Are the minutes of the meeting of 5 March agreed? Agreed. Correspondence received since that meeting has been circulated.
Is it agreed to note the list of proposals considered and decisions adopted by the Joint Committee on European Scrutiny at its meeting on 26 February? Agreed.
It is proposed to note No. 67, a letter from the Czech Parliament forwarding a copy of the resolution adopted by the Parliament on the future status of Kosovo. Is that agreed? Agreed.
It is proposed to note No. 68, a letter from the ambassador of Iran enclosing information on the political organisation of the National Council of Resistance of Iran. Is that agreed? Agreed. Council representatives have visited the House on a number of occasions. Debate is ongoing between them and the authorities in Iran.
It is proposed to note No. 69, a letter from the European Citizen Action Service, an NGO, forwarding its publication of 50 questions to citizens and their answers on the Treaty of Rome. A copy was received by the secretariat and will be made available to any member who wishes to have a copy. It is proposed to note the letter. Since all members have not read it, I cannot comment on it. I ask the clerk to do a précis in order that if anything needs to be brought to our attention, we will have it.
No. 70 is a letter from the University of Hull inviting members to participate in an on-line survey of ESDP. This was sent to all members but the university notes that only two members have responded and a minimum of 12 responses is required. I do not recall receiving the letter but I presume everybody received it. I will arrange for 12 members to reply.
