I move amendment No. 32:
In page 14, subsection (1), line 39, to delete "may" and substitute "shall".
Subsection (1) reads:
Where civil proceedings or criminal proceedings are instituted in connection with a matter that is the subject of a complaint under section 8 or 9 of this Act and have not been finally determined, and the Society consider that in those proceedings it is likely that the court will determine an issue relevant to or concerning such complaint, the Society may adjourn their investigation . . .
Where the society sees that the High Court is likely to determine an issue relevant to or concerning such a complaint, it should not pre-empt the High Court and it should not continue to carry out inquiries in parallel if it knows that the High Court is to come to a determination. The word "may" gives the option of continuing although the High Court may be in the process of making a determination of which the society would be aware. I would not "go to the wall" with this amendment but I would like the Minister's view on the point.