Skip to main content
Normal View

JOINT COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS debate -
Tuesday, 3 Apr 2007

Baha’i Community in Iran: Discussion.

The next item on the agenda is a discussion with members of the Baha'i faith living in Ireland as regards repression of the Baha'i community in Iran. I welcome Mr. Brendan McNamara, chairman of the National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is of the Republic of Iran, as well as Mrs. Alison Wortley and Mrs. Sabina Nagle, who are both members of the National Spiritual Assembly of the Baha'is. In the Visitors Gallery is Mr. Patrick Dawson, a member of the National Spiritual Assembly of Baha'is and Ms Emer Butler of Irish Aid. This will be the second presentation we have had today. We are under some pressure as regards time, so I ask the speakers to keep their presentations to around ten minutes and members of the committee should keep their questions as brief as possible.

The Baha'i community in Iran numbers about 300,000. The community has, for many years, faced threats from Islamic leaders in Iran. After the 1979 Islamic revolution these threats turned into outright hostility and persecution. As a result, the Baha'i faith and its followers came under attack. Baha'i holy places were confiscated or destroyed and many members of the community were executed. Others were imprisoned and tens of thousands were removed from their jobs.

Now that Iran is fully under the control of conservative elements, there is evidence of a new campaign of organised and orchestrated oppression against the Baha'i community. Over the years Ireland has been to the fore in seeking to help the people of the Baha'i faith. Today, Mr. Brendan McNamara, chairman of the national administration body for the Baha'i faith in Ireland is with us to bring the committee up to date on the serious situation being faced by members of the faith in Iran.

Mr. Brendan McNamara

I thank the Chairman for his kind welcome and introduction.

We are happy to have the opportunity to make this presentation to the Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs, and very much appreciate the time given to us. We are particularly grateful for the interest of the committee and our parliamentarians in general in the plight of Iran's Baha'i community and acknowledge the long-standing support of successive Irish Governments for the Baha'is in Iran. This support has been expressed in commitments to the many resolutions, both at United Nations and European Parliament levels, that have been passed on the human rights situation in Iran which make specific mention of the Baha'i community.

The Irish Baha'i community is gravely concerned about the situation faced by our co-religionists in Iran and would like to make the following observations which we hope will be of interest and assistance to the committee's work and in light of its possible visit to Iran in the future.

The Baha'is have been persecuted throughout their history in Iran, but the persecution greatly increased after the Islamic revolution in 1979, as the Chairman has said. More than 200 Baha'is have been executed or killed since then, hundreds have been imprisoned and tens of thousands deprived of jobs, pensions, businesses and educational opportunities. The Government banned all Baha'i institutions, and the community's holy places, cemeteries and properties have been confiscated, vandalised or destroyed. The civil, political, social, economic and cultural rights of Iranian Baha'is are still being systematically violated today.

With some 300,000 members, the community is the largest religious minority in Iran, where Baha'is are oppressed solely on grounds of religious intolerance. According to the Iranian constitution, Zoroastrians, Jews and Christians are the only recognised religious minorities. The regime refers to the Baha'i faith as a heresy or a conspiracy and classifies its members as "unprotected infidels", who thus have no legal recourse. Some conservative Islamic leaders in Iran and elsewhere view the Baha'i faith as a threat to Islam and brand its followers heretics or apostates. The progressive stand of the faith on women's rights, education and independent investigation of truth are of grave concern to many Muslim clerics.

In localities throughout Iran, Baha'is are subjected to arbitrary arrest and short-term detention, harassment, intimidation and discrimination. Attempts to obtain redress are systematically denied as officials confiscate homes, deny rightfully earned pensions and inheritance, block access to employment in the public sector and impede the private business activities of Iranian citizens who are Baha'is. The authorities interfere with classes for Baha'i youth in private houses and persist in banning the sacred institutions that perform, in the Baha'i faith, important functions reserved to clergy in other religions.

Iranian officials have sought to force Baha'i students to identify themselves as Muslims as a prerequisite for entrance to university. Because Baha'is will not deny their faith, an entire generation has been denied access to higher education. For the first time in decades, Baha'i students were allowed to take the national university entrance exam in 2005. Some 800 did so, a great many passed with high scores, but none obtained admittance to university that year. They tried again in 2006. Only 178 were admitted and about 70 of these students have since been expelled, with the reason expressly given as their adherence to the Baha'i faith.

The planned and systematic nature of the persecution against this religious minority came to light in 1993 with the discovery and publication by the former UN special representative of a Government memorandum establishing a policy on "the Baha'i question". Drafted by the Supreme Revolutionary Cultural Council and signed by the Supreme Leader, the document states unequivocally that the "progress and development" of the Baha'i community "shall be blocked".

In August 2006, Iran's Ministry of the Interior ordered provincial officials throughout the country to step up systematic surveillance of Iranian Baha'is. This was the latest in a series of documents revealing a national effort to identify and monitor members of the community and to collect information about them that, in most societies, would be considered private and sensitive. The United Nations special rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Ms Asma Jahanjir, had already expressed concern about a confidential letter sent in October 2005 by the Iranian military headquarters to various Government departments, including the Revolutionary Guard and police forces, instructing them to identify and monitor Baha'is throughout the country. Reports from various localities have since attested to the fact that the surveillance is being implemented and that acts of intimidation have followed.

We are alarmed at what could be implied by the combined effort of intelligence, military and police agencies in this context, particularly as it is concurrent with a campaign of propaganda against the Baha'i faith in the Government-controlled national media. Kayhan, the official Tehran newspaper, has published over three dozen calumnious articles since October last year. During the same period Iranian radio and television broadcasts have regularly condemned the Baha’is and their beliefs and we have received reports regarding an even greater number of anti-Baha’i websites. In the 1950s and 1980s, media campaigns of this nature led to acts of violence that included the murder of Baha’i men, women and children.

Iranian authorities have also continued to arrest and detain Baha'is throughout Iran in recent months, subjecting them to a revolving door sequence of imprisonment and release without setting trial dates. Bail demands have been very high in most cases and the assets being retained by authorities include considerable sums of money, deeds to property, business and work licences.

In addition to physical threats, the Baha'is in Iran continue to face ongoing obstacles to earning their livelihood. Managers of private companies have been pressured to dismiss Baha'is from their organisations; landlords have been asked to refuse lease renewals to their Baha'i tenant shopkeepers; trade organisations have taken action to prevent Baha'is in the service industry from working; and Baha'is who are directors or managers of companies have received death threats and-or threats that their family members would be kidnapped. Many of these Baha'i employers and factory owners set up businesses because they and other Baha'is could not obtain employment in Iran.

Many Baha'i homes have also been raided with personal property confiscated. Furthermore, a movement appears to be targeting Baha'i households, which have received notes, CDs and tracts, all aimed at refuting the tenets of their faith and, in some cases, they have been sent to all family members regardless of age. In recent months, the tone of these messages has become more blatantly threatening.

We consider that we are now witnessing the intensification of a co-ordinated strategy of intimidation against the Baha'i that includes physical threats, economic pressure and the incitement of public hostility through slanderous articles in the media. Our experience has been that once the spotlight of international attention is focused on these attempts to strangle the community culturally and economically and terrorise its members, this pressure is ameliorated or at least is not allowed to develop to a more catastrophic outcome.

The persecution to which Baha'is in Iran are subject is purely on religious grounds and if the authorities there have, on occasion, tried to dress up the pressure they are applying in the cloak of spurious charges and allegations, the fact is that Baha'is can invariably buy their freedom, enter university, rightfully inherit and acquire the job they desire simply by denying their faith and converting to Islam.

We seek no special treatment or recognition for our co-religionists in Iran but only that the Iranian Government honour its commitments under the various international covenants and standards to which it is a signatory and that this beleaguered community be finally emancipated.

It should be said that Iran's Baha'is love their country and have no other wish than to contribute to its progress and development. It is a peace-loving community drawn from all backgrounds of Iranian life whose members endeavour to live by the standards as set down by the founder of the Baha'i faith, Bahá'u'lláh, when he wrote: "Consort with the followers of all religions in a spirit of friendliness and fellowship", and, "The earth is but one country and mankind its citizens".

Members are aware of the time restrictions under which we are working and I ask them to be brief in their contributions.

I welcome Mr. McNamara, Ms Nagle and Ms Wortley. I will not waste the time of the committee asking questions the answers to which I already know, except to say that I will declare an interest in this matter. I have friends who are members of the Baha'i faith in Cork, including Ms Nagle and some other members of her faith. All these people whom I know are of impeccable character. I cannot accept in any way the treatment some of these families have received at the hands of the Iranian authorities, especially people who have been forced to flee Iran, who have come through countries such as Spain and eventually settled in Cork and its surrounding areas.

It was frightening and unacceptable to hear the stories they told me of what happened to them, and I do not doubt them because they are honest and decent people. How can we address this issue effectively in light of what the Government has attempted to do on numerous occasions in regard to this ongoing persecution?

Some of us have attempted to understand the stance of the Iranian Government on some issues. Some of us have also had the pleasure and honour of visiting that country and we recognise that nation's rich history and tradition. I find it difficult to defend that country on other issues and certainly it is the victim of a strong propaganda war by some of our global leaders. Having defended that country and its stance on the peaceful development of its nuclear industry, it is unacceptable that it could undermine everything it is trying to do by the treatment it is handing out to those of the Baha'i faith.

Having seen the efforts made by our Government, Ireland being a member state of the European Union, and the failure of the European Union to make any progress as a result of its support for the Canadian initiative on human rights and the resultant withdrawal of Iran from the dialogue that was taking place on human rights with the European Union, I despair in some respects, but we cannot abandon the people of the Baha'i faith in Iran.

One action we must take today is to signal to Government a motion supporting the Baha'i faith and condemning what is happening to its members. We should support the Government on any positive initiatives it takes to address this serious problem of persecution and the erosion of human rights. We could agree such a motion on the conclusion of this session with the delegates.

We can prepare a statement.

Yes, we should do that, but I do not have any solutions, only condemnation for the actions of the Iranian Government on this issue. We should continue our dialogue with the delegates as representatives of the voices of the silenced in Iran. We should also continue our attempts in this regard through diplomacy and perhaps support Iran on other issues and, in that way, we can help the delegates in our own small way.

I take it that it is agreed that we will prepare a statement after this session which we can send to the Minister responsible and to the chargés d'affaires, the Iranian representative here. I call Deputy Michael D. Higgins.

I apologise to the Deputy but I omitted to mention one point. I apologise for being long-winded. Some of us, in different contexts, have met the chargés d'affaires of the Iranian embassy in recent times. We met him formally. We also met his predecessor who seemed to have been subsequently incarcerated in Tehran. We expressed our serious concerns to both gentlemen about what was happening in regard to the members of the delegates' faith in Iran.

We all met representatives of the National Council of Resistance, an Iranian opposition group. We raised with them the issue regarding those of the Baha'i faith and they seemed to be supportive of our concerns. I do not know if the delegates found any other approach to pursue. I call Deputy Michael D. Higgins.

I will be brief in my contribution. I first became aware of members of the Baha'i faith when I was in the United States in the 1970s. My first contact with them then was with members of the faith who were involved in the musical world — they were members of an orchestra. The Baha'i faith is a gentle and wonderful aesthetically rich belief system. My second contact was through my friend, O. Z. Whitehead, the actor, who frequently spoke to me about the community in Ireland. He is a friend of my wife and was involved in the Focus Theatre.

I agree with everything that has been said. The other point that we should bear in mind is that the attitude of Iran and Iranians towards the Baha'i faith was not always such. Certain changes took place in Iranian history, and it is the grossest distortion of Islamic scripture to operate in such a manner. It is a contradiction, and especially those of us who have respected Iranian sovereignty and the Iranian attitude towards the non-proliferation treaty are very anxious to stress breaches of human rights.

It is valuable to raise such issues regularly in the international community. We should ask that the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Deputy Dermot Ahern, do so at the next opportunity at his meetings in Geneva. I would certainly support the statement proposed. I pay tribute to our visitors, who have shown solidarity with the Baha'i community in Iran. There is no need for me to repeat anything, except to restate that the breaches involved are of the most fundamental rights, including those to association, belief and education. We should certainly insert that into our statement.

Mr. McNamara

I thank the Deputies for their very kind and insightful comments and express particular appreciation to Deputy Allen for his assistance in making this meeting possible. It has been very important for us and a great honour to present the case of our co-religionists in Iran on behalf of Baha'is in Ireland.

I will briefly answer the Deputy's question regarding what can be done. Every time this situation is raised in international fora, it has an effect. I include the resolutions that have been passed at the United Nations, the statements made by special representatives, and the efforts of our Government. We pay tribute to successive Governments, which have been extremely sympathetic to the plight of Iran's Baha'is and worked diligently on their behalf. Together, those help to ameliorate the situation.

We are not against Iran, and as I mentioned in my statement, the Baha'is who live there love their country. Rather, we want the Iranians to adhere to the standards to which they have committed themselves and finally emancipate this beleaguered community. We greatly appreciate the committee's time and Deputies' concern. I will not continue further, but if the committee can do anything through a statement or through raising the matter in fora in which it might participate, such as the Inter-Parliamentary Union, that will contribute to alleviating the situation of Iran's Baha'is.

We will prepare a statement condemning the repression of the Baha'i faith in Iran and calling on its government to live up to its international obligations and the agreements to which it is a signatory.

I thank the witnesses for attending and apologise for being pressed for time. However, they will appreciate that many things of all kinds are happening. We have been delighted to have the representatives of the National Spiritual Assembly with us today and have the opportunity to hear their presentation.

The joint committee went into private session at 5.55 p.m. and adjourned at 6 p.m. sine die.
Top
Share