Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Friday, 9 Dec 2011

Vol. 749 No. 3

Order of Business

It is proposed to take No. 9, motion re appointment of members of the Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission, back from committee; and No. a4, Social Welfare Bill 2011 — Second Stage (Resumed) and Subsequent Stages.

It is proposed, notwithstanding anything in Standing Orders, that No. 9 shall be decided without debate and that the following arrangements will apply in respect of No. a4: the proceedings on the resumed Second Stage will, if not previously concluded, be brought to a conclusion at 1.30 p.m.; and the proceedings on Committee and Remaining Stages will commence immediately at the conclusion of Second Stage and, if not previously concluded, be brought to a conclusion at 3.30 p.m. by one question which shall be put from the Chair and shall, in respect of amendments, include only those set down or accepted by the Minister for Social Protection.

There are two proposals to be put to the House. Is the proposal for dealing with No. 9 agreed to?

My party will not agree, as there is no motion to reconvene the Dáil on Monday to allow time to discuss the detail and serious implications of what is being put to the people.

I am surprised the Deputy does not want it to take place on Sunday.

It is remarkable that we must rely on sources elsewhere in Europe to access this information which we have not had a chance to debate.

Please, Deputy. This is a straightforward proposal on the arrangements for taking No. 9 solely. We cannot stray into other areas.

We are objecting. I am genuinely shocked that there is nothing on the page——

Will the Deputy, please, resume his seat?

How can the Government have it said in Europe that the people have agreed to a set of proposals that gave away our sovereignty, when there has not even been a discussion on these measures in the House? It is outrageous.

The Deputy should resume his seat.

Prime Minister Cameron is on Deputy Mac Lochlainn's side.

I am surprised Deputy McDonald is not doing the running on this proposal.

It is not true that the issue of the European summit has not been discussed. We had a three hour debate on it yesterday.

But not on the measures as they affect the people.

In addition, a new procedure saw the Taoiseach attend the House last week to set out what was to be discussed by the European Council. We have made arrangements for him to revert to the House when it reconvenes next week to give a report on what was discussed at the European summit.

Question, "That the proposal for dealing with No. 9 be agreed to," put and declared carried.

Is the proposal for dealing with No. a4 agreed to?

No. More and more issues are arising with the Social Welfare Bill and it has become apparent the disregard of home help income is to be eliminated.

We cannot discuss the contents of the Bill.

It sets the context.

There are issues with family income supplement, disability allowances and community employment schemes. No doubt the Government will be told that, for some arbitrary reason, the Dáil must pass the Bill today. It will affect people's lives next year. Some will lose hundreds of euro thanks to the decisions that will be rammed through the House today. I received an e-mail from a woman this morning——

We will not mind e-mails for the moment.

We will hear about it at our clinics tomorrow.

We can hear about the e-mail when we debate the Bill, but I am sure it has nothing to do with the arrangements for the taking of Second and Subsequent Stages.

It is about the arrangements.

It is about the manner in which the Bill is being rammed through the House.

Will Deputy Ó Cuív stick to the proposal, please?

The e-mail is from a woman who will lose €330 a month because she is a carer and her husband is in receipt of family income supplement.

I am not interested in e-mails other than those which relate to this issue.

From the bottom of my heart, I ask the Tánaiste to put politics aside, allow Second Stage to continue until 3.30 p.m. and a detailed debate to take place next week on the Bill's serious provisions which will hurt people badly. The Government should give itself time to reflect on and amend some of the proposals made. Some of the measures proposed will not save significant amounts of money. It is impossible——

The Deputy is only entitled to give a short explanation as to why he is not agreeing to the allocation of time motion. Other Deputies wish to contribute.

It is like a Second Stage speech.

I am trying to impress on the Tánaiste how vital it is that we all stand back, to reflect on this issue——

We will do that in one moment.

——and debate it in more detail next week having had the weekend to consider it——

What about the way the Deputy signed the bank bailout by telephone in the middle of the night?

——and make necessary changes to proposals that will only save a small amount of money but which will hurt people badly. The Tánaiste knows this to be the case, given the reaction to the budget.

I object to the rushed passage of the Bill which will cut the contributory State pension and allowances for lone parents.

We cannot discuss the contents of the Bill. This is purely a technical motion.

We have not even dealt with the manner in which the Government proposes to devastate community employment schemes across the State. Job creation, how are you? I object to the manner in which the Bill is being processed through the House and the indecent haste with which the Government is prepared to butcher €800 million from the social welfare bill.

It is not €800 million; it is €455 million.

It is astonishing that the Labour Party and the Tánaiste as its leader are standing over such cuts.

We can discuss all of these matters during the debate.

That is bad enough, but the Government is also insisting on the Bill being rushed through the Dáil.

What about Northern Ireland?

Why does Fine Gael not stand for election there, too?

That is a good point.

I call Deputy Higgins to discuss what is a technical issue.

I oppose the guillotining of the debate on the Social Welfare Bill.

This time last year, as the Minister for Finance, Deputy Lenihan, unveiled his budget, screams of anguish reverberated through the corridors of Leinster House. The Labour Party's finance spokesman Deputy Burton was feeling the pain of the poor, the lone parents and, especially, the women of Ireland.

A history lesson.

I dare say the Minister must be aware people with children took the biggest cuts this year and last year.

She is not even here.

The Deputy is straying. We do not want any quotations from last year.

Let us remember child benefit is paid almost universally to women. I suppose that is a comment on how few women are Members of this House and what little power women exercise compared to bankers.

This day, in an extraordinary transformation, the same Deputy Burton is now the tormentor of the women and children of Ireland.

This is nothing to do with the technical motion before the House.

I wonder is the Minister in Deputy Higgins's constituency.

I ask the Deputy not to abuse this. I am anxious for him to have his say but not on a technical motion. He can say all these things when we get into the debate.

The nub of it is that mná na hÉireann and leanaí na hÉireann are bewildered by this massive about-face and need an explanation.

About the fact we are finishing at 3.30 p.m.?

We need, therefore, far more time for Deputy Burton, now Minister for — allegedly — Social Protection, to come into the Dáil and explain the extraordinary transformation and to do so section by section. She must think that along with her pain, a general anaesthetic should be administered to the same women and children whose state she bewailed last year.

The Deputy has made his point about the lack of time. He must resume his seat.

The Tánaiste, on behalf of the Labour Party, must explain the absolute about-face in regard to these issues.

Yes, when we get to the debate.

A few clinics tomorrow back in the constituencies.

Therefore, we need far more time for the Minister and the Tánaiste on behalf of the Labour Party to explain why now they are carrying out these savage cuts on behalf of the same bankers.

The Deputy is looking for time and I will ask the Tánaiste about that in a moment. I am sure when I call Deputy Boyd Barrett that he will understand what he is entitled to say.

The Ceann Comhairle knows I understand.

It is a Friday so give us all a break.

This is a serious issue and the Tánaiste knows it. People are reeling with shock; lone parents, low income families and the elderly are reeling from the attacks meted out in this Bill. The very least they deserve is that the full implications of the attacks on their living standings are explained, particularly the Government's commitment to labour activation measures designed to get people back to work, when it is absolutely clear that, particularly for lone parents, these measures are a direct disincentive to work.

We can discuss that when we get to the section.

They will drive lone parents out of work and back into poverty.

These serious implications deserve to be discussed in detail and not rammed through in this way by a Government that promised a new type of politics and a new type of openness and transparency. These austerity measures are being rammed through in an unfair and undemocratic way.

The Deputy has made his point.

There will be 1,000 people outside the gates of Dáil Éireann appealing for a proper debate and a reversal of these cuts. Will the Tánaiste at least allow for a proper discussion?

The Deputy has made his point. He can resume his seat and we will ask the Tánaiste to explain the arrangements.

It will take some explaining.

The Government is providing more time for the debate on the Social Welfare Bill. There is 50% more time being provided for the debate on the Social Welfare Bill this year than was provided last year.

There are 50% more cuts.

There are more cuts targeted at the vulnerable.

Deputies cannot come in here today and argue for more time when yesterday they voted against the extra day's sitting the Government is providing for this Bill, today's sitting. This is the extra day's sitting.

What is the Tánaiste on?

A huge amount of time is being provided for the debate. The Bill will go to the Seanad next week and if the Seanad makes amendments, it will come back into the Dáil and there is plenty of time. I ask Members for accuracy in the debate.

It is not true, Deputy McDonald, that the Government is making €800 million of cuts in social welfare.

In a full year it is.

In fact, it is €190 million less than was proposed by Fianna Fáil.

There are €811 million of cuts in a full year.

It was actually fairer last time round.

Mr. Angry is not exactly Mr. Accuracy.

Secondly, it is not true that the Government is closing down community employment schemes.

It is just closing the doors.

The Government is providing additional money for labour activation measures.

Not for community employment schemes; it is slashing the training budget.

Wait until a few clinics tomorrow.

Not for lone parents. The money is being taken from lone parents.

An Ceann Comhairle: The Deputy had his say. Will he stay quiet for a moment?

The amount of money being provided for employment support measures through the Department of Social Protection in 2012 is almost €100 million more than was provided last year.

I thought this was a technical issue about the sitting?

A little bit of accuracy and honesty from the Opposition benches would contribute to the debate.

The Tánaiste should read the expenditure cuts outlined by the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform. He has obviously not read them.

I have no proposal from the Opposition for the amendment of the times provided here and, therefore, I wish to put the proposal.

(Interruptions).
Question put: "That the arrangements for dealing with No.a4 be agreed to.”
The Dáil divided by electronic means.

The Tánaiste has, effectively, misrepresented the position of the Fianna Fáil Party on today's sitting, which we did not vote against yesterday.

This is ridiculous.

Go back to Clonmel and close the barracks.

The Deputy is former Senator Donie Cassidy's man.

I am my own man. I was elected in my own right and I am not on the crest of a wave like the Deputy.

We would welcome deferral of Committee Stage to next week to give Members an opportunity to consider the many insidious proposals contained in the Social Welfare Bill 2011. If the Tánaiste is not prepared——

(Interruptions).

What is the Deputy seeking?

As the Tánaiste is not prepared to accede to our request for the allocation of further time, as a Whip, under Standing Order 69, I propose that the vote be taken by other than electronic means.

As a Whip, the Deputy Ó Fearghaíl is, under Standing Order 69, entitled to call for a vote through the lobbies.

Question again put: "That the arrangements for dealing with No. a4 be agreed to."
The Dáil divided: Tá, 77; Níl, 36.

  • Bannon, James.
  • Barry, Tom.
  • Breen, Pat.
  • Broughan, Thomas P.
  • Bruton, Richard.
  • Burton, Joan.
  • Butler, Ray.
  • Buttimer, Jerry.
  • Byrne, Catherine.
  • Byrne, Eric.
  • Carey, Joe.
  • Collins, Áine.
  • Conaghan, Michael.
  • Conlan, Seán.
  • Connaughton, Paul J.
  • Conway, Ciara.
  • Coonan, Noel.
  • Corcoran Kennedy, Marcella.
  • Creed, Michael.
  • Daly, Jim.
  • Deenihan, Jimmy.
  • Deering, Pat.
  • Doherty, Regina.
  • Donohoe, Paschal.
  • Dowds, Robert.
  • Durkan, Bernard J.
  • English, Damien.
  • Feighan, Frank.
  • Ferris, Anne.
  • Fitzpatrick, Peter.
  • Flanagan, Charles.
  • Gilmore, Eamon.
  • Griffin, Brendan.
  • Hannigan, Dominic.
  • Hayes, Brian.
  • Hayes, Tom.
  • Heydon, Martin.
  • Howlin, Brendan.
  • Humphreys, Heather.
  • Humphreys, Kevin.
  • Keaveney, Colm.
  • Kehoe, Paul.
  • Kelly, Alan.
  • Kenny, Seán.
  • Kyne, Seán.
  • Lawlor, Anthony.
  • Lyons, John.
  • McEntee, Shane.
  • McFadden, Nicky.
  • McGinley, Dinny.
  • McHugh, Joe.
  • McLoughlin, Tony.
  • McNamara, Michael.
  • Mathews, Peter.
  • Mitchell O’Connor, Mary.
  • Mitchell, Olivia.
  • Mulherin, Michelle.
  • Murphy, Eoghan.
  • Nash, Gerald.
  • Neville, Dan.
  • Nolan, Derek.
  • Noonan, Michael.
  • Nulty, Patrick.
  • O’Donnell, Kieran.
  • O’Donovan, Patrick.
  • O’Mahony, John.
  • Phelan, Ann.
  • Quinn, Ruairí.
  • Reilly, James.
  • Ring, Michael.
  • Ryan, Brendan.
  • Sherlock, Sean.
  • Shortall, Róisín.
  • Stagg, Emmet.
  • Tuffy, Joanna.
  • Wall, Jack.
  • White, Alex.

Níl

  • Boyd Barrett, Richard.
  • Browne, John.
  • Calleary, Dara.
  • Collins, Joan.
  • Colreavy, Michael.
  • Cowen, Barry.
  • Crowe, Seán.
  • Daly, Clare.
  • Dooley, Timmy.
  • Ellis, Dessie.
  • Ferris, Martin.
  • Fleming, Tom.
  • Grealish, Noel.
  • Halligan, John.
  • Healy, Seamus.
  • Healy-Rae, Michael.
  • Higgins, Joe.
  • Kelleher, Billy.
  • Kitt, Michael P.
  • McDonald, Mary Lou.
  • McGrath, Finian.
  • McGrath, Mattie.
  • McLellan, Sandra.
  • Moynihan, Michael.
  • Murphy, Catherine.
  • Ó Caoláin, Caoimhghín.
  • Ó Cuív, Éamon.
  • Ó Fearghaíl, Seán.
  • Ó Snodaigh, Aengus.
  • O’Brien, Jonathan.
  • O’Sullivan, Maureen.
  • Pringle, Thomas.
  • Smith, Brendan.
  • Tóibín, Peadar.
  • Troy, Robert.
  • Wallace, Mick.
Tellers: Tá, Deputies Emmet Stagg and Paul Kehoe; Níl, Deputies Aengus Ó Snodaigh and Seán Ó Fearghaíl.
Question again declared carried.

On the Order of Business——

Sorry, the Order of Business is out of time. We are 17 minutes and 46 seconds over the time.

This is a joke.

That is the problem.

Deputies opposite agreed to it.

The Tánaiste might order the business to provide a little additional time.

As the man says, I only obey the rules.

The Government is bludgeoning the Parliament to death with its massive majority.

I seek a conversation about next week's business.

Sorry, we are out of time and I cannot do anything about it. You will have to agree this between the Whips.

I will discuss it with the Deputy in a few minutes.

The Chief Whip is given a lot of time in here to talk.

Top
Share