all debates that 24-hour accident and emergency services would be retained at Ennis General Hospital and that the hospital would finally receive a capital development allocation of €39 million. These commitments have been given by the Government since 2000, and they ring hollow in 2009.

The people of Clare should have the best possible health care service delivering the best possible medical outcome. Placing 44,000 Clare people outside the reach of golden hour cover is not the answer. Asking people to travel 60, 70 or 80 miles to an accident and emergency department is not the answer. This argument aside, there is insufficient capacity at the Mid-Western Regional Hospital in Limerick to cope with the extra workload. Where are the 135 beds promised for Limerick? Where are the new ambulances? The new plans provide for eight accident and emergency consultants based in Limerick. There are currently only three with a potential for five, but the two additional posts will not be filled for 18 months.

Instead of creating a centre of excellence in Limerick, a centre of chaos will arise. One need only look at the result of the Government's attempt to centralise services in the north east. In recent weeks, sick people have been lying on trolleys for three days in Our Lady's Hospital in Drogheda. Surgery has been cancelled, there are insufficient beds and medical staff are extremely frustrated.

I plead with the Minister for Health and Children to listen to those at the coal face, to GPs, consultants, nurses and ambulance crews. All these staff groupings have expressed serious concern about the situation, with one consultant threatening to resign. The Minister must learn from the mistakes made in the north east instead of pushing more patients towards the Mid-Western Regional Hospital in Limerick, which is already bursting at the seams. The Minister must abandon her plans for the mid-west and abandon this general slash and burn approach. Instead, she must honour the political commitments made by the Government to the people of County Clare.

Taking services out of a community before putting alternative services in place is a classic case of putting the cart before the horse. The Teamwork report estimates it will cost €380 million to implement this change. However, only €6 million has been allocated to Mr. Paul Burke, the person charged with implementing it. The services are simply not in place at the Mid-Western Regional Hospital in Limerick. The promised additional 135 beds have not been provided and the additional ambulance and paramedical staff are not in place.

I regret the absence of the Minister of State with responsibility for older people, Deputy Hoctor, from the Chamber. I appeal to the Minister of State who is in attendance, Deputy Moloney, not simply to make new claims that funding is promised for various services. The public has grown tired of the broken promises of Fianna Fáil and the Minister for Health and Children, Deputy Harney. A 20-bed long-stay facility for Borrisokane was included in the capital funding programme last year. This funding was withdrawn on 31 December 2008 and must be reapplied for. The ambulance spaces promised for Thurles and Nenagh — as part of the Government deal with Deputy Lowry, as we were told — have not been delivered. The promised paramedical staff have not been trained and an air ambulance has not been provided.

The Minister of State, Deputy Moloney, is aware that parts of north Tipperary are not accessible to Limerick within the golden hour. This is of great concern to the people of that area and they will not accept it. We will fight tooth and nail on this issue. To paraphrase the words of the Bull McCabe to his son Tadhg, "Do not do it, Minister". Laois people have always been decent to the people of Tipperary and we ask the Minister of State to support us in our battle to retain vital services in north Tipperary. The theory of such proposals is fine but the reality is entirely different. If the services are seen to be in place and operational in Limerick, the people of north Tipperary may reconsider.

The engineers who designed the Titanic said it was unsinkable but it sank on its maiden voyage. The Teamwork report will also sink on its maiden voyage because it is based on a perfect world and a perfect health service which do not exist. The report makes no reference to funding. In the current economic climate, nobody believes the Government has any intention of providing the necessary funding.

If the Health Service Executive proceeds to implement this report without the full capital expenditure, people will die. This is not scaremongering. One life lost as a result of the implementation of this report without the provision of the necessary funding will be one life too many. This report is not concerned with putting the patient first or reshaping local services in line with the needs of the local population. Rather, it is concerned with cutting costs and removing services from Ennis and Nenagh hospitals. No sooner was the ink dry on the report than the implementation team was put in place. Another plan is being hatched as we speak to remove services from Ennis as soon as possible.

Not one hand was raised in support of these proposals when GPs from Clare and Tipperary met yesterday. These are the people who work at the coal face of the health service and who understand the issues. The Minister, Deputy Harney, said yesterday in her response to a parliamentary question of mine that detailed plans are being formulated by the Health Service Executive in regard to emergency care, critical care and surgical services and that certain changes to current arrangements for the provision of some acute services will be made.

The people of Clare want a 24-hour accident and emergency service to be retained at Ennis General Hospital. There is genuine fear and concern among those living in west and north Clare that they will be further isolated from the provision of vital life-saving services. If this report is implemented in full, Ennis General Hospital will become a minor injuries clinic. A group of six advanced paramedics based in Ennis will be expected to deliver a 24-hour emergency care service throughout the county. The existing ambulance service is already starved of resources. If the Health Service Executive and the Minister are serious about providing funding, they must increase the number of proposed advanced paramedics and install them on a 24-7 basis at each of the ambulance stations at Kilrush, Ennistymon, Scariff and Ennis.

My colleagues and I are elected to represent our constituents and we demand answers on their behalf. The Minister, Deputy Harney, has the ultimate responsibility and she must come clean with the public. If we cannot obtain answers in the Chamber tonight, we will persist in our efforts to oblige the Minister to debate this issue in the House. I am disappointed she is not here for this debate. She should be in attendance to answer our questions.

I am responding to the Deputies on behalf of the Minister, Deputy Harney, who cannot be here.

The Government is committed to ensuring the delivery of the best quality health services possible, in an effective and efficient way, and ensuring patient safety is of paramount importance in order that people can have confidence in the services and the best possible patient outcomes can be achieved.

There is significant international and national evidence that acute complex health care, particularly for emergency medicine, complex surgical services and critical care, should be provided in hospitals which are suitably staffed and equipped and which undertake sufficient volumes of such activity in order to maximise clinical outcomes and, more important, ensure safe services. At the same time there is a significant range of less complex care which can continue to be provided safely in smaller hospitals.

Reorganisation of services must occur in consultation with the key stakeholders and on an incremental basis.

That never happens.

It does. I have seen it happen in the midlands and I am quite certain it also happens here.

The GPs were not consulted.

I make the point that reorganisation will occur in consultation with all the stakeholders, which would include the GPs. The Minister believes that it is important to work with health professionals and other interested parties to secure an increasing set of improvements over time. She is confident this approach will produce the best outcome for patients.

It is also important to note that the HSE has commissioned a number of reviews on how acute hospital services should be organised, including the Teamwork-Horwath report on the mid-west region, which the executive has recently published.

The Teamwork-Horwath report on the mid-west highlights the need for changes to be made in the provision and organisation of acute hospital services across the region, particularly in regard to accident and emergency services, critical care, acute surgery and medicine. It is also worth noting that the report found that the services are too fragmented, carry increased risks for patients and staff and are not sustainable in their current form.

The HSE has also indicated that certain changes to the current arrangements for the provision of some acute services, including accident and emergency services, must be made, in the interests of patient safety and also to make best use of the clinical resources available within the mid-west region. The HSE has been engaged in a consultation process with key stakeholders as it formulates detailed plans in regard to emergency care, critical care and surgical services in the region.

The HSE plans will involve the reconfiguration of acute hospital services into a network and their better integration with primary care services across the region, with a regional centre at Limerick Regional Hospital that will deal with complex and specialist cases. The plans will also provide for the development of significant and effective local hospital and community services. These will include important roles for Nenagh General Hospital and Ennis General Hospital which, for example, will involve the expansion of day surgery and diagnostic activity.

The Government is closing them.

If the Deputy follows the script, he will note the position is otherwise. The Minister emphasises and confirms that there will be important roles for Nenagh and Ennis.

They are like the centre of excellence in Portlaoise in the Minister of State's constituency, the Government did not invest the necessary funding in it.

No, the Deputy is wrong about that. I supported the then Minister who selected Tullamore. The funding is in place and the service is up and running.

Portlaoise was designated a centre of excellence.

In regard to accident and emergency services, it is important to appreciate that, although these departments are staffed on a 24-hour basis, the number of attendances in Ennis and Nenagh between 8 p.m. and 8 a.m. is low.

Some 21,000 people attended the accident and emergency department in Ennis.

That does not stack up with the facts I have here. In Nenagh the average number of attendances in this period is 7.6, while the corresponding number in Ennis is 9.2. Most of these cases would be more appropriately dealt with by GP out-of-hours services.

Some 19,000 people attended the accident and emergency department in Nenagh.

The HSE plan will reorganise the arrangements in Ennis and Nenagh so that these hospitals will provide an urgent care service for 12 to 14 hours a day as part of a regional accident and emergency structure. These hospitals will also continue to admit appropriate medical cases. The HSE has identified the enhancement of emergency ambulance services as an essential element of the new service delivery arrangements for the mid-west.

Agreement has been reached with the ambulance service that all trauma, paediatric and obstetric emergencies will not be brought to the local hospital but will go directly to the major tertiary centre, which includes the regional maternity unit.

Plans are under way to introduce a 24-hour advanced paramedic service in Clare and north Tipperary.

There are only two paramedics on duty at any stage. How can two cover an area?

Plans are under way to introduce a 24-hour advanced paramedic service in Clare and north Tipperary.

Six are assigned for the entire county, but how can that number cover the county if one of them is out ill?

Advanced paramedics are trained to a standard that equips them to provide more complex pre-hospital care than ordinary paramedics. This includes the administration of a wider range of drugs and the urgent assessment and resuscitation of patients.

The Minister of State should tell that to someone from Kilbaha or Carrigaholt.

The strategy is all about providing the best care for patients.

It is all about money.

In regard to capital development, the Minister has asked the HSE, in the context of the development of its capital plan, to consider the requirements of the mid-west arising from the planned reconfiguration of services in the region.

A Deputy

What about patients who died when they had to pass Monaghan——

Deputies will also be more than satisfied to realise that discussions on the HSE draft capital plan are ongoing between the executive and the Department. The Minister is satisfied that the measures being taken by the HSE are necessary and appropriate in order to ensure the provision of safe and effective health services to the people of the mid-west region.

We believe she is wrong.

Farm Waste Management.

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for allowing me to raise the important issue of the farm waste management scheme. It is a good scheme and has had a positive impact not only for agriculture but for the environment. People were shocked when they heard that the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food could not add the number of farmers who applied for grants under the scheme. The number of applicants went through Teagasc, the farm development service. The Department must have known the number of applicants, given that the number of planning permissions granted throughout the country could have been checked with the county councils. People are shocked, as am I, that the Department underestimated the number of applicants or the money required to cover the payments. However, that is the position and there is nothing we can do about it now.

In the limited time available, I want to impress on the Minister the hardship being experienced by farm families throughout the country and their concerns about farming. They are worried about milk prices falling to as low as 19 cent or 20 cent per litre this year. Farming is changing. The applicants under this scheme have borrowed a large amount of money from banks or other financial institutions. They had to meet high standards that were laid down in respect of these projects, which they did. I stress the worry, fear and the anxiety they are experiencing.

I appreciate the Minister coming into the House to listen to what we have to say. I cannot understand why a Department would underestimate the figures in question to such a degree. The Minister should give us a commitment tonight that these grants will be paid within the time specified. Banks, other financial institutions and, in some cases, contractors who carried out the work are waiting for the payment of this money. I implore the Minister to give us an answer that properly addresses this matter.

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for allowing me, along with my colleagues, to raise this important issue. It is an important but a simple one. Thousands of farmers around the country had to work day and night to meet the deadline of 31 December for the completion of the work on the projects under the farm waste management scheme. They took out loans based on the grants to which they are entitled. The Minister and the Government voted down the motion introduced by Deputy Creed and other members of the Fine Gael Party last October to extend the date for the completion of the works.

On making representations on behalf of our constituents in recent weeks, we were told by Department officials that the Minister had suspended payments under the scheme. The reasons for this were revealed in The Sunday Tribune last weekend when it emerged that the Minister totally underestimated the money needed to cover payments in respect of the approved applications.

How could the Minister have got it so wrong? I heard him state on "Morning Ireland" on Monday that he underestimated the late rush of applications. Given that he was well aware of the number of applications approved, how could he have underestimated the cost involved? For the Minister to say that the large demand took him by surprise can be compared to a person selling 20,000 tickets for a football match and then being surprised when 20,000 people turn up. If the deadline had been extended, the irony is that the work could have been done in a more orderly fashion and the Minister would not have been hit with all of the costs coming down the tracks at the one time.

The Minister said he will honour his commitments by way of some form of deferred payment. With banks putting pressure on farmers, deferred payments are not acceptable. Farmers need their money now in order to get the banks off their backs. The perception on the ground is that the Minister's Government bailed out the banks for their misadventures. All we ask here tonight is that the farmers get what they are entitled to get. I call on the Minister to do the honourable thing and pay the hard-pressed farmers the money to which they are entitled.

I thank the Minister for coming to the House. The payment of grants under the farm waste management scheme is an extremely important issue. In spite of a three-hour debate in the Dáil some months ago, the Minister refused to allow time for the people to finish the job, thus putting increased costs and pressures on the farmers concerned to have all the necessary paperwork in by 31 December 2008.

The only answer we and individual farmers can get from the Department is that no payments are available, even for those applications received long before the December deadline. This is an extremely serious situation and cannot be ignored by the Government. Nobody denies that this was a generous scheme but it had to be allowed so that farmers could meet the necessary regulations with regard to preserving the environment. The Minister explained last week that this came about as a result of a legal situation in Brussels. This only happened because for many years a Fianna Fáil-led Government ignored the problem and the regulations until the matter went to law, but that is no excuse for the hold up in payments today.

The Minister, Deputy Smith, and his Department knew exactly how many farm grants had been sanctioned and they knew especially how many applicants had sent in their cards showing clearly that work was in progress. However, the Minister and his Department totally failed to budget for this, as recently as the much heralded October budget in which so many other figures were completely inaccurate.

When this scheme was announced by the then Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Deputy Mary Coughlan, who is now Tánaiste, I specifically asked her in the House how she intended to fund the payments as it was clear to me, even at that early stage, that her Estimates were completely flawed. She assured me in no uncertain terms that money would not be a problem.

Farmers entered this scheme in good faith and bankers lent them significant sums of money on the clear understanding that the grants would be paid according to the agreed charter of farmers' rights. Many of the jobs cost more than farmers had originally budgeted for, due to weather conditions and pressures of time. It is vital that this money be paid immediately.

It is interesting that the prices of both ready-mix and steel have fallen dramatically within one month of the scheme ending. This proves that farmers were forced to pay over the odds in an unjustified rush to finish this work. Farm incomes are dropping. Farmers are under pressure. Farmers from the Minister's own county as well as my own contacted me in desperation. I urge the Minister to ensure that farmers are paid now or within the next two months at least.

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for permitting my colleagues and me to raise this matter and I thank the Minister for being here to take the debate in person.

There is very little I can add to what has been said by my colleagues. To say that applicants who are awaiting payment are alarmed is an understatement. It must be emphasised that in complying with the nitrates directive and in availing of this grant scheme, there is no financial gain for the farmers who have borrowed significant amounts of money. They are merely complying with their legal obligations, assisted by a grant scheme introduced by the Minister's Government.

The reality is that this money will pass through the hands of the applicants only on its way to the bank managers who approved these farmers for matching funds to complete the works. Loan facilities were approved to carry out the works on the basis of the grants that would be available.

Reference was made by previous speakers to bailing out the banking sector. Money makes the world go round. If one is talking about a figure of approximately €400 million as the liability for which the Department stands, this by itself, if denied to the banking institutions, will create a liquidity problem for them. I urge the Minister to act and I hope he can allay our fears. I hope he can tell us that he is in negotiation with the Minister for Finance or that he has concluded negotiations with him.

I am alarmed that the Taoiseach said in the House yesterday that no Supplementary Estimate was envisaged. The prospect of robbing Peter to pay Paul is raised if the Minister has to fund this scheme out of departmental resources. In addition to the disproportionate cuts that agriculture has already been asked to carry in the recent budget, that is a scenario that we cannot countenance.

I hope the Minister is in an position to allay our fears. It is incredible that he was not in a position to predict this situation on the basis of precedent. There were 42,000 applicants. An average payment, established from existing grants, was to be in the region of €33,000. A total of 17,000 had already been paid and approximately 17,000 remained to be paid. The mathematics are quite simple. The Minister had an allocation of €125 million which was entirely inadequate.

I can assure the Minister that if he does not pay this grant at its due time to members who are due their payments, it will make the protests that arose in respect of the disadvantaged area scheme, the installation aid scheme and the early retirement scheme look like the teddybears' picnic party. This issue will not go away.

The farm waste management scheme is the most successful on-farm investment scheme in the history of the State. It will see over €2 billion invested by both farmers and the Irish taxpayer in providing essential on-farm infrastructure and represents a long-term investment in improving the productive capacity of the most important indigenous sector in the economy. The scheme represents an enormous vote of confidence in the sector and is well justified on the basis of our export performance. Significantly, a recent analytical study showed that the agrifood industry contributed over 30% of net foreign earnings from the manufacturing sector.

Ireland must compete on the basis of quality, productivity and efficiency and must ensure that we meet the needs of consumers and society in general. We must ensure that the sector operates in a manner that is consistent with the preservation of the natural environment. Investment in the farm waste management scheme is consistent with all these priorities.

While market conditions are difficult at the moment, as Deputy Crawford mentioned, the global demand for meat and milk is forecast to double over the next 40 years and Irish agriculture and the agrifood sector——

We must hang in long enough then.

I referred to the fact that my constituency colleague, Deputy Crawford, was right when he referred to the price and the demands on commodity prices. I state the facts——

When will the Minister pay the cheques? He should simply pay the cheques.

Deputy Connaughton's intervention is not much use. Can I refer to a constructive contribution that my constituency colleague made?

The Minister is looking for his preferences.

It is a breach of contracts.

When the Deputy was a Minister of State, there were not too many on-farm investment schemes in his day in Agriculture House.

They were not allowed in the first place.

While market conditions are difficult at the moment, the global demand for meat and milk is forecast to double over the next 40 years and Irish agriculture, and the agrifood sector which is built on it, with the benefit of the investment under the farm waste management scheme, will be well positioned to take advantage of these trends.

As Deputies will be aware, a revised, and greatly improved, farm waste management scheme was introduced by the Department in March 2006 in order to assist farmers meet the additional requirements of the nitrates directive. The amendments to the scheme included, in particular, an increase in the standard grant rate from the previous 40% to 60%, with 70% available in the four Zone C counties, namely counties Cavan, Donegal, Leitrim and Monaghan. In addition, the new scheme provided for an increase in the maximum eligible investment ceiling from €75,000 to €120,000 and removed any minimum income requirements from farming from the scheme so that all small farmers could participate in it.

It is acknowledged that Ireland was in a very difficult position prior to the introduction of the revised scheme in 2006, having been found to be in breach of the terms of the nitrates directive in 2004 by virtue of a judgment of the European Court of Justice. Continued failure to implement this directive to the satisfaction of the EU Commission would have had serious implications for Ireland, including the threat of substantial daily fines and the undermining of EU funding for rural development schemes and the single payment scheme. The annual EU funding to Ireland under both headings amounts to approximately €1.6 billion. To have continued to have ignored those threats would have represented nothing less than gross irresponsibility which the Government was not prepared to countenance.

The immense success of the scheme is demonstrated by the 48,500 applications which were received by the closing date of end-December 2006, of which over 30,000 were received during the final month for receipt of applications. By responding thus to the Government's generous scheme, not only was the farming sector demonstrating a willingness to address the nitrates issue but it was also showing a huge amount of confidence in the future of the sector. Almost 43,000 approvals to commence work were issued to farmers under the scheme prior to the end-2008 deadline for completion of work. These figures are virtually unprecedented within the context of on-farm investment schemes.

The financial commitment of the Government to the scheme has been very substantial, particularly during these challenging economic times, and all of this grant aid comes directly from the Exchequer. This is demonstrated by the fact that €413.7 million was paid out to farmers under the scheme in 2008. This was in addition to amounts of €21 million in 2006 and €114 million in 2007. The high level of expenditure under the scheme last year was made possible by the agreement of this House to a Supplementary Estimate of €195 million, which enabled a further 6,000 farmers to receive timely payments under the scheme during 2008.

The 2008 expenditure of €413.7 million should be seen against the original provision of €129 million in the Estimates. In addition to savings of €53 million, identified in mid-year, and the Supplementary Estimate of €195 million, the Department devoted an additional €36 million to funding the scheme before the end of the year.

The Government places a very high value on the Irish agri-food sector and it was in view of the sector's importance that the Government agreed to fund such a generous scheme in support of an essential infrastructure investment that is every bit as important to the agri-food sector as other infrastructural investments were to other sectors of the economy. There is no doubt the scheme has already dramatically transformed the Irish farming infrastructure through this major injection of capital and it has left the sector well-positioned to meet the highest international environmental standards required of Irish farming, as well as the changing market requirements. It will also continue to strengthen the competitiveness of Irish agriculture into the future as well as protect Irish farmers from the threat to their EU payments.

The deadline of 31 December for completion of investment works under the scheme was an integral part of the EU state aid approval and had to be strictly adhered to. The state aid approval was granted by the Commission on the clear understanding that the scheme represented a once-off opportunity to enable farmers to meet the requirements of the nitrates directive. The Commission consistently reiterated that position, both in writing and to me personally, as well as to our officials on several occasions. Indeed, only recently an MEP representing Leinster was advised of this specific condition.

The imposition of this deadline was known at all stages of the scheme and has been shown in the final analysis not to have hindered the participation of most interested farmers. Despite the urgings of others, I was consistent in my advice to farmers that the deadline would not be revised and that they should spare no effort to ensure the necessary work was done and the paperwork submitted to my Department by the end of December last. All of the evidence suggests this advice was adhered to and approximately 35,000 claims were received in respect of completed works under the scheme prior to the closing date, over 14,200 of which were submitted during the month of December.

In an effort to facilitate those farmers who may, for whatever reason, not have wanted to proceed with the full extent of the project for which they had approval, I introduced a facility whereby the scheme participants could proceed with distinct discrete units of work, for which the Department would provide funding. I am satisfied this important initiative will have been of considerable assistance to thousands of farmers who might otherwise have lost the opportunity to provide important storage facilities.

By 31 December, almost 17,600 farmers had been paid and approximately 17,400 payment claims now remain to be processed. The Department is currently assessing these claims with a view to estimating the overall cost involved in grant terms. Though this review is not yet complete, I expect it will be completed shortly.

I am pleased to confirm to the House, as I have done earlier this week both through the media and again last night at the Irish Farmers' Association national AGM, that all farmers who completed work in accordance with the terms and conditions of the scheme will be paid.

I am currently discussing the funding arrangements with the Minister for Finance, Deputy Brian Lenihan, and I expect that a determination on those arrangements will be made shortly. As the Taoiseach said last night, "the Government's aim is to ensure that funding is available to meet claims for properly completed and validated work under the scheme."

In the short intervening period, payments to farmers under the scheme have been deferred but they will be resumed as soon as possible. I reassure Deputies that the Department continues to carry out the necessary inspections and to process claims to payment stage. I am aware of the concerns among farmers that these payments will not be honoured but I would again reiterate my commitment and that of the Government to full payment of these claims, subject to their meeting the terms and conditions of the scheme.

Before concluding, it is important to stress that the Government has made and continues to make very significant financial commitments to underpin the future development of a sustainable and competitive agriculture and food sector capable of meeting the demands of modern consumers. This year, the Department spend is in excess of €3.4 billion in support of Irish agriculture, fisheries and forestry. Notwithstanding the overriding need for budgetary restraint in these difficult times, we are making every effort to preserve measures designed to underpin the productive capacity of the sector. I can assure the House that the Government will continue to utilise whatever means it can to enable agriculture and the agri-food sector to maximise its contribution to the wider economy.

I again thank the Deputies for giving me the opportunity to set out the position on this matter and to reiterate the Government's commitment to honouring in full those farm waste management scheme claims that meet the Department's specifications. In response to Deputy O'Mahony, I never spoke about the late flood of applications on the national airwaves. I spoke about the number of claims that came in, which are quite different to applications. On a point made by Deputy Creed and others, there is a gain for farmers in this scheme. Many people I spoke to and whom we all represent have said that for the first time they have good on-farm facilities. They are able to keep cattle indoors for longer to save and preserve their grassland. Similarly, individual farmers——

We know all that. We need the money from the banks.

Deputy Hayes does not like to hear the facts. Similarly, any individual who did not meet the cross-compliance criteria would be in danger of losing his or her single payment, which is now a very important part of farming income. That scheme has enabled farmers to ensure they are in a position to meet the criteria for the single payment scheme and, from that point of view, it is extremely beneficial to the farming community.

That is why we wanted it extended.

The work is done.

Turbary Rights.

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for the opportunity to raise this matter. I want to give the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government and the Government a chance to think seriously about this terrible decision to prevent thousands of turf cutters throughout Ireland from cutting their own domestic supply of fuel on the 32 raised bogs designated under the EU habitats directive. In the economic circumstances in which we find ourselves, not alone do the thousands of bog owners who are to be driven out of their own bogs this spring believe this is a daft scheme operated under an illogical EU-Government order which makes no sense, but so do those in society generally. We need only look at the facts.

I must explain to the House I have a vested interest. I am one of the thousands of bog owners who will be prevented from cutting a domestic supply of turf this year, something which has happened in my family for three generations.

Last summer, as people harvested their supply of turf, the price of crude oil hit €147 a barrel, and while it is not at that level now, most economists suggest that over the next year or so this level will be surpassed. Bogs were made available to families to allow them to become self-sufficient with regard to fuel supplies. Everybody wants the ailing economy to be energy conscious and less dependent on foreign oil imports but the Government seems not to understand that turf provides fuel for cooking, heating houses and an array of purposes. Why would the Government, particularly in this week in our history when our collective backs are to the wall, want to drive thousands of ordinary, decent people out of their bogs, forcing them to replace their heating systems with appliances that are powered by electricity or gas, all necessitating expensive oil imports?

We must consider the loss of jobs on turf-cutting machines and the financial disaster that is facing turf-cutting contractors, many of whom have €500,000 tied up in expensive turf-cutting machinery that can never be used for any other purpose. When the beet industry was allowed to die a few years ago, at least the beet contractors got some financial help but nothing whatsoever is planned for the bog contractors. The compensation offered to bog owners is a measly €3,000 per acre. Even such a ridiculously low valuation is beyond the capacity to pay of this cash-strapped Government. In other words, it does not have the funds to pay in any case; the Government is not able to pay for a bog. Why not let people continue to supply their domestic needs?

Many areas of the country contain raised bogs which do not have the quality turf which is a feature of many of the 32 bogs previously mentioned. Why are efforts not made to take over those bogs? This would not cause problems for the landowners, because the turf quality is bad. It would allow people cut turf on their bogs, which have proved useful throughout the years. I warn the Minister and the Government that this matter will be very difficult to implement, because right is on the side of bog owners in this case. There is a moral right to allow them to cut turf on their bogs as they have been doing for generations.

The Minister has five minutes in which to keep the home fires burning.

The Ceann Comhairle should put that out.

Once, I listened to the Ceann Comhairle on the radio discussing one of his favourite poems. He recited it and perhaps he will put Deputy Connaughton's contribution to song some evening. I thank Deputy Connaughton for raising this issue. The Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Gormley, is unable to reply and I do so on his behalf.

The Minister is currently considering proposals for preservation of bogs of high conservation value. I understand that the Minister will bring this issue to Government shortly.

Turf cutting is scheduled to end during 2009 in 32 raised bogs, which would involve a relatively small proportion of turf cutters and not, I am advised, several thousand. Outside these 32 bogs, in other words, in the vast majority of areas, cutting may continue as normal. In particular, blanket bogs, which comprise most of the areas of peatland, are not affected. These arrangements will concern only raised bogs. However, there are between 1,500 and 1,600 raised bogs. Only 139 of these are designated and turf cutting is scheduled to cease during 2009 on 32 of these.

Turf cutting is not prohibited on most bogs, although on special areas of conservation and natural heritage areas cutting must be for domestic or non-commercial purposes and the use of certain machinery, such as sausage machines is not allowed.

Ireland's designated raised bogs are of European importance. Almost all of western Europe's raised bogs have disappeared or been severely damaged. Ireland has approximately 60% of the remaining uncut areas. These are of significant importance to Ireland's and Europe's natural heritage. We are required to protect habitats of European importance under the 1992 habitats directive. This bogland is priority habitat under the directive. It is also protected under our legislation, the European Communities (Natural Habitats) Regulations 1997, and the Wildlife (Amendment) Act 2000.

Within Ireland, as elsewhere, most areas of bog have been severely damaged. This has mainly been caused by turf cutting, but also, in more recent times, by afforestation and over-grazing. Less than 1% of Ireland's active raised bogs remain. These are bogs on which the indigenous flora are still growing and where peat is forming. When arrangements were announced for the cessation of turf cutting on the 32 bogs designated for conservation in 1999, a ten-year grace period was granted to domestic turf cutters. It was intended to allow domestic turf cutters to find an alternative source of fuel. This ten-year period is now ending. A similar ten-year derogation applies to bogs designated after 1999. When natural heritage areas were designated in 2004, under an agreement with the farming organisations, another ten-year derogation was put in place, allowing cutting in these areas until 2014.

Since 1999, the Government has actively encouraged the cessation of domestic cutting by buying the traditional turf-cutting rights through a voluntary scheme of compensation. This covers both special areas of conservation and natural heritage areas. However, a review of the state of our bogs has revealed severe and continuing damage caused by domestic turf cutters. It is the Government's responsibility to ensure Ireland meets its obligations in protecting at least a portion of what remains of this irreplaceable natural heritage. I will ensure Deputy Connaughton's contribution is brought to the attention of the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Gormley.

The Dáil adjourned at 9.35 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 29 January 2009.
Top
Share