Skip to main content
Normal View

Local Government Reform

Dáil Éireann Debate, Tuesday - 23 October 2012

Tuesday, 23 October 2012

Questions (51)

John Halligan

Question:

51. Deputy John Halligan asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government if he will bring forward a statement on the way in which he intends to proceed with the merging of Waterford City and county councils; specifically, the way in which a unified Waterford authority will be better positioned to address the many economic challenges facing Waterford; the legislative changes that will be required in the reorganisation process; the key issues and challenges that have been identified in the actual merger process; if any particular early priorities in service delivery are likely to be achieved ahead of the merger; location of the headquarters of the new authority is likely to be located; if he will provide details of the Waterford Implementation Group’s terms of reference; the reason the boundary area between Waterford and Kilkenny was not addressed in the reform programme; the amount being saved by Waterford City and county councils through local government efficiency savings since 2010; if those savings already accrued are included in the estimated €5 million savings to be brought about by the proposed reforms in Waterford; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [46507/12]

View answer

Oral answers (10 contributions)

The report of the Waterford local government committee on local government arrangements in Waterford was submitted to me on 29 March. Following Government approval, it has been published on my Department’s website. The report recommended that the county council of Waterford and the city council of Waterford be unified to replace the existing councils with effect from the 2014 local elections. The committee indicated that it had reached its conclusion having carefully weighed the evidence and considered the concerns about amalgamation raised during the consultation process. The context for the committee’s deliberations, the approach and rationale adopted in its analysis and the advantages associated with the merger are fully set out in the report.

Regarding the boundary areas between counties adjoining Waterford, the implementation group's report recommends the need for more effective arrangements for co-ordinated development planning between nearby counties and the need to develop a multi-authority retail strategy. Implementation arrangements, similar to those followed in Limerick and Tipperary to date, are being put in place in Waterford. I have appointed an implementation group which will be chaired by Mr. Seán Aylward who chaired the Waterford local government committee to identify further details of the requirements for the merger and oversee the establishment of the arrangements necessary for the reorganisation and transition to a single authority in mid-2014. The group will produce an implementation plan by the end of June 2013 to provide a blueprint to guide and direct the restructuring process. I have published the terms of reference and membership of the group. I expect that planning for the new arrangements will begin immediately. As was the case in Limerick and Tipperary, it is proposed that a dual management structure will be put in place on an interim basis to manage and drive the restructuring process and the transition to full amalgamation.

Amendment of the Local Government Act 2001 will be necessary for appointment of a single manager to manage both authorities in advance of a merger. Further substantive legislation will also be required to implement, with effect from the next local elections, the merger of the two authorities and establishment of a new unitary authority.

In regard to local government efficiencies and savings that can be made, I am advised that approximately €2.4 million of the €195.5 million efficiency savings during 2010 and 2011 that have been identified by the independently chaired Local Government Efficiency Review Group has been attributed to Waterford City Council and just over €2 million has been attributed to Waterford County Council. This is not included in the estimated financial savings of at least €5 million identified by the Waterford Local Government Committee, which relate purely to savings that would be likely to arise from merger of the authorities and does not include savings that might otherwise arise, for example, through other efficiency measures.

There is a perception out there that this is not about better local government but about cuts and savings. I believe what we will have is a greater divide between the citizens and the Government for the many people looking for more transparency in government and from politicians.

No matter what way we dress up this report, it proposes a downgrading of Waterford city's status and it further weakens its standing alongside cities like Galway and Cork. Some 1,898 jobs were created by the IDA in Galway and jobs were created in Limerick and Cork but none were created in Waterford in 2011. How is a demoted Waterford city expected to compete? Will we be in a position where, for example, no dedicated staff will be looking after the city despite the fact we are supposed to be competing with Cork, Galway and Dublin for inward investment? There is no consistency. Why were we not treated the same as Cork and Galway?

Waterford city is the natural centre for the headquarters to be located, being both central and highly populated, but it is also the gateway and commercial hub of the south east under the existing spatial strategy of this and the previous Government. Waterford has comparable key strengths, including its highly developed industrial infrastructure and quality of life at low cost, and the city is an intersection point for Irish biochemistry, sciences and ICT international services. In addition, the new M9 motorway has made possible a journey time between Waterford and all other areas of 90 minutes. The question everyone in Waterford is asking, including the mayor, who is a member of the Minister's party, is why we were not treated the same as Cork and Galway, given Galway is of comparable size?

I can understand that Deputy Halligan has got caught up in some misinformation that would arise-----

There is no misinformation.

I want to set a few matters straight with him.

Fine. I look forward to hearing it.

There will be no change in the status of Waterford city and Deputy Halligan will have his mayor. I know the Deputy is not a public representative who would be articulating what others are saying but there are local representatives who got off to a bad start in regard to clarifying those issues. I am glad to clarify them now for Deputy Halligan. As a distinguished former mayor of Waterford city, I know he will be anxious to keep the traditions, the history and the status of Waterford city, and that will happen.

It is not the intention of anybody to demote any place, particularly Waterford. This is done for the benefit of driving a gateway city much better than it is going today. There is a decline in every part of the country because of the economic downturn but we cannot ignore the fact we need a cohesive economic plan in order to drive Waterford city, to make it a meaningful gateway for the south east and to have it the capital of the region. That is what I intend to do, with the Deputy's help and that of the public representatives in Waterford and the region.

I have two questions. First, will the Minister clarify once and for all whether a city needs a city council under Irish law? If that is not the case, what the Minister is doing is wiping away 1,098 years of history in Waterford. Second, will provisions be made in law to ensure Waterford city's status within a merged authority? These are reasonable questions and the Minister might answer them.

First, Waterford city, in the context of the arrangements we have made for local government, will have its city status. Second, I want to see an enhancement of how we deliver public services in Waterford city and county. We are in the 21st century and we do not need as many structures as we used to have before. Whatever we can do in terms of the legislation, let us see how we can devolve as many functions as possible from national Government and national agencies, if we need them, to local authority level in places such as Waterford.

Then people will have much more opportunity to be able to decide their own destiny in Waterford in conjunction with greater co-ordination between the counties in the south east.

When I was a member of a local authority there was a great deal of co-ordination. We used to have a lot of meetings between Waterford and Kilkenny. A predecessor of the current Waterford city manager decided to stop such meetings. Perhaps we should resume the process in order to have a better relationship. Waterford could start to have a better relationship with Kilkenny; I would welcome that.

The time for Priority Questions has expired. We will take Question No. 52 in ordinary time.

Top
Share