Skip to main content
Normal View

Dáil Éireann debate -
Thursday, 22 Nov 2012

Vol. 784 No. 1

Topical Issue Debate

Mental Hospitals Report

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for the opportunity to speak briefly on the Mental Health Commission report on St. Fintan's psychiatric hospital in Portlaoise. I also welcome the Minister of State at the Department of Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, Deputy John Perry, who will respond on behalf of the Department of Health.

The issue of older person's services is very important in County Laois. Many of the residents of St. Fintan's Hospital in Portlaoise are elderly. Proposals have been made regarding the closure of two such facilities in the county, namely, Abbeyleix and Shaen hospitals. In that context, it is important to consider together the two units designated for closure and St. Fintan's psychiatric hospital.

The Mental Health Commission, which is responsible for St. Fintan's Hospital, paid an unannounced visit to the facility on 28 March 2012 in line with normal practice. The commission's report found the hospital "continued to admit residents which had resulted in an increase in the number of residents in the hospital which contravenes national policy on the closure of 19th century psychiatric hospitals." The previous Government's policy of closing such hospitals has been adopted by the current Government, Health Service Executive and Mental Health Commission. The report also found the following:

All residents did not have a choice of main meal and access to fresh drinking water. A therapeutic activation programme was not available for all residents of the approved centre. Residents were not provided with adequate information about the approved centre and the services offered. The Rehabilitation team and the Psychiatry of Old Age team were not adequately staffed with health and social care professionals.

The circumstances in respect of St. Fintan's Hospital are not in dispute. Everyone agrees the facility, which opened 180 years ago in 1832, should close. The Mental Health Commission report referred to its recommendation, made in 2011, that plans to close the hospital "should be progressed with a clear time frame", noting that there were "no clear plans for the closure of St. Fintan's Hospital."

On the day of the commission's visit 38 people were resident in the hospital, 25 of whom were in ward six, with the remaining 13 in what is known as the "rehabilitation area". In its conclusions, the Mental Health Commission report notes that St. Fintan's Hospital "was the only old psychiatric institution in the country to continue to increase its bed number year on year." Instead of closing, the number of beds in the hospital increased in the past year. The report also notes that the residents were either elderly or under the care of the rehabilitation team. The commission's first recommendation is that "plans to progress the closure of St. Fintan's Hospital should proceed expeditiously."

What should be done with the hospital's residents? In May 2012, the Health Service Executive in the midland region published an information and consultation document on its older persons service in which it invited people to participate in a consultation process on the potential closure of two community nursing units, Abbeyleix and St. Brigid's Hospital, Shaen. The document stated that all institutions for older persons in the midlands will be subject to the future decision process and listed facilities in Mountmellick, Longford, Birr, Mullingar, Athlone, Tullamore, Edenderry, Shaen and Abbeyleix. It does not, however, refer to St. Fintan's Hospital because while the Mental Health Commission is responsible for psychiatric hospitals, the Health Information and Quality Authority is responsible for other residential institutions for the elderly and ne'er the twain shall meet. As my time has concluded, I will make some final points when I hear the Minister of State's response.

I thank Deputy Sean Fleming for raising this important issue, which I am addressing on behalf of the Minister of State at the Department of Heath, Deputy Kathleen Lynch.

Under the Mental Health Act 2001, the Inspectorate of Mental Health Services is required to visit and inspect every approved centre annually. Such centres are defined under the Act as "a hospital or other in-patient facility for the care and treatment of persons suffering from mental illness or mental disorder". The inspectorate carried out the 2012 inspection on St. Fintan's Hospital, Portlaoise earlier this year and the report is available to the public on the Mental Health Commission website.

St. Fintan's Hospital is an old Victorian hospital which was licensed by the Mental Health Commission for 42 beds. There were 43 residents on the day of inspection and these were either elderly or under the care of the rehabilitation team. None of the residents was detained under the Mental Health Act 2001. Staff were described as being caring and knowledgeable and the nursing care and practice was high, with each resident having an individual care plan. The inspectorate was also pleased to highlight improvements and initiatives carried out in the hospital over the past year.

The inspectorate was critical of the fact the hospital continued to admit residents during 2012. This practice had resulted in an increase in the number of residents in the hospital. Ideally, both the Minister of State, Deputy Kathleen Lynch, and the Health Service Executive would like greater use to be made of community health services. In this regard, Deputies will be aware that the HSE is in the process of filling some 400 posts from the €35 million special allocation the Minister of State secured to increase staff on community mental health teams. When these additional health care professionals are in place, it will help the HSE provide more appropriate community based services for many of those who are currently in residential care. The main recommendation contained in the report, however, is that plans to progress the closure of St. Fintan's Hospital should proceed expeditiously.

Both the Health Service Executive and Minister of State acknowledge and accept the Mental Health Commission report and its findings. While noting the positive comments in the report, the HSE also notes the specific deficits identified, which it is actively addressing.

The HSE has developed plans for a purpose built, 40 bed unit to be located on the St. Fintan's Hospital campus as a replacement for the hospital. Funding of approximately €6 million for this important project has been secured from the HSE capital plan and the estimated timeframe for this work will be three years. While this unit is being progressed, the HSE is also considering and actively pursuing all options regarding interim solutions for the existing hospital and its current service users given the findings in the report. It will liaise with the Mental Health Commission to ensure relevant standards continue to be met as required.

I thank the Minister of State and am pleased that, although he has again confirmed that the plan is to close St. Fintan's Hospital, plans are afoot for a new unit to be built on the hospital's grounds. However, we all know that it will take some time. In these straitened times, it may not happen. It is still some way off, as it has not gone through the planning process yet.

We are discussing care of the elderly in three institutions - Abbeyleix, Shaen and St. Fintan's Hospital - in County Laois. The problem is that St. Fintan's Hospital is under the HSE's hospital division whereas the other two institutions are under its community care division, and ne'er the twain shall meet. When the HSE carried out consultations on care of the elderly, zero reference was made to St. Fintan's Hospital because it was handled by a different wing. It is almost as if the divisions were separate organisations. There is only one HSE, only one Department of Health and only one body responsible for dealing with these institutions. The artificial division in the HSE, whereby the Health Information and Quality Authority, HIQA, deals with one group of people while the Mental Health Commission deals with another, is insufficient.

At the beginning of the consultation process, the HSE suggested to me that some of the patients in the hospital in Shaen could move into St. Fintan's Hospital. Given there is a closure order on the latter, some of the staff and residents, who need the level of professional care to which they have been accustomed, could move to the facilities in Shaen while others could move to Abbeyleix. Under the HSE's capital plan, funding is made available for equipping a Respond! community accommodation facility in Abbeyleix so residents could be relocated from St. Fintan's Hospital. There are background plans to transfer patients from the hospital. I ask that it be done. It would have the benefit of securing the issue.

I apologise to the Ceann Comhairle for my outburst 12 months ago on the closure of the facilities at Abbeyleix and Shaen, which was mooted last November. Using the staff of St. Fintan's Hospital to care for their designated patients would provide the ideal solution to retaining those community nursing homes. There would be no need to discuss their future closure.

Before the Minister and his senior departmental officials make a final decision, they should consider St. Fintan's Hospital in conjunction with the Shaen and Abbeyleix situations and not take an isolated decision. The three institutions should be considered collectively.

I will be brief.

There is no need to rush. The Minister of State has two minutes.

The Minister of State, Deputy Kathleen Lynch, is conscious of Deputy Sean Fleming's final point. It is accepted that the HSE needs to consider alternative accommodation. This is the Minister of State's top priority. The HSE has a firm plan of action. This work will be done. As the funding is available, it is only a matter of getting on with the job. In the interim, alternative accommodation will be provided.

The HSE recognises that the new unit will not be available for three years. Interim measures are required to ensure compliance with the Mental Health Commission's standards. This is the Minister of State's immediate emphasis. In no way will she neglect this responsibility. The Deputy will see rapid progress in terms of alternative accommodation.

The HSE is actively pursuing all options as interim solutions and will remain in contact with the Mental Health Commission in this regard. Some €35 million has been allocated for the planned expansion of community health teams. In many ways, this will enhance the region's facilities. I assure the Deputy that I will bring the points he has raised to the Minister of State's attention.

Flood Relief Schemes Applications

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for the opportunity to raise this issue. This month marks the third anniversary of householders in County Galway having their homes devastated by flooding. They have been left in limbo for three years. As they face into their fourth year without homes, they need a speedy conclusion to be brought to the flooding relocation scheme so they can move on with their lives.

A total of 32 families from all across the country applied for the flood relocation programme, including a dozen from County Galway. Of the 32, 20 applications have been deemed successful, yet they are still facing into their fourth year without homes. The severe flooding's impact on them has been significant, with the loss of a much-cherished home and many personal belongings such as photographs and other treasured mementos, the price of which cannot be measured. However, their loss has been compounded by the failure of successive Governments to bring the matter to a conclusion.

Once the rising flood waters receded, a number of families across south County Galway in places such as Gort and Ardrahan, as well as in Skehana in north Galway, were left picking up the pieces, both literally and metaphorically, of their lives. I have met these families and have seen the devastating impact this event has had and, unfortunately, continues to have on them. Due to the lack of a resolution in terms of relocation, they have not had anywhere they can call home in the intervening years.

They had enjoyed a secure home where they could plan for the future, but the flooding episode of late 2009 changed all of that. Many found themselves living in rented accommodation for the first time in their lives, unable to plan for the future as they awaited the outcome of the flooding relocation scheme. The application process was particularly long and tortuous and many believed that, once they were accepted onto the scheme, their difficulties would be over. This has since proven not to be the case. The months drag on and, instead of achieving clarity, it appears to become more difficult to get answers.

I have raised this issue with the Minister for Social Protection numerous times, highlighting the south Galway families' need for closure. Having met them, one can see the toll it is taking on each family member. This matter has reached a critical point. They cannot continue into a fourth year in this uncertain atmosphere. Answers are required.

I had just been elected as a councillor when the flooding occurred. At that time, I believed it to be unacceptable that those people should be left in a legal limbo regarding their relocation. Three years on and facing the prospect of a fourth without a home, the time for action is well past. Lives have been suspended and these families have been left waiting for the former and current Governments to resolve the issue. The compensation scheme was announced six months ago. Since then, however, progress appears to have slowed even further, with no deadlines, no news for families and no information from the Department. This situation is unacceptable and must be resolved.

Each family is in a different situation and each case must be dealt with on its individual merits, but even dealing with them on a case-by-case basis should have seen them resolved many years ago. These families need a date by which this saga will be brought to an end. They need homes, somewhere to call their own where they can start to plan for the future again and leave the dreadful events of November 2009 behind them.

I am taking this debate on behalf of the Minister for Social Protection, Deputy Burton, who conveys her apologies to the Deputy for being unable to take the debate herself.

The Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government is the lead Department for severe weather emergencies and the Office of Public Works, OPW, has responsibility for capital flood relief activities. However, the Department of Social Protection has an important role to play in assisting households in the immediate aftermath of emergency events, such as flooding.

When the spending of the various Departments and agencies is added together, there is combined Government spending of more than €21 million arising from the floods of November 2009. The Department of Social Protection will spend in excess of €5 million, with a further €16.4 million spent by the local authorities and more than €500,000 spent by the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine.

In the immediate aftermath of the flooding, departmental officials provided support through the exceptional and urgent needs payment scheme, primarily in respect of needs such as clothing, food, bedding and emergency accommodation. In addition, a humanitarian aid scheme was approved by the Government and an allocation of €10 million was provided. Financial support was provided to more than 1,300 people who suffered damage as a result of the flooding.

In December 2010, the Government also decided to offer support to families that were continuing to experience significant housing problems as a result of the November 2009 flooding and were considering relocating rather than permanently returning to their original homes. An allocation of up to €4 million was provided by the Government to assist up to 20 households towards relocation. The Government's decision provided that relocation offers would be made to householders whose primary residences were deemed by the OPW to be unsustainable and could not be protected from flooding at an economically feasible cost.

To date, the OPW has deemed 19 primary residences, mainly in Galway, as unsustainable and letters inviting householders to formally apply for assistance issued from this Department between November 2011 and May 2012. The Department has since been in contact with the majority of householders providing details of the amounts payable in their particular cases. The Department expects that the legal agreement necessary for the purposes of the scheme will be finalised and issued to householders within the next week or so, which at least is a move in the right direction. The Department of Social Protection can assure the Deputy that there will be no delay in issuing payments once the terms of the legal agreement have been met.

I welcome that. It is good news to hear it is a week away but I want to make sure it is just a week away. The weather we had today causes much fear among the people whose homes were flooded three years ago. In a week's time, or at most in two week's time, I want to see this resolved. The Minister of State at the Department of Finance, Deputy Brian Hayes, visited a number of these people a year ago and much work has been carried out on flood alleviation works around the county. However, for these families, for the likes of Anne Connolly in Gort, the Flatleys in Ardrahan and the Devaneys in Skehana, it is unacceptable that it has taken us three years to get to this point. I would like the message to go back to the Minister and the Department that whatever legal issues need to be sorted out are sorted out in the next seven to 14 days because it is not fair to ask these people to go through another Christmas not being able to plan for their future.

I can understand the concern and frustration of people on this issue. The letters have gone out to the legal people. It is important there is a response from people's legal representatives because issues can get lost in legal offices. The Deputy can be assured that what the Minister has stated will happen. It is important people react in a positive way and that their legal teams respond. There can be delay on both sides. Getting due diligence done to formalise legal offers took time but we are ready to go. Let there be a clear message to people very distressed over this issue for that length of time that it will be resolved with immediate effect.

Vehicle Registration Issues

I thank the Ceann Comhairle for selecting this topic for discussion and I am very glad the Minister of State, Deputy Brian Hayes, is in the House to reply. I raise the issue of licence plates because we are coming close to January which is the busiest time for our motor trade. There are serious concern in the industry that this will be another year of declining sales and declining trade. We have seen the effects of the recession over the past five years on the motor trade. Driving around Ashbourne or Drogheda five years ago, all the licence plates were 07 and 08 and they still are all 07 and 08 because the trade in new vehicles has declined.

The figures we have seen are very worrying. New car sales are down by more than 50% in the past five years. Commercial vehicle sales are down by 72% and the industry is looking at the new year and wondering what the future has in store for it. There are two key concerns for the industry. The first is the impact of additional taxation in next month's budget and the second is the new year's licence plate.

Each year we issue one licence plate at the beginning of the year in January. We front-load all the vehicle sales to January, February and March and if one looks at the figures for each year, that contention is borne out. For instance, last year, 21,000 cars were sold in January but only 4,000 were sold in July. The UK had a similar problem to this a few years ago but it changed its system, so it now issues new licence plates in January and in July. That has led to an increase in demand but also a flattening out over the year. One of the reasons for that is the dual registration system.

Some 60% of our sales are in January, February and March of each year. That should be changed. If we introduced a system where we issued two licence plates, one in January and one in July, it would give the motor trade much more flexibility in planning things like staff and for the year's trade. Will the Minister look at that? I brought this up last year and I was told he would consider it. The Minister has had consultations on the issue since then and I hope something will be done in next month's budget.

Will the Minister of State let us know the current state of play? Is this something which will be considered because the motor trade wants it? I do not think any of us can see any reason we should not introduce it.

I thank Deputy Hannigan for bringing this matter to the attention of the House and for rightly highlighting the importance of the motor industry to the economic recovery of this country and some of the difficulties it is going through. As the Deputy said, the Minister for Finance, Deputy Noonan, indicated in last year's budget that he would review all of the issues surrounding vehicle registration tax and motor tax revenues for future years this year. That work took place this year and obviously any outcome from it will emerge in the budget in two weeks' time.

The real problem here is that some years ago, when the new motor tax system was being introduced, there was an understandable bias towards low emission cars. What is interesting from the figures I have is that 96% of new cars purchased in 2011 were in the first three CO2 emission bands where the VRT rates are lower. People who bought new cars with low emissions paid very little tax indeed and that put out of kilter the total revenue yield from motor taxation.

The consultation process attracted 34 submissions from various sources. The motor industry's representative association, the Society of the Irish Motor Industry, submitted a comprehensive document setting out its proposals in this regard. Aside from its proposals on VRT and motor tax, the industry also put forward proposals in regard to issues surrounding the seasonality of the motor industry and, in this regard, proposed the introduction of a second registration period which it felt would bring a degree of stability to the sector in terms of employment levels.

Some of the proposals contained in its consultation paper were already contained in SIMI's pre-budget submission to the Minister for Finance in respect of the 2012 budget and have again been included in its budget 2013 submission. The industry asked that consideration be given to a number of initiatives that it felt would protect employment and give some stability in the motor industry while at the same time generating some additional revenue for the Exchequer. It pointed out that one of the biggest problems facing the motor retailers is the seasonality of car sales in Ireland, to which the Deputy referred. Each year new car sales become more compacted in the first quarter of the year - 48% in 2010 and 53% in 2011.

The industry is becoming more seasonal each year leading to funding and cash flow issues that add to uncertainty and instability. As a result, it says the following issues arise. As car sales become more seasonal so does employment in the industry as business is over-stretched early in the year and over-resourced later in the year. The costs associated with a seasonal business mean that motor retailers require large funding arrangements with their banks at the start of the year. The costs associated with holding stock both new and used are the largest cost after labour costs. Motor retailers need to have sufficient floor space for the first three months of the year and generally do not require this floor space throughout the rest of the year. As the year the vehicle was first registered is obvious on the Irish number plate, there is a strong emphasis on the age of the car. If a motor retailer is holding used stock over the change in the year, those vehicles will be perceived by the customer to be a year older, leading to depreciation of that vehicle.

Proposals put forward by the Society of the Irish Motor Industry, together with a wide range of proposals submitted to the Minister for Finance from a large number of interested parties in issues across all tax heads, are being considered in the context of the forthcoming budget. I am sure the Deputy will appreciate that I cannot comment on what might or might not be in that budget.

However, I assure him, on behalf of the Minister for Finance, that his proposal is being actively considered in the context of submissions that have been received from the industry to see how the implementation of that proposal would affect the industry. We all appreciate that it is going through a very rough time at present.

I thank the Minister for his detailed response. I have submitted a number of these Topical Issue matters in the past and I take it from the Minister's response there is a potentially positive outcome here. I do not expect the Minister to comment on that but I look forward with interest to this aspect of the forthcoming budget. I hope we can do something to try to regenerate sales in the motor trade.

The Minister for Finance is fully aware of the stress of the motor industry in Ireland. He also recognises, as he said in the Budget Statement last year, that the way motor tax is currently levied gives an enormous bias towards top end, low CO2 cars. That will have to be balanced out. His announcements in the budget concerning the way in which the tax issue will be resolved will not be a surprise to people.

On the Deputy's question about having a second time of the year for the registration of cars, that is something the Minister and the Department are examining following the consultation with the industry. It is under active consideration and I have no doubt the Minister will have due regard to the Deputy's comments last year and this year about bringing forward those proposals. However, I do not wish to second guess what might be in the budget.

Sitting suspended at 4.23 p.m. and resumed at 4.30 p.m.
Top
Share