On section 3, I am comparing it with the draft Bill that accompanied the Bankruptcy Law Committee Report. That is helpful because it does give an alternative view. In a lot of cases the view will be identical but it does give in certain areas an alternative approach. Therefore, I would propose to make use of that conflict to help the Minister in explaining what is in this Bill. There are a number of definitions which are in the draft Bill which do not appear to be in this Bill." Proof of debt" appears in section 3 of the draft Bill and it does not appear in this Bill. Could the Minister tell us what the significance of that is to help us in our education in this regard?
Secondly, am I correct in assuming that the bankruptcy inspector referred to in the definitions section of section 3 of this Bill is the same person as the inspector referred to in the draft Bill in the Committee's report?
Thirdly, am I correct in saying that the creditors' assignee referred to in the definitions section of the draft Bill is the same and accomplishes the same duties and responsibilities as the assignee referred to in the definitions section of this Bill? There are three differences which I would like to have explained to me if possible to help me in this regard.