Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 14 Dec 1983

Vol. 102 No. 8

Alcohol Abuse: Motion.

I move:

That Seanad Éireann, noting the concern that has been expressed in many quarters at the extent of alcohol abuse, particularly by young people, calls on the Government to take whatever action is necessary to help to counteract this abuse.

There is grave public concern about under-age drinking but I do not intend to delay the House by drawing attention to that concern. This matter has been discussed at local authority, county council and urban council meetings all over the country. I proposed a motion at the General Council of County Councils on this subject about three years ago and it was passed unanimously. The view was that it was a matter of grave concern and that it was a problem that would have to be tackled effectively and immediately. Figures of admissions to hospitals which deal with alcoholism have shown a steady increase over a number of years.

The most disturbing factor is the number of young people who are being admitted for treatment for alcoholism. This point has been stressed at public meetings in different areas of the country and addressed by psychiatrists and others who look after or treat alcoholics. In every case the point that got most attention from these experts was the growing number of young people who are the victims of alcoholism and in need of immediate attention. It is the generally accepted view that the licensed vintners all over the country treat this matter conscientiously. There are few, if any, cases of licensed vintners supplying intoxicating drink to under-age people. That is freely admitted at every forum, but the abuse arises in these late night extensions.

It has been a tradition in this country for a long time that hotel extensions be granted to clubs which run annual dinners. These extensions are availed of by GAA clubs, golf clubs, insurance institutes, angling associations, creamery societies and so on and in all cases a substantial meal is provided. That is a recognised part of the function and it could be looked on as the most important part of the function. The meal, the chat, the toasts proposed and the speeches and so on are regarded as part of a big social occasion in many areas. This practice has been going on for a very long time. I do not wish to be interpreted as objecting to that in any shape or form, but the abuse arises where extensions are given in hotels and a meal is served. In some cases no meal is served and in other cases what can only be described as a very light meal — a sausage or two and chips — passes as a substantial meal which, by any reasonable standards, does not measure up. Young people go there and alcoholic drink is served usually until 2 a.m. and very often there is no supervision. People at the very tender age of 16, and perhaps even younger, are served alcoholic drink.

In a hospital in my part of the country recently two young girls under 16 years old had to be treated for an excess amount of alcohol. As long as this practice prevails, society is in danger and these young people who start consuming large amounts of alcohol at that early age are certainly in grave danger of becoming alcoholics.

It was stated quite recently by Mr. Mulcahy, an expert in this area, that the regular consumption of the alcoholic content in four pints of beer can be the cause of a high percentage of people becoming addicted to alcoholism. He went on to point out that the recent increase in alcoholism as compared with past generations has ensued because people go out to drink more often now than earlier generations did. Years ago a man indulged in alcohol only on fair days.

The regular intake of even a moderate amount of alcohol can lead to alcoholism. When we take into account that people at a very tender age are served alcohol at these functions, and they often attend as many as three in one week, we see the danger that the country is heading for. These extensions are often granted for the flimsiest of reasons. One very notable occasion in my own county a couple of years ago which drew a lot of unfavourable comments was labelled a hairy chest competition. That sort of flimsy reason for a hotel bar extension until 2 a.m. does not stand up. In my opinion it is necessary that the law, as I understand it is enforced, that is, that a substantial meal must be part of the function. It is well known that a substantial meal is not served on many occasions, and I have already said there are cases where no meal is served. It is also true that people who do not get a meal, and did not go with the intention of getting a meal, are charged an admission of £1 or £2. Constantly people stay in public houses until closing time and then drive off to one of these events which have bar extensions. These people stay drinking until 2 a.m. Sunday morning, and sometimes even later because they know the bars will not be open until much later.

Anybody who goes to the trouble of checking not only hospital admissions for treatment for alcoholism but the number of road accidents, will see that many road accidents occur between 2 a.m. and 4 a.m. and must realise the harm these functions are doing. Furthermore, anyone who checks on absenteeism from work on Mondays, and even absenteeism from school, which is another serious matter, will come to the conclusion that it is absolutely necessary that the law be rigidly enforced first with regard to supplying a substantial meal and, secondly, ensuring that under-age people are not served with alcoholic drinks.

I second the motion. I welcome the Minister of State, Deputy G. Birmingham. As a result of our discussion of this very important motion all parties will realise that they have an obligation to face up to their responsibilities in this issue, and I hope they will do so.

I welcome the opportunity to speak on this motion. Even though I am a publican involved at retail level in the sale of alcohol, I see no conflict whatsoever between that position and my support of the motion tonight, and my unrelenting opposition to the sale of alcohol to under-age people at retail level. Despite the publicity, and indeed valid publicity, that we have had in recent times concerning drug abuse by young people, I am still convinced that under-age drinking is perhaps as great, if not a greater, social problem and menace in society. It is the easy availability and the acceptance of that availability by society that, in my opinion, is the primary cause of the problem we are discussing.

There are many sectors of society and many people who have a responsibility in this matter. As legislators we have a major responsibility in this area. As I said at the beginning, I may have some controversial things to say, but in relation to our role as legislators our performance so far in even addressing the problem has been miserable.

I hope that as a result of this motion we will see positive action. We know what is happening in this scene — and Senator O'Brien very clearly outlined certain aspects of it — but we have been content to ignore it. I recognise that many well-meaning people and organisations have tried to do something positive in this area but their attempts have not got much support from the quarters that support should be coming from. I will give one example. A report published in 1977 by the Youth Council of Ireland, called "Teenage Drinking — A Cause for Concern", dealt in depth with the problem and the causes of teenage drinking, but it also made certain recommendations. For example, it stressed the need for more education about alcohol; it dealt with the inadequacy of existing legislation; it dealt with the lack of responsibility on the part of adults; and it dealt with the lack of supervision in certain retail outlets, particularly the sale of drink through off-licences, supermarkets, late night discos and some drinking clubs. They made many worthwhile recommendations on what is an important issue. At that time that report received much public vocal support but it is fair to say that after six years little or nothing has been achieved.

I mentioned that I have an involvement at retail level in the liquor business. I was also involved at that period with an organisation that represents a large part of retail liquor outlets — the Vintners' Federation of Ireland. Our national executive committee considered that report. They felt it deserved their full support as responsible people and, in particular, the recommendations made in that report. Amongst these recommendations were the following. There was the call for the setting up of a working party to recommend certain changes, and it was emphasised that amongst the changes that were necessary was the enactment of legislation concerning the purchase and drinking of alcohol by those under 18 years of age, with particular reference to those adults who purchase alcohol in pubs on behalf of teenagers.

I want to emphasise that there is no provision in our existing law to deal with a person who buys drink for an under-age person in a pub or elsewhere. In most cases the person who purchases the drink is the main culprit but he gets off without penalty, whereas the owner of the retail outlet can be charged and have his licence endorsed and the underage person can be fined.

I believe it is important in dealing effectively with this issue that the purchaser of the drink for the under-age person should be dealt with. It is imperative that the change be made in the legislation to include him for what he is — somebody who is engaging in and promoting what is a most objectionable practice. That report also called for more stringent enforcement of existing legislation covering under-age drinking and more severe penalties on those convicted of supplying it. It called for a publicity campaign to highlight the dangers of under-age drinking which would be aimed at children and parents and it called for the enactment of legislation covering those areas where drink is available without proper control, such as, clubs, discos, off-licences and supermarkets.

Senator O'Brien gave an example of what is happening in the disco scene, and I will come back to that, but I also want to deal with what is happening at another level — the off-licence, the supermarket and the wine shop. The reality is that a young person can buy virtually what he wants without control or supervision. The liquor is on open display on shelves or shop floor. He can go in and pick up what he wants and go out and drink it. The only control is at the check-out counter, but more often than not, that is manned by another under-age person, and so long as the drink is paid for there is no further concern.

There are two main factors responsible for this situation. First, there is easy access to drink on the part of young people and easy access to money to buy it. The advertising ethics of some drink advertisements on television leave a lot to be desired. Admittedly, they are not as bad as they were some time ago when a very simple message was that if a young person, boy or girl, was not drinking, manhood or womanhood had not been attained.

I will deal very briefly with the attitude of publicans to this situation. Those whose knowledge of the licensing trade is superficial have a tendency to lay the blame on the publicans, but they are wrong. As one of them I am familiar with the attitude of the vast majority of them towards this subject. Their attitude is responsible, and we would regard any member of our trade who went in for this kind of business as being a disgrace to the trade. The reality is that most of us are parents, and I would expect that we would show the same sense of responsibility towards another person's child as we would towards our own. Our organisation has made its position perfectly clear on this subject, and it has put it like this: for any publican who is in doubt about the age of a young person on his premises the principle is simple, do not serve.

I want to deal with a point raised by Senator O'Brien earlier. For any of us at that level who are attempting to do something positive in relation to this trade, there are often occasions when we feel we are wasting our time when we see what is happening elsewhere. I want to turn quite deliberately, as Senator O'Brien did, to the teenage disco scene. As he pointed out, exemptions are applied for and granted as a matter of course by the courts. He gave a perfect example of the so-called substantial meal. Even if it is available, it is simply only a sham.

Supervision is minimal on the premises. Teenagers gain admission to these premises and these licensed discos without question. They find themselves in an environment — this is very important and I say it from experience — from which the restraining influence of older people is totally absent. That is not absent on the premises I and many of my colleagues are involved in. The older element are there and they exercise a restraining influence. On the licensed disco scene the clientele are aged from 15 to 20 years. Drink is freely available. From my knowledge and from information available to me, inspection by the Garda of these premises rarely if ever takes place. The result is that seldom if ever are there prosecutions in relation to the sale of drink to young people on these occasions. It is a weekly, a twice weekly and on many occasions a thrice weekly event in many towns and cities. Teenagers are exploited. They are damaged, and the silence and inaction of all of us with responsibility for this scene are damning.

There are 15,000 liquor licences issued each year for a population of about 2,000,000 people over 21 years of age. On top of that, 42,000 late night exemptions are granted by the courts each year. That was the figure in 1981, and it represented a seven-fold increase on the 6,000 exemptions granted ten years earlier in 1971. The fault lies to a great extent in laxity at many levels: those who control the sale of drink at retail level, parents, teachers, Garda and Government and, unless all involved work together, the control of this problem is far from us. Teenage drinking is not unique to Ireland. In fact, consumption of alcohol in volume terms is increasing in all countries for which figures are available.

Ireland, however, is an exception in this case because, in the three years since 1980, in volume terms the consumption of drink has decreased by about 23 per cent here. The fact that we spend more per head of the population is due to the level of taxation. Spirits here carry the highest level of taxation in the world and beer the highest level in Europe.

I referred to the report of the National Youth Council and commitment to be seen. Another organisation have also attempted to do something positive in this field, that is, an organisation called Caritas, an organisation of voluntary groupings and people. They are concerned about the problem. They are trying to deal with it. They have put their faith in a system of identity cards for young people. They received only limited co-operation. While they made some progress in 14 counties, without support from the Government and others their efforts will not succeed. I want to thank them for their concern and for the effort they have made.

There is need for a responsible, mature and moderate attitude towards drinking. The sooner that attitude is adopted voluntarily by young people, the better and the healthier for all. Hand in hand with that must go a firm enforcement of the existing laws and the enactment of laws when existing laws are inadequate. I refer again in particular to the person who buys a drink for an under-age person. He is not subject to any penalty by the law.

I should like to be associated with a call on all who have responsibility at retail level to show their positive support in dealing with a growing social problem which can bring misery, hardship and suffering to many young people and to their parents. No single group and no single factor can provide the solution. The solution can come only when all interests involved, and all with responsibility in this scene, work together collectively to find it. I hope we can start that process and that what we decide today will be for the benefit of our young people and the Ireland of tomorrow.

This is a motion everyone should support. It is very difficult to suggest a practical approach to this problem. Previous speakers have shown — and this is in no way criticising what they have said — how little can be done particularly by the Government in the sense of passing legislation which will make any major change in relation to this problem. It has been indicated that the major problem is that the laws which already exist have not been implemented. The principal fault in that respect is the fact that under-age people are still supplied with drink.

It is true that the majority of publicans are conscientious about this problem and do not serve drink to young people. We must admit that it is very difficult sometimes for them to know the age of people who ask for drink. On the other hand, there are publicans, I am afraid, who are quite careless and negligent in this regard and who do serve drink to people who are fairly obviously under age. If this aspect of the problem were tackled with far more intensity than it is at the moment, there would be a considerable improvement. I agree with the proposer of the motion about the way in which extensions are granted on flimsy excuses and, when they are granted, the conditions under which they are granted are not complied with.

It is not easy to see how the Government could make a major improvement or a major change in this respect. The approach must be very largely an educational approach. When I talk about education I do not mean merely for young people, although of course it is particularly relevant for them. It must be educational in the sense of impressing on people of all ages the danger of abuse of alcohol. We have had Government warnings, and so on, about the danger of smoking. There should be something similar in relation to the danger of alcohol abuse to try to get people to put drinking into perspective and to differentiate between drinking which is reasonable and enjoyable, and which certainly cannot be condemned in any way, and drink abuse.

It is unfortunate that there was a restriction on the serving of alcohol in restaurants. This gave people the idea that drinking is something you do in public houses only, that you have to devote your whole mind to drinking, that you go into a public house to drink, and do nothing else, that when you are having a meal in a restaurant you do not drink. Many restaurants do not and cannot get licences. This gave a wrong impression to people that when you wanted a drink you went to a place for drinking, and you devoted your entire attention to it.

I hope that gradually the restrictions will be withdrawn and that it will be possible to have a drink with your meal. Drinking with a meal is the most moderate way, generally speaking, in which people drink. It gives a better balance as to how one should approach drink. When this was being discussed in the past, publicans used to object to it very much on the basis that restaurants should stick to supplying meals and they would stick to supplying drink. Most good public houses now serve food, and that is a very good thing. In view of the fact that most of them do serve food, they cannot really object to restaurants being allowed to serve alcohol.

Basically, the approach to this problem must be something which starts from the very beginning. Young children must have the proper attitude to it. It must begin in the home. A good deal more could be done in the schools in regard to their outlook, in regard to various educational helps in this respect and, after that, it should be continued in the community generally. There should be a new philosophy, a conscious effort by people in the community to adopt a new view on drinking. There must be a departure from the view that hard drinking is in some way a sign of manhood and virility. There must be a departure from the view that standing innumerable rounds is an indication of generosity and from the view that the only way that one can really enjoy oneself is by drinking to excess.

In other words, there must be an effort by the community generally to bring a new perspective to the way in which alcohol is consumed. This is not going to be easy. It is going to be a long and a very hard haul. It is something that must be done, and in many ways it is more important than anything that can be done by legislation.

I should like to say, at the outset, that the Government are fully alive to the problem posed by alcohol abuse.

There have been many indications of an increased level of consumption of intoxicating liquor — for example, in the figures published by the Revenue Commissioners on the quantities of spirits, beer and wine released for home consumption. These quantities doubled between 1969 and 1979. While it appears that the total sales of spirits and beer declined during the last year or two, overall spending on alcohol in this country is still at one of the highest levels, proportionately, in Europe.

From the mid-sixties, admissions to psychiatric hospitals for alcoholism and related illnesses showed a continuing increase, so that alcoholism is now the most common cause of admissions. While there was a small drop in the number of men admitted to psychiatric hospitals for such conditions in 1982, there was an increase in the number of women so admitted.

One of the other indices of alcohol abuse is the number of alcohol-related road accidents. These continue to constitute a disturbingly high proportion of the total number of such accidents.

When we turn from the overall picture to particular areas of alcohol abuse, the aspects which are most frequently mentioned are drinking by the under-aged, late night drinking and excessive consumption arising from easy availability in outlets such as off-licence shops and supermarkets.

It is very difficult to get precise statistics which would indicate the extent to which alcohol is being abused at particular times or by particular categories of the population. That there is excessive drinking by young people is, however, not merely a matter of common observation but is a view borne out by reports from concerned, responsible organisations such as the Irish National Council on Alcoholism, the Economic and Social Research Institute and the Medico-Social Research Board. This abuse occurs through the consumption of drink by young people in licensed premises during the ordinary permitted hours and at late night functions in licensed hotels and restaurants under the special exemption order provision, as well as drinking by young people at so-called "cider parties" of liquor obtained for them from licensed outlets by older teenagers or young adults.

As to the manner in which these abuses must be tackled, I think I should emphasise that we cannot hope to counteract them merely by restrictive measures such as might be enacted in amendments of the licensing code. What is in question, essentially, is the development of a proper attitude towards the use of alcohol. I would refer, in this connection, to initiatives such as the alcohol education programme prepared for second-level schools by the Health Education Bureau. The desirability of developing a more responsible attitude to drink, especially among young people, cannot be emphasised enough by concerned organisations and community groups.

That being said, it is accepted that the liquor licensing code has a very important part to play in counteracting alcohol abuse. This code has been under continuous review in my Department with a view to establishing the areas where amendment of the law would be appropriate. It is important to bear in mind, however, that any measures taken must be aimed at specific abuses and must not be such as would militate against the requirements of the average reasonable citizen.

The statutory provisions relating to the presence of young people in licensed premises must logically be among the first to be considered when examining the question of under-age drinking. These provisions are in the Children Act, 1908, as amended, and make it an offence for a licensee to allow a child to be in the bar of his licensed premises — a child for this purpose being a person under the age of 15 years. The aspects which arise for consideration include the question as to whether 15 years is an appropriate age-limit, the degree of responsibility to be placed on parents and whether the overall prohibition should, perhaps, be varied in relation to the time of the day or the location of the licensed premises.

Next comes the very important question of the provisions governing the purchase and consumption of intoxicating liquor by young persons. These provisions are contained in the Intoxicating Liquor Act of 1924 and make it an offence for a licensee "knowingly" to sell intoxicating liquor for consumption by a person under 18, though liquor may be sold to a person aged 15 to 18 if it is in a corked and sealed vessel of not less than one pint. There are considerable difficulties in securing convictions under this provision but there are many aspects to be borne in mind in contemplating an amendment of it. For one thing, in view of the earlier maturity of young people nowadays, it can be very difficult in many cases for the licensee to be able to say with any confidence that a particular young person is not aged 18 years or over. This raises the question of the introduction of a system of identity cards, and I understand that this has been done on a voluntary basis, with some success, in a number of areas. While the present provision creates an offence for the licensee, it is for consideration whether a statutory responsibility should also be placed on the under-aged person himself or herself where he or she purchases and consumes intoxicating liquor in a licensed premises, or on any person who procures the liquor for him or her, as well, perhaps, as on the parent or guardian of the young person.

It is frequently represented that it is not appropriate to have intoxicating liquor as freely available on the shelves of supermarkets as, say, cornflakes or soap powder. It has been suggested that restrictions should be placed on such outlets or, at least, that the sale of liquor in them should be separate from the sale of other commodities. In this area it is particularly difficult to establish the line between what is legitimate in meeting a reasonable public demand and what must be restricted in order to prevent abuse.

Next there is the question of the hours during which intoxicating liquor may be sold. In this connection, there has not been a great deal of pressure for changes in the ordinary permitted hours. There has, however, been a large volume of complaints about the abuse of the special exemption order provisions which is available to licensed hotels and restaurants. The numbers of such orders granted by the courts has increased considerably. Provision for the supply of a substantial meal is a prerequisite for the grant of most kinds of special exdemption orders, and there have been many complaints about what passes for a substantial meal on these occasions. When special exemption orders were last reviewed by the Oireachtas in 1960 and 1962, I think it could not have been envisaged that they would be granted on the present scale. Those provisions now merit very close scrutiny, so that any necessary steps may be taken to ensure that they are not abused.

Any new provisions in the licensing code must be such as can be enforced by the gardaí without undue difficulty. In this connection, I should say that it would probably be timely now to review the penalties for offences under the code, some of which have remained unchanged since they were originally provided in nineteenth century legislation.

As I said at the outset, I am convinced that legislative restrictions under the licensing code will not, of themselves, be sufficient to counteract drink abuse. The development of a public consciousness of the nature of this danger, and the inculcation of correct attitudes to drink, particularly among young people, is at least equally important. I would like to assure the House, however, that the Government are fully alive to the dangers inherent in a widespread abuse of intoxicating liquor and that they will take whatever steps are appropriate, including the amendment of the licensing code, to deal with this situation.

Mr. Browne:

A bhunáin bhuí,

'Sé mo léan do luí,

Is dó chnámha sínte,

Tar éis do ghrinn.

Sin dán a bhí ann fadó, fadó, agus is oth liom a rá go bhfuil a lán daoine tar éis bás a fháil toisc go raibh an iomarca le n-ól acu. Is oth liom a rá freisin go bhfuil an iomarca de na hógánaigh ar fud na tíre ag ól an iomarca faoi láthair.

How you stop this, I am not too sure. I know from experience that those of us who are involved in sport have a very responsible position. Many of us have seen how cups are being filled in different organisations and how teenagers and under-age drinkers are very willing to partake. It is something which frightens me. I had occasion some years ago when we won the minor championship to decide, with the help of my committee, that we would not use the cup anywhere afterwards and we kept it in the boot of the car. The following year in my absence the minors themselves managed to take off with it to the nearest pub, where they had a hooley.

We have condoned drinking on sporting occasions; it is the only way we seem to be able to celebrate a win in sport in Ireland; everybody gets plastered. It is a pity. I am not criticising any particular organisation, because I have spent my lifetime with one of them. People nearly forget what day of the week it is, even a week afterwards, because they have been celebrating so well. It affects sportsmen. The good sportsmen are not drinkers, and many a good sportsman has lost his skill, his interest and his contribution to his parish and to his team simply because he could not stop drinking. It may be thirsty work, but I think we could give an example and, in general, sporting organisations should give an example that it is not part and parcel of their code to drink to excess.

There are publicans who are excellent and who set standards that are an example to everybody and there are some publicans who unfortunately do not. On occasions when publicans refuse drink to teenagers because they are under-age, they get the comment "okay, we can go somewhere else." It is a pity that there is somewhere else they can go. While understanding it is often very difficult to decide what age a teenager is nowadays, at the same time I think what has been said by Senator Howard is true: if there is a doubt they should not get it. If one publican is doubtful I do not see why other publicans should not also be doubtful.

There is another aspect that leads to difficulty too. It is the question of sporting clubs having bars. Again I speak from experience because I am involved in a club. It is very difficult in a local scene where everybody is very friendly and some person is looking for drink. It takes a lot of courage for a member of the local community to say to somebody, "Well, you are under-age, you are definitely not getting drink here." It takes more courage to go over to an adult and say "You are buying drink for somebody who is under-age." Clubs have a responsibility to ensure that their facilities are not abused and that they are not setting young teenagers on the wrong course.

Clubs may serve a purpose. They may be a facility for older members and so on, but they can be abused. It is very easy to see that where you have a lot of young people generally involved in these sporting clubs. They come in after games and join the adults and it can lead to abuse.

Dance halls long ago were generally not filled up until reasonably late for some strange reason, but nowadays they are not being filled up because people have to wait until the pubs close first. It is a pathetic situation in a country like ours that young people cannot go into dance halls until the pubs have closed. If they have to rely on drink at that age to give them courage to go in to ask a nice girl to dance or the other way round, I think it is too bad for the future of our country.

It is very difficult to legislate to prevent the abuse of alcohol. It has to come from the example given by adults and by parents, by those in charge of public houses and clubs. It is something that has to be done by a lot of people together, and I do not expect that any Government of any political creed could possibly legislate effectively to stop the abuse of alcohol, because it seems to be endemic in this race that alcohol is part and parcel of our lifestyle.

I would hope that the Government would stop any loopholes that exist and make it more difficult to abuse the laws and the rules as they stand, but I still think that it is the example the teenagers are getting that will eventually lead them on the right track. Go raibh maith agat.

This is a motion which I certainly welcome. It is one which is well worthwhile and I commend the Minister on a very crisp, clear, purposeful statement in relation to it. She has identified the problem and she has pointed out quite clearly that it needs a two-fold remedial programme relating firstly to legislation, but not legislation alone, and secondly, to alcohol education.

One thing that fascinates me in relation to a lot of legislation and, in particular, legislation in relation to drink, licensing laws and drink abuse is this. At times one gets the impression that legislators and legal draftsmen seem to be deliberately vague in the terminology they choose in order to frame particular pieces of legislation. I point, for example, to the section mentioned by the Minister and the insertion of the word "knowingly" which has created endless problems with regard to the securing of convictions. I believe that the word "knowingly" should be deleted, placing the onus very firmly on the shoulders of the publican to find out clearly the identity of the person who is purchasing the goods or alcohol and that it should be incumbent upon him to establish in some way, whether it be by the ID card scheme or otherwise, the precise age of that person. It is not too much to expect.

Another word which strikes me as being deliberately vague is the word "substantial" used in describing a meal. We should have a precise definition of what exactly constitutes a substantial meal. Is it one course, two courses, three courses or four courses? It should be couched in precise detail. I often get the impression that deliberately vague terminology is grist to the mill of the legal profession because they can spend hours on end in court arguing the legal niceties. I therefore would urge the Minister in relation to whatever legislation she proposes that it should be clear, precise and definitive.

I would urge the Minister that legislation in relation to the purchase of drink at off-licences should be looked at. I would exhort her to have a serious look at the possibility of raising the age limit here from 15 to 18 years. I agree with her that statutory provisions are not enough in themselves, but I think that the statutory provisions that exist are reasonably tight if they were enforced. There is a problem in a small rural community for gardaí to carry them out to the letter of the law. I would urge, therefore, that the flying squad should be used to carry out raids on public houses which are known to be abusing the licensing laws.

I refer to the issuing of licences to publicans. In my opinion they are given out too freely even though a district justice is the final arbiter in relation to this However, there are too many maverick publicans, too many Johnny-come-lately publicans without any training, background or tradition in the trade, who make lots of money and open up licensed premises. I would venture to suggest that if a statistical analysis were carried out one would find that these people are the main abusers of the licensing regulations. It is a suggestion I make cautiously, but I have the impression from looking at cases I know of transgression of the regulations that these are the people who invariably seem to be the main transgressors.

I agree with the Minister that it is a two-fold problem. It is a problem to which we must address ourselves as a matter of urgency. If it is not tackled now it will totally undermine our society.

I have listened to Senator Higgins speak about the need for alcohol education, and it is a very crucial point in this whole debate. The Minister has told us about what may or may not be done by the State and by the Government in order to curb the abuse of alcohol. At the end of the day, no matter what legislation is brought in it is not possible to prevent young people having access to alcohol.

I speak as someone who was reared in a pub, and in Ireland there is always a way around the legislation. What is important is to educate people about the dangers of alcohol. We have seen in the past year or two some very good programmes on television about both alcohol and drug abuse. Many young people nowadays do not smoke. When I was a young student it was the thing to smoke: if you did not smoke you were not with it. Nowadays it is the thing not to smoke, and that is a result of a drive against smoking and making people aware of the dangers of smoking. That same drive against alcohol would be very useful, and resources could be made available for it.

Another area I would like to speak on is the area of education for leisure. One of the problems nowadays in relation to alcohol abuse among young people is that they have nothing else to do. I have teenage sons and daughters myself and I cannot think of anywhere they go to enjoy themselves where alcohol is not being pushed at them. It is very difficult in those circumstances for young people to withstand those pressures. Apart from the fact that we have advertisements on television glorifying the use of alcohol and making it all seem so lovely, everywhere they go they have alcohol readily available, whether it be to the dance or to their local football club. There could be more leisure facilities made available for young people to play games and use swimming pools. We may not have a lot in Northern Ireland but we do have a lot of leisure complexes which help to keep young people away from drug abuse and alcohol abuse and other things as well, for example, petty crime and so on. The resources of the State could be well spent in building leisure complexes and other places for young people to go where they would not have to be dependent on drink to enjoy themselves.

Our education system as a whole has not educated youngsters for leisure. We tend to look on sport and the arts and drama and so on as a luxurious extra. It would be very helpful if more emphasis were placed on sport in the curriculum; in other words, on educating people for leisure as well as for life and careers. Perhaps in our young days, certainly in mine, leisure and sport and drama were little extras on the side which you did if you had nothing better to do. The important thing was to learn your French and Latin and make sure that you got your examinations in order to get a job when you left school. Of course, there are many people leaving school now who certainly face the very real probability of being unemployed for quite a length of time. What are they going to do with their time, if they have not been educated for leisure?

I would propose that in order to help stop alcohol abuse it would be very helpful if we could have more money spent on educating young people to pursue healthy leisure pursuits and on providing leisure complexes for them to pursue those hobbies.

I do not intend to say too much because I am sure all the points have been covered so far. I am sure people can understand me as a Pioneer speaking against the abuse of alcohol. I feel very strongly about the availability of drink to teenagers. It is one of the greatest problems we have, and how we are going to curb this I am not quite sure. In any supermarket or off-licence premises, the smallest child will be able to purchase alcohol.

Recently I passed through a county on the far side of the Border and I saw drink freely available along the roadside to anybody who could carry it away. They were not concerned with the age of the person. That was the least of their worries as long as they could sell it.

I remember the days, not too long ago, when the country halls were the places to go. The real truth is that most of these halls closed because they had not drink available. Some of the finest halls are closed down because they could not get licences and the people tended to go where they could get drink. This is very sad.

Quite recently it came to my notice in a certain place that there was a disco on and the cover charge was £5. One paid £5 at the door and one got a docket for £2 to be spent at the bar. That was one of the saddest things I could think about. Some type of ticket was refunded to the value of £2 but one had to spend it at the bar. I would like to see this sort of thing curbed.

I listened to Senator Browne when he talked about the good old days when we all went out to play football, and I remember this full well, when we would be looking forward to the night when we could discuss it in the many céilí houses. In latter days when I used to play football they would hardly take time to take their togs off them and they could discuss the game nowhere else but in the pub. It is very sad for all of us and we must take a long hard look at this.

Quite recently I saw a local football team winning the championship and I was very pleased to see them winning it. The only sad part about it was that they spent a full week drinking. In a time when jobs are so scarce none of them seemed to be too concerned about whether their jobs would be there at the end of the week. It did not seem to worry them.

I am rearing a family myself and I am particularly worried as far as the youth of my family are concerned. The trend now amongst young people is that if you are not drinking or not smoking you are a "drip". You are not living if you are not doing these things. My own children come home and tell me that some of the children aged 14 and 15 are smoking at school and that they are encouraged by their colleagues to do these things. The worst feature is the question of alcohol abuse.

How many working days are lost in this country because of drink? Thousands of days are lost and people lose their jobs. It has a disastrous effect on some young people's marriages. Some may have a nice house and car and everything that they should want, but if they have not money for drink they are not contented which is very sad.

Some Senators have mentioned the need for education in this regard. We all have a responsibility in trying to get people to understand that they can live a natural, normal life without drinking to excess. That is the message that we should be getting across. All of us realise the favour that we should be doing, and I am sure that the people involved would appreciate later the favour we were doing them in trying to educate them about the dangers of alcoholism.

Debate adjourned.
Top
Share