I move amendment No. 300 :—
To delete sub-section (1).
The section says :
" If any person without due authority, the proof of which authority shall lie on such person—
(a) opens or keeps any house, place or rendezvous, or office as connected with the recruiting of the Defence Forces. . . he shall be guilty of an offence under this sub-section."
Could anyone imagine such a thing happening ? Is there any reason for that ? Could anyone imagine any person in his senses opening a house for recruits for the Defence Forces, unless he was paid by the Department of Finance?