Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 26 Oct 1994

Vol. 141 No. 4

Cork City Coal Ban: Motion.

I move:

That Seanad Éireann welcomes the decision of the Government to improve air quality in Cork by introducing a ban on bituminous coal in Cork city area; and to make available a special fuel allowance of £3 per week to facilitate full compliance with the new smoke control régime.

I am pleased with the opportunity to contribute to this debate. I welcome the Minister of State at the Department of the Environment, Deputy Brown (Wexford) the House and I compliment him on his activities to date, particularly the recent announcement by himself and the Minister for the Environment, Deputy M. Smith, on the prevention of smog in Cork city and its environs.

The Minister will be aware that the ban on the sale of bituminous coal will have a major beneficial effect on Cork city and, in particular, on the elderly, those with chest complaints and those who find smog a major interference in their lives. A similar decision was taken about Dublin a few years ago and its effects are clear today. This was successful in Dublin because the public accepted and implemented it. The introduction of bans on the sale of bituminous coal and other such measures are only as good as the public which implements them. People are interested in such Government measures. The proposal put forward by the Government and the Minister to ban the sale of bituminous coal in Cork is a correct one and will benefit that city and its environs in the future.

The levels of smog in Cork city are not good. My information suggests that the regulations have not been breached, but we are close to the top levels of smog. It is therefore appropriate to introduce proper measures to eliminate that. However, this Government could not bring in such measures without introducing compensatory allowances. The compensatory allowances, which will be paid over the winter months to allow people to buy smokeless fuel, is the proper way to implement this measure and to get public acceptance for it. People today are on a tight budget and it is important for the Government to recognise this. We must welcome the co-operation between the Department of the Environment and the Department of Social Welfare in this regard. It is part and parcel of the overall package which allows this decision to be fully implemented early in the new year. The decision can now be implemented in practice if people respond positively.

I compliment the Minister on his wide-ranging discussions at local level in Cork. He met all interested groups in Cork regarding the ban on the sale of bituminous coal. He met Cork Corporation and Cork County Council, the coal and fuel suppliers and other interested groups in that area. That is the proper way to implement such measures. My information suggests he has received a positive response from the interested parties there. This House hopes that the people of Cork will also respond in a positive manner, as the people of Dublin have done over the past number of years.

The people of Cork city will benefit from the ban on the sale of bituminous coal over the next couple of years. People's health is important, particularly elderly people, who are often prisoners in their homes during the winter months when the burning of such fuels causes smog in the city and its environs. A measure which allows them to travel from their homes without the fear of having to call into the nearest casualty unit because of the level of smog in their city is an important aspect of the ban on the sale of bituminous coal. Young children with asthma and people with chest complaints will benefit from this important decision.

The visual environment of Cork city and its environs will improve because the fall out from the burning of such fuels will not be the same. This Government has taken a positive approach to matters of environmental importance. People are now conscious of the environment and of implementing measures which support and maintain a good clean environment. It is important for the Government to respond. The Government is responding and this measure is part and parcel of a number of measures. This decision will have positive effects in Cork city and its environs.

One needs a backup to the national fuel allowance scheme because it is no good to say we already have a scheme. The extra £3 per week to buy smokeless fuel, introduced by the Minister and the Minister for Social Welfare, is important to implement this. The fact that this is available now to the people of Cork and not when the measure becomes fully implementable over the period of mid-October to mid-April allows people to be involved, to some extent on a voluntary basis, in the implementation of this Government measure. I am sure that when it does finally come into regulation early in the new year, people will already have become used to the situation and in fact may have realised the benefits of the non-burning of bituminous coal in the city.

I compliment the Minister for the work he has done to date and I recommend the motion to the House.

I second the motion. I join with Senator Finneran in welcoming the Minister, Deputy Browne to the House. I congratulate the Minister on the work he has been doing in the general area of environmental protection since he was appointed, especially on the achievements he has had in regard to this specific motion, the banning of the distribution, sale and marketing of bituminous coal both in Cork city and its surrounding areas.

The Minister has done a good job in the Department of the Environment in highlighting many areas of environmental protection and, indeed, many new preventative measures to protect the environment in many respects. The amount of progress that has been made in this area over the last number of years is a great credit to the Minister and his officials in the Department, who have worked in a diligent way to make progress in awareness and action throughout the country. Indeed, the level of awareness among our local authorities and industry can be seen. While we all appreciate that a major amount of work remains to be done and there are still serious problems with regard to environmental protection which will cost a significant amount of money to correct and cure, significant progress is being made by the Department. I hope the additional resources it requires to continue to make those improvements will be made available to it.

The specific example of Cork city and the swift action that has been taken by the Minister is a case in point. While we have had great success in the initiatives taken in Dublin, I have no doubt that these initiatives will meet with equal success. I have discussed with the Minister the desirability of expanding this initiative to other cities. I know it is currently a priority of the Minister to see this initiative expanded to our other cities. I very much welcome the Minister's determination to see the ban on bituminous coal being extended to other cities. I recommend to the Minister to put Galway as high up as possible on the list. We have seen the positive effects of this development in Dublin. No doubt we will also see the effects within the new Cork coal ban area as soon as it commences. The Minister for Social Welfare and the Government should also be praised for the way in which they introduced the new smokeless fuel allowances. This will ease the burden on families dependent on social welfare and on low incomes.

I again commend the Minister for Social Welfare for the range of supports he has introduced to social welfare recipients right across the board to ensure there is no financial burden on those people in regard to this new initiative.

I want to dwell for a moment on the more general area of environmental protection. This initiative focuses on the great improvement that can be made in the quality of life as a result of such initiatives. There is no doubt that we have taken our environment for granted over the years. Sadly, we were unaware of the negative impact that our failure to protect our environment has had. I suppose it is only now that we have all come to appreciate the great advantage for this country to become the most environmentally friendly and most pollution free environment in Europe. When one considers this in the context of making Ireland the most attractive and prestigious destination in Europe for quality tourism, it brings into focus the importance of environmental protection in all its various aspects. There is much more work to be done. More awareness must be brought into place in every aspect of environmental control across the spectrum, from the local authorities and industry to farmers and ordinary people.

I would like to refer to the subject of litter. It is a terrible indictment on our young people to see the way in which the streets of our towns are littered with the remnants of the sales of take away restaurants. Young people come out of a disco or a dance at night, go into a take away restaurant, come out and simply throw their litter on the street. In the morning one will often see the remnants of a fast food meal lying in the middle of the roads leading out of some of our county towns. It is a most disgraceful sight to see and I take this opportunity to remind people of the most basic type of environmental control. If we have litter, we should not simply throw it on the street where it becomes a most terrible eyesore.

I conclude by joining with Senator Finneran in complimenting the Minister; we are proud of his performance. I hope the Minister and his officials keep up the good work and I hope the Minister for Finance will make available to him the resources I know he needs. Investment in the environment the Minister is trying to protect will certainly give this country a good return.

I wish to share my time with Senator Doyle.

You can have eight minutes each. Is that agreed? Agreed.

A Chathaoirligh, ar dtús báire, cuirim fáilte roimh an Aire go dtí an Teach. Cuireann sé áthas orm bheith in ann cúpla caibidlí a rá faoin ábhar tábhachtach seo. Is minic a chloistear an abairt "Téigh amach san aer agus tiocfaidh biseach ort".

How often have we heard it said "Go out into the fresh air". There is nothing better for the lungs and indeed, the body then plenty of God's fresh air. Of course we cannot see the air we breathe and if it contains impurities, it can be very harmful. Some of the worst air pollutants are gases and particles produced by burning certain fuels. Some fuels give off a lot of sulphur dioxide, a gas which, when mixed with air, creates a dirty yellow smog. Smog is unpleasant to breathe and can even kill people. History tells us that in one winter alone in the great city of London, 4,000 people died from breathing smog. Thankfully, since the 1950s, the air in London has become much cleaner because the burning of solid fuels that gave off too much sulphur was stopped in the city centre.

There was a different problem in the American city of Los Angeles where on bright days a yellow/brown haze often darkened the sky and stung people's eyes. Scientists found that this smog formed when sunlight shone on exhaust gases from cars and trucks. Inventors designed special filters for vehicle exhausts which helped prevent nitrogen oxide gas from escaping and after that the air became much cleaner.

Vehicle engines can emit other poisons, the most dangerous of which is lead in petrol. To prevent pollution from this type of emission governments around the world have started making oil companies reduce the amount of lead in petrol. The statement by the Minister in today's newspapers, that he will see to it that EU standards are conformed to in this country, is welcome.

Some power stations and factories have very high chimneys which channel harmful fumes high up where the wind can carry them away, thus keeping the air in nearby cities clean. We are all familiar with the problems caused by acid rain which rots stone buildings and steel railway lines; it has killed trees in German forests and fish in parts of Sweden, Canada and the United States.

Air pollution is a serious problem, particularly where there is a high concentration of houses, and it gets worse at this time of the year when people are more inclined to light fires because of the longer evenings. In winter, when the air is frosty and there is no wind to blow the emissions away, the problem is accentuated. At Christmas time we all like to see the home fires burning brightly but that means there is an immeasurable increase in air pollution from house fires.

Air pollution can be a major problem in Cork city due to the outline of the surrounding terrain where a saucepan-type landscape leads onto Cork harbour. It is appropriate that the Government is introducing a ban on bituminous coal in Cork city to improve the quality of the air there. It takes courage to make such a decision and I commend the Government for that. However, perhaps the time is inopportune because merchants have new stocks of bituminous coal piled up at this time of year. It would have been much better to introduce such a measure in springtime. However, I suppose it is appropriate that we should be talking about Cork, and perhaps this is the reason the House is so empty this evening. There are other activities in that city at this time.

It goes without saying that when a transition like this is called for, a cost factor is involved. We are asking people to buy smokeless fuel costing £205 per tonne whereas up to now they had been buying bituminous coal for £145 per tonne. I accept that a fuel allowance is available to people on social welfare, and that £3 extra is being given which is helpful. It is important for the Government and the Department of the Environment to monitor the situation closely and no hardship should be caused because of the changeover.

Most local authority tenants burn coal, and in council houses fitted with Stanley ranges burning coal is a must. It has been statistically proven that most local authority housing tenants are in receipt of some type of social welfare benefit. An increase in the cost of coal, despite an allowance, could lead to hardship, particularly during the winter months when a lot of extra fuel is burned. People should not have to suffer hardship because of the changeover to smokeless coal.

The better-off members of our society can fill their central heating tanks with £300 worth of oil and have double glazing in their homes. They can provide as much heat as they like for their families. A person on social welfare or an old age pensioner, however, is dependent on buying, say, one bag of coal per week. In their case the increase in the cost of smokeless coal as against a bag of ordinary coal is significant and could cause hardship. It is vitally important that this should not be allowed to happen.

While the technical solution to problems caused by smog in Dublin, Cork and other major cities is straightforward in theory, changing fuels or significantly raising the efficiency of combustion engines would be difficult to achieve in practice. Two major considerations must be borne in mind on economic grounds — the increased cost of smokeless fuels and the changeover cost from the simple open grate to a specially designed, highly efficient burner system. This can be very expensive, particularly for people on social welfare and the elderly.

An educational promotion programme should be put in place outlining to householders the benefits to be gained from using smokeless coal. The costs involved in the transitional process must also be brought home to the ordinary householder.

I would like to digress for a moment to mention a problem which has arisen in my own city of Galway. In recent times, unacceptable levels of radon gas have been found in houses, especially in Salthill.

Acting Chairman

Sorry Senator, but your time is up. I do not know how you could share it, but it is up now.

This is an important point so I will try to make it within a minute. Radon gas is a matter of major concern to people in Galway city. A special report has been issued highlighting this concern and the mayor of the city, Fintan Coogan, has gone on record expressing his concern. Householders have found that there are unacceptable levels of radon gas in many houses. I would appeal to the Minister to look at the situation prevailing in Galway and the problems there.

Finally, the General Council of County Councils is hosting an important conference on Friday, 27 January 1995, in Galway on all aspects of pollution and associated problems.

He is inviting us all.

I am inviting you all to come along and I hope the Minister will come because that will be an opportunity to highlight various aspects of pollution. This is one of the most important conferences to come on stream in recent times.

That is the commercial.

I welcome the Minister to the House. I support the motion.

I know the layout of Cork city fairly well and will know more of it in the next couple of weeks. I do not think much smog will rest there at the moment because there is an amount of hot air around which will cause it to drift away.

I welcome the motion and the move by the Government to improve air quality. I know Cork city of old. It was built on an island on the River Lee and was originally low lying. As time passed, the main housing areas were built on the high land on each side of the river. Consequently, we must be careful with smog and smoke which would disimprove the quality of life of those people living in the higher areas. I therefore welcome the ban on the use of bituminous coal.

In the cool winter weather, when there is little movement of air in the Cork city area, the development of smog is particularly noticeable. Sometimes there is a good breeze in from the sea and up the harbour or down the river but there are certain times in winter when smoke will rest there. Any smoke coming from the lower parts of the city will affect the higher areas. People living in the main housing areas in the city, particularly older people and those suffering from asthma and other chest complaints, will suffer greatly as a result of smoke or smog emanating from chimneys.

It is also very important to ban the use of bituminous coal in a city that is working towards inner city renewal. Many of the older buildings which were left derelict are the subject of work by the corporation and will be replaced by shops and, eventually, more housing. The use of bituminous coal would be fatal because it would destroy the effort to keep the place clean and would also affect the health of those living in the higher areas.

Bord Gáis have done tremendous work providing services for the people living in the city. They are and have been extremely busy extending the gas network and finding new customers. I have to compliment Bord Gáis on the work they have done in Cork.

We must be vigilant however because any new legislation or ban is going to affect suppliers. These people are making a living for themselves and providing work. Consequently, we have to recognise that some effort will have to be put into alleviating the problem for these people. I believe that is being done.

The special allowance of £3 per week facilitates full compliance. The payment of this amount to social welfare recipients is to be welcomed. I welcome the motion and totally support it.

Like others I welcome the ban on bituminous coal in Cork. I have to declare an interest. I come from the Mahon peninsula and I know that it would take quite a breeze from the Lee to shift the smog there at times. Anything that will alleviate that must be considered useful. As everyone as said, it is particularly important for the elderly, young children and those with chronic respiratory diseases.

When the Minister is considering the cost of subsidising smoke free coal, it is worth remembering that there could be a great decrease in the amount of pharmaceuticals consumed by those with respiratory diseases. A few years ago a colleague of mine, Dr. Luke Clancy in St. James Hospital, conducted a survey on the correlation between death from respiratory diseases, particularly among the elderly, and the occasions when smog was particularly severe in the Dublin area. The same inversion problem exists in Cork and I believe that if the hospitals there conducted a similar survey, they would find that the death rates were also increasing.

It is important that we do not think that this will totally solve the smog problem in Cork. We have to look seriously at the value of by-elections. If we are not going to get some value out of them, there would be no point in holding them. We already got some value in Cork because incinerators have been closed down in both the Cork Regional Hospital and the South Infirmary. I congratulate the Department for doing that. It now appears that we will not even have to build our own incinerator but will send waste to south Wales. It seems that a satisfactory solution has been found in the Cork area.

If we are serious about smog in Cork we must address the traffic problem as well as the coal problem. It surely must be the time to announce that work will commence on our own "channel tunnel" under the Lee. This will divert traffic from the Dublin road on to the ring road to west Cork while bypassing the Mahon peninsula, where I might get involved in opening a petrol station. This is extremely serious and we have been waiting for it for about ten years. I hope it will form part of the Minister's proposals.

The lack of traffic policy is serious. In light of the Minister's interest in air pollution he may have noted that the Ministry of Transport's plans for traffic in London have been seriously criticised by an independent report set up to study them. It has been decided that plans for enlarged roads in city areas will only increase the traffic volume. The Minister might examine cities such as Manchester which have reintroduced trams. This has had a great effect on air quality in that city and other cities throughout Europe which have introduced similar schemes. Oslo, in particular, has been very successful.

The air quality has to be examined as an overall problem and not just taken a piece at a time. I urge the Minister to consider the traffic situation in Cork. For example, provision could be made for cycle lanes. Much of the city is flat so it would be extremely easy to introduce cycle lanes. This could make a great difference to the density of traffic coming into a small city.

Like Members on both sides of the House, I welcome this initiative and I welcome the Minister to the House. I feel like the person in the fairy story who screamed that all their clothes had been stolen because my colleague, Senator Henry, has addressed many of the problems I was going to raise. Perhaps I can put a different spin on them. I hope this initiative is just one aspect of an integrated approach to the elimination of urban pollution, especially in cities such as Cork which continue to expand and grow at an inordinate rate.

I share Senator Henry's views on the elimination of car, truck and bus pollution. I hope that the Minister will follow up on this initiative by continuing to press for further development in the area of sewage disposal. One has only to look at the map of Ireland to see that the largest proportion of our population is concentrated on an east west axis rather than a north south axis.

Cities such as Cork and the area along the south east coast up into Dublin and towards the Border have a very high population. Consequently, there is an equally high distribution of sewage, much of it untreated, due to the rapid urbanisation of this part of the country. The Government is conscious of the need to inject sufficient funds to eliminate this problem and I welcome the developments in that area. The Minister has taken a lead in ensuring that there are fully equipped, state of the art sewage facilities along the east coast to Cork and beyond. It is something which the population should be more conscious of. It is not enough for us to point to the Government of the day or to Government agencies and say it is their problem, because pollution is our problem. We contribute to it one in way or another, particularly in the area of waste management or perhaps waste mismanagement.

How many of us, especially in cities, have sat in a car behind someone who carelessly tossed an empty cigarette box out the window? Often if there are children in a car, they throw the remnants of sweet and crisp packets out the window. I blame the parents, not the children. We seem to go through life believing that it does not matter and that waste management is someone else's problem to solve.

I do not want to stereotype anybody, but we have been hidden from the reality of an outside perception that we are a dirty nation, that we do not take environmental matters seriously, concern ourselves with waste disposal and that we tend to believe it has a low political priority and is of no consequence. Yet we are happy to bask in letters of affection published in newspapers from time to time from people telling us what a wonderfully friendly nation this is and what a beautiful holiday they had. We rarely hear about the perception people have of this country, particularly visitors from the Continent, about the manner in which we attempt to dispose of our problem.

There are several areas which the Minister could look at. There should be legislation to outlaw plastic bags, which are one of the greatest dirt collectors. It is an area where waste management could be addressed. As in the case of this motion, there may be criticism that it would prove costly. However, environmental matters are costly but in the long term the benefits which they bring to our social order and economy far outweigh the initial costs.

As regards this initiative by the Minister in Cork city, it is right that people should question whether those most affected by this change, those on social welfare, will be in a position to pay for the changeover or the legal requirement under this statutory requirement. It is equally right to highlight the enormous advantages which will accrue from such measures in terms of the reduction and I hope, the elimination of respiratory illnesses, especially among the elderly. I do not know whether the Minister has costed this on the basis of the experience in Dublin over the past number of years. However, it would be interesting to discover whether there has been an appreciable reduction in hospital admissions among this targeted group most at risk from urban and air pollution. Perhaps if we had those figures it might help to strengthen the argument towards more initiatives of an environmental nature such as this rather than weaken it.

One significant statistic arising from the debate on this initiative in Cork city by the Minister and his colleague, the Minister for Social Welfare, which shocked me probably more than my urban counterparts, because I come from an a rural environment, related to the £3 allowance. The Minister for Social Welfare stated that the number of households involved was over 20,000. If one takes the national average of Irish families, between 70,000 and 90,000 people will benefit from the national fuel scheme.

The significance of the statistic is that an enormous number of people live on or below the poverty line within the designated area for this measure. Surely it is a challenge for us as politicians to address that problem as well? An enormous number of people who are recipients of social welfare, and who Senator McDonagh is concerned about, may not be in a position to meet the financial obligations of this changeover and will require more assistance than that outlined. That is a side issue, but one which is important.

I would welcome more stringent measures than those in existence in relation to car or vehicle pollution. I am aware the Minister introduced regulations which apply to new fleets — for example, Dublin Bus has an ageing fleet which it is replacing on an ongoing basis. Some consideration should be given to speeding up this measure. I am not sure how practical that would be, but we should not tolerate in cities, especially in those the size of Cork, diesel fumes from public and commercial transport. Senator Henry suggested that the Minister speed up the decision on the underground tunnel in Cork city to eliminate this problem. However, it would be less costly in the short to medium term to speed up directives which would eliminate this problem rather than making a by-election commitment for what will be an extremely large expenditure, although I hope it will happen because it would benefit Cork city.

I welcome, encourage and support the Tidy Towns competition. Although it is not directly related to this motion, in the context of waste management and the elimination of pollution in towns and cities that competition was one of the most innovative of this generation. One has only to look at small towns and villages to see how they have improved. Perhaps the Minister might look at some way to encourage a more civic response from those in cities, which face major pollution problems. As Members said, pollution covers a wider area than air. The EU Commissioner, Pádraig Flynn, recently spoke about the introduction of unleaded petrol in this country. He said the only way people would buy unleaded petrol was if they had a financial motivation to do so. He proved that by having a disparity between leaded and unleaded petrol. Perhaps a similar measure could apply to eliminating litter from towns and cities.

Senator Mooney mentioned the benefits which accrue from banning bituminous coal, referred to in this motion, and he asked how this related to Dublin. I will give some figures to show the benefit that has accrued in Dublin. In May 1990 the Minister of State at the Department of the Environment made an order under the Air Pollution Act, 1987, banning the sale of bituminous coal in the greater Dublin area. The effect was to ban certain types of coal, mainly British, Polish and Texan coals.

Before the order was made Dublin experienced serious pollution problems and broke EU guidelines on numerous occasions. It seriously affected the health of citizens in Dublin, especially elderly people who suffered from respiratory problems. The main environmental problem caused by bituminous coal is serious air pollution due to unacceptably high emissions of smoke and sulphur dioxide.

The House might be interested to know what have been the effects of banning bituminous coal in Dublin. Smoke and sulphur dioxide for measurement purposes are expressed in micrograms per cubic meter. I will deal with smoke first. In 1989-90, before the ban was imposed, the mean figure for smoke was 41 micrograms per cubic meter, the median was 24 and the highest concentration on any particular day was 1,098 micrograms per cubic meter. The highest concentration on any particular day occurs when there is an inversion, when during the very cold weather, smoke is unable to escape into the atmosphere; it is held just over the chimneys and causes serious respiratory problems.

In 1993-94 when the ban was in place, the mean was reduced from 41 micrograms per cubic meter to 15, the median from 24 to 11 and the highest concentration on any particular day was reduced from 1,098 to 193 micrograms per cubic meter. These figures show clearly the benefits of the ban in relation to smoke emissions. Similarly the levels of sulphur dioxide were substantially reduced.

Sulphur dioxide, known as SO2, is also expressed in micrograms per cubic meter. In 1989-90, before the ban was imposed, the mean was 25 micrograms per cubic meter and was reduced to 20 in 1993-94. The median was reduced from 27 to 19 and the highest concentration on any particular day that related to sulphur dioxide was reduced from 197 to 134 micrograms per cubic meter. I quote these figures to show the improvement brought to air quality by the banning of bituminous coal.

I wish to make passing reference to another form of pollution. There have been a number of references during the discussion to other types of pollution. The Transport Select Committee in the House of Commons published a report yesterday stating that super unleaded petrol which contains cancer forming chemicals should be banned. The committee's report into air pollution in London highlighted concern about carcinogenic aromatics in petrol, the most significant being benzene, added to petrol instead of lead to improve octane rating.

The committee reported that the evidence before them suggested that the potential health hazard from excessive aromatics used in super unleaded petrol outweighed any possible benefit from reduced lead. The committee then recommended the phasing out of super unleaded petrol by the year 1996. The most extraordinary aspect of this report is that it has highlighted how the development of green fuels as we know them can replace one health hazard with another. I understand that the Minister made some comment on this report today and I hope he will take note of the report because many motorists — I spoke to some today — are under the impression that by using super unleaded petrol they are helping to reduce pollution in the atmosphere.

I have a problem with the timing of this motion, not from a political point of view but because, unfortunately, many of the merchants in Cork have already bought their stocks of coal for the winter. They will have bought and will be selling bituminous coal this year. In no way can they be restricted in selling it this year, so Cork will not benefit from the proposition before us until next year.

It is one thing to make an order banning bituminous coal but the enforcement of such a ban is another. That is where the officials in Cork County Council will be important. I understand that in Dublin a number of officials take samples from coal merchants to see what coal they are using. They send the samples to Eolas who examine them. I understand that ten or 12 merchants break the regulations each year and they are brought before the courts and fined. The extraordinary part of the banning of bituminous coal is that the sale and distribution is banned but the burning is not.

There is a problem in Dublin now where people buy coal outside the area and bring it home to burn. People should be encouraged not to do that. A very forceful advertising campaign would inform consumers that it is in their own interest not to buy or burn bituminous coal.

The citizens of Dublin have benefited substantially from the order the Minister made in 1990. It has changed the whole atmosphere of the city and we witnessed this recently when we had some cold nights. We did not experience pollution such as that we experienced some years ago. This is wonderful for old people with respiratory problems. It is good for the whole city and I hope Cork will enjoy the same benefits as Dublin.

An Leas-Chathaoirleach

I call Senator Mooney. Sorry, my apologies, Senator. I call Senator Cassidy.

This is not the first time this has happened.

No doubt this is officially on the record. I could never understand how a man with glasses could be confused with a man with no glasses, even though we have been good friends for a long time.

I welcome this legislation. This is another indication of how seriously we view the problem of pollution. Having visited many countries over the last ten or 15 years, I can honestly say that Ireland is a beautiful country. We are going in the right direction; many other countries are much worse off than we are.

Without being repetitive I wish to make the point about smoke and the coal regulations which were introduced in Dublin in 1990. I have vast experience of the north inner city of Dublin. Before bituminous coal was banned, many people will tell you that the filters on their air conditioning had to be changed every two or three weeks; now they only have to change them every three, four or five months. That will show the reduction in pollution there.

As Senator Doyle will know, more than 1,440 buses go around Parnell Square every day. Members will appreciate the amount of damage they could have done in that area if they had not been properly fitted with the necessary equipment to keep down pollution emission levels.

I congratulate the Minister and the Government for bringing this initiative into our second capital city, Cork, a very beautiful city on the banks of the Lee. Cork is unlike Dublin because it has a much smaller population and can be controlled much more easily. I have no doubt that the proposals before us this evening will bear fruit even sooner there than happened in Dublin.

What is the position in relation to turf? We have an abundance of this smokeless fuel. In our area this industry generates an enormous amount of employment, particularly in the midland counties adjacent to Dublin. One third of our population lives within 25 miles of O'Connell Street. What is the position of Bord na Móna in relation to developing a hard and long burning black sod turf briquette to cut down on the imported smokeless fuel? Turf is a smokeless fuel. In 1978 I visited the UK and did a study of the city of Southampton. It was one of the first cities to be declared a smokeless area. I was pleasantly surprised to see how many people on the outskirts of that city were burning a hard solid turf. If this turf can be produced, manufactured and create employment in Ireland, the Department should consider the idea, because it would be a terrific asset and a tremendous bonus. I know from experience that it is easier to light a fire with turf than with coal or timber.

The Minister should bring proposals to the Oireachtas in the near future with regard to plastic bags. These bags are a major hazard and in the long term are detrimental to the issue of dealing with pollution. I am familiar with the plastics industry as the major employer in Castlepollard, Mergon Limited, manufactures plastic components. Last week the price of plastic was £400 per ton; this week it is in excess of £700 per ton.

I am unable to understand why it is not possible to find a substitute for all of this plastic, because in the long term it is going to make it more difficult to come to terms with the problem when, eventually, plastic will have to be banned in respect of bags for all goods or for whatever other use.

Regarding the issue of car and truck pollution today, there has been a major improvement and an increased awareness of this over the past number of years. Even with the small budget which the Minister may have at his disposal, it would be a good idea to organise reminders in this respect from time to time every year through television and radio advertising, which controls 90 per cent of the market media.

There are campaigns year after year with regard to drink driving and other matters. It is all about awareness. It is also an educational problem which ultimately goes back to the schools. There should be competitions in schools, and indeed many do hold them on the occasion of Tidy Towns events. For example, if pupils are advised that the habit of unthinkingly throwing a cigarette box out of a car window is wrong, dirty, unpleasant and will affect the livelihoods of people in the long term, they will bear that in mind. Indeed, while this still happens in Ireland, it does not happen on the scale which applied three, four, five or six years ago.

I welcome the motion before the House today and wish it a speedy passage through the House.

Wexford): I thank the Senators for their contribution on the motion before the House regarding air quality in Cork. It was a wide ranging debate, covering issues such as storage schemes, plastic bags, sprayed on gasses and benzene. The Senators are well briefed and up to date on the areas of the environment which affect people.

Smoke pollution has been a major environmental concern in Cork city and its environs. Average annual smoke concentrations in the area are running at twice the average level of other urban areas in the country. Air quality limits for smoke have not been breached in recent years in Cork, but they are constantly being threatened.

The Cork smoke problem has therefore been high on my agenda since taking up office last year. I have met with and listened to many political representatives and interested groups, both Cork Corporation and Cork County Council, in addition to the solid fuel industry in Cork. The outcome of this process is that the Government has decided to ban the marketing, sale and distribution of bituminous coal in Cork city and surrounding area. In other words, we are extending to Cork the same smoke control regime as has operated with great success in the Dublin area. This will include a £3 supplement to the normal fuel allowance to assist low income households in the designated Cork area with the higher costs of using smokeless fuel. The Minister for Social Welfare — and I wish to thank him for his interest and commitment in this area — is making the necessary administrative arrangements. Exchequer costs will be at least £1.2 million in a full year.

We have already begun preparations for the coal ban. These will involve the Cork local authorities, the local fuel industry, and publicity and education campaigns aimed at the public. We are seeking to have the new regime in place from the beginning of 1995. Many comments were made on this aspect. The fuel industry may find it difficult to get rid of their stocks, but we have, from the date of announcement, given them a lead-in time of three to four months, which should be sufficient to ensure that much of the stocks they have at present will be disposed of.

The area involved will in principle be the same as the one which was designated last year for the more limited smoke control measures applied then. It includes all of Cork city and the district electoral divisions of Ballincollig, Douglas, Inishkenny, Lehenagh, Rathcooney, Bishopstown and St. Mary's, insofar as they are situated in County Cork. However, further discussions with the Cork local authorities may result in some refinement of this designated area. Indeed, at the press conference in Cork to announce the go-ahead for the banning of the coal, a number of public representatives made strong cases for other areas to be included. We will consider these areas and, hopefully in the near future, we will make a final decision.

In recent years smoke pollution in Cork city and its environs has reached worrying levels. Air quality standards have been regularly threatened, although not breached. Last October, following consultation with the local authorities, the fuel industry and the community groups I introduced a ban on slack and a requirement that all solid fuel retailers should carry smokeless fuels. These regulatory measures, which applied to the built-up area of Cork, were complemented by voluntary ones applied by major solid fuel suppliers.

I believe that it was necessary to attempt this lower cost solution before seeking to implement the higher cost measures which we have now decided on. Our review of air quality in Cork showed, however, that last year's measures would at best contain rather than improve the situation. In 1993-94 the standard for a three day value was exceeded for single days on three separate occasions, the annual 98 percentile value was 80 per cent of the specified standard, the winter median value was 64 per cent of the specified standard and the annual median value was 63 per cent of the specified standard.

If these trends were to continue there would be every prospect of air quality limits being breached in Cork. My judgement was that we should deal with this threat on a precautionary rather than a reactive basis. Accordingly, we recommended to the Government, and it accepted, that a full ban on bituminous coal should be extended to Cork from the earliest practicable date.

The Dublin coal ban measures introduced four years ago have achieved a remarkable and rapid transformation of air quality in that area. From a situation where gross breaches of smoke standards regularly occurred, Dublin smoke levels have now virtually reduced to the guide levels which are fixed aspirationally by the EU Directive as an indicator of optimum air quality.

It is therefore on the basis of proven effectiveness that the Government is extending the coal ban regime in Dublin to Cork. However, we must not assume that this regulatory initiative is sufficient of itself. The whole experience of the Dublin coal ban demonstrates that this measure relies for its success on a shared responsibility. Government, local authorities, the fuel industry and the public all have distinct but important roles to play in ensuring the success of the coal ban.

It is the job of Government, as we will do now do in Cork, to establish a clear regulation of the coal ban regime and to ensure that support is provided to lower income households to enable them to cope with any increased costs. The Government will also, in co-operation with the Cork local authorities and fuel industry, ensure that information on the coal ban is widely available to the Cork public.

In addition, it is the job of the Cork local authorities to enforce the prohibitions of the new smoke control régime actively and fairly. In this way the solid fuel trade will be guaranteed a level playing field for the transition to smokeless levels. It will also be for the Cork fuel industry to co-operate conscientiously with the new régime both by strictly observing the ban on bituminous coal and by ensuring the supply of good quality alternatives.

Finally, and I cannot over-emphasise this, Cork householders themselves hold the most important key to the success of the coal ban. Residents' groups, and local politicians on their behalf, have strongly advocated the ban which we are now extending to Cork. The new regime will not work without widespread public co-operation and consent. It will be for the local public to demonstrate to any unscrupulous traders that disrespect for the coal ban will not be tolerated and that householders are committed to the success of the ban from a civic and environmental point of view.

I would like at this stage to describe briefly the background to smoke control measures within the EU and Ireland. At EU level a Council Directive was adopted in 1980 which specified air quality standards for both sulphur dioxide and suspended particulates, or, as we know it, smoke. In Ireland the Air Pollution Act, 1987, established a modern legislative framework for the control of air pollution in order to meet national requirements and to facilitate the implementation of EU Directives and regulations relevant to air pollution control. The Act includes general provisions relating to air pollution, special control areas, air quality management plans and standards, monitoring of air quality and emissions and licensing of industrial plant to control air pollution.

The various EU Directives on air quality standards have been transposed into Irish law by regulations under the 1987 Air Pollution Act. The most significant of these regulations — the Air Pollution Act, 1987, and Air Quality Standards Regulations, 1987 — prescribe air quality standards for the whole country and give effect to EU Directives on smoke and sulphur dioxide, lead and nitrogen oxides, which up to 1987 had been implemented here by administrative measures.

Air quality standards are useful instruments of environmental policy. They set limits for the purpose of protecting human health as well as the natural and built environments. The limits are legally binding, but at the same time they do not constrain individual sources of emissions.

I am happy to state that Ireland has never breached the EU quality standards for sulphur dioxides, lead or nitrogen oxides. This is partly attributable to a comprehensive range of regulations, including controls on the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels, on the lead content of petrol and more recently on the enforcement of vehicle emission standards for all new vehicles.

Dublin is the one place in the entire country where breaches of the air quality standard for black smoke occurred. Breaches were significant both in terms of the levels of the exceedance and the numbers of occurrences.

Smoke pollution or smog occurs when black smoke or tiny grains of unburnt carbon are emitted from bituminous coal fires in large numbers and are not quickly dispersed into the wider atmosphere. This condition is particularly likely to occur in periods of calm cold weather which bring temperature inversions in the lower atmosphere. Such inversions trap the smoke-laden air close to the ground. Black smoke has adverse effects on health and can particularly effect the elderly or those suffering from respiratory conditions. It may also be a contributory factor in some lung cancers. Studies have shown a direct link between increased morbidity and mortality during incidences of elevated smoke levels.

There are of course other sources of smoke besides domestic fires. In modern cities smoke from industry is no longer the major source it once was, but transport, particularly diesel engined vehicles, has been a significant contributor to overall smoke levels. Obviously, in any area the percentage of smoke attributable to various sources is determined by a wide range of characteristics. These include topography and prevailing weather conditions. Work done in Dublin prior to the implementation of the bituminous coal ban there indicated that domestic sources accounted for about 80 per cent of the city's smoke and transport emissions for some 16 per cent. Transport emissions are now being addressed through stricter emissions on all new vehicles, including, in particular, heavy goods vehicles.

I said in Cork on 6 October that work would begin immediately to prepare for the implementation of the ban and I hope to have the controls in place by the beginning of 1995. That work is now underway. In finalising arrangements I will be looking at the precise designation of the area within which the marketing ban will operate in the light of local authority and community views. I would like to take this opportunity to say I very much welcome the support for the measures voiced by the local community groups and by the Cork coal trade in the wake of the announcement.

The introduction of the coal ban represents a major environmental opportunity for Cork. Let us all seize this opportunity. I am confident that Cork air quality and the health and amenity of Cork householders will greatly benefit from the new measures.

Some issues were raised in the course of the debate to which I would like to respond. Senator Mooney raised a number of issues such as sewerage schemes, which we will not get into tonight. He also raised the issue of plastic bags, as did Senator Cassidy. I share their concern. It is not an easy problem to solve. All supermarkets use plastic bags and are probably the biggest offenders in this regard. We have had meetings with the supermarket owners but have not been too successful to date. However, we will continue to try to find reasonable solutions to that problem. I accept that it is one of the major litter pollutants. In every road and street as one enters Dublin city one sees plastic bags in the ditches and so on, which is unsightly.

Senator Fahey mentioned litter from take-aways, which is another major problem. Litter generally is still a major problem in this country and one which we are trying to come to grips with.

Senator Cassidy spoke about turf, which is acceptable as a smokeless fuel. Briquettes are widely sold in Dublin. I concur with him that it is a national fuel and one which could probably create extra jobs if it was purchased on a wider scale. However, it is acceptable as a smokeless fuel.

Senator McDonagh mentioned the problem of radon gas in Galway. Radon is a natural phenomenon, but it can give rise to high levels of exposure to radioactivity. The Government has fixed a precautionary level of 200 becquerels for exposure to radon in buildings. Our guidelines on building regulations take account of this limit and we are currently running an active campaign of information for the public and to public institutions about measures which can be taken to reduce radon levels. The Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland has also devised a low cost testing service for this area. We are monitoring the situation and will be advised of any developments in that area.

Senator Henry spoke about the traffic management measures in Cork and the need to curb emissions from transport. Much work has already taken place in relation to the future transport problems of the Cork area based on the land use and transportation study of some years ago. Various components of this planning process are already in place. However, I accept that there is still much work to be done.

Vehicle emission controls and environmental fuel standards also have a vital contribution to make to reducing transport emissions. I recently introduced a range of new emission standards for different classes of new vehicles including heavy goods vehicles. These standards will greatly reduce emissions from all new vehicles. Ireland is fully up to date in regard to the implementation of all EU vehicle Directives. However, I would still emphasise that domestic coal burning is the major source of smoke emissions in urban areas. By tackling this directly, it has been shown, as in the case of Dublin, that we can achieve major and rapid reduction in such smoke emissions. Extending it to Cork will bring quick results in that area.

Senator Doyle mentioned benzene levels in petrol. We are aware of the concerns being expressed in the UK. The current EU and Irish standards fix a limit of 5 per cent for benzene content of petrol. Analyses conducted regularly by the State Laboratory indicate an average benzene content of 3.4 per cent in Irish petrol in 1993 and an average of 3 per cent in 1994 to date. These levels are obviously well within the required standards. This disproves the recent allegations made by Earthwatch that the average benzene content of Irish petrol is 4.8 per cent. Our monitoring system, which is modern and up to date, shows that it is 3 per cent in 1994 to date.

We have introduced a number of measures. The fitting of catalytic converters to all new petrol engined vehicles, as required by Irish regulations, will reduce benzene emissions by up to 75 per cent. This will contribute greatly to the overall improvement in benzene emissions. Nevertheless, we all share the growing concern about our exposure to benzene in the atmosphere and we will support relevant EU initiatives to improve our position in this regard. Initiatives under consideration at present at EU level include a significant reduction in the benzene content of petrol, controls on evaporative emissions from the gasoline distribution chain and additional controls on vehicle emissions. As soon as those are agreed at EU level, I can assure the House that we will take them on board and implement them immediately, as we have done with all other regulations to date.

I thank the Senators for their contributions and their words of welcome for the smoke ban in Cork.

Question put and agreed to.

An Leas-Chathaoirleach

When is it proposed to sit again?

At 10.30 a.m. tomorrow.

An Leas-Chathaoirleach

Is that agreed? Agreed.

Sitting suspended at 7.20 p.m. and resumed at 8 p.m.
Top
Share