Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Thursday, 16 Nov 1995

Vol. 145 No. 6

Adjournment Matter. - Restoration of Corncrake Grants Scheme.

Corncrake numbers have suffered such a dramatic decline that they are now threatened worldwide with extinction. The corncrake is Ireland's only globally threatened bird species. Since the turn of the century, corncrake numbers have been falling continuously. In 1978 the numbers recorded in a national census had fallen to just over 900; the most recent full national census was in 1993 and found that only 174 singing male corncrakes were recorded in Ireland. Most of them were restricted to four areas — the Shannon Callows in County Offaly, north County Donegal, County Mayo and County Fermanagh. A further census was undertaken in 1994, mainly restricted to these four areas, which found that numbers had hit an all time low of 129 male corncrakes. In 1994, for the first time, no corncrakes were recorded in Northern Ireland during the census period.

In 1992, the Irish Wildbird Conservancy and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds decided to pay grants to farmers for corncrake friendly practises. The scheme is open to all farmers with a calling corncrake on their lands for at least one week. The grant payable was £80 per hectare in the Shannon Callows and £120 per hectare in north County Donegal and County Mayo. There was also a further grant of £20 per hectare payable when mowing from the centre of the field outwards was undertaken.

This grants scheme has proved to be an outstanding success. In 1995, for the first time since recording began, an increase in corncrake numbers in Ireland was recorded. The number of singing male corncrakes was increased to 174. Given the success of the scheme, appropriate management and sufficient support, we can be optimistic about not alone the survival of the corncrake but a real increase in their numbers in the future.

However, I raise this matter here today because there appears to be a problem over who is to continue to manage the corncrake grants scheme. This year the National Parks and Wildlife Services, which was formerly under the control of the Office of Public Works but is now under the control of the Department of Arts, Culture and the Gaeltacht, contributed £65,000 to the scheme. There is a proposal that the scheme will now come under the REP scheme, under the aegis of the Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry. However, the uptake of the REP scheme in the specific areas to which I referred is only approximately 5 per cent. If the scheme is to be included under REPS it would have to be dealt with under a separate budget. Such a proposal must be in place before any change in the existing arrangements takes place.

It is my opinion, and the opinion of those involved in wildlife preservation, that it is essential for this funding to continue. Any break in the continuity of the scheme could lead to corncrake numbers being depleted to such a level that the species could be wiped out. I appreciate that the Minister for Arts, Culture and the Gaeltacht, Deputy Higgins, the Minister of State and all those attached to his Department are anxious to ensure that the corncrake survives and it is essential that we all work together to ensure this.

As somebody from the other side of the River Shannon, I agree with the points raised by Senator Enright. Many farmers along the banks of the river in my constituency have availed of the scheme.

I thank Senator Enright for giving me the opportunity to reply to his Adjournment Matter regarding the special effort required to save corncrakes from distinction.

On two recent occasions the Minister for Arts Culture and the Gaeltacht, Deputy Higgins, gave commitments in Dáil Éireann first, on the preservation of the corncrake and, second, that he would not abandon the corncrake grants scheme until such time as he is satisfied that REPS is capable of providing at least the same protection for this endangered species. Following a proposal in 1992 by the Irish Wildbird Conservancy to pay grants to farmers for corncrake friendly farming practices, the Exchequer, through the National Parks and Wildlife Service, has provide annual interim funding for the scheme. It was never the intention to make it a permanent scheme and it was envisaged that it would be supported by agri-environmental measures still being mooted.

The 1995 corncrake grants scheme was operated in three areas — Shannon Callows, north County Donegal and parts of County Mayo. Where mowing was delayed until 1 August the scheme provided for payment to landowners of grants of £80 per hectare in the Shannon Callows and £120 per hectare in north County Donegal and in County Mayo. In all three areas an additional grant of £20 per hectare was payable where mowing from the centre of the field outwards was undertaken.

This year the scheme cost £85,000 and it received Exchequer funding of £60,000, with the balance coming from the Royal Society for Protection of Birds. In addition, to the £60,000, the Irish Wildbird Conservancy, which administers the grants scheme, has been promised funding of up to £5,000 and £10,000, respectively, this year by the NPWS and RSPB for habitat creation measures. I understand also that the costs of the IWC fieldworker network are borne by the RSPB and the EU LIFE fund.

Between 1992 and the end of 1995 Exchequer funding of £142,000 has been allocated for corncrake conservation measures, made up of £133,000 for the corncrake grants scheme — £5,000 in 1992, £13,000 in 1993, £55,000 in 1994 and £60,000 in 1995 — £4,000 towards the cost of a survey in 1993 and £5,000 earmarked for habitat creation measures this year. Total grant payments in the three areas in 1995 were £63,884 in the Shannon Callows, £15,832 in County Mayo and £6,143 in County Donegal.

While the number of corncrakes increased by nearly 35 per cent from 129 to 174 between 1994 and 1995, the increase between 1993 and 1995 is only about 7 per cent when the 1993 number of birds was 163. The greatest level of increase has been in north Donegal, where actual expenditure and take up of the grants scheme this year was lowest. In the Shannon Callows, where take up and expenditure was highest, the number of corncrakes dropped slightly between 1994 and 1995 with a significant drop of 28 per cent since 1993. It would appear from this analysis that the evidence as to the relationship between the grants scheme and corncrake numbers is still not conclusive.

This year the action programme for the corncrake is operating independently of the rural environment protection scheme. As REPS has been operational since June 1994, the Minister for Arts, Culture and the Gaeltacht asked our officials to examine the feasibility of a transition from these annual interim payments, which have been in place since 1992, to REPS. I believe that the considerable potential presented by REPS should be examined and utilised to maximum advantage for corncrake conservation purposes. My officials, along with their counterparts in the Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry, are currently exploring the options provided by REPS for corncrake conservation. While aid is available under the supplementary measure in REPS to encourage the preservation of the corncrake, greater efforts will have to be made to get landowners in the target areas to join REPS, where funding of up to £6,000 per annum is available to each of them. I understand the Department does not consider that there is any scope for a special REP scheme for the corncrake.

I can do no more than reassure the Senator and the House that the Minister does not intend to abandon the present corncrake scheme until such time as he is satisfied that REPS or other agri-environmental measures are capable of providing at least the same protection for this endangered species. He intends to review the situation at the end of February 1986.

The Seanad adjourned at 3.25 p.m. until 2.30 p.m. on Wednesday, 22 November 1995.

Top
Share