Skip to main content
Normal View

Seanad Éireann debate -
Wednesday, 30 May 2001

Vol. 166 No. 19

Adjournment Matters. - Cattle Movement Permits.

I welcome the Minister of State to the House. I congratulate him and the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Rural Development on the wonderful work they did in ensuring the foot and mouth disease outbreak was contained. It was a great achievement and the farming community appreciates the work that was done.

It was decided earlier this month that farm to farm movement of breeding bulls would be allowed. Prior to that there was only movement of cattle from farms to slaughtering factories for which permits could be obtained from the local Teagasc office. For farmers in my area to move breeding bulls from farm to farm one had to obtain an application form from the local Teagasc office and send it to the south-western cattle services office in Bandon, County Cork, which would issue a permit by return post. Every precaution had to be taken to ensure there would not be a recurrence of foot and mouth disease and that rogue dealers would not cause problems. However, breeding bulls are moved between farmers who are very conscious of taking every precaution to ensure there is not an outbreak of disease.

Farmers have experienced difficulties because breeding bulls must be blood tested and tested for TB and brucellosis, and they often have to wait for nine or ten days to get the results. A farmer cannot do anything until his bulls have passed the TB and brucellosis tests. He must then send his application form to the south-western cattle services office in Bandon and wait until he receives a permit to move the bulls. Breeding bulls are very important to beef production. At this time of year farmers are anxious to get their cows in calf as early as possible and, therefore, the delay in the granting of permits for breeding bull movement created hardship for both the purchasing farmer and the seller.

One farmer told me he sent three application forms to Bandon on a Monday and received two back on the Friday. He rang the office in Bandon, but it was difficult to get through, which was another problem experienced by farmers. The farmer was told the form had to be forwarded to the DVO in Limerick. He rang that office and said he would call there to collect the form but he was eventually told that the office had posted it to him and as a result it was a week before he obtained the third permit. Meanwhile, the farmer to whom he had sold the breeding bull was extremely anxious to get his bull.

I compliment the Minister for allowing the applications for permits to be sent by fax as they could only be issued by post initially. I am aware of a farmer who sent in three application forms via fax but only received two back. When he inquired about the third application, he was informed that it did not arrive.

I do not know what will happen with regard to cattle movement on 18 June when marts re-open, but I am sure the Minister of State will inform me. The south-western cattle services office in Bandon is over-burdened as it is also responsible for calf birth registration. I have an envelope addressed to the Department of Agriculture and Food, Farm to Farm Cattle Movement Notification Agency, Freepost, Kilfinane, Kilmallock, County Limerick. It was originally decided that the farm to farm movement agency would be based in Kilfinane. Since the office in Bandon is over-burdened a better service might be provided if the agency was located in Kilfinane, although I am open to correction.

The permits could also be granted through local DVOs because prior to this all one had to do was provide the identification number of one's animal, the herd number and the purchaser's number. The purchaser and the seller would send forms to each other, which were kept, and that sufficed. It was understandable that the Department had to go to extremes following the outbreak of foot and mouth disease and the fear of its spread and take the precautions it did, but at this stage the restrictions could be eased and cattle movement permits expedited more quickly.

I thank the Senator for his kind remarks about our efforts and those of departmental officials, the Garda, the Army and members of the public in regard to preventing the spread of foot and mouth disease. This House has, throughout the foot and mouth disease crisis, been solidly behind the national effort to prevent the spread of the disease and has been generally supportive of the Department's efforts in that regard. Senators were quick to recognise the magnitude of what was at stake and the consequent necessity for a range of restrictions on animal movements and other aspects of daily life. The House is to be commended for adding at an early stage its voice to those of the Taoiseach, members of the Government and Members of the Dáil in underlining the importance of vigilance and of adhering to the necessary restrictions. The Members of this House have played a significant role in contributing to the success to date of the national effort on foot and mouth disease.

I have, therefore, no doubt that the House will recognise that we are not yet out of the woods as far as foot and mouth disease is concerned. We can take great comfort from the fact that we have had just a single case of the disease and that more than two months have elapsed since that occurred. However, there remains good reason to ensure that precautions continue to be taken against the disease for the time being. New cases of foot and mouth disease continue to arise in Britain and it is expected that this will continue for some time to come. There remains uncertainty about aspects of the four cases of foot and mouth disease which occurred in Northern Ireland.

We are in the throes of a major programme of serological testing of sheep flocks throughout the State in the context of obtaining the degree of assurance which will ultimately enable us to declare Ireland once again foot and mouth disease-free under OIE rules. Foot and mouth disease is still a live concern and we are still some way from the point at which we can feel totally relaxed about the issue or consign it to history.

Controls on the movement of susceptible animals and a range of protocols and precautions therefore remain necessary. It has, however, been possible to bring about a significant easing of these restrictions over recent weeks, having regard to prevailing conditions and taking account of advice from the expert advisory group. This has relieved some of the pressures which farmers in particular have endured over recent months. Further easing of restrictions will be possible if matters continue to move in the right direction and as and when we reach the point of being able to make the foot and mouth disease-free declaration to which I have referred.

The permitting systems which have underpinned the easing of restrictions on animal movements have worked well. Cattle are the most relevant species as movement of other species, other than to slaughter or on welfare grounds, remains prohibited for the time being. Since farm to farm movement of cattle under permit was allowed, 145,000 cattle have been permitted to move to other farms. That number was covered by almost 13,000 applications from individual herdowners. Where applications are fully in order, they are processed on receipt and the permits posted to the herdowner without delay. The available evidence would support my view that this system is working well.

As the House would expect, permits are issued only in cases where everything is in order on the application. In the context of foot and mouth disease controls, it would be entirely inappropriate to permit movement where there was a question mark over an application and until concerns had been satisfactorily addressed. The type of anomalies which have occurred in relation to some applications were the use of an invalid herd number, seller's details not corresponding to the details entered on the CMMS database and buyer's details which were similarly inconsistent with the CMMS. Where minor issues arose, it has often been possible to rectify those over the telephone and to subsequently issue the permit with little or no delay. That will continue to be our approach. Where more significant anomalies arise, this may result in necessary delay while the herdowner addresses the particular issue or in refusal of a permit on stated grounds.

Given the volume of applications received, the system is working well. From next week, as already announced, it will be possible for herdowners to seek permits to facilitate the assembly of cattle at marts to make up consignments for onward movement to other farms or for export. That will further relieve pressure among livestock farmers as we move towards eventual normality.

The Senator will appreciate that there have been some other aspects of animal movements which we have had to take account of and which may have a long-term effect on disease control. We are extremely conscious of that and there is sufficient evidence to show that we need to be restrictive in this area.

I appreciate the Minister of State's concern and that precautions must be taken to ensure that everything is done legally—

The Senator will appreciate that there is sufficient evidence of a number of illegal movements which give rise to concern about traceability and so on.

I appreciate that but perhaps matters could be expedited.

The Seanad adjourned at 8.35 p.m. until 10.30 a.m. on Thursday, 31 May 2001.

Top
Share