This matter is not unrelated to adult literacy. There is a link between lack of education, literacy, unemployment, disadvantage and involvement in drugs. The original ministerial task force on measures to reduce the demand for drugs was established to tackle this problem. Arising from that report, a two pronged approach was initiated involving local drugs task forces in designated areas in Dublin and a Cabinet sub-committee on drugs set up to examine the problems.
The Youth Services Development Fund arises in the context of the Cabinet sub-committee. This fund was established by the last Government and £20 million was committed for development purposes. This was seen as an important development which would provide funding for various community projects directed at youths who were at risk or who had been, or might become, involved in drug abuse. The fund was to be significant and targeted to deal with the demand for drugs by providing alternative activities.
I was appalled that the budget allocated only £1.25 million for this year. The £20 million fund covered three years from 1998 to 2000. However, £1.25 million is a particularly poor start. It indicates a lack of urgency at Cabinet level. The purpose of establishing a Cabinet sub-committee was to underline the importance of the drugs problem. This fund was seen as one of the major ways of tackling the problem by providing alternative structures and projects.
It is only 18 months since the death of Veronica Guerin in the midst of a drugs epidemic. Since then, communities in deprived areas have come together at grassroots level because of the apparent inadequacy of the various State agencies empowered to deal with the problem. The fund is intended to tap into grassroots community involvement and activity so that communities will be empowered to provide services and projects to divert youngsters from crime, and drugs in particular.
I was recently at a meeting of the Hardwicke Street Association chaired by the local parish priest. The group involves the local community, the Garda and the business community. Every group was anxious and enthusiastic about the project. It was a three phase programme intended to give youngsters an opportunity of repairing cars, particularly stock cars, to channel their energy away from vandalism; to bring them into recreational and sporting activities; and to phase them into employment.
Central to this programme was the belief that there was a substantial fund available. This community led the fight against drugs. It was the first community to organise and get rid of drugs and drug pushers. It did so in a democratic fashion. However, the community then found that there was no guarantee that any funds were forthcoming and that the Department of Social, Community and Family Affairs had rejected its application. This undermines the efforts made by local communities. It is not long since we had an drugs epidemic. The drug barons can easily come back into communities which are now relatively free of drug pushers.
Irrespective of politics, if only £1.25 million is being made available then we could quickly slip back into the old situation. I hope the Minister can assuage my fears and give me some hope that the Government will provide adequate funding for the Youth Services Development Fund.