Skip to main content
Normal View

Food Safety Standards.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Thursday - 20 May 2004

Thursday, 20 May 2004

Questions (5)

Mary Upton

Question:

5 Dr. Upton asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food his views on the recent report by the FVO, following a mission carried out from 15 to 18 September 2003, on the control systems for the placing on the market and use of plant protection products and for pesticide residues in foodstuffs of plant origin; if he has satisfied himself with the response to the recommendations in the report; if he has further satisfied himself that there are sufficient resources in place to ensure the delivery of the appropriate level of confidence in the testing regime for the products referred to; and if he will make a statement on the matter.[14885/04]

View answer

Oral answers (6 contributions)

I was pleased with the results of the mission carried out last September by the FVO in that the audit did not identify any serious flaws regarding the control systems for the placing on the market and use of plant protection products and for pesticide residues in foodstuffs of plant origin. Some of the criticisms made in the report reflected a misunderstanding on the part of the FVO regarding the controls in place. The mission report identified a few issues that should be addressed. In each such case, either steps were already being taken to address the concerns or have since been taken. I am satisfied that adequate resources are in place for the delivery of the appropriate testing, as required under the relevant EU legislation. The development of the new laboratory complex in Backweston and the recruitment of further staff will further enhance this testing regime.

I am afraid I cannot share the Minister of State's confidence or the confidence he attributes to the FVO on this report. Reading the report is a negative experience. One bad report can be considered an accident but two bad reports must surely be carelessness of some sort. Yesterday, one will have seen on the Europa website that there is yet another report on residues in animal products. It is very negative and critical. What action can be taken to inspire confidence in the consumer at home and to inspire confidence in our exports?

The audit mission, by its nature, focused on flaws in the system in place. Its function is not to point out the positive aspects of the system and the progress made but to highlight the difficulties and flaws. In the past three years, the number of samples analysed by the laboratory has increased by some 240%, a huge increase. We have increased staff numbers and will continue to do so. We are building a modern complex at Backweston. Some Members of the House believe we should not do so but we are proceeding with it because we believe it is important. It will be done and will have a major impact. This laboratory was the first in Ireland to be accredited to ISO 17025 standard and it continues to maintain that accreditation status.

There was further expansion of the testing capacity of the pesticide control service in 2003 to permit it to assess applications for the authorisation of plant protection and biocidal products in a timely manner for the risks arising for humans, animals and the environment. The staff has increased by 16% since the beginning of last year and a further eight people will be recruited over the next year. Given the investment made, the equipment that has been purchased and the productivity and performance that operates there, high standards have been achieved. We accept there are negatives in the report. We addressed some of them immediately and we are addressing others. By and large, we are as good as any other member state in terms of performance.

The previous mission was carried out in 1998 and six recommendations arose from it. One of them was addressed in the intervening five-year period and two were partly addressed. However, it appears that nothing was done about three of them. Does the Minister agree this is scarcely a timely method of dealing with this problem? While I accept that the report on animal products is not part of today's question, because it only appeared yesterday, it is an extremely serious and negative report. Products are not tested for nitrofurans, for example. There was a question earlier about the import of beef and poultry from South America. Nitrofurans have been found in poultry from South America but we do not test for them in this country. What type of confidence does this inspire in the consumer and the exporter?

Obviously we operate to the highest international standards and best practice. The FVO is there to ensure that happens. As we make investments in human, technical and physical resources, it is obvious we are committed to improving facilities and increasing performance. Performance has been increased by 240%. We are mindful and take account of the recommendations in the FVO report. We have already implemented some of the recommendations and we were in the process of implementing others before the inspection. However, that would not be taken account of during the inspection and probably would not have been obvious to the inspectors from the FVO. On that basis, people can be assured we are working to achieve the highest standards and to eliminate any doubt in the testing process. We will continue to work to achieve that.

There is a serious concern for our export market if we persist in failing to address these issues. I welcome the Minister's commitment to enhanced resources and supports and the recruitment of new staff. That is particularly relevant to the life products and meat. There are also issues regarding the co-ordination of the residue testing process. There are six or seven laboratories but some of them are not accredited. One private laboratory that is used is not accredited. There are issues that must be addressed with regard to consumer protection and confidence both at home and in our export market. This information is on the EUROPA website and is available internationally. It does nothing to inspire confidence when it is so negative.

Top
Share