I wish to thank Senators for their comments on the Bill and the work of the joint committee. I will deal briefly with some points raised. Senator Cregan spoke about the amount of money involved. This Bill concerns the expenditure of £3.7 billion, not spread over a number of years but in one year. Therefore, it is important. In case Senators are worried, that figure includes pensions to which people have contributed over their lifetimes. It includes also all payments under the social insurance and social assistance schemes. The Senator was right in saying it is a substantial amount of money.
He was also concerned about the difference between long and short term payments. The historical reason for that difference is that those on long-term payments would have their resources depleted and would virtually be receiving a pension. There are standards we hope to achieve by the next budget. For instance, we wish to bring everyone up to at least the priority rates suggested by the Commission on Social Welfare. I expect we will be able to do that. Reaching the long-term rates is a further objective and some payments have reached that level.
Senator Cregan also raised the question of equal treatment payments. This is complex because the court cases go back to 1985. Those cases were taken to establish the equal treatment provisions and tease out what they would mean in practice. That process has continued to date. I assure Senators the legislation passed by the Houses and the regulations arising from that are being implemented in full.
People will get their full entitlements. Some were paid last year, the bulk paid this year and more will be paid next year. The majority of people know this is how it is being paid and if they do not they can be reassured. We are trying to pay as many as possible this year and we appreciate the urgency of this. However, the total cost was so large it was necessary for the Government to spread it over a number of years.
Other people are making claims separately and we cannot do anything about that. We can only make clear that my Department's interpretation is that we have met the requirements in the clarifications. That concludes the matter as far as we are concerned. We will be opposing any further claims that will be made. Some 85,000 people have submitted claims which are all being processed rapidly.
Senator Wall said we are setting standards for ourselves which, in effect, we are. We are outlining the current standards and we can work from that base. In a way it suits a Minister to have a confused situation. Social welfare is very confusing. We are setting out our baseline and that will be helpful.
Senator Henry spoke about the disabled person's maintenance allowance. That is one of my priorities and we are working on it urgently. The Senator will not have to wait until the next consolidation Bill for news on that issue. I hope we will have that dealt with quickly. There are interdepartmental and industrial relations considerations, among others, but we are tackling the issue as a matter of urgency. We are also concerned about the supplementary welfare allowance scheme but we are giving priority to the disabled person's maintenance allowance while simultaneously working on the other scheme.
Senator Honan mentioned the new developments. The power to make deductions is in the Bill. The second chance education for single parents is going well and there has been a good response. We expect to accommodate a substantial number this year. For budgetary reasons the Government must put some limits on my activity in that area but we will be able to accommodate everyone this year. Nevertheless, we will be able to accommodate everyone who comes along this year, at least numerically. There can be some regional difficulties because people may want a scheme in an area in which one cannot be provided, but that is a separate question.
Senator Honan also mentioned the students' summer scheme. We talked about the fact that it had to be brought in quite hurriedly this year because unemployment assistance, the dole, for the summer was gone. I could not wait until next year to take action so I had to act immediately or there would have been nothing available this year. It has been very successful. There were 9,000 jobs put forward and we have received many letters from parents, students and sponsors who were delighted with the scheme and who found it very worthwhile and helpful.
As Senators may know, I mentioned earlier that I had received Government approval for a new school leavers' job scheme. Many school leavers go on to third level education or to jobs or to training with FÁS but there are up to 6,000 who go straight from school on to the dole. I do not want that situation and I want to try to break that cycle. I know all Senators want to see it ended if it can be done, so I got the approval of the Government to go ahead with the scheme. It will operate somewhat on the lines of the summer jobs scheme because many of the sponsors had jobs going on into the winter in the voluntary and community areas.
The other aspect is that we had discussions with FÁS regarding its relationship with us in that scheme, because the money will come entirely from the Department of Social Welfare. In effect it is the money that would have been given out in social welfare. We have reached the stage with FÁS that there will be a FÁS training component added to that scheme which is excellent. I am delighted that FÁS has come forward with that component. The scheme will be starting very shortly and again it arises particularly from the experience of the summer jobs scheme.
Senator Honan also mentioned the money to the Society of St. Vincent de Paul. It reminds me of something that was very much in the media during the week — the book launches in Tallaght on the developments there and the fact that people are developing local community enterprises. I wish to make it very clear that that started between the Minister for Social Welfare, who happened to be me at the time, and the Society of St. Vincent de Paul. From savings we made I got the Government to make £500,000 available, which was given to the Society of St. Vincent de Paul. It was involved and had groups in different places all over the country. In fact Tallaght was one of its most successful.
I have heard it said that the State did nothing and that everybody stands away, but that is nonsense. We put money into ideas at the very start and got it off the ground. However, that is one of those things to which one gets used. Senators know when we discuss these things that we have tried to be innovative, particularly in the development of community resources. We started the community development projects, of which there are now 41 around the country, developing community enterprise and other facilities. They are grant aided by the Department of Social Welfare and they led to the Programme for Economic and Social Progress special areas which are leading now to the back to work schemes and the other schemes.
All of that is part of the total effort which comes from the type of discussions we have with Senator Cregan. He said we almost had rows here, but we must be seeing them in a different way. I regard them as constructive, healthy, vibrant, informative and useful debates. While I might not be able to say much at the time, I note what is said and we try to fit those things in later when an opportunity arises.
Finally, the consolidation of the regulations is coming up shortly. As Senators know, the legislation is here and all the regulations that flow from the legislation are separate. If the legislation is complex the regulations can be even more complex when one goes to examine them.