Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Thursday, 16 May 1996

Vol. 147 No. 7

Adjournment Matters. - Compensation for Winter Beef Producers.

In 1989, while Minister for Agriculture and Food, I introduced a slaughter policy for any isolated incidents of BSE and banned the use of meat and bone meal, whether indigenous or imported. Despite my firm actions, which demonstrate that Ireland does not have a problem with BSE-infected cattle, the crisis with BSE in the United Kingdom has affected Ireland's beef and livestock sector, which is worth £1.7 billion, and created an unprecedented crisis at farm level, particularly for winter beef finishers.

The pre-Christmas BSE scares in the United Kingdom, in addition to the severe reduction in the level of European Union export refunds last October, resulted in a dramatic decrease in the price of cattle in December 1995. The UK announced the existence of a problem with BSE on 2 March 1996. We all regret and deplore the manner in which that announcement was made. With the subsequent virtual collapse of beef markets in the UK and European Union and the imposition of export bans in many of our international markets, cattle prices collapsed to 92p per pound. This gave rise to an income crisis for winter beef producers who play an essential role at the end of the beef production chain.

At a steer price of £1 per pound, Teagasc calculates that producers were losing £71 per head of cattle even with the £60 per head winter beef slaughter premium. This price operated from 1 January to the announcement of the BSE crisis on 20 March. Following that announcement cattle prices fell to 92p per pound. Teagasc, taking account of the £60 per head slaughter premium, calculates that producers are losing £138 per head at that price. Premium compensation is required. The UK BSE crisis and European Union reductions in export refunds inflicted heavy income losses on producers during the current year. Both problems were outside the control of farmers and were in no way related to the stringent and effective actions I took in 1989 as Minister for Agriculture and Food.

The Luxembourg BSE farm council acknowledges the need for producer compensation if required by the market situation. Point 10 of the council's report states that, if justified by market conditions, additional specific measures will be proposed by the Commission for suckler cows and male bovines. The beef sector is three times more important to the Irish economy than any other agricultural sector is to other European economies. When I was a member of the Council of Ministers I argued for specific support for the Irish beef sector. I constantly reminded my European colleagues that no matter how important was cheese to the French economy or wine to the Italian, Ireland's beef sector was three times more important to its economy. Full premium compensation is required to offset the severe losses endured by winter beef producers in 1996.

Premium compensation should be very specific and should be paid to producers who incurred losses during the current year. It should be paid in the form of a beef finisher premium based on beef animals sold between 1 January and 9 June 1996. The level of premium compensation must reflect the cattle market price and differentiate between the periods 1 January to 24 March and 25 March to 9 June. The compensation must cover steers, heifers and young bulls slaughtered at meat plants and exported live during the period 1 January to 9 June. As calculated by Teagasc, the beef finishers premium rate should be £71 per head for January to mid-March and £138 per head mid-March to June.

I will now explain what I propose by way of deseasonalisation premium. As a result of the BSE crisis there was a significant reduction in steer slaughtering at beef export plants from 25 March. The European Union deseasonalisation premium was reduced from £60 per head to £45.07 per head on 15 April. It was further reduced to £35.05 per head on 29 April. In view of the fact that animals could not be sold because of the BSE crisis, it is now essential that the full level of the deseasonalisation — £60.09 per head — be paid on all eligible steers slaughtered up to 9 June. This proposal is neutral in terms of the European Union Commission budget.

To give an indication of the calculation of losses, 305,763 disposals took place between 1 January and 24 March. The total losses calculated by Teagasc, at £71 per head, were £21.7 million. From 25 March to 9 June there will be 260,455 disposals and the losses calculated by Teagasc, at £138 per head, total £35.9 million. The overall number of disposals will be 566,208 at a total loss of £57.5 million. Teagasc calculates that winter beef producers have incurred the following income losses as a result of collapsing beef prices in 1996: January to mid-March £71 per head and mid-March to June £138 per head.

Compensation for these losses is required in the form of a beef finisher premium. Premium compensation must be paid to producers of steers, heifers and young bulls who sold cattle between the dates of 1 January and 9 June. The full rate of £60.09 per head of the deseasonalisation premium must be paid on all eligible steers slaughtered up to 9 June. The IFA has calculated that total premium compensation will amount to £57.6 million. This money must be paid in the form of beef finisher premia at the following rates: £71 per head for the period January to mid-March and £138 per heard for the period mid-March to June. That is the only basis that this essential link in the chain of cattle and beef production in Ireland will be protected against complete decimation.

On behalf of the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry, I fully acknowledge that beef producers in Ireland have experienced a very difficult period since the beginning of this year. This happened as a result of the various reductions in export refunds last autumn and the recent BSE crisis following the announcement by the British Minister for Health on 20 March in the House of Commons of the possible link between BSE and CJD. The difficulties being experienced by Irish producers are evidenced by the substantial fall in cattle prices since the beginning of the year, which has resulted in serious income losses for many producers. The Minister's objectives throughout this crisis have been, first, to ensure the market was adequately supported through the introduction of emergency intervention measures and, second, to secure compensation for the income losses arising from the BSE crisis. Any reasonable commentator would acknowledge he has been successful in achieving those objectives.

As regards intervention, the emergency arrangements for April abolished the carcase weight limit and extended intervention purchasing to grade 04, a quality of animal not normally eligible for intervention. The arrangements for May introduced a weight limit at a relatively high weight and covered 70 per cent of our steer production. These arrangements have worked very well to date, and have succeeded in disposing of most of the backlog of cattle which had built up on farms in the immediate aftermath of the House of Commons announcement. In any event, the Minister is satisfied the emergency intervention measures prevented a complete collapse in the market, not just in Ireland but across Europe.

The Commission has also increased export refunds by 12 per cent in order to improve the competitiveness of our exporters to third country markets and to boost cattle prices within the European Union. This increase took effect from 9 May and, along with the intervention measures, should ensure a degree of stability in the market over the coming months.

The Minister was always conscious that the emergency intervention measures would be insufficient to support cattle prices at reasonable levels. For this reason, he insisted, both at the emergency BSE Council on 1-3 April and again at the usual meeting of the Agriculture Council on 29-30 April, that provision should be made for compensation to be paid to beef producers who suffered income losses because of the crisis. I am very pleased, therefore, to be given the opportunity today to outline on behalf of the Minister the compensation package which the European Commission adopted yesterday. This package represents a substantial response to the conclusions of the two Councils held in April.

In summary, the compensation package consists of an increase of £24.88 in the suckler cow premium and £20.71 in both instalments of the special beef premium. I understand the intention is that the increased premium payments would be based on applications submitted in 1995, with provision for adjustments to be made where producers had fewer animals in 1996 than in 1995, and for the savings on this to be used to compensate those producers who had more animals in 1996. This package is worth about £60 million to Irish beef producers and, in global terms, it will go a long way towards alleviating the income difficulties of Irish producers.

The Minister acknowledges, however, and I agree with him, that the package as currently constructed is not sufficiently targeted at those producers — the winter fatteners — who have borne the brunt of this crisis. He intends to seek to have the package amended so as to provide for compensation to be paid also to those producers through the deseasonalisation slaughter premium. I do not want to underestimate the difficulties the Minister faces in persuading the Commission and other member states to agree to this approach. Nevertheless, this will be an extremely important objective for him in the negotiations ahead on the Commission's proposals.

In conclusion, I am very pleased the Commission has adopted the compensation package and I intend to ensure that, first, it is targeted at those producers most affected by the crisis and, second, that the compensation is paid as early as possible.

I thank the Minister of State for her response but I think she will acknowledge that——

Acting Chairman

The Senator can make just a brief comment.

——the package as currently constructed is not sufficiently targeted at the people whom I am concerned about, the winter fatteners. In view of that, could the Minister of State ensure the Minister says to his colleagues in the Council and the Commission what I said so many times, that we are not just talking about individual fatteners or producers but the Irish economy? Will the Minister redouble his efforts——

Acting Chairman

The Senator cannot make a second speech.

——both in this context and in the context of GATT to ask the Commission to look to the exception panels in GATT to enable us to introduce such compensation?

I reiterate that the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry intends to seek to have the package amended. He accepts that as it is currently constructed it is not sufficient to compensate our winter fatteners, yet he underlines that he does not want to underestimate the difficulties he faces in persuading the Commission, and other member states, to agree to this approach. However, the Senator can rest assured that both he and his advisers in the Department will do everything possible to ensure those most seriously affected, the winter fatteners, will get some compensation for the serious loss in income they experienced for the two reasons I outlined — the reduction in export refunds last autumn and the BSE crisis which has befallen them since early April.

The Seanad adjourned at 5.26 p.m. until 2.30 p.m. on Wednesday, 22 May 1996.

Top
Share