I welcome the ladies and gentlemen and thank them for coming in today.
I was interested in the comment that there might be an all-island dimension which would be worth exploring. All I can say is I do not think our counterparts in Northern Ireland would be too anxious to step backwards by having an all-island dimension because they are a long way ahead of us in terms of what they have achieved to date by virtue of having a strategy in place, if nothing else. We are very much playing catch-up.
In saying that, I welcome the fact the group was finally set up on 11 July last after many calls to establish an interdepartmental group and that the relevant utilities are on board as well because nothing has been achieved in quite a long time in addressing the issues in a co-ordinated way. There have been increases in benefits such as the fuel allowances and there have been programmes under the Departments of Communications, Energy and National Resources and the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, but nothing has been co-ordinated. Each time we try to raise these issues through any of the three Departments we have been told, through parliamentary questions, that they are the responsibility of another Department. I hope, at least, the fact that this group is in place will see some changes in that regard. However, I would be concerned about the delivery from the group. The future initiatives do not instil me with a great deal of confidence.
It is important that we, in the committee, point out the facts on lower income households in particular. The proportion of the budget such households must spend on heating their homes is far in excess of what families that have larger incomes spend. Straight away, they are at an enormous disadvantage in terms of what they have left in disposable income. That has not been addressed adequately in what was discussed today.
The office for social inclusion of the Department of Social and Family Affairs spoke about the fuel allowance increases and the budget increases. The average rate of social welfare increase in the budget is between 3% and 3.5%. If one compares that with the increases sanctioned in the past six months alone for utilities, one can see how difficult it will be for those families to make their payments.
I accept, to be fair, what has been said by both the ESB and Bord Gáis about dealing and working with people. I get many people coming to me with all sorts of difficulties but I rarely get somebody coming to me who has been cut off from their supplies. They seem to be able to get it sorted out, and it is important to make that point.
On housing aid for older people, I do not know that they are working in the same area as I am. Offaly County Council and Laois County Council are still working on applications from 2006 and 2007, and there are applications arriving day in, day out. I am sure it is the same in every other local authority around the country. They are not accepting applications at present. The applications of anyone I came across which were submitted in late 2007 or early 2008 will not be looked at until 2009. That is the reality being faced by people, and they speak of there being a scheme.
I refer to the words used in terms of regeneration programmes. There are no specifics. Where will those regeneration programmes be? Who will be allowed avail of them? Will they be available in every local authority area around the country?
The central heating initiative was very successful. However, I cannot understand that when the local authority sent out officials to do this work — 97% of houses in Offaly were done — money was not given at the same time to install insulation in those local authority houses. The same people must go back to those houses and do it again. That is an utter waste of time. If one was getting someone in to one's own house to do it, one would do the two jobs together.
Often it has been commented to us in debates on this in the Dáil and elsewhere that there is no point in giving more in the fuel allowance because it is going out the window and that is the responsibility of the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. It is a catch-22, but it is still happening.
In terms of their new programmes coming on stream, will there be a specific programme to ensure every local authority house is fully insulated and done in the way the central heating programme was rolled out, and when will that be fully completed?
In the budget there was a €20 million increase for the home energy saving scheme, which is for private houses. Some €5 million has been allocated to the warmer homes scheme, which is for houses of people on lower incomes, which will be backed up by the ESB and Bord Gáis. It seems typical that the scheme for people who are less well off is the one on which the Department will look for support from utilities whereas the scheme for people who are already able to afford to do something to their houses will get €20 million from the State. It would have made more sense for it to be the other way around because the less well off are the ones who are least likely to do it because they cannot afford it. What level of funding will be given to the warmer homes scheme mentioned in the presentation by the ESB and Bord Gáis?
While one can argue about any payment made by the Department of Social and Family Affairs, the increase in the fuel allowance will not go any way towards really addressing the problem. A second issue, which has been raised on many occasions, is the way the fuel allowance is paid. There are many people who rely on oil-fired central heating who are unable to purchase oil because of the cost of getting their tank filled or half-filled. Nobody will make a delivery of €20 or €30, or €50 worth of oil. It is an administrative issue but it should not be too difficult. Is there a way of allowing those people the option of getting the fuel allowance in two lump sums rather than every week? That causes immense difficulty, particularly when the oil price is extremely high. There have been changes made in the way the early child care supplement has been paid and I do not see why there cannot be changes made in the way the fuel allowance is paid as well.