Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 8 Jul 1964

Vol. 57 No. 17

Fisheries (Amendment) Bill, 1964: Second and Subsequent Stages.

Question proposed: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

The purpose of this short Bill is to continue, in permanent form, the existing temporary provisions for rates on fisheries. These provisions, which are due to expire at the end of September next, enable boards of conservators to strike and collect rates on fisheries within their districts.

It may be of interest to recall that fishery properties have been liable to rates in one form or another for more than a century. The Fisheries (Ireland) Act, 1848, enabled the boards of conservators established by that statute to strike and collect rates on fisheries over and above the local authority rates payable on the fisheries under the then poor law relief provisions. This fishery rate was an amount equal to the difference between 10 per cent of the valuation of the fishery and the licence duties for engines used in fishing that fishery. These 1848 rating provisions have been suspended since 1925 but appear in the comprehensive Fisheries (Consolidation) Act, 1959, as section 63 which is being repealed by section 3 of the present Bill.

In 1925, as part of a drive to put fishery protection services on a more effective footing, the present system of fishery rating was introduced and fisheries were exempted from local authority rates. This system, which has since been continued from time to time, enables boards of conservators to strike on all fisheries within their districts rates of such amount per cent of the valuations as will, with their estimated income from other sources, be sufficient to meet the estimated amount of their expenditure for the fishery year to the end of September.

The local authorities, to whom fisheries had also been rateable up to 1925, receive compensation from the Exchequer for that loss in their rates. Where, by reason of the exemption of fisheries, a local rate on other property would have to be increased by more than 1d. in the £, the local authority receives an amount equivalent to that which would be produced by such an increase. The total amount of these compensatory payments from the Fisheries Vote in the last financial year was approximately £33,500.

The produce of the fishery rate is an important item in the revenue of boards of conservators. Out of the boards' total receipts of some £103,000 in the fishery year ended 30th September last, £36,000 came from fishery rates, close on £29,000 from licence duties and £23,000 in the form of grants from the Fisheries Vote. The State grants are first paid into the Salmon Conservancy Fund and indeed form the main income of that Fund an account of which is published annually with the Appropriation Accounts.

As I mentioned at the outset, this Bill merely continues the existing provisions for rates on fisheries. I do not claim that the system of fishery rating is perfect but in its present form it has proved of considerable value to boards of conservators and has come to be accepted as a permanent feature by all concerned. I can therefore confidently recommend this Bill to the House.

With the exception of a certain section of the community, whom it is not part of the function of this House to protect, the work of the boards of conservators has given general satisfaction and there has been general recognition of the good work being done by them. Accordingly, there can be no objection to this proposal of the Minister, in which he asks that the fishery rate, which is about one-third the income of such boards, should now, having been merely a temporary provision, pass into part of the permanent legislation.

The Minister, apparently, is satisfied with the working, and there has been no indication from any source that this is not desirable. Accordingly, we have no reason to disagree with the proposal in this Bill. Towards the end of his speech, the Minister said he did not necessarily think that this particular system was perfect, but he thought it something to go on with for the time being. It is, however, going into permanent legislation, and I should like to ask the Minister whether he intends to review the whole system of the financing of boards of conservators in the near future, or after what period of time would he consider such a review to be necessary.

It is correct to state that I intend to review the whole system as it at present exists. Some of the laws and regulations dealing with the boards of conservators are archaic. It is also necessary, I feel, to increase their scope, particularly in the protection of fisheries throughout the land and of course to provide a suitable system to give them the necessary sinews of war for that purpose. Detailed examination is being made of the whole system, and I hope to have legislation introduced at an early date when a full study has been made of the system. In the meantime, this Bill is necessary for them to carry on, and I am very glad that it is acceptable to the House. As I have said, in due course I shall come here, having reviewed the working of this whole system, and ask the Oireachtas for the necessary legal powers to implement the changes I have in mind.

Question put and agreed to.
Agreed to take remaining Stages today.
Bill put through Committee, reported without amendment, received for final consideration and passed.
Top
Share