I thank the Chairman. I thank the committee for inviting me to address it. My presentation will address six areas. I will speak about my own experience and expertise in the area of trafficking and prostitution. I will then discuss the type of legislation that will work to prevent and suppress trafficking and, at the same time, protect victims' safety. Following this, I will discuss the links between prostitution and trafficking and a forthcoming publication that I understand has been circulated to members of the committee. I will address the merits of the model used in the Netherlands, as opposed to those of the model used in Sweden. I will finally draw the committee's attention to two reports it may find useful and provide it with some specific suggestions about the possible content of future legislation when it is first drafted, in light of the fact that members' main role is as legislators. We hope such legislation will be introduced soon.
My expertise and opinion derives from five specific sets of experiences I have had. As the Chairman noted, I am the chairwoman of the European Women's Lobby Observatory on Violence against Women since 1996. This observatory brings together national experts on violence against women. The organisation, which once numbered 15 but now numbers 25, aims to share experiences of violence against women across the EU and beyond and, in particular, to share information about how member state governments are combating such violence.
The European Women's Lobby is a European wide network of women's non-governmental organisations, approximately 5,000 of which come together democratically under the lobby's umbrella to influence EU institutions to promote gender equality in all its forms and facets. Violence against women is obviously an area of great concern for the European Women's Lobby, thus leading to the formation of the observatory. In this context the phenomenon on trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation of women has increasingly been the subject of discussion at observatory meetings over the past ten years.
I am currently working with the European Women's Lobby on the development of a regional inter-agency network on combating trafficking in women for sexual exploitation in the Nordic-Baltic region. This project is funded by the Nordic states — Norway, Iceland, Finland, Denmark and Sweden — and involves both the Nordic states and the Baltic states — Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania. It seeks to set up a regional network of inter-agency bodies who will work to prevent trafficking, provide support services to victims and organise repatriation and safe return of victims. This project is just one year into its three-year life but has already shown interesting possibilities for application of learning to Ireland.
Monica O'Connor and I are co-authors of a briefing handbook on trafficking and prostitution for the European Women's Lobby and the Coalition against Trafficking in Women. This handbook was requested by women's groups in eastern European countries where women and men are struggling to combat trafficking and sexual exploitation. I have provided members with pdf copies of this document which will be launched in Ireland in June 2006, at which time hard copies will be made available.
As some members of the committee know, I am the former chairwoman of the National Women's Council of Ireland and vice president of the European's Women Lobby, which gave me the opportunity to represent Ireland at EU and global conferences, including UN meetings, where this issue has been widely discussed.
I am a member of the Irish Observatory on Violence against Women, an initiative hosted by the NWCI and supported by the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform as part of a network of national observatories, the role of which is to report on Government progress on tackling violence against women. I refer members to the copies of the 2004 Irish observatory report I have provided, which focused on prostitution and trafficking. Its recommendations on page 8 are relevant to this discussion.
We agree that Ireland needs legislation to effectively combat the rising tide of trafficking in human beings. The recent media attention to the matter, especially the excellent "Prime Time Investigates" programme, has finally supported the work of the NGOs in the field, such as Ruhama, which reports dealing with more than 200 cases of women trafficked to Ireland for sexual exploitation.
What sort of legislation do we need? What will work to prevent and suppress trafficking while making victims safe? Our proposed legislation should refer to the internationally agreed definition of trafficking as contained in the UN protocol to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children, that is, the 2000 Palermo Protocol. The definition is repeated in the Council of Europe declaration on trafficking.
The definition is important because it clearly says that trafficked persons are victims, require support and protection and must not be treated as illegal immigrants. The protocol recognises the need for assistance for victims and encourages efforts to prevent trafficking, prosecute perpetrators of this modern form of slavery and ensure forms of co-operation, including between police and judiciaries.
In Ireland, it is impossible to separate trafficking from the demand for prostitution services. The television programme amply showed the clear links between prostitution and the growing networks of traffickers working to meet that demand. The UN protocol calls on governments to take action to reduce demand for any activities that promote or create a demand or "pull" factor in trafficking. The "Prime Time" supplementary programme on Tuesday night supported the view expressed by experts at the EWL observatory for many years, that is, to legalise prostitution is to normalise and increase the demand for the purchase of sexual services.
For example, we see the impact of legalisation on the Netherlands where the police force is admitting failure to deal with growing levels of trafficking due to the demand for legal prostitution. Compare this to the Swedish situation. The Swedish Government has recognised prostitution as a form of violence against women and criminalised the purchase of sexual services. In surveys across Europe, eight out of ten Swedish men admitted to buying sex from women and 18% of German men admitted to using prostitutes regularly, as did 10% of London men.
There is no data on Ireland. However, the business being done by so-called escort agencies, telephone lines and Internet sex lines, in conjunction with the normalisation of buying sexual services from women — whether in lap dancing clubs, on-line or in apartments or hotels — anecdotal evidence of groups like Ruhama and the "Prime Time Investigates" programme, shows that many Irish men and other men residing here consider it usual and acceptable to buy sex. While I look forward to the forthcoming Trinity College Dublin study on prostitution in Ireland commissioned by the Irish Human Rights Commission, which is due to be published in June, I doubt that it will give much insight into trafficking specifically.
The question for the Irish is do we want to follow the Dutch model, where trafficking is out of control and the demand for more foreign and "exotic" women is fuelling the trafficking of non-EU women? Alternatively, could we examine the impact of the Swedish model, where the Swedish National Rapporteur on Trafficking notes that in 2003 and 2004, there has been a decrease in the trafficking of women for sexual exploitation?
The law in Sweden acts as a deterrent and sets a normative standard, that is, buying sex is not acceptable and can be subject to sanctions under the law if the political will exists. Swedish law has been accompanied by a significant investment in awareness raising campaigns on how buying sex is unacceptable and a criminal offence. Services to those working with women in prostitution have also been resourced. Some 7,340 men have been arrested under the legislation since it came into effect in 1999. Of this number, 1,400 between the ages of 16 years and 70 years pleaded guilty.
The legislation has an 80% approval rate among Swedes. The training of police in how to best implement the law has led to a 300% increase in arrests. The measure is actively supported by political parties and trades unions and has led to flanking legislation, including codes of behaviour for how Swedish nationals act in respect of the purchasing of sex when abroad, whether as tourists or as part of military or peace keeping forces.
While it was not the intention of the Swedish legislation, Sweden has seen a fall in the number of women trafficked into it. Unfortunately, perhaps we might ask whether the women have instead come to Ireland where there is an almost complete lack of regulation in respect of prostitution and an explosion of sex industry sites. This lack of effective legislation arises out of the confusion of some about the very nature of prostitution and how, by defending and failing to tackle it, we are protecting the rights of men to abuse women instead of protecting women, many of them vulnerable, from abuse and exploitation by men.
Whose rights are paramount, those of men to access women's bodies or those of women to freedom from exploitation? The lazy answer and the one most trotted out by elected representatives is that prostitution is the oldest profession. However, it is neither a profession nor a problem that cannot be solved. Members can read the recent research and argumentation on this matter in my co-authored publication on making the links between prostitution and trafficking.
l will draw the committee's attention to the February 2006 report by Ms Sigma Huda, the UN Special Rapporteur on Trafficking. She carefully chose her language in regard to this matter and wrote about how a human rights approach must be taken and a gender perspective applied to attempts to combat trafficking in women and children. She suggested that governments should use the definitions in the UN protocol, she explains demand and how it must be combated as part of any strategy to combat trafficking and she rejects the terms "sex worker" or "client", speaking instead of "prostitute" and "prostitute user".
There is no doubt that the use of business terminology in respect of this human rights abuse is one of the reasons there is a belief that women and children's bodies are purchasable commodities. Let us drop this market language and see the abuse for what it is. Ms Huda referred to the Swedish model of legislation and a similar model introduced in South Korea last year as effective strategies for combating trafficking and the national demand for sexual exploitation.
The first report of the Irish Observatory on Violence against Women was published in 2004. It focused on prostitution and trafficking as areas of violence against women in which the NGOs and violence experts believed there was a gap in legislative provision and consideration. The recommendations contained on page 8 of the report are worth repeating and perhaps we might see some action if this committee supports them.
In summary, the recommendations call for research into the extent of prostitution and trafficking in Ireland, including a consultation with NGOs working in the area. I am sure the committee is aware of and has examined the UK consultation document on strategies in prostitution, which was published in January. While some media treatment of that document was unfortunate, the principles used in the consultation and the document's underlying conclusions are relevant to Ireland.
The report asks for a high level ministerial group to examine the role of the sex industry in the phenomenon of trafficking in Ireland with a view to developing a strategic response. It asks for legislation to ratify the UN protocol and resources for service providers to ensure women's safe return. It also calls for leave to remain to be granted to victims. It calls for an examination of the Swedish model of legislation to criminalise the purchase of sexual services and proper data gathering. The report specifically calls for enhanced support for the work of Ruhama and other NGOs. A dedicated specialist NGO, perhaps supported by Ruhama, should be set up to co-ordinate the Irish response of NGOs to trafficking in women.
The situation in Ireland today has been described to the committee already by Ruhama and in other presentations in recent days. Best practice is emerging from the Nordic and Baltic project in which I am working to develop an effective regional network to combat trafficking, support victims and provide for repatriation and rehabilitation of victims and punishment of traffickers. In Ireland we need specific anti-trafficking legislation in which all steps in the trafficking process are defined and described in law to enhance identification and prosecution of traffickers. The Minister stated that legislation exists but other countries have found that specific anti-trafficking legislation makes enforcement much easier. A national plan to combat and prevent trafficking must be developed and a national office or officer for this work must be identified. Co-ordination of services to victims must be put in place and resourced. The normalisation of the demand for sexual services must be addressed. We propose that criminalisation of the purchase of sexual services would go a long way to addressing this.
Legislation must be put in place that follows the UN Palermo Protocol and should provide specifically for protection of victims of trafficking. This should include inter-agency co-operation between all those who play a role in supporting the victims, including the Garda Síochána, immigration officers, NGOs, health service agencies, immigrant organisations and legal services. The legislation should provide for legal protection and leave to remain, the lack of which was highlighted in the "Prime Time Investigates" programme. In Italy article 18 allows victims to remain in Italy and be provided with education, training and employment. In Norway victims are allowed to remain for 45 days but our work in the Nordic and Baltic states suggests that proper service provision and support dictates a six-month minimum period. Training of police and immigration officials in victim identification is crucial and support to victims should include services from NGOs, counselling, medical referral procedures and inter-agency protocols.
Legislation should also indicate how safe return of victims would take place between agencies in destination countries, such as Ireland, and countries of origin. Risk assessment on the potential for re-cycling the victim must be carried out. Many repatriated victims are often returned to prostitution and trafficking, such is their vulnerability. Victims may also face danger if repatriated to their countries.
Rehabilitation should include development of economic and social supports for the victims to ensure they can find an economic foothold that will allow them economic and social inclusion. All measures must happen nationally and transnational co-operation and regional strategies must be developed so that on a regional and global level the fight against trafficking has some effect in reducing the misery and suffering of hundreds of thousands of human beings. If we can shed the invisible cloak that surrounds trafficking in Ireland at the moment — including by making the links between prostitution and trafficking — we can clarify some of the reigning confusion. We should clarify the distinction between illegal immigration and trafficking, which has been done in other jurisdictions. We can continue to work as EU members to raise the standards of living and lower the levels of poverty here and elsewhere to combat the push factors that cause trafficking.
Criminalising the purchase of sexual services in Ireland and having penalties for prostitute users would allow the Garda Síochána a clear enforcement route. This would lead to a reversal of the current norm and a realisation that allowing men to continue to buy sex from any human being is unacceptable to society. This would have a visible and actual effect on the growing demand that is feeding the demand for trafficked women into Ireland where they are being bought and sold around the country. International criminal gangs are moving out of drug dealing and starting to traffic women. The penalties are lower, the chances of getting caught are lower and women can be resold as a commodity many times over.
In 2004 the Irish Observatory on Violence Against Women made recommendations to Government that went nowhere. The Irish people have spoken out in recent weeks, demanding that the Government move quickly to introduce the appropriate legislative framework to combat trafficking. I hope this committee can show the Irish public and victims of trafficking in Ireland that the political will exists to address this crisis swiftly and effectively.