Skip to main content
Normal View

Select Committee on Enterprise and Economic Strategy debate -
Wednesday, 19 Jan 1994

Business of Select Committee

Business of Select Committee.

Perhaps we could have a brief discussion on the time we intend to spend. Do we intend to adjourn at a particular time and do any Members have to be elsewhere at a given hour? I suggest that we continue until 12.45 p.m. and then adjourn. We may have completed Committee Stage by then but I do not know.

At our meeting last week we spent a lot of time on section 1 of the Industrial Training (Apprenticeship Levy) Bill, 1993. I do not want to restrict anybody's contribution, but if we are going to go through the same exercise again there is a slight difference this week in as much as we have an amendment to section 1, which will be dealt with first. Could we agree on a time for the contributions on section 1? In the various meetings we have had it is emerging that people tend to give something akin to a Second Stage speech on section 1. Could we agree on three minutes per Member with five minutes for the Minister to respond on section 1? That would be separate from Deputy Quill's amendment to section 1.

I would prefer to go right through and terminate the Bill without a break at lunch if that proves possible. I wholeheartedly support your idea of curtailing discussion on section 1. I think your proposal is a good one and might be supplemented by saying that we will complete section 1 by a certain time.

I agree with that and would rather work right through as well. I also support your remarks. It is not as if anyone is trying to curtail anybody. There was a debate on Second Stage and if colleagues want to make Second Stage speeches, I think that at this early stage in the life of the committees the chairpersons should take the line that the Dáil Chamber is the place to do so. If they want to stay with the Bill, amendment by amendment throughout the afternoon, I would like to see everybody stay; but that is a matter for themselves.

Thank you, Chairman. I have a meeting at 1 o'clock and I would very much appreciate it if the committee could facilitate me in that. Since it is a small piece of legislation I would hope that, if we can focus on what is entailed, we ought to be able to finish our meeting by 1 o'clock.

I think we are in agreement on how to deal with section 1 in particular. Is everybody happy with a three-minute slot? Is that agreed? Agreed. I will try to accommodate everybody. Deputies R. Bruton and Quill have other meetings to attend and I have no doubt that other Members of the committee have also. So we will proceed with the business.

The Oireachtas Joint Committee on Commercial State-sponsored Bodies is meeting at 11.30 a.m. today and there is a clash of committees again tomorrow. It should be possible to arrange meetings so they do not clash, because some of us are on more than one committee. My party has very few members and I feel I have to turn up at these different committees, otherwise we would not have any representatives at some of them. I wonder if it would be possible for you, in consultation with other chairpersons, to try to arrange that these clashes, which seem to happen every week, might be avoided. It is worst on Wednesdays, because most of the committees seems to want to meet on Wednesdays. Perhaps it would be possible to schedule such meetings throughout the week.

A letter has already been sent by Deputy Jim Mitchell, who is chairman of the Committee of Public Accounts, which meets regularly on Thursdays, because problems are being created for some of the Members of that committee. That committee has organised its timetable as far as June this year. When the Dáil sits next week I hope the chairmen will meet and work out a timetable to avoid duplication and resolve this matter. I will ask my colleagues to sit down and discuss how we can ensure that there will be no clashes in future. It may not be possible to avoid clashes at all times because the availability of venues is another problem. While we may try to avoid a clash of meetings, a room with adequate facilities may not be available. That is part of our problem.

The purpose of the Terms of Employment (Information) Bill, 1993, is to provide for the implementation of provisions of the EU Council Directive on employers' obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to contract of employment or employment relationship. The Bill also amends the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act, 1973. The Bill is primarily concerned with the provision of information to employees about their terms of employment. The main provisions are as follows.

The Bill requires employers to provide their employees with a written statement of specified particulars of employment within two months of commencement of employment. In the case of employees assigned to work outside the State for not less than one month an employer must provide supplementary information to the employee prior to the employee's departure. Notification of any change in the terms of employment must be notified to the employee within one month of such change. Existing employees must be supplied with a written statement of the particulars of their terms of employment within two months of requesting such a statement.

Complaints about non-compliance with the terms of the Bill may be referred to the rights commissioner in the first instance with a right to appeal to the Employment Appeals Tribunal. If the complaint is upheld the employer may be directed to pay compensation of up to four week's pay to the employee in addition to being required to supply the required information. Section 9 of the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act, 1973, which is being repealed by the Bill, provides that an employee must be provided with certain specified particulars of employment. The provisions of the Bill, in order to comply with the terms of the directive, are more extensive in a number a respects than the provisions of the 1973 Act.

Prior to consideration on Committee Stage of the Bill it should be noted that, in addition to the Minister for Enterprise and Employment, the following Deputies have put down amendments: Deputies Richard Bruton, Pat Rabbitte and Máirín Quill. We will now proceed with the Committee Stage.

Terms of Employment (Information) Bill, 1993: Committee Stage.

Top
Share