Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 14 Feb 2001

Vol. 165 No. 3

Adjournment Matters. Disadvantaged Status.

I thank the Minister of State for coming into the House to hear about this important matter, the application of St. Kevin's primary school, Littleton, for disadvantaged status. My files indicate that this is the third occasion on which I have raised an issue concerning the school, although not specifically this matter, on the Adjournment. In the past I have raised the question of the need for sanction for refurbishment and extension of the school and other works. I am happy to say that the works in question have been sanctioned and are at design stage. They are linked to the need for the school to be granted disadvantaged status.

The Minister of State, Deputy Hanafin, who comes from north Tipperary maintains contact with the area through her family. Perhaps she is au fait with the situation in Littleton, which is near Thurles.

There are 143 children on the roll in Littleton national school. The economic and social background of the area can only be described as disadvantaged, mostly for historical reasons. There are 160 local authority houses in what is a small area where employment is concentrated in the large Bord na Móna factory, where employment opportunities have depleted. As in other areas, many of those who used to live in the local authority houses to which I have referred have bought their own homes. This means that the catchment area of the school is dominated by households which collectively are experiencing a number of problems.

I maintain considerable contact with the staff of the school, including the principal, the parents' council and the community in general. A huge amount of work is being done by the parents' council on behalf of the community and the school. While it is true that there are problems in the area, it would be unfair to label it as a prob lem area. The committee is doing its utmost to secure the necessary resources to solve the school's problems. It is unfortunate that it was not included in the announcement by the Minister in January of this year's programme for schools designated as disadvantaged. It was a bureaucratic problem of application forms and a questionnaire not reaching the Department in time. A bureaucratic error meant the school was not included. The application is one of a number being reviewed by the Department this month. That is the reason it is so urgent that the matter is attended to as soon as possible.

The school is rising to the problems and issues facing it. Over 50% of the 143 pupils on the roll come from households in public or voluntary housing, 16% come from traveller families who have their own special needs, while about 46% come from households where the head of the household is unemployed. The picture is clear. Barnardos is undertaking a project in the school based specifically on the identified needs of the children concerned.

It is a six teacher school and, apart from its immediate inclusion in the disadvantaged schools programme, its needs are to maintain the current mainstream teacher number of six, to have a full-time home-school-community liaison officer and to obtain additional funding. The school has been allocated a part-time learning resource teacher who is present in the school three and a half days each week. There is a need for a resource teacher both for children with special needs and for traveller children, of whom there are 23 on the rolls. This is, proportionately, much higher than average. There is also a need for special needs assistants.

The school has outlined its needs. Its major concern is that, refurbishment and extension having been sanctioned, the brief given to the architect is much less than what the school needs. The brief is for a six classroom school, but lack of space is a major problem. It is urgent that the school is granted disadvantaged status. This can then become part of a new brief for the extension and refurbishment of the school to ensure, for example, a parents' room is provided for with increased staff facilities. There is a need for an additional staff bathroom, additional car parking space, and additional space for resource teachers and special needs teachers.

I appeal to the Minister of State to listen to the needs of this community which does much to help itself. She should heed its call for inclusion of the school in the disadvantaged schools programme in order that the teachers concerned and the community as a whole obtain the resources they need to meet the special needs of the community. I make that plea in the hope of a positive response from the Minister of State.

I thank the Senator for raising the issue of Littleton national school in which, as she said, I take an interest. When I met the principal last week we discussed the full profile of the school and the application made.

The issue of disadvantaged status arises in the context of the new programme of supports for pupils in primary schools announced by the Minister for Education and Science on 4 January. Only schools which participated in the recent national survey of educational disadvantage in primary schools are eligible to receive the package of supports available under the new programme.

All primary schools were invited to participate in a comprehensive survey of all primary schools undertaken by the independent Educational Research Centre in April and May 2000 on behalf of the Department of Education and Science. The purpose of the survey was to identify the level of concentration in each primary school of pupils with characteristics associated with educational disadvantage and early school leaving. The profile of the school outlined by the Senator and an examination of its file and profile suggest that it would qualify under a number of different headings.

At least three separate items of correspondence issued to all schools about the survey. It was expected that the survey would be completed before the summer of 2000, but this was not possible because schools requested additional time to compile the information requested. It was then decided that schools which submitted returns before 31 August would be ranked under this phase of the programme. Almost 75% of primary schools responded by that date. Participation in the survey was not obligatory. There was no way the Department of Education and Science would go back to a school which had not replied to ascertain the reason it had not replied.

A number of accepted socio-economic variables were used to compute an index of disadvantage for each school surveyed. These variables included unemployment, medical card possession and residence in local authority housing which have been found to be valid indicators of disadvantage at school level. Separate indices were used for rural and urban schools to reflect the findings of previous research which showed that educational disadvantage manifests itself differently in urban and rural locations. Participating schools were ranked in order of the number of disadvantaged pupils enrolled.

The survey provides a valuable basis for directing resources to the areas of greatest need. The findings were used to allocate resources under the new programme to tackle educational disadvantage at primary level. The programme involves expenditure of £26 million over a three year period, including the allocation of over 200 new teacher posts and supplementary funding to primary schools with concentrations of pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds. The additional supports must be targeted at the disadvantaged pupils in each school. The programme has both an urban and rural dimension.

All the schools identified as having enrolled pupils with characteristics of disadvantage have been invited to participate in the new programme. Almost 2,300 primary schools will benefit under the programme based on the levels of concentration of disadvantaged pupils in the schools as identified through the Educational Research Centre survey. Details of the schools eligible for assistance under the programme have been published.

Schools which submitted survey returns after 31 August were not considered for inclusion in this phase of the new programme. I am aware from the principal of Littleton primary school that the completed questionnaire was not received from the school until 21 September 2000. While I am aware that there are surrounding issues, it is important to indicate that the reason the school was not considered was not that it did not qualify, but that its application was not received by 31 August. The position on such schools is that the ERC has been requested to consider their submissions. Their position will be considered by the Department under the later phases of the programme. I presented the file again this week to the relevant section of the Department and asked that it review the position of Littleton primary school quickly. It was in the context of the Barnardos project as part of the extended State-run, Government funded Springboard project that I met the principal of the school. I regret that it is not possible to include the school in the new programme at this stage, but I have asked for its submission to be reviewed. I hope it will be included in the new phase.

The Minister for Education and Science is committed to supporting schools such as Littleton primary school which will receive the new supports to which it is entitled. I am aware that the school has applied for a second resource teacher for travellers and the Department expects to be in a position to make a decision on this issue shortly. I thank the Senator for raising this issue, in which I take an interest.

Does the Minister of State know when the decision on the later phase is likely to be made?

I was not in a position to obtain a date, but I will check the matter for the Senator.

Top
Share