Skip to main content
Normal View

Grant Payments.

Dáil Éireann Debate, Tuesday - 22 February 2005

Tuesday, 22 February 2005

Questions (288, 289, 290, 291)

Paul Connaughton

Question:

289 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food when the single payment entitlements will issue to a person (details supplied) in County Galway; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [5611/05]

View answer

Written answers

The person named applied for consideration of force majeure/exceptional circumstances on 5 February 2004.

Following examination of the exceptional circumstances outlined, my Department decided that the reference years 2000, 2001 and 2002 will be excluded from the calculation of the single payment entitlements for the person named and the entitlements will be based on the reference years 1997, 1998 and 1999. A statement of provisional entitlements reflecting this position issued to the person named on 1 February 2005.

Paul Connaughton

Question:

290 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food when her Department proposes to pay a special restocking grant to a person (details supplied) in County Galway; if her Department has approved such a payment to all sheep farmers in similar circumstances; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [5612/05]

View answer

The sheep flock belonging to the flock owner in question was depopulated as a result of scrapie prior to Christmas 2001. He has been paid compensation on the basis of an agreement reached with my Department. The terms of the agreement and the amount of compensation and income loss involved were clearly understood and accepted by all concerned at the time of depopulation.

Flock owners depopulated under this first phase depopulation arrangements were not allowed to restock for a period of two years. They received compensation for the capital value of the sheep and for income loss for that period. In addition, those who restocked in the third year, including the person named, also received compensation for income loss for that year.

The amounts paid to these producers for the capital value of the animals and for income loss for the period of three years were generous having regard to all the circumstances involved. I do not consider that payment of any additional amounts by way of restocking grants is justified in these cases.

Paul Connaughton

Question:

291 Mr. Connaughton asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food the amount of grants awarded to a person (details supplied) in County Clare in 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002; if it is more advantageous to this person to have the reference years calculated on the years 1997, 1998 and 1999; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [5613/05]

View answer

The person named received the following payments under the cattle headage scheme for the years 1997-2000:

1997

1904.61

1998

2034.12

1999

Nil — Not an applicant

2000

Nil — Not an applicant

The person named received the following payments under the sheep headage scheme for the years 1997-2000:

1997

91.42

1998

Nil — Not an applicant

1999

Nil — Not an applicant

2000

Nil — Not an applicant

The area based compensatory allowance scheme replaced the cattle-sheep headage schemes in 2001 and the person named received the following payments under the scheme for the years 2001-02:

2001

Nil — area aid (100% over declaration penalty)

2002

1858.92

The payments awarded to the person named under the special beef premium scheme for the years 1997-2002 are:

1997

1,300.99

1998

1,652.57

1999

Nil — not an applicant

2000

Nil — not an applicant

2001

Nil — not an applicant

2002

Nil — not an applicant

The payments awarded to the person named under the suckler cow premium scheme for the years 1997-2002 are:

1997

1,246.39

1998

1,246.39

1999

Nil — not an applicant

2000

Nil — not an applicant

2001

Nil — not an applicant

2002

Nil — not an applicant

The payments awarded to the person named under the extensification premium scheme for the years 1997-2002 are:

1997

1,300.99

1998

1,173.84

1999

Nil

2000

Nil

2001

Nil

2002

Nil

The payments awarded to the person named under the slaughter premium scheme for the years 1997-2002 are:

1997

Nil — not an applicant

1998

Nil — not an applicant

1999

Nil — not an applicant

2000

103.84

2001

Nil — not an applicant

2002

438.21

The payments awarded to the person named under the ewe premium scheme for the years 1997-2002 are as follows:

1997

318.60

1998

407.88

1999

708.00

2000

602.96

2001

Nil — not an applicant

2002

Nil — not an applicant

The only grounds for calculating the single farm payment using the reference period 1997-99 are where force majeure/exceptional circumstances are accepted as having caused a sudden, unforeseen breakdown in production, beyond the control of the producer, and affecting the entire reference period 2000-02.

The person named submitted an application for consideration of force majeure/exceptional circumstances on 5 February 2004. Having examined the circumstances outlined and supporting documentation, the single payment unit advised the person named that his application did not satisfy the criteria laid down in Article 40 of Council Regulation EC No 1782/2003.

An opportunity to appeal this decision to the independent single payment appeals committee was offered to the person named but has not been availed of to date.

Michael Ring

Question:

292 Mr. Ring asked the Minister for Agriculture and Food when a person (details supplied) in County Mayo will receive his REP scheme payment. [5631/05]

View answer

The application for payment in this case was received in my Department on 10 January 2005 and is being processed in accordance with the targets set out in the protocol on direct payments to farmers.

Top
Share