Skip to main content
Normal View

JOINT COMMITTEE ON EUROPEAN AFFAIRS (Sub-Committee on European Scrutiny) debate -
Thursday, 1 Jul 2004

Scrutiny of EU Proposals.

We turn now to the first set of proposals before the committee for consideration, documents 1.1 to 1.25, which, it is proposed, do not warrant further scrutiny. COM (2004) 245 is an amended proposal for a directive concerning the quality of bathing water. The proposal also relates to better and earlier information to the public when making use of locally and regionally available facilities and technological approaches such as the Internet. The amendment to the proposal concerns changes by the European Parliament and accepted by the Commission. The Department has indicated that the Presidency has proposed some additional amendments to this proposal and that these will be presented to the European Parliament in September for possible adoption early next year. It is proposed this document does not warrant further scrutiny given that the proposal has evolved. It is proposed that the document be forwarded to the Joint Committee on the Environment and Local Government for information. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 254 is a Green Paper on maintenance obligations. I was surprised by this proposal. A number of issues relating to maintenance obligations are highlighted in a Green Paper from the Commission which indicates, for example, that in many Union countries the number of divorces per 1,000 inhabitants is close to half the number of marriages and that in Spain 80% of the divorce or separation orders award maintenance but that it is not actually paid in 50% of cases. Furthermore, the paper notes that 21,000 of registered maintenance debtors in Sweden reside abroad. It suggests that a lack of awareness of existing mechanisms as well as deficiencies in co-operation between member states results in all manner of difficulties — language difficulties and the provision of incomplete files by those in authority — for those seeking enforcement measures.

The paper indicates that the Commission is seeking synergies with the work of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, which is, I understand, preparing a new general convention on maintenance obligations. This paper will run parallel to the Hague Convention which is addressing the issue. It poses a number of questions relating to the recovery of arrears, modifications to earlier judgments and the principle of automatic provisional enforcement of judgments relating to maintenance obligations. The Commission is seeking views on the paper by 30 September 2004. It is anticipated the Commission will publish a proposal in this area in early 2005. It is proposed that the Green Paper be forwarded to the Joint Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence and Women's Rights and the Joint Committee on Social and Family Affairs for information. Is that agreed? Agreed.

Is statistical information of a similar nature to that available for Sweden or Spain available for Ireland?

We do not have such information on hand but we will try to obtain it and circulate it to members.

It would be interesting to know the statistics for Ireland.

COM (2004) 263 is a proposed directive regarding examinations carried out under official supervision and equivalence of seed produced in third countries. The proposal seeks to permit seed certification through official supervision of procedures and through the current system of direct official sampling and testing; to lay down the procedures that should be followed for the supervised approval — testing would be carried out by independent and certified laboratories; and to extend recognition of seed harvested in third countries to all kinds of seeds meeting requirements laid down in Community directives. This follows OECD rules on the international trade in seeds.

The Department's note suggests that the adoption of the proposed measure is unlikely to have a significant impact in Ireland as little interest has been shown by the sector in a non-state agency carrying out the sampling and testing role. It is proposed that this document does not warrant further scrutiny but that it be forwarded to the Joint Committee on Agriculture and Food for information. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 279 is a proposed directive on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation. This proposal is a consolidation exercise in the area of equal pay and equal treatment in employment and occupational social security schemes. It is somewhat different from other consolidation exercises previously considered by the sub-committee in that it also incorporates case law. It is proposed, as this is a consolidation matter, that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 311 is a proposed directive on the recognition of seafarers' certificates issued by the member states. The Convention of the International Maritime Organisation on Standards of Training, Certification and Watch-keeping for Seafarers 1978, as amended, the STCW Convention, outlines the skills required by seafarers.

The convention was transposed into Community legislation by Directive 2001/25/EC. This legislation was amended through Directive 2003/103/EC and requires member states to issue certificates of competency to seafarers of third countries holding certificates in line with the standards of the convention. This proposal for a further amendment to the original directive seeks to extend the requirement to issue certificates of competency to suitably qualified seafarers from other member states. This would remove the current paradoxical situation by which the administrative procedure to obtain a certificate is generally smoother for nationals of third countries than it is for those holding certificates from other member states.

The two other key provisions in the proposed directive relate to an obligation on member states to adopt measures to prevent and penalise fraudulent practices associated with certificates of seafarers; and the regular assessment of compliance of member states with the requirements of the directive, with the assistance of the European Maritime Safety Agency.

The Department has expressed the view that the adoption of the proposal should improve mobility and promote seafarers' employment with the EU and that the involvement of the agency in the monitoring process should greatly assist Ireland in identifying and preventing fraudulent practices. It is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny, but that it be forwarded to the Joint Committee on Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, for information. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 315 is a proposed Council decision concerning the notification to the Republic of Korea of the withdrawal from the agreement on telecommunications procurement. This proposal takes account of the liberalisation and reduced government influence and control in the telecom sectors in the EU and Korea in recent years. Consequently, it seeks to respond positively to the request from the Korean authorities to terminate a bilateral procurement agreement in telecom sector. It is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 320 is a proposed directive relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of toluene and trichlorobenzene. Toluene and trichlorobenzene are used in the manufacture of household products such as paints. The Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the Environment has confirmed the risk assessment that identified a need to reduce the risk to health of these products. The Commission is therefore, through this proposal, seeking to restrict the marketing and use of both products, and of preparations containing them, thereby according to the Department prohibiting the marketing and use of toluene as a substance in adhesives or spray paints intended for sale to the general public. The Department has confirmed that its consultations with interested parties such as the chemical and paints sectors in Ireland have indicated no negative implications for these sectors and the Department has undertaken to inform the secretariat if any negative responses are received in relation to its extensive consultation process. I understand that to date no negative observations have been received from those circulated. This has been deferred from a previous meeting. On the basis of the additional information provided, it is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.

Those terms will trip off the Chairman's tongue.

It is a fairly noxious substance.

COM (2004) 324, is an amended proposal for a Council decision laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission. This proposal seeks, according to the Commission, to establish a new system for delegating powers which more closely reflects the legal and political realities of the European Union. It also seeks to reform "comitology" to take account of the European Parliament's position as co-legislator, along with the Council, and is presented as an interim measure, pending the adoption of the constitutional treaty, which in Article 35 appears to give an enhanced role to the European Parliament in the area of delegated regulations.

The adoption of this proposed measure would see, inter alia, the European Parliament being informed without delay of decisions by regulatory committees. It would also, within one month of notification by an absolute majority of its members, be able to raise objections to a measure. The Commission would then withdraw, amend or uphold the proposal. The proposals would also be available on the Internet. The issue of delegated regulations, such as those concerning genetically modified crops, has been discussed by the sub-committee. The Joint Committee on European Affairs has asked its consultant to report back on the question of delegated regulations. The Department has indicated that the discussions on this proposed measure are not expected to conclude in the immediate future.

This measure would advance the oversight of delegated regulations and will be of particular interest in the context of the study by the committee's consultant. It is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny at this stage, but that the proposal be forwarded to the consultant of the Joint Committee on European Affairs for consideration in the context of the study on comitology and delegated regulations being undertaken for that committee. The sub-committee would then consider any amendments to this proposal in the light of the presented report. Is that agreed? Agreed.

I am sure the Chairman will look after the interests of Ireland very well in the European Parliament with regard to this matter.

By the time this goes through, the Senator knows where I will be.

I sure the Chairman will follow it all the way through.

COM (2004) 333 is a proposed regulation temporarily suspending the autonomous common customs tariff duties on certain industrial, agricultural and fishery products. Customs tariffs are suspended by the Community following applications through the national authorities, where this is considered to be in the interest of the Community. The tariffs may be suspended to assist the industry importing the product to become more competitive. Members will recall that the sub-committee has on a number of occasions dealt with similar proposals from the Commission. I understand that, in this instance, applications for the inclusion of two of the products included in the proposal came via the Irish authorities. I also understand that one of these products is used in the production of cholesterol-controlling tablets and the other is certain camera equipment — CCTV equipment. It is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 339 is a proposed regulation setting up a Community regime for the control of exports of dual-use items and technology. The Department's note indicates that the proposal has no implications for Ireland. It is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny but that it be forwarded to the Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs for information. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 385 is a proposed Council decision granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans for certain types of projects in Russia and the western new independent states or WNIS. The Department has indicated that, given the existing volume of EIB activities, the proposal would have limited implications for Ireland. It is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.

I propose to deal with items Nos. 1.12, 1.13 and 1.14, together, as each is an anti-dumping measure concerning certain steel wire originating in India. In July 2003, the Commission initiated a review of countervailing duties in place on imports of stainless steel wires of various diameters and originating in India. This review was undertaken at the request of an Indian company, VSL Wires Limited. That company claimed it had not exported the product at the time of the Commission's investigation prior to the imposition of duties on exports of this product from India and that therefore the duties should not apply to their product. The review confirmed that the company had not exported during the relevant reference period, 1 April 1997 to 31 March 1998, but it did determine that the company benefited from official subsidies. In these three proposals the Commission is seeking to include the company in the countervailing and anti-dumping duties currently applied to exports of the stainless steel wires from India. It is proposed that proposals 1.12, 1.13 and 1.14 do not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 371 is a proposed Council decision on the conclusion of the protocol to the interim agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the EU and Croatia, to take account of the accession of the new member states. It is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 372 is a proposed Council decision on the signing of the protocol to the interim agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the EU and Croatia, to take account of the accession of the new member states. It is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed. As I stated earlier, No. 117 was adopted prior to scrutiny and the committee was notified within the past few days.

COM (2004) 403 is a proposed regulation extending the definitive anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of certain ring-binder mechanisms originating in China to imports of the same product consigned from Vietnam. The proposal was adopted on 28 June, following the presentation of the Department's note to the Oireachtas. The Department had advised of this possibility. It is proposed to note the measure. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 426 is a proposed Council decision on a Community position in the Association Council on the implementation of Article 84 of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the EU and Morocco. It is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 47 is a proposal that seeks to codify the Council Directive of 23 July 1962 and subsequent Acts on the establishment of common rules for certain types of carriage by goods by road. The Department's note classifies the proposal as of "no significance" to Ireland. It is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.

SEC (2004) 675 is a preliminary draft amending budget No. 8 to the budget for 2004. The net effect of the three elements of this proposal is an additional contribution by Ireland of €4.32 million to the European Union. The Department's note indicates that, as the estimate of this figure had been €5 million, there is no need to alter the existing forecast of a contribution of €1.177 billion for 2004 from Ireland.

This proposal takes account of three elements of the EU budget that need to be adjusted. The first concerns a surplus in the loan guarantee fund of the European Investment Bank for 2003. The surplus results in a benefit in accounting terms to Ireland of €2.9 million. The second element of the proposal relates to contributions to the EU budget by the member states. Ireland's contribution increased in 2003 and reflects, according to the Department, the above-average performance of the Irish economy. Contributions are in part calculated with reference to national income. Taking into account the €2.9 million I mentioned, the increase in this area amounts to €7.75 million in contributions. The third element of the proposal concerns contributions by the member states to the so-called "UK correction" that takes into account the level of EU funding Britain receives. It is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 428 relates to proposed Council decisions on the conclusion and the signature and provisional application of a protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the EU and Egypt, to take account of the accession of the new member states. Like a number of proposals considered by the sub-committee, the Commission is seeking here approval for the signature and provisional application of a protocol to an international agreement to take account of the recent enlargement of the European Union. This proposal also makes provision for changes to the tariff regime with regard to certain crops, for example garlic and cut flowers. I understand the lead Department has confirmed that the Department of Agriculture and Food was involved in the discussion on the proposal and in its view the crops and quantities involved meant that the adoption of the proposal would not cause difficulties for Ireland. It is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 442 is a proposal for a regulation which follows from Common Position 2004/510/CFSP. It relates to an EU arms embargo, which has been in place with respect to the Sudan since 1994. The proposed measure would extend permission to supply certain equipment to the African Union and follows the plans for the deployment of the African Union-led ceasefire commission regarding the current situation in the Darfur region of the Sudan. It is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 331 is a proposal for a Council decision on the position to be taken by the Community concerning the proposal to amend the TIR Convention 1975. TIR stands for “transport international de marchandises par route”. According to the Commission memorandum to this proposal, the movement of goods has been facilitated through the TIR Convention 1975 and the TIR carnet. The TIR carnet is a customs transit document used for an international transit operation of goods. Each TIR carnet has a unique reference number. An electronic system has been developed to manage the process.

The proposal outlines that customs authorities shall transmit by the fastest means of communication related information in a standard format. This is with a view to encouraging use of the new electronic system. The Department indicates that the adoption of the proposed measure would not impose any additional obligations on Ireland. It is proposed to note it. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 411 is a proposal for a Council decision on the fulfilment of the conditions laid down in Article 3 of the Additional Protocol to the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the EU and Bulgaria, with regard to an extension of the period foreseen in Article 9(4) of Protocol 2 of the Europe Agreement. The Department's note indicates that the adoption of the proposal would have no implications for Ireland. It is proposed to note it. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 419 is a proposal for a Council decision on a Community position within the EU-Mexico Joint Council concerning the amendments to the Joint Council Decision 2/2000. The lead Department has confirmed that the Departments concerned with aspects covered by the proposal had no negative observations on the proposal. It is proposed that the proposal does not warrant further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.

To sum up, it was proposed that the items discussed, with the exception of COM (2004) 403, which has already been adopted, do not warrant further scrutiny and should be forwarded for information to sectoral committees as agreed.

The next set of proposals relates to the documents which it is proposed to refer to sectoral committees for further scrutiny. The first four proposals are related proposals, which form part of a package of proposals from the Commission that would impact on the rail sector. While each one is classified as of "some significance", together they would have a greater significance and would have implications for the operation and for users of the rail service in Ireland.

COM (2004) 139 is a proposed directive on the development of the Community's railways. A survey carried out by Eurobarometer is highlighted in the memorandum to this proposal. This showed that 70% of those interviewed agreed with the proposition that "if safety standards are met, competition is the best way to make the railways more efficient". The Commission proposal is based on a belief that increased competition would be good for the sector and proposes that the general principle be established that the market should be opened on the basis of free access to international services. Thereafter exemptions would be possible in instances of public service contracts for specific services, where supply and demand and the need to ensure an adequate service require it.

The Department has indicated that after 2010, if the proposal were adopted, any railway undertaking established in the EU would have the right to access the rail market on the island on a North-South basis. This right of access would be subject to the requirement that it did not negatively impact on the "economic equilibrium" of a public service contract.

COM (2004) 142 is a proposed directive on the certification of train crews operating locomotives and trains on the Community's rail network. The Commission suggests in its presentation of this proposal that there is a need to maintain and raise the safety levels in rail services and to enhance the interoperability of train crews so as to encourage international railway transport. The Commission proposes the establishment of a dual system of certification for rail drivers and certain other rail staff in the European Union. The first would be an EU-wide licence to reflect the attainment of minimum Community requirements, for example physical fitness, experience and minimum age, and would be issued by a competent national authority, but mutually recognised.

The second part of the system would be an element unique to the requirements of the service on which the driver is employed and would be issued by the railway undertaking. The certification scheme would be phased in over the period 2008 to 2015 and member states would have the option of excluding light rail, metro and heritage lines. The Department has indicated that Iarnród Éireann has its own system of certification of train drivers.

COM (2004) 143 is a proposed regulation on international rail passengers' rights and obligations. The Commission in its presentation of this proposal suggests that the proposal follows from its White Paper on transport policy, complaints received by the Commission and questions raised by Members of the European Parliament. It aims to promote international rail travel by improving passengers' rights.

The proposal seeks inter alia to establish rights for the passenger to obtain information such as the conditions for the lowest fares and availability of on board services; and for the passenger to buy a “throughticket” for the international journey. It would also establish liability on the part of the transport company in the event of death or injury to passengers and for damage to or loss of luggage. It sets minimum insurance cover and minimum compensation in case of delays, such as 100% compensation for a delay of an hour on international services of up to two hours. The Department has confirmed that the proposal would have implications for the North-South rail service. It is proposed that the three proposals be referred to the Joint Committee on Transport for further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.

Does that mean we can travel to Brussels by train?

I suppose so.

COM (2004) 144 is a proposed regulation on compensation in cases of non-compliance with contractual quality requirements for rail freight services. In its memorandum to this proposal, the Commission outlined a number of documents it has produced on the future of the rail transport sector in Europe. The documents "underline the overriding importance of improving the performance of rail freight services in Europe". The Commission has set out its conviction that "specific measures are needed to convince customers of the reliability of rail freight services".

As the opening up of the national and international rail sectors to full competition will not occur for some years, the Commission is proposing that mandatory minimum requirements and a compensation scheme be applied to such freight transport contracts. The proposed compensation regime would encompass losses and damage to transported goods, delays in delivery and cancellations as well as compensation for breaching other quality requirements laid down in the transport contract. The proposed measure also includes areas which must be part of the transport contract, such as arrival time and compensation in the event of losses. An upper limit of €75 per kilogram is proposed.

The Commission suggests that the adoption of the measure "is likely to lead to investment in new and better performing rolling stock". It is proposed that the proposal, along with the other proposals in the package of proposals on the rail sector, be referred to the Joint Committee on Transport for further scrutiny. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 273 is a proposed directive on reinsurance. The proposed directive suggests that "there are currently no harmonised reinsurance rules in the EU", which has resulted in "significant differences in the level of supervision of reinsurance undertakings in the EU". The Commission argues that there is uncertainty for direct insurance companies and their policyholders. It claims that trade barriers in the Single Market, as well as administrative burdens and costs, weaken the Community's position during international trade negotiations.

The proposal seeks, inter alia, to establish mutual recognition of the supervision in the member states where the reinsurance undertaking is licensed, to provide for the freedom to establish and provide reinsurance services and to impose the same solvency requirements on reinsurance companies. The proposal appears to provide for improvements in the reinsurance market and to facilitate the conclusion of international mutual recognition agreements. I understand that the Department has confirmed that consultation took place with the financial services sector and that it has expressed concerns on certain aspects of the proposal relating to solvency requirements for life and non-life reinsurance. The Department has indicated that a number of member states have similar concerns that they wish to be addressed by the Commission. The Dutch Presidency has scheduled a number of meetings on the proposal this month. It is proposed that the proposal be referred to the Joint Committee on Finance and the Public Service for further scrutiny and to the Joint Committee on Enterprise and Small Business for information. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 367 is a proposed decision establishing a multi-annual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable. The Department's information note states that the continuation of the programme could offer opportunities for private and public sector organisations in Ireland and across Europe. A number of Irish organisations and companies, including Ordnance Survey Ireland and the University of Limerick, have benefited from the current scheme. The opportunity to link with partners in the ten new member states will be an additional factor in the new scheme. Given the importance of technology issues to the economy and the fact that the original proposal has also been forwarded for further scrutiny, it is proposed that the amended proposal be referred to the Joint Committee on Enterprise and Small Business for further scrutiny along with COM (2004) 96. Is that agreed? Agreed.

We will consider four proposals which were adopted prior to scrutiny. COM (2004) 147 is an amended directive on minimum safety requirements for tunnels in the trans-European road network. The measure was deferred from the previous meeting of the sub-committee. The Department has provided additional information for the committee. In the additional note, which I understand has been circulated to members, the Department states that "the Dublin Port tunnel is designed to best international standards" and that "the safety installations in the Dublin Port tunnel exceeded those prescribed under the directive". The note indicates that changes are required in respect of the positioning of telephones and the provision of spare fire extinguishers.

Regarding the Jack Lynch tunnel, the Department has stated, "A full assessment procedure will be required to be conducted (to evaluate in detail) its compliance with the new tunnel safety directive." The Department's note indicates, "It is not currently anticipated that any significant modifications will be required on foot of such evaluation but until such time as that assessment is carried it is not possible to be definitive on the issue." It is proposed to note the measure and to forward a copy of the measure and the additional note to the Joint Committee on Transport for its information. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 421 is a Council decision of 10 June 2004 concerning the representation of the people of Cyprus in the European Parliament in the case of a settlement of the Cyprus problem. Members will have been circulated with a post-adoption note from the Department confirming that the measure was proposed and adopted within a short period of time. The note also states that, in advance of further elections in Cyprus to the European Parliament, the EU will take account of the situation prevailing there. It was not possible to hold elections across the island because the application of the acquis is suspended in its northern area. The measure provides that the mandates of those elected in early June in the area of Cyprus under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus will end following the conclusion of a comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus question. Cypriots across the island will, after this settlement, participate in an election to the European Parliament that will give electoral rights and representation to everyone on the island.

It is a most unusual proposal. The existing MEPs will resign and new elections to the European Parliament will be held in Cyprus. The membership of the Parliament would change. It is proposed to note the measure. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 375 is a Council decision on a Community position concerning a decision of the EC and the stabilisation and association council of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on the council's rules of procedure. It is proposed to note the measure. Is that agreed? Agreed.

COM (2004) 377 is a proposal for a Council decision, amending decision 2003/893/EC, on trade in certain steel products between the European Community and Ukraine. It is proposed to note the measure. Is that agreed? Agreed.

There are two Title IV measures to be considered, the first of which is COM (2004) 384, a proposed decision adopting an action programme for administrative co-operation in the fields of external borders, visas, asylum and immigration. The European ARGO programme is tasked with promoting administrative co-operation in the fields in question. The proposal seeks to establish additional funding for aspects of the programme. It would be specifically targeted at structural weaknesses at strategic border points, based on an agreed risk assessment. Areas identified for support include IT, meetings of experts, and studies. As a Title IV measure, the adopted proposal would not automatically apply to Ireland. It is proposed to note the measure and to forward it to the Joint Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence and Women's Rights for information in advance of any decision by Ireland to opt into it. Is that agreed? Agreed.

The second Title IV measure is COM (2004) 391, a proposed regulation establishing a Community code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders. The proposal updates and develops the Schengen common manual for checks at external borders and, in certain circumstances, at borders within the Schengen area. For example, the proposal provides that if checks are to be imposed at the internal borders by a member state, other member states and the Commission must be consulted. If the checks persist beyond 30 days, the Commission will issue an opinion on the prolongation. While it also permits security checks at ports and airports throughout the Schengen area, the proposal confirms that border checks on persons, irrespective of their nationality, are abolished at internal borders.

As this is a Title IV measure, the adopted proposal will not automatically apply to Ireland. It is proposed to note the measure and forward it to the Committee on Justice, Equality, Defence and Women's Rights for information in advance of any decision by Ireland to opt into its provisions. Is that agreed? Agreed.

The following Common Foreign and Security Policy measure was notified to me as Chairman in advance of its adoption in accordance with the confidential scrutiny procedure agreed with the Department of Foreign Affairs. CFSP (2004) 510 is a Council Common Position involving the imposition of an arms, munitions and military equipment embargo on the Sudan. An EU arms embargo has been in place on the Sudan since 1994. The sub-committee considered a Common Foreign and Security Policy measure in February 2004 which followed requests to address the need to make certain equipment available to, among others, humanitarian organisations. The measure amended the embargo to permit the supply of humanitarian equipment intended solely for humanitarian or protective use in certain situations. The measure before us extends that permission to supply certain equipment to the African Union and follows plans for the deployment of an African Union-led ceasefire commission to address the current situation in the Darfur region of the Sudan. A related measure is outlined in COM (2004) 442. It is proposed to note the measure. Is that agreed? Agreed.

It is proposed to defer until the next meeting consideration of COM (2004) 57, which is a Council regulation on the creation of a European foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions. The proposal is for the most part technical, involving amendments to change the operational direction of the foundation, and is similar to others proposed for the agencies of the European Union. The proposal seeks, inter alia, to provide a greater strategic role to the boards of the foundation. Rather than burdening a committee with the scrutiny of a proposal which may not be of particular significance, it is proposed to defer its consideration until the Commission has provided the Department with the information requested. In the meantime, it is proposed that the proposal be forwarded to the Committee on Enterprise and Small Business for information purposes. Is that agreed? Agreed.

Can we obtain a list of the membership of the board as soon as possible?

Thank you.

Item 3 is the minutes of the previous meetings of 27 May 2004 and 17 June 2004, which have been circulated. Are the minutes agreed? Agreed. Item 4 involves reports of the sub-committee. The 29th, 30th and 31st reports were circulated to members and it is proposed that the reports as circulated be laid before both Houses. Is that agreed? Agreed. It is hoped that any remaining reports in the backlog will be finalised during the recess.

I take this opportunity to thank Laura Real from the University of Limerick who has been with the committee for five months and is now returning to her studies. I am sure members would like to join me in wishing Laura the very best of luck with her studies and future career. I understand from the staff of the committee and from my own contact with her that Laura has contributed greatly to the work of the committee, particularly during the busy period of the Presidency. We express our appreciation to Laura and wish her the very best.

I propose that the next meeting of the sub-committee should be in three weeks at 9.30 a.m. on Wednesday, 21 July 2004. This will allow us to include as many proposals as possible before the committee's recess in August. Is that agreed?

Could the meeting be held later than 9.30 a.m.?

It could.

The Oireachtas golf society is the only conflict.

Can Deputy Sexton suggest a time?

Either 10.30 a.m. or even 10 a.m. would do.

We will say 10 a.m. and if there is any difficulty members will be informed. There should not be a problem. Is that agreed? Agreed. The meeting will provide us with an opportunity to bring our work right up to date before the sub-committee's August break.

We are obliged by scrutiny legislation to report to both Houses of the Oireachtas on how the scrutiny process operated up to 31 December last. I hope by the next meeting to have a draft report for members to allow us to discharge our responsibility to both Houses.

The sub-committee adjourned at 10.15 a.m. until 10 a.m. on Wednesday, 21 July 2004.

Top
Share