I join with colleagues in welcoming the members of the parliamentary delegation from Croatia and wish them success. I also took the opportunity to visit Croatia in July 2003. Senator O'Rourke accompanied me on that visit and I am sure she would have liked to be present today. She is attending to the Order of Business in the Seanad and perhaps she will join us later.
It is important not to neglect the cultural dimension. Senator O'Rourke comes from the same part of the country as Lavall Nugent and we were interested in that particular connection. He was an Irishman from the midlands who joined the Austrian Army at the age 16 and who later went on to make a distinguished contribution of a diplomatic kind to Croatia. Lavall Nugent was able to engage with memory in a non-conflictual way. His scholarly interest in Rome and Greece was exemplary and it probably made the point that scholarly approaches towards archaeology and memory are more fruitful than the manipulation of memory for difference and conflict, a topic on which we in Ireland would have some experience.
It is interesting that James Joyce, who is being celebrated this year by way of exhibition, found no difficulty in moving between the different communities of the Adriatic. He did so easily because of his interest in matters that were profoundly human. That is the way to go. Having allowed myself those few remarks there are a few political points I wish to make.
We are one of the foreign affairs committees in the European Union that has yet to discuss fully the most serious implications of the confusion of an international war on terrorism. "War" is the wrong word. It should be an international opposition to terrorism and the invasion of Iraq. We have not fully considered this matter. The common day assumption that the international world movement against terrorism is, was or could ever be associated with the invasion of Iraq is one of the most powerfully dislodging suggestions among the public all over Europe. With unanimous support we can co-operate in our efforts against terrorism but the suggestion that the invasion of Iraq could be justified under that cover is the most powerful recruiting atmosphere at present for terrorists from several backgrounds. There is no point in going on with the fudge of imagining that one cannot face that confusion. Humanity will pay a price for it for generations to come. I am interested in hearing about co-operation between countries against terrorism but I am not interested in the dishonest justification of illegality. A moral and political question flows from that in relation to the future of Europe.
Like others, I support the welcoming of Croatia to the European Union. It is a European union. The EU will be will be dislodged rather than helped by people with covert agendas within it. There is a need for an alternative force in geopolitics, one that is committed to peace, humanity, diverse cultures, respect for a view of history and several different forms of economy that is not crude militaristic imposition of a neo-liberal single ignorant agenda that has nothing to do with economic theory. When the members of a delegation from the previous Croatian Government visited the Oireachtas I put a question to them, as I have put to every country applying to join the EU. I asked, given that the EU was pushing the notion of people adapting their economies and society, what price was being paid in terms of social protection. The countries we welcomed on 1 May had a litany in that regard. In some places the teachers were on strike, in other places it was the nurses. In some places nurses, teachers and the transport workers were all on strike. The price being asked was so high that the acque negotiated at the time was one that sought to impose the model irrespective of the human cost. I exchanged this view with my fellow Europeans because one does not need to join anything to be European.
One thing that has fascinated me has been the manner in which the Lisbon Agenda, which was a high moment in regard to balancing competitiveness, innovation and social cohesion, is being abandoned to facilitate a cruder relationship in the labour market, which is attacking pensions social security. The gift we have to offer each other as neighbours is that of truth. We have done enormously well in the European Union and we have increased incomes but we have remained at the bottom of the league in terms of social protection. We are the second lowest, reflected in the fact that we spend less than half of what Sweden does, which is at the top of the league in this area. The issue of social protection is crucial. When I visited Croatia, my wish for the Croatian people was for that culture and humanity, to which I have referred, to thrive. I also wished for a different relationship with between Croatia and its neighbours because I could detect a significant amount of negativity in regard to the capacity the country to deal with its neighbours.
I want to say, lest people think I am vague — I was an academic at one stage — what I mean specifically about the US influence and its dislodging of some of the relations within the European Union. I am referring specifically to the international criminal courts where several countries, not only in Europe but all around the world were asked, as a condition of a positive relationship with the US Administration, not to sign up to the International Criminal Court. I raise this point because today our Parliament is due to debate the International Criminal Court.
I wish to end as I began. I have got the greatest pleasure from Croatian film makers and writers. The film festival in Pula is very good. It was my pleasure to meet John Malkovich as he was receiving a well deserved award. That is what we need — a mind of the European Union that deals with matters cultural, social protection and has generosity and is not trying to be anything else. Our message should be not that we are failed soldiers but that we would like to be Europeans who did not imagine that we were at some disability because we are not talking or acting like that.