I am grateful to the Cathaoirleach and Senators for the good wishes they expressed on my appointment. I noticed during that debate that many Members had a particular interest in the west. I hope to make a contribution to the improvement of living standards of people in the west during my short 120 or so weeks as Minister of State.
Rural Ireland faces serious economic and social problems. These are all too evident to anybody travelling outside urban centres, especially in remote areas. These difficulties are a daily fact of life for people who live in rural areas. They are aware of being caught in a vicious cycle. As population has declined, services have been reduced, and, in turn, economic activity has decreased and so communities have less hope of holding on to their own young people. As young Europeans they will naturally seek improved standards of living. They have every right to expect this.
These young people will be attracted to the better employment opportunities and life styles of the big city. They may wish to taste the different experiences of living in a foreign country. They may also want to broaden their education or gain valuable work experience. At the same time they fully appreciate the quality of the environment and special family ties they have left behind. In many rural areas they do not have an option of staying in their local area. Many of those who have left find it too difficult to return and settle back once they have become used to easy accessibility of facilities and services.
This is not a unique problem to Ireland; it is an international one. Our European colleagues are also facing the problem of rural depopulation, the cycle of rural economic decline and decreasing services. Approaches to the question have been varied, reflecting the different nature and culture of communities in Europe. However, a common element in all these models is a bottom-up approach coupled with a top-down commitment: local communities involved in partnership with their local authorities supported by central government.
The decline in rural areas due to population loss leads to the withdrawal or curtailment of necessary services such as post offices, ESB offices, bank branches, health clinics and county council offices which in turn accelerates the process of population decline. This is a very depressing feature. We can all appreciate the need for public services to be provided efficiently and on economic criteria. However, that is little comfort to the small and remote communities whose standard of living is under threat.
The effects are not just economic. I am acutely aware of the impact that loss of population, especially the emigration of young people, can have on the morale of small communities. It is important that such communities regain and develop their self-confidence so that they will be in a position to join in the rural renewal process.
In the recently published report entitled New Approaches to Rural Development the National Economic and Social Council highlights the seriousness of the economic and social difficulties facing Irish rural areas. The publication recommends that these difficulties are important enough to warrant detailed and sustained attention by policy makers. As an example of how complex the whole issue of rural development is, the report states that the future of rural Ireland will not be determined alone by restructuring the agricultural and non-agricultural sectors of the economy. It will also be determined by the operation of policies at national and European levels. The council raises issues regarding the interdependence between urban and rural areas. Above all it points out that rural development policy goals can only be met in the context of balanced regional development and national settlement patterns.
The NESC report considers the origin and nature of the problem. It examines the issues involved in policy terms from a national and rural perspective. It discusses the context within which rural development policy must be formulated and it looks at all the elements involved in this process, the value of area based partnerships, the delivery of public services and many other issues.
The current and future policy responses and the institutional and organisational issues which now arise are examined. A number of core principles are identified as a guide to the development of structures and institutions for rural development. Some of these principles are already in practice through existing groups such as the county enterprise boards, Leader and area development management partnerships and through the efforts of Government. I compliment the members of the council who examined all these existing groups. There is a valuable critique of the long term and short term attitudes people should have to these companies in the report.
The Government has accepted NESC's recommendation that a pilot scheme be initiated to develop service centres in rural areas. I have been given the job of overseeing the implementation of this pilot scheme as part of my responsibilities. The idea is a simple one: to house a number of essential public services under one roof so that remote rural communities will still have a range of services available to them in an economic and effective way. The pilot scheme is to test out how best this might be achieved.
My appointment as Minister of State with responsibility for western development and rural renewal is an indication of how serious the Government is in tackling the many areas of rural policy. My job should also be considered in the context of the roles allotted to my colleagues the Minister of State with responsibility for rural development, Deputy Deenihan, and the Minister of State with responsibility for local development, Deputy Gay Mitchell; our briefs are complementary. Each of our areas of responsibility reflects the complexity of the issue of rural development as the NESC's report clearly shows. It is also an indication of the Government's commitment to tackling this policy issue in a co-ordinated way and a response to the heartfelt desire of the people who live in rural Ireland to stem the decline in their populations, to become vibrant, self-sustaining communities with a long term future.
My own area of responsibility seems very broad at first, but in many ways it is straightforward: it is to find practical ways of helping communities in rural Ireland break out of the vicious cycle of population decline, reduced economic activity and the consequent erosion of services. There is already a variety of interesting work going on in this area. A notable example is the work of Jim Connolly and his colleagues in Rural Resettlement in Ireland. They are developing new partnerships between the public and private sectors and the Irish overseas.
The Western Development Partnership Board was established to promote the economic development of the western region with the objective of achieving population stability by the end of the decade at 1991 census levels on a county by county basis. The board will prepare an action plan for the region. Its work will also take account of the need to strike a balance between the development of urban areas as centres of growth and the maintenance of rural communities.
The Forum group in Connemara is responding to the needs of the elderly in the area along with improvements in remedial education, in public transport together with new initiatives in shell fish farming and local tourism. It is an excellent model of how practical achievements can be made.
There is a section of the rural Irish population I wish to specifically mention in the debate on rural development that is, the people living on our offshore islands. Whatever difficulties rural communities on the mainland have, islanders have the additional problem of isolation. As Chairman of the Interdepartmental Co-ordination Committee on Island Development I hope to further the development and improvement of living conditions of our offshore islands.
The NESC report identifies the serious nature of the economic and social problems in rural Ireland but it also emphasises the many positive initiatives which are already impacting on life in rural communities. The report calls for further research on Ireland's settlement problems in order to explore the interdependence between urban and rural areas. I would hope this interesting research will be carried out soon so that a further piece of the jigsaw will be in place.
I wish to praise the authors of this report. I commend them for the extensiveness of their research and the comprehensive nature of the consultative process they pursued. I wish also to acknowledge the co-operation and assistance they received from many individuals and organisations in bringing this research work through the many stages and, finally, to its publication.
Rural development is a complex matter. The NESC report has, however, increased our understanding of the nature and depth of that complexity. At the same time it clearly marks the difficult road ahead for policy makers in approaching rural development in innovative ways.