Skip to main content
Normal View

Semi-State Bodies.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Thursday - 17 June 2004

Thursday, 17 June 2004

Questions (2)

Brendan Howlin

Question:

2 Mr. Howlin asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if her attention has been drawn to the serious concern expressed by trade unions, commercial firms in the region and the board of the company itself regarding her proposals to break up Shannon Development; if an independent assessment has been done of her proposal to transfer the company’s rental income from the Shannon free zone to the Shannon Airport authority; the reasons behind her proposal to transfer 100 jobs from Shannon Development to Enterprise Ireland; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [18151/04]

View answer

Oral answers (9 contributions)

As the House is aware, a number of recent developments will impact on the mid-west region and the State agencies located there. First, under decentralisation policy, some 1,210 staff from Departments and State agencies will transfer from Dublin to the mid-west region and the headquarters of Enterprise Ireland involving 300 of the agency's Dublin based staff will be moved to Shannon.

Second, it has been agreed that the management of Shannon town should be transferred from Shannon Development and vested in Clare County Council. The proposal by the Minister for Transport, which is again supported by the board of Shannon Development, to establish an independent Shannon Airport authority is also important in this context.

In light of these changed circumstances, I met the chairman, some members of the board of Shannon Development and the chief executive of the company on several occasions recently to explain and expand on matters under consideration. At the meetings, I also asked the board to bring forward detailed proposals in regard to the role that Shannon Development can play in the future development of the region and this discussion is ongoing.

I am aware of concerns expressed by trade unions, companies in the region and other interested parties. In this regard, I wish to stress my commitment to the future of Shannon and the mid-west region as a whole. My concern is to ensure that we put in place the most dynamic, sensible and efficient structures and manage the region's most valuable and strategic assets so as to optimise their benefit for the entire region.

Will the Minister agree it is unusual for a Minister to break up one of the most successful semi-State companies under that Minister's control? Will she accept that the track record of Shannon Development is without parallel in the country, that it is the only statutory regional development engine, that it has achieved the industrialisation of the mid-west, which is second only to Dublin, and that its break up will have an enormous negative impact on regional development, particularly the development of that region?

Does she agree with the comments made by the managing director of Avocent, the computer firm, when he said the region needed a strong airport but also a strong regional development authority and that one should not be at the expense of the other? What coherent reason is there for breaking up Shannon Development?

Change is often resisted. The reality is that since the early 1990s Shannon Development only helped indigenous companies on an agency basis for Enterprise Ireland. That role was removed from it in the reforms put in place after the Culliton report. On an agency basis, it was given the role of supporting indigenous companies.

Obviously, when Enterprise Ireland was moving to Shannon, it did not make sense that the work being done by Shannon Development, on an agency basis, for Enterprise Ireland should continue to be done by Shannon Development. In fact, the board of Shannon Development wrote to me stating that since Enterprise Ireland was moving to Shannon, it proposed that the staff doing the work for Enterprise Ireland should move to the new agency. That involves up to 100 people, although the exact number is not clear. Frontline project management staff may account for 50 or 60, while the remainder are background, clerical, administrative and information technology staff. That was going to happen in any event.

When the 12.5% tax rate was introduced for the entire country, and when the Shannon Free Zone no longer had a favourable tax regime compared with any other area, there was no longer a need for a licence to enter the zone. The Revenue authorities have now taken over the responsibility for those matters. An economic development agency should not run a town. It is more appropriate for the local authority to do so. All these matters were happening with the support of Shannon Development.

The most important asset in the region is the airport. Unless we can get more passengers using that facility and provide more services to Europe in particular to help business and tourism, the region will not be able to grow to its potential. In that context. the free zone is under the aegis of the Department of Transport which owns the property. Shannon Development leases it and this matter has not been resolved. It is by no means a fait accompli and has not been agreed. Contrary to much speculation, both today and on earlier occasions, these matters have not been finalised.

There is a need to strengthen the asset base at Shannon Airport. Shannon Development has an asset base of approximately €260 million. The Government must focus not on how it organises itself in the region but on what needs to be done to make the region vibrant. We need a strong Shannon Development with a new focus and role. Last Friday, I had a good discussion with the chief executive and a number of board members about the new scenario. We must have an open mind on the best way of organising the State's assets in that region, to bring the greatest benefit to the area and, in particular, to the airport which is the largest asset in the region.

The Tánaiste's first reply was more characteristic of the Taoiseach, in talking about extraneous matters such as decentralisation and the amount of jobs that are being located in the area. Her second response, however, was more forthright and focused. The real reason, however, is to give some economic justification to the break-up of Aer Rianta and the stand-alone policies of the airport. Is it not a fact that the only reason the Tánaiste is taking this decision is to transfer the rental income of the Shannon Development Company to the airport to put a gloss on the economic situation? In that way, the proposals by her colleague, the Minister for Transport, to break up Aer Rianta and establish each of the airports on a stand-alone basis have at least some semblance of economic sense. The Tánaiste should simply state that that is the only reason. All the rest is only fluff to hide the motivation which is purely ideological.

No, it is not the only reason. Shannon Development will have no role to help indigenous companies. That role is reverting to Enterprise Ireland which will operate from the region, so Shannon Development will not be dealing with companies. Both Cork and Dublin airports have industrial development parks, which is not unusual. Aer Rianta has serious problems and even if it were to remain intact, those problems could no longer be masked. We need three vibrant airports competing with each other, doing deals with airlines, getting passengers in and opening up more access routes. We must keep an open mind about how the State organises its activities to bring about the most vibrant and dynamic set of circumstances in the region in so far as the State can do so. Shannon Development has played a crucial role in the development of the mid-west region and there is no doubt about that.

It is true, as Deputy Howlin said, that no other region has done as well as Shannon. There is no other regional authority equivalent to Shannon Development. We all know the history of how and why it was established.

We must move on to the next question.

It has been extraordinarily successful.

The Tánaiste should replicate it, rather than damaging it.

As it goes forward, however, it must have a clear remit as regards what it is supposed to do and what its targets are so that we can measure the outcome. I am working with the company to achieve that and I believe we will achieve it.

Top
Share