This is quite a good provision. However, one thing intrigues me. We appear to be putting this obligation on moneylending but not on any other type of credit agreement.
In section 99 (1) (b) we envisage charges being payable by the borrower for non-compliance with his commitments in the credit agreement. However, we are making it illegal in the case of moneylending agreements. There are mixed principles involved if we take the view that a moneylender cannot increase the rate for credit when somebody defaults on a payment. The moneylender will have to negotiate a new agreement if he wants to put that person into a higher risk category. It is strange that although we are correctly imposing that requirement on moneylenders we are not imposing the same requirement on other types of lending. There is much talk nowadays about level playing fields but it is clear that we envisage other lending institutions being able to impose these additional charges. Is there an inconsistency there?