I propose to take Questions Nos. 225 and 226 together.
The table outlines the number of FOI requests received, the relevant fees paid as well as the overall amounts received in respect of FOI requests in each of the years 2002 to 2011:
Year
|
No of requests
|
Application Fee€
|
Internal Review application Fee€
|
Balance of Search and Retrieval paid€
|
Total Fees received€
|
2002*
|
205
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
912.88
|
912.88
|
2003
|
153
|
300.00
|
Nil
|
569.57
|
869.57
|
2004
|
62
|
600.00
|
375.00
|
240.79
|
1,215.79
|
2005
|
86
|
675.00
|
225.00
|
366.15
|
1,266.15
|
2006
|
71
|
600.00
|
375.00
|
580.93
|
1,555.93
|
2007
|
57
|
540.00
|
300.00
|
147.29
|
987.29
|
2008
|
85
|
880.00
|
375.00
|
346.07
|
1,601.07
|
2009
|
124
|
1,225.00
|
225.00
|
1,327.49
|
2,777.49
|
2010
|
104
|
975.00
|
225.00
|
673.77
|
1,873.77
|
2011
|
70
|
610.00
|
150.00
|
81.22
|
841.22
|
*Application fees only came into effect on 1st July 2003.
As regards the further breakdown of fees that the Deputy has requested in relation to initial search fees and search and retrieval fees, I can advise that this information would require the investment of significant time and resources and cannot, in the time available, be provided. If the Deputy has an interest in a particular year, I would be prepared to have this examined further.