Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Tuesday, 18 May 2010

Vol. 709 No. 2

Adjournment Debate

Home Help Services

I thank the Leas-Cheann Comhairle for selecting this issue for discussion. It is an important issue both nationally and locally.

I was appalled recently at a health board meeting when I was informed that in County Mayo, there will now be a review of home help hours. As soon as I heard that, I said to the officials that a review means there will be cuts. I have since read in the newspapers that they are now deciding how carers should look after someone, how much time they can spend with those they look after and how while they are being asked to do an impossible job, they will be timed by the health services. We are not dealing with animals — we are dealing with people — and they cannot be timed.

How can a person in need of a home help be treated like this? This is the lowest blow this Government has struck since it came into office. There is no doubt the recent cutbacks have been hurtful and severe but this is the lowest of the low. I am surprised Fianna Fáil would do this to the most vulnerable in society, those who need help most.

I would not mind but home helps save the State a huge amount. If it was not for those who come into people's homes to give them a bit of support and backup, they would need to be in full-time care and would cost the State much more. Home help is the greatest scheme ever introduced. It has worked well but timing home helps — how fast they can get someone's breakfast and clean up their house — is inhuman. I am surprised any Minister, any Government or any politician of any party could stand over this and allow the HSE to do it.

I am saying to the Government tonight that this will be fought every step of the way. In my own county of Mayo, there is talk that they will take away 50,000 home help hours. We are a broad constituency, the third largest county in the country, with rural areas where people are very scattered. They depend on the home help service.

The person who contacted me is looked after by a home help who works beyond the call of duty. On one occasion, the home help came in when she was off duty. She gets tea for this person and painted the house and did not want to be paid for it; she wanted to help. The person, however, was delighted to have the home help hours.

This is an outrageous attack on the elderly and I am surprised the Government and the Fianna Fáil Party are letting this happen. I say shame on the Minister for Health and Children, because this is the lowest blow of all. I say to the HSE that surely to God there must be another way for it to make savings. It is not long since it was spending money in my county on conferences to make sure the budget for the year was spent. I say shame on them to the HSE and the Minister. They should stay away from the home helps, the old, the weak and the sick. If they must make cuts, they better make them somewhere else.

If the Government can find money for the banks and for everyone else, we must find it for the home helps because this is the greatest attack I have seen by Fianna Fáil and the Green Party on rural life, rural people and particularly the elderly. All I can say is shame on Fianna Fáil, it has gone to the lowest of the low.

I thank Deputy Ring for raising this issue as it provides me with an opportunity to update the House on Government policy on the home help service specifically, and community services generally, for older people.

The guiding principle of Government policy in this area is to support older people to live in dignity and independence in their own homes and communities for as long as possible. This is realised through a range of community-based supports such as home help, home care packages, meals-on-wheels and day and respite care.

The importance attached to these services is highlighted by the fact that between 2006 and 2010, over €200 million additional funding was provided to the HSE to develop such supports for older people. Without these initiatives, many older people would spend longer than necessary in acute hospitals, or would be admitted to residential care earlier than might be required. Home care services are provided either directly by the HSE or in partnership with the community and voluntary sector, or by arrangement with private providers.

Despite the serious economic constraints experienced in recent times, we have continued to prioritise improving community services for older people. This is reflected in the €10 million additional funding provided in the last budget, to expand home care packages nationally. These packages often contain a significant home help component.

The HSE national service plan 2010, which was approved by the Minister for Health and Children last March, commits the executive to providing almost 12 million home help hours to over 54,000 people. With reference to the Deputy's question, the national target for 2010 for home help hours is unchanged from the 2009 figure. The HSE has, therefore, formally committed to delivering this year effectively the same number of home help hours as were provided in 2009. Any change to this commitment would have to be notified to the Department.

In addition to the mainstream home help provision, the current service plan is designed to deliver home care packages to around 9,600 people at any one time, or to some 13,000 clients over the course of the year. This represents an increase for this particular initiative over last year. The plan also provides for 21,300 day care places, which should facilitate an estimated 80,000 people.

Other important initiatives in relation to home care supports are also being undertaken at a strategic level. Arising from an evaluation of home care packages, commissioned by the Department of Health and Children and published in December last, the HSE established a task group to progress this year various improvements in home care provision, including the delivery of home care packages, the allocation of home help hours, and the procurement of home care services generally. The various guidelines now being prepared are intended to allow the HSE adopt a more standardised approach nationally to the provision of home care services, including home help. The draft guidelines will have to be considered by senior management in the HSE, and will be submitted to the Department of Health and Children for consideration.

The Health Service Executive has operational responsibility for the delivery of health and social services. The Deputy will appreciate that decisions in the area of home care have to be addressed in the light of the current economic and budgetary pressures. The executive has been asked to make a rigorous examination of how existing funding might be re-configured or re-allocated to ensure maximum service provision is achieved. This requires a stringent ongoing review of the application of the resources currently available.

Unfortunately, due to the current industrial action, this is the most up to date information available to me. I regret that I do not have any more information at present but if the Deputy wishes to raise this matter again once the current industrial action has ended, I will endeavour to have the matter re-examined at that stage.

Children in Care.

I have already expressed in the House today my condolences to the family of Daniel McAnaspie on his tragic death and I repeat those condolences. It is particularly appalling that almost three months after he went missing, his remains were found in a ditch at the side of a field in County Meath. I am very conscious that a Garda murder investigation is under way and I do not want to say anything that could in any way prejudice that investigation. I hope, as no doubt do all other Members of the House, that those responsible for his appallingly violent death are brought to justice in the not too distant future.

I met the family of Daniel McAnaspie shortly after he went missing and they were greatly concerned about him. They told me the story of his dealings with the HSE and their concerns about the manner in which he had been failed by the HSE. This was a troubled young man who suffered from dyslexia, who had learning difficulties and who was an orphan. He was in the care system and he was supposed to be properly provided for by the HSE. At various stages, his family did their best to be of help to him.

From the information I have, it is my understanding that having been in care, he returned to live with an aunt for a period of approximately two years. Having attended a special school, my information is that his movement out of care to reside with the aunt resulted in the place that had been available to him in the special school ceasing to be available. At a time when this child had particular needs, the lack of co-ordination between the HSE and the Department of Education and Science within the care services added to the difficulties of this family in caring for this troubled young man at home.

The HSE failed to provide the supports required. The HSE also failed to provide the special facilities needed to meet his very special needs. I am still not sure why that occurred. Clearly there were substantial failings. This is the second young person to have been murdered when under the care of the HSE, as far as we know. Melissa Mahon is another young person who was murdered while supposedly in care. It may well be that additional numbers of young people will be revealed to have died while in care when the group that the Minister appointed finally undertakes the work assigned to it and when it reports.

With regard to Daniel McAnaspie, I call on the Minister of State to ensure that there is a full independent inquiry into all of the dealings by the HSE with this tragic young man and his family. I also call on the Minister of State to appoint individuals entirely independent of the HSE to conduct such an inquiry without delay. I ask the Minister of State to ensure that such an inquiry is not delayed until the completion of the Garda investigation and the taking of any prosecution that may ensue from such investigation. There is no reason the inquiry should not commence at an early stage.

The inquiry should involve not just a review of the files and records of the HSE but should include interviews with social work personnel, care workers involved with this young man, and those in managerial positions in the HSE and the educational system who made decisions that impacted on the tragedy of this young man's life. That independent inquiry should also include interviews with members of Daniel McAnaspie's family, who can very articulately set out their concerns and worries.

I am fully conscious of the fact that along the route dealing with this tragic young man I am sure there were some dedicated social workers who did their best and tried to ensure the tragedy that has occurred would not occur. The particular concern I have is that despite everything we have learned in the past ten years, despite the publication of the reports into the deaths of Tracey Fay and David Foley — two reports which were sitting on the shelves of the HSE and in the Minister of State's office during the crucial year of Daniel McAnaspie's life immediately preceding his death — we were told lessons were learned from these reports. The lessons should have been learned 18 months, two years or maybe five years ago. Certainly, both reports——

The Deputy's time has come to an end.

I will conclude with this point.

Both reports were well completed during the time that this young man was still alive when proper provision could have been made for him. I am sick of hearing the HSE say it will review what occurred to learn what went wrong. The truth is, and it seems to me, that over the past decade with all the tragedies that have resulted from the gross failures of our child care and protection services, no real lessons have been learned and nothing has changed. We need this independent investigation so the truth is known as to how this young man was dealt with and what went wrong. We in this House should then consider the radical changes necessary to ensure we put in place child protection structures that truly protect children.

The last thing I will say this evening in the restricted time I have is to ask the Minister of State to confirm to the House that before we get to the end of this week three people will be appointed to conduct the inquiry that is necessary and that the results of that inquiry will be fully published. I ask him to give serious consideration for the first time in the context of an inquiry of this nature to making it a public inquiry. Let us have full transparency and accountability for the manner in which our child care services are failing.

I welcome the opportunity to reply to this Adjournment matter. The tragic circumstances of the death of Daniel McAnaspie are particularly harrowing and all the more difficult for his family and friends. As Deputy Shatter mentioned, the case is the subject of a murder investigation being carried out by the Garda and therefore I am limited in what I can say about the specifics of the case.

Daniel was initially placed in the care of the HSE in 2003 and I understand that efforts were made since 2009 to stabilise his living environment. The boy went missing on 25 February 2010 and unfortunately his body was identified on 16 May 2010. The HSE has confirmed that Daniel's case will be reviewed in accordance with the recently published HIQA guidance for the HSE for the review of serious incidents including deaths of children in care.

The review will involve a full investigation into the care provided to Daniel McAnaspie and the circumstances leading up to his disappearance and death. Any concerns raised by family members, and other relevant parties, will be addressed in the course of the review, which will be conducted under an independent chairperson. The review into Daniel McAnaspie death will commence without delay, with a review team of three members, external to the HSE, drawn from a national review panel soon to be finalised. The primacy of the Garda investigation will need to be taken into account by the review group. It should be noted that I wrote to the HSE's assistant national director for children and families on 25 March, when it was reported that the child was missing, requesting that a review under the HIQA guidance commence.

The HIQA guidance was produced in response a commitment in the Government's implementation plan following the publication of the Ryan report. I recently established the independent review group on child deaths. The group has been asked to examine existing information on deaths of children in care over the past ten years so as to validate the categorisation of those children who died from natural causes. The group is to examine existing reviews and reports completed by the HSE, or by others on behalf of the HSE, on children other than those who died from natural causes and based upon this information, provide an overall report for publication. The group's report will be laid before the Houses of the Oireachtas and published. The case of Daniel McAnaspie will be notified to the group.

The HSE is committed to a comprehensive review of Daniel's care to be undertaken in line with the guidance from HIQA so that any lessons can be learned in terms of the provision of services to young people in care. Deputy Shatter mentioned there may be more than 23 cases, which is the figure I mentioned in the Dáil earlier this year, and this is probably true. Part of this is associated with the widening of the ambit of the review to include those children notified to the child protection system but not in care as well as children who have already left the care system but are under the age of 21. This is not the only reason I dare say that the numbers may increase; it may also be due to poor record keeping on the part of the HSE. Nevertheless, this is a very challenging area and I believe the changes we introduced since the implementation plan following the Ryan report will bring transparency to this crucial area.

European Globalisation Fund

I thank the Ceann Comhairle's office for permission to bring this matter to the floor of the House. This matter concerns employees of Alienware, which is in Athlone. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dell, a fact I and the employees have ascertained. I understand a member of the Acting Chairman's party who is an MEP has been very helpful with regard to the European globalisation fund. A particular block of money was produced to deal with employees of Alienware. The employees wish to know how they can participate in the European globalisation fund awarded to Dell.

Alienware is slowly decreasing its employee numbers. Many have left and many others are to go. The entire exodus will be completed within a few months, which is a very sad event in the town. It was a small manufacturing company doing very good work and had a very good market.

As it is a wholly-owned subsidiary the employees cannot ascertain what is their position with regard to participation in the European globalisation fund. They cannot get any answers from Dell, even though Dell owns the company. They are listening to half-stories and stories so I thought the only way I could get clarification, if such clarification is evident in a matter such as this, was to bring it to the floor of the House so we would know exactly what is the situation.

I am taking this Adjournment matter on behalf of my colleague, the Tánaiste and Minister for Education and Skills, Deputy Coghlan.

I am aware of the redundancies last year and this year at the Alienware company which is located in Athlone. I understand that this company, which is an Irish limited company, is a subsidiary of the Dell Corporation, as Deputy O'Rourke has pointed out. The Department of Enterprise, Trade and Innovation received notification from Alienware on 1 April 2009 of an impending 57 redundancies at its plant in Athlone over an 18-month period.

It was clear from the notification and from subsequent inquiries made by officials of the Department at the time that, although linked to the Dell Corporation, the redundancies at Alienware were not directly linked to the 1,900 redundancies announced by Dell at its computer manufacturing facility in Raheen, County Limerick in January 2009. The subsequent application for European Union co-financing assistance made by Ireland under the European globalisation adjustment fund, EGF, was made specifically in regard to the Raheen redundancies.

Alienware is a distinct company and its business activity is in an area completely separate from that of the type of computer manufacture carried out at the Raheen plant. I understand that Alienware is involved in high-end computer gaming machines and systems. The rationale for the redundancies, as notified to the Department in April 2009 by the management, was one of infrastructural change to support the company's expansion and the streamlining of its operations by reducing costs to improve business efficiencies.

Strict criteria apply to the making of applications for co-financing assistance under the EGF regulation. The fund can provide supports where redundancies in a European Union member state result from trade related reasons. These reasons include delocalisation of production outside the European Union, a substantial increase of imports into the European Union or the rapid decline of the European Union share of the global market for a given sector. The EGF does not, however, provide supports in the case of a company restructuring or rationalisation such as that in the Alienware situation.

Applications must encompass a minimum number of 500 redundancies occurring within a four-month period in the case of a single enterprise fund. It is understood that Alienware was proposing up to 57 redundancies in a timeframe between April 2009 and October 2010. These criteria clearly militated against any application being pertinent to the case of the redundancies occurring at Alienware. Additional redundancies within the Dell company in other Irish locations have occurred since the redundancies at the Raheen plant which also were not eligible for EGF support.

Beyond the prescribed limits of EGF support, the Government continues to provide a wide and varied range of supports in terms of guidance, job search, upskilling, retraining, enterprise supports and educational opportunities for all redundant persons. These supports are delivered through the services of State agencies such as FÁS, the vocational education committees, Enterprise Ireland, the city and county enterprise boards and various educational institutions. The Government remains fully committed to upskilling the unemployed in order that they are successful in getting back into employment.

We are investing substantial resources in tackling our unemployment problem. This year more than €1 billion will be invested in the provision of a range of labour force measures. We are focusing our resources on a number of key cohorts of the unemployed which include the lower skilled, the long-term unemployed, those under 35 years of age, and those formerly employed in the manufacturing, construction and retail sectors. These cohorts have been prioritised as they are most likely to drift into very long-term unemployment.

In 2009 FÁS employment services, together with the local employment services, doubled their capacity. This means that the annual referral capacity under the national employment action plan rose from 78,000 persons in 2008 to 147,000 persons last year. The additional resources allocated by the Government to tackling the rising unemployment rate have also enabled the significant expansion of activation, training and work experience places. This year the total number of training and work experience activation places will be approximately 147,000 compared with the 66,000 places that were delivered in 2008 and the 130,000 places delivered last year. The bulk of this additional provision has been due to the increase in training places on short courses for the unemployed. FÁS now provides modular based training in order that participants can pick which modules they most require to improve their skills and increase their employability while maintaining a close link to the labour market.

Training courses are being delivered in innovative formats such as on-line, blended learning and night courses. In this way we are providing a range of delivery methods in addition to the traditional classroom approach, which enables more people access the services of FÁS. In addition to the places mentioned, Skillnets and FÁS will provide this year almost 10,400 training places for the unemployed or those on short-time working. Owing to the economic downturn, many individuals work for two or three days each week and receive social welfare payments for the days they do not work. Skillnets and FÁS provide training opportunities for these people. Individuals participating in these programmes can avail of training for the days they do not work while retaining their social welfare entitlements, subject to the normal social welfare rules applying. This means these individuals are able to use their reduced working week as an opportunity to upskill, thereby improving their employability.

Additional information not given on the floor of the House.

The Government is acutely aware of the large numbers of people under 25 years of age who are unemployed. That is why the Government has decided this cohort will receive priority access to the State's supports for the unemployed, such as FÁS employment and training services. FÁS has been asked to make significant prioritisation of services for those under 25 years of age a key element in its provision in 2010. An initiative has been put in place to immediately activate 18 and 19 year olds instead of waiting the usual three months for this automatic activation.

The main specific provision for early school leavers continues to be training at community training centres and vocational education committees under the Youthreach programme. The Government is maintaining the 6,000 places available in this programme at a cost of approximately €110 million. Another important initiative which would be of particular relevance to this cohort is the work placement programmewhich has 2,000 places, of which 1,000 are for graduates. Participants on the programme gain work experience for a period of up to nine months and may retain their social welfare entitlements, subject to the normal social welfare rules applying. This work experience will significantly improve their chances of securing paid employment in future.

The Government has implemented a variety of measures which will support around 4,000 redundant apprentices to progress their apprenticeships. These measures include a new €4 million redundant apprentices placement scheme for up to 750 apprentices participating in on-the-job training at phases 3 and 5, agreeing with ESB Networks to take on 400 redundant apprentices at phases 5 and 7 over a period of 18 months, amending the rules for off-the-job training to facilitate redundant apprentices to progress their apprenticeship, and the provision by the institutes of technology of a programme for redundant apprentices which will provide them with a level 5 FETAC award which allows for access and transfer of credits to other post-apprenticeship programmes.

The education sector has been very proactive in responding to the need for increased offerings for the unemployed. This can clearly be seen in the significant increase in the number of back to education allowance recipients which has increased to more than 18,000, many of whom are participating in further and higher education programmes. In the further education sector this year an estimated 126,000 learners will benefit from part-time learning opportunities for the low skilled, the disadvantaged and the unemployed. A total of 40,000 learners will benefit from full-time further education opportunities under Youthreach, the vocational training opportunities scheme and the post-leaving certificate programme. These programmes are targeted at the unemployed or are specifically designed to enhance participants' employability.

There is clear evidence which shows that increasing numbers of people are choosing to pursue third and fourth level education. This is a welcome trend at a time of reduced opportunity for school leavers entering into the labour market. The total number of full-time enrolments in universities and institutes of technology is projected to be more than 140,000 for this academic year, an increase of 4.5% on the last academic year.

The Government has also created a €20 million labour market activation fund to support innovative proposals over and above mainstream provision for the unemployed. Several hundred proposals from the public, private, community and voluntary sectors are being assessed and it is expected this fund will provide at least 3,500 training places this year. The activation fund targets the low skilled and those formerly employed in declining sectors such as the construction, retail and manufacturing sectors, with a particular focus on those aged under 35 and those unemployed for more than one year. Successful proposals will be those that can show they will provide the unemployed with skills that are in demand to enable them secure employment or to progress them on the pathway to employment.

The Government's core strategy in this area is one of creating jobs, supporting enterprises, protecting vulnerable jobs and providing the unemployed with upskilling opportunities to get them into employment as soon as possible. While EGF supports cannot be provided in the particular instance of the redundancies occurring at Alienware, I hope I have highlighted the wide range of alternative national supports which exist. I urge all those currently unemployed, including those at Alienware, to avail of these supports as appropriate. I thank the Deputy once again for raising this matter.

School Accommodation

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for giving me the opportunity to raise this very important issue in the parish of Herbertstown. On behalf of the board of management, principal and staff of Herbertstown national school I ask the Tánaiste and Minister for Education and Skills to sanction a devolved grant to enable the board of management to build an additional classroom, learning support room, general purpose room, staff room and office. This will enable the school to deal with the planned expansion in its number of pupils.

It is a rural school that was built in 1943. It has three classrooms and a prefabricated section which is 20 years old. It is divided into three sections. One is used by the day resource teacher, one by the learning support teacher and the other as a library and storage facility. While the boys have a cloakroom, the girls must use the corridor for their coats, sporting gear, bags, shoes and other personal effects because the original girls' cloakroom is used as an office. It has been converted to facilitate photocopying, filing cabinets and other office equipment. The room also stores art and crafts supplies, mathematics equipment and other teaching supports. It is unsuitable for storing confidential files and reports.

The school enrolment in September 2009 was 70 pupils. It has applications to enrol 82 pupils for September 2010. These numbers will entitle the school to an extra mainstream teacher for 2011. There are still more enrolment forms outstanding so it is possible that the extra mainstream teacher may be appointed in September 2010. As well as an increase in the pupils numbers, there is enrolment for a junior infant pupil with autism in September 2010. The school will apply, therefore, for a full-time support resource officer, which will create a need for a new staff room and toilet facilities to accommodate the extra staff. There is no accommodation for the new mainstream teacher or a full-time learning support resource teacher. The school has no indoor facilities for physical education for the children and, with the present emphasis on PE in the new curriculum, this is not acceptable and is unfair on the children.

I commend the board of management, principal and staff on their excellent educational facilities in the current conditions. Pressure will come with the expansion of numbers and needs of the school. Will the Tánaiste sanction a devolved grant to enable the board of management to build an additional classroom, learning support room, general purpose room, staff room and office? An adequate site is available on the school grounds to facilitate this development, so no site purchase is necessary. I urge the Minister to take our proposal seriously.

I am taking this matter on behalf of my colleague, the Tánaiste and Minister for Education and Skills, Deputy Coughlan. I thank the Deputy for giving me the opportunity to outline to the House the Government's strategy for capital investment in education projects and also to outline the current position on Herbertstown national school.

Modernising facilities in the existing building stock as well as the need to respond to emerging needs in areas of rapid population growth is a significant challenge. The Government has shown a consistent determination to improve the condition of school buildings and to ensure that the appropriate facilities are in place to enable the implementation of a broad and balanced curriculum. The Deputy will appreciate that the extent of the demand on the Department's capital budget is enormous, providing, as it does, accommodation for new communities, additional accommodation for extra teachers which the Government has put into the system and modernising existing schools. However, huge inroads have been made in addressing those needs.

The Deputy will also be aware that the allocation for school buildings in 2010 is approximately €579 million, which represents a significant investment in the school building and modernisation programme. This level of funding for the building programme, at a time of great pressure on public finances, is a sign of the very real commitment of the Government to investing in school infrastructure and will permit the continuation of progress in the overall improvement of school accommodation. However, the level of demand on the Department's resources is such that all projects cannot be carried out together. They will have to be carried out over time in a structured and coherent manner and that is the reasoning behind the Department's published prioritisation criteria.

Turning to Herbertstown national school in particular, the Deputy will be aware that this school's staffing complement comprises a principal, two mainstream teachers, one shared learning support teacher and one part-time resource teacher. As Deputy Neville pointed out, the school's current accommodation consists of three permanent classrooms and temporary accommodation which is used for resource teaching. The school made an application for additional accommodation, consisting of a classroom, learning support room, office, GP room, staff room and toilets. I am pleased to advise that the school was approved a devolved grant to build an additional two classrooms to meet the school's most immediate needs. The school was advised of that by letter on 7 May 2010.

I again thank the Deputy for raising the matter. I assure him that the Tánaiste is committed to meeting the needs of schools such as Herbertstown national school as resources allow.

The Dáil adjourned at 10.35 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 19 May 2010.
Top
Share