Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 14 Feb 1990

Vol. 123 No. 17

Marine Institute Bill, 1989: Second Stage (Resumed).

Question again proposed: "That the Bill be now read a Second Time."

For this reason the quality of the fish that goes into the can must be of top quality. All during the summer around our coasts there are hundreds of thousands of tonnes of sprat, the same thing as kippers, sardines and so on, and there is a big market for them. I know one buyer who can get an order as high as 50,000 tonnes in one country for sprat.

The problem is that when the sprat comes around our coast in the summer and the weather is fine to catch them there is a problem because they are feeding and their stomachs are full. In other countries they have developed a method whereby they go out to fish spart with a ring net. They ring their nets around the shoal of sprat and leave them there for a few days. The fish can swim freely within the net but they cannot feed. After one or two days their stomachs are empty and they can be caught live from the net, brought inshore and sold as top quality fish ready for canning. If the fish had been caught with the food in their stomachs and were sent off to the canning factory, canned and then cooked, I am afraid they would not be nice tasty fish to eat.

We know nothing about the processing of fish and the methods other countries use. Since about 1950 the State has put large sums of money into the fishing industry. They provided grants for boats for fishermen, they provided finance for boats by way of loans, but then the fishermen were left to make their own way. The fishermen who were initially grant-aided and funded by the State for boats at that time, probably 40 to 50 foot boats, had only graduated from the currach, the naomhóg or the half-decker. They knew the sea and they knew how to fish, but they knew very little else.

In the early days they took on investments, possibly £18,000 to £50,000 and immediately they had to become not alone a fisherman but they had to become navigators and they had to understand charts without any education whatsoever. They had to be engineers to look after the boat engine, they had to be able to operate radios, they had to learn to use radar and all the other electronics that are installed in boats. They had to learn all these skills to become good fishermen. But then there was another problem. When they landed their fish they then had to become marketing managers to try to find a proper market for their fish and, as well as that, they had to become accountants, and in a lot of cases it was the wife at home who was the accountant and manager. It is fair to say that the bulk of fishermen — I am not in any way downgrading them; I am one of them — never had anything better than second level education simply because those were the times that were in it. I know they have changed now and things are different. They left school at an early age, they went fishing with their fathers, uncles or neighbours and they graduated from that to the bigger boats.

These people are a very hardy, rate breed. It is all right when you are on dry land. Those of you who have never gone out for a week's fishing or for even a day's fishing, except when the weather was fine and you went out to do a bit of angling, do not realise what fishermen have to contend with. When fishermen fish off the Blasket Island or the west coast of Ireland in the middle of winter, with anything up to gale force winds blowing, you would be quite comfortable inside your homes and perhaps have not a thought for the fishermen who are out there trying to make a living. The criticism that has been levelled on fishermen over the years for getting so-called handouts from the State is unfair and untrue. The powers that be on shore are doing their best, but unfortunately finance is missing and, what we are talking about here today, proper research.

When we compare agriculture and fishing, we find in nearly every small village or town in Ireland there is an agricultural adviser. Within 30 or 40 miles of where you live you can go to ACOT or, in the past, to the country committee of agriculture and you can get all the advice you want, but a fisherman is out there on the west coast of Ireland and he has nowhere close to him to turn to for advice. He can get in contact with Bord Iascaigh Mhara or the Department of the Marine, but they are miles away and no structure is set up whereby a fisherman can be advised on what to do. On his own boat he has to be the engineer, he has to see that the engine of his boat is all right and he has to be able to look after a whole lot of expensive complicated equipment. This has changed slightly in recent times.

As the years progressed the National Fisheries School was opened in Green-castle. There is no doubt that the young fishermen who went there got a great education and knowledge of fishing. They came out from that school with certificates of competency on all aspects of fishing, nautical education, vessel maintenance, net mending and so on, but they were not taught management skills. When they left the National Fisheries School they were then quite competent to get their own boats, but they had no financial backup to buy those boats. I am talking about young men aged 21 to 25. They are not rich people; they have not got hundreds of thousands of pounds in the bank.

This is one place where we have failed and where other countries in Europe have come up trumps. In Scotland, for instance, fish buyers and the fish catchers co-ordinate in one catching unit. The fish buyers put up the money in a special arrangement for the boats and the fishermen fish the boats. This is a great arrangement because, from the fisher-man's side of it, if the price is too low he can hit his partner and say "You are not doing enough" and "you are not getting the proper market". From the fish buyers side of it, he can hit the fishermen and say, "You are tied to the pier all day. Why do you not get out there? You are not bringing in enough fish". This is one of the best partnerships that I can see in the fishing industry. Why should fish buyers not invest in fishing boats and why do we not attract them? If that were to happen here the unfortunate thing about it is that, to my knowledge, we would not recognise them for grant aid. I might be wrong, but I do not think I am.

In Spain companies are formed by the fishermen. I have gone to Spain and checked it out. They then go to the bank to borrow money. One of the stipulations of the bank giving them money is that a high ranking person in the bank will then be nominated as a paid director in that company to ensure that the boats are out fishing, that the accounts are right and that everything is in order.

In spite of all my criticism there have been many successful fishermen most notably a Mayo man — I am sure the House will have heard of him — Kevin McHugh — who is the proud owner of the Veronica and more recently the Genesus. The Veronica, a factory fishing boat, employs up to 50 people. To my knowledge she is the biggest privately-owned factory fishing boat in Europe. I remember Kevin McHugh when he started out at about 21 years of age——

An Leas-Chathaoirleach

The Senator should not refer to a private individual.

He is without doubt an example to all of us. He is not alone, as there are several others. When the Marine Institute is formed it must take a long hard look at the financing of the fishing industry and must look to onshore investors to invest money in fishing. That investment is there at the moment in mariculture, in salmon and in mussel farming. I must strike a small word of warning here. We should not go too far too fast in mariculture without doing a lot more research. Weather such as that experienced in the past few weeks could wipe out mariculture overnight. In my own area — is docha go bhfuil aithne ag an Seanadóir Pól Ó Foighil agus an Seanadóir Murphy ar an áit — in Ventry mussel farming started about two years ago but storms over the past few weeks have left them with practically nothing. They are almost wiped out. This is the reason we should tread carefully with mariculture. If I were to advise on fisheries at this point I would bring in and enforce — I really mean enforce and I am hitting myself and my friends in this — stricter quality control measures because it is a fact that even though we have the best fish around our coasts we are at the bottom of the list in European markets both in quality and price.

The other investment I would make is in fish processing and added value to our fish export trade, thereby creating jobs and getting our employment figures down. To do this and to be competitive in foreign markets we must have two essential ingredients. The first I have stated already, that is quality, proper care and proper handling of fish. The second is continuity of supply. If we have not continuity it is no good setting up a processing factory somewhere, where you have a supply of fish coming in for three months of the summer and for the rest of the year you have nothing. We must have continuity of supply. I maintain that at this point perhaps in Killybegs or Castle-townbere you might get continuity but around the rest of the coast I do not think that is the case. The reason is our boats are too small. They are still inshore boats which are not capable of fishing in inclement weather and most of them are only day trippers. They leave in the morning at four or five o'clock and they are back in the evening at 10 o'clock.

We need another 100 boats up to 100 feet in length. I do not know how this can be brought about but other countries have decommissioned the small boats and the obsolete boats. Perhaps it can be brought about in this way, but it is for the Department of the Marine and the Institute when set up to look into this because we are going down a blind alley if we start building processing plants and we have not the supply to keep these processing plants going. We need a good fleet of an extra 100 boats in the 100 foot range capable of fishing for at least 40 to 45 weeks of the year — the average trawler of 45, 50 or 60 feet is limited to fishing for only about 32 to 35 weeks of the year. These boats I am referring to must be capable of staying out for six to ten days at a time until they have their boats filled. Only when we build up the fleet in that way can the processing of fish be a success.

As the Minister said, there is a vast ocean out there and we should now make a fresh start to tap that wealth. The wealth we can get from the sea is absolutely limitless. With modern technology we can and will in the future be able to harness the sea to give us energy through wave power. The United States has a very big problem with inhabited islands that come under their jurisdiction and there is no available fresh water on these islands. The US has to deliver tanker boats with fresh water to these islands on a regular basis. Only recently have they installed desalination pumps on these islands where they can now extract salt from the water. It comes out in a proportion of 40 per cent pure fresh water full of all the vitamins — it is far fresher and far cleaner than anything we can get on land — and 60 per cent salt. If we run out of fresh water and we pollute our inland waterways we can turn to the sea.

We must be forever watchful of the way we treat the seas. In our modern world pollution of the seas is a great threat. I said before in this House, and I will say again today, we are very lucky that oil floats on the surface of the sea because if it sank to the ocean bed all sea-life would be dead now. We must also embark on educating our school-going population. Perhaps our treatment of the seas should be brought in as part of the school curriculum. We are an island nation and there is nothing taught in our national, secondary or third level schools about the sea around us. Students know where it is but they are not told about the wealth that can be got from the sea, they are not told about fishing, how the fishing industry works, how it should work. They hardly know where the sea is, other than to look out at it. We need to educate our young people on matters relating to the seas. We are an island nation and we will have to educate the young population accordingly.

I must give a special word of praise to the Central Fisheries Board who have produced some beautiful films and videos on fish life. They show the harm pollution is doing and how it can be prevented. They show the life cycle of the Atlantic salmon from the time it leaves our rivers until it returns again. It is an amazing story the way the salmon leaves our rivers, travels thousands of miles through oceans, returns a couple of years later to the very same stream and starts the whole process all over again. I got videos from the Central Fisheries Board and gave them to the two secondary schools in Dingle and within a week I had a request whether I could find more of these films. They generated great interest and I recommend them to Senators. Full marks to everybody involved in the making of these videos and to the Central Fisheries Board.

I would like to emphasise again the need for strict quality control. The trouble is that, unlike meat, from the time fish is caught it starts to deteriorate, the value decreases and it starts to go bad. The story is different with meat; in fact, it is the reverse. Meat can improve over a period of time. There are ice plants in most of the fishing ports around Ireland but up to a couple of years ago those ice plants were not profitable. The reason was that my friends, the fishermen, were not taking ice on board and were not looking after their fish in the proper way. This is where I must emphasise to the Minister and to the Institute the importance of having the laws enforced. If they were enforced tomorrow morning and there was a regular check-up of the boats to make sure the right amount of ice was on board and that fish were being handled properly, I would guarantee that the price of Irish fish would almost double the next morning.

There are exciting times ahead in the fishing industry. I always regarded the fishing industry as being the poor relation of agriculture. Everything seemed to be put into agriculture. As I said before, they had advice centres and every facility. Fishermen were given their boats and that was the end of it. However, in the past two or three years there has been a complete change and a different emphasis. The Department of the Marine was set up and over the past two or three years the Department have a new enthusiasm towards the fishing industry. They have shaken the cobwebs and the dust off the old Department of Fisheries. There are good, sound, solid young people in the Department of the Marine and we are going places. With the new Department of the Marine, the Minister and the Minister of State and the proper people in the Marine Institute, in the next two or three years great things will happen in the fishing industry. I commend the Bill to the House.

I would like to believe Senator Fitzgerald's optimism in his concluding sentences will be justified in the course of time. I have to say, first, that if this is a welcomed Bill, and I welcome it with a lot of reservations, it is about high time it was brought into the House. The phrase "más maith is mithid" was never more appropriate in this respect.

The Bill is very late in coming before us. It is late in the long-term historical perspective when you think that long before Independence our nationalist philosophers and economists believed an independent Ireland would be a prosperous Ireland and would be a prosperous Ireland because it would be in charge of its own resources and among those resources were foremost the land and the sea. This was a basic article of faith stretching back as far as the early 18th century because the lineage of economic nationalism goes back to Bishop Berkeley in his Querist in 1752 and, indeed, to his contemporary, Dean Swift. All of them believed in one of Berkeley's famous phrases that you could build a wall of brass around this island and it would prosper on its internal resources. Down to Arthur Griffith expounding the need for economic independence, we had this doctrine that a free Ireland would maximise its potential in terms of its agriculture and its fisheries.

Nonetheless a free Ireland was very slow in paying any attention to these vital resources. It is an extraordinary thing that with a resource like forests, the afforestation of the country was again retarded. It could have been undertaken in the early years of the State. In fact, it was not so undertaken, as we know, until, let us say, the 1940s and the 1950s. Fisheries and the whole marine resource is an even more delayed area, in spite of the fact that in our own time a distinguished authority such as John de Courcy Ireland has been reminding us for decades now of how neglected are our marine dimensions.

We should have moved much earlier on this and on related matters. We should have moved to develop, protect and encourage research in our marine resources when we had the power to do so, when we had the sovereignty over the sea which, alas, we no longer have. I am not so sure that we have made a good deal in that respect. We are now moving at the 11th hour, when we no longer control our seas.

In the long term, this Bill is a very belated measure set against the large historical context but in the short term that is also true. The Government and the Department have been very slow to move on this Bill since it was first mooted. Although Senator Fitzgerald and Senator Ó Foighil spoke from first-hand experience, there is another whole range of genuine interest in this Bill apart from the very worthy and primary interest of the fishermen and that is the interest of scientists, marine engineers, geologists and so on, all of whom are waiting for a long time for this Bill. They are disappointed it has taken so long in coming.

From time to time we hear about how delays in certain enterprises might jeopardise our chance of Community funding and I am afraid this may be the case here as well, that there are opportunities waiting for us in Community terms, that we will not be able to avail of until this institute is up and running. Under Community auspices, the Marine Science Research Programme, MAST, has recently awarded research contracts under its first phase. There is an amount of funding available under the heading "Supporting Initiatives" to this programme which is earmarked for a number of tasks. We are missing out as a member State on this potential funding and we will do so as long as the Marine Institute is not put in place.

Debate adjourned.
Top
Share