Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Thursday, 12 Dec 1996

Vol. 149 No. 14

Adjournment Matters. - Horgan's Quay (Cork) Site.

There are many reasons I raised this issue. Many questions have been asked and answers are needed if the innuendo and confusion which surrounds this sorry episode is to be dispelled.

In November 1994, a Cork property developer stated he wished to purchase a three acre site at Horgan's Quay from CIE for a price in excess of its market value. This issue was discussed at the CIE board and it was deemed an appropriate price to pay for the property. The site was to be developed as a technology park with potential employment of up to 800. The vast majority of businesses and people in general welcomed this proposal. The latter saw it as an opportunity to find employment in a city with exceptionally high unemployment.

The good news for Cork people did not last long because the former Minister for Transport, Energy and Communications decided to go on a personal crusade to seek out and destroy corruption in semi-State bodies. After some time, he found little evidence to uphold his initial allegations and decided to portray this development as a cosy cartel. There then followed the crazy debacle of surveillance and allegations of corruption in the semi-State sector resulting in a full Dáil debate in the autumn of 1995. Owing to the exceptional publicity and smear campaign which followed, the development of the Horgan's Quay site was shelved.

It was claimed in the Dáil debate that other parties would have expressed an interest in the site had they known it was for sale. Would the Minister confirm if any of these have put forward proposals to purchase or develop the site? Does the Minister agree with the stance his former colleague took on this development? It was an unprecedented and callous attack on an individual who has done much to promote and develop Cork city. As a public representative for the constituency of Cork North-Central, I am appalled at the way the former Minister conducted this affair which has resulted in the potential loss of 800 jobs.

I remind the Senator that it is the current status of the site with which he is concerned.

The history of this matter is important if we are to assess the current status of the site and find out if any proposal is in the pipeline to compensate Cork for the loss of up to 800 jobs.

If the Minister knew then what he knows now, would he have supported the actions taken? This is something which must be found out because all businesses in the city welcomed the proposal. There is now a three acre site in a prime location whose only productive aspect is the rats. There has been no movement since November 1994.

I find it incomprehensible that this Government could have allowed a Walter Mitty-type character to damage the semi-State sector and the names of many good characters in Cork city. That is why I raised this matter. Will the Minister say if we are to be compensated for the loss of the potential 800 jobs, if any interested parties which were claimed during the 1995 Dáil debate to be interested in the site have expressed further interest and what is the current status of the site?

I convey to the Senator the regrets of the Minister for Transport, Energy and Communications, Deputy Dukes, who is unable to be present to respond to the issue.

I wish to explain at the outset that the way Coras Iompair Eireann uses the various assets at its disposal, including its property holdings, is a matter which falls entirely within the responsibility of the CIE group itself. Under the Transport Acts, the board of Coras Iompair Eireann may dispose, whether absolutely, for a term of years or for any lesser period, of property which in its opinion is not required for the discharge of its duties. The Minister for Transport, Energy and Communications has no function in individual property disposals by the CIE board.

As regards the Horgan's Quay property, the Department understands that the site is still used on an operational basis. Comprising approximately three acres with a possible option on a further two acres, the site is part of the group's total property at Kent railway station amounting to about 30 acres. The question of its future is currently under review as part of a comprehensive examination by the group of its operations and other commercial requirements at Kent Station. CIE expects that this review will be completed in early 1997. As part of the review, it may be necessary to move some operational elements of the freight business to another location.

The general aim is to put in place a development plan for the station which will substantially improve the integration of public transport in Cork city. This is in line with the group's efforts to improve and develop the services it delivers to its customers in its core business as a public transport operator. Options are also being examined for other on-site developments which would be specifically suited to this major transport node with a view to using the group's overall property holdings at the station in such a way as to maximise business development opportunities for the group.

The Minister has been advised that, over the past year, a number of inquiries have been received by CIE about the development of the Horgan's Quay site. The parties concerned have been advised that, on completion of the comprehensive review to which I have already referred, CIE will be in a position to deal with these inquiries.

The overall policy now pursued for CIE property places emphasis on an aggressive and fully commercial strategy. The aim of this is to develop the group's property portfolio in such a way as to maximise rental income and other direct revenue from the properties themselves while generating additional core transport business and improving facilities for passengers on a commercial basis. Specific opportunities are pursued through joint venture arrangements, leases and conditional or full disposals as appropriate in individual cases. Where it is decided to dispose of property which is surplus to operational requirements, the group's policy is to proceed as far as possible by way of an open public tender procedure in the interests of maximising the realisable value of the assets in question. Under this policy, CIE's income from its property portfolio has increased from £0.67 million in 1987 to £1.2 million in 1995. Specific initiatives undertaken in line with the group's commercial approach to its property assets include the major development schemes for Heuston and Connolly Stations recently announced, the development of restaurant, bar, retail and service facilities at various locations throughout the mainline rail network, together with the installation of facilities such as vending machines and public telephones on station platforms.

There have been two further positive developments in CIE's arrangements for handling its property portfolio. In the first place, the CIE board's property sub-committee has been reinstated, in line with the recommendations of the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Commercial State-sponsored Bodies, to assist the board in the commercial development of its property portfolio. Second, CIE has introduced new procedures whereby all substantial property disposals must be cleared by the board on the recommendation of the group chief executive following an open public tendering process.

I want to emphasise that the statutory position remains unchanged. Responsibility for property disposals is a matter for the CIE board. While the Minister has no function in this area, he considers that there exists within the CIE group the professionalism, commercial approach and institutional arrangements necessary to ensure that proposals for the future use of the Horgan's Quay site can be developed and processed in a manner which would have his confidence and that of the House.

Top
Share