Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 6 Nov 2012

Written Answers Nos. 238-259

Tobacco Smuggling

Questions (238)

Seán Kyne

Question:

238. Deputy Seán Kyne asked the Minister for Finance if Customs and Excise or the Revenue Commissioners have conducted an assessment on the impact the introduction of plain or standardised packaging for cigarettes here would have on the illicit cigarette trade here; if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the Department of Health supports international developments in relation to plain or standardised packaging for tobacco products; if he or his officials or the Revenue Commissioners have participated in any consultation with the Department of Health and the Health Service Executive regarding the proposed EU Tobacco Products Directive; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48147/12]

View answer

Written answers

The requirements in relation to cigarette packaging are a matter for my colleague the Minister for Health.

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that they have not, at this point, conducted a detailed assessment of any impact that the introduction of plain or standardised packaging might have on their work to combat the illicit trade in cigarettes. They will, however, examine the matter further in light of any specific proposals on that issue that may be brought forward in the context of forthcoming proposals for amendment of the EU Tobacco Products Directive. Among the factors to be considered in that context will be the requirement that all cigarettes that are offered for sale in the State must carry a tax stamp containing a range of sophisticated security features designed to prevent counterfeiting. An examination of whether a pack of cigarettes carries a genuine tax stamp is a key means for Revenue officials to distinguish between legal and illegal products, and this will continue to be the case irrespective of the way in which cigarettes are packaged.

Pension Provisions

Questions (239)

Paudie Coffey

Question:

239. Deputy Paudie Coffey asked the Minister for Finance the appeal mechanisms open to persons who currently have a pension bond who now wish to liquidate this bond in order to reinvest in a business, however the pension company are refusing to accede to the request; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48148/12]

View answer

Written answers

Revenue approval of occupational pension schemes is given on the basis that retirement benefits may, generally, be paid at normal retirement age which cannot fall before age 60 or after age 70. Most schemes would have a normal retirement age of 65. Revenue approval may also provide, however, for early retirement from age 50 where scheme rules allow and with the employer's consent. In such situations benefits are restricted. In the case of personal pensions such as retirement annuity contracts (RACs) and Personal Retirement Savings Accounts (PRSAs) benefits can be taken from age 60 with no retirement condition. Buy-out bonds, are Revenue approved policies or contracts of assurance into which occupational scheme benefits have been transferred and which can be availed of by members of occupational pension schemes leaving service or where schemes are winding-up. Benefits can be taken at the same time as were available under the original occupational scheme.

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that in relation to all of these pension arrangements benefits can be taken at any stage where retirement is due to serious ill-health or incapacity.

Where retirement benefits are taken in any of the circumstances outlined above, pension benefits drawn down by an individual (after taking any tax-free retirement lump sum that may be due) are subject to tax, generally at the individual's marginal rate of income tax.

I have no plans to amend the above arrangements for accessing pension benefits.

There are a number of reasons why, under existing policies, early withdrawals of pension savings are not permitted, the principal one being that pension schemes and plans (and the associated tax reliefs) are designed as long term savings vehicles to provide an income in retirement based on the principle that the savings will be "locked away" until that time. This, in effect, is the quid pro quo for the tax relief which is available to encourage long term saving for retirement.

There are also issues around pension funds investing in a beneficiary's own business. The first is the protection of pension benefits. In other words it would not be possible to protect pension and death benefits if the pension funds were to be invested in a company or business resulting in the possibility that the pension scheme or plan might ultimately be unable to pay the pension benefits on the retirement of the beneficiary or beneficiaries. Secondly, tax legislation in relation to pension saving arrangements seeks to ensure that the investment transactions of the pension arrangements are conducted on a commercial 'arm's length' basis. It does this by effectively rendering transactions that are not arm's length tax inefficient by deeming the amount or value of the pension schemes assets used in such transactions to be a pension payment and, therefore, subject to income tax.

Tax Code

Questions (240)

Joe Higgins

Question:

240. Deputy Joe Higgins asked the Minister for Finance his views on the fact that Ireland currently does not have legislation on controlled foreign companies which would allow the State to declare a tax haven subsidiary of a parent company to be resident for tax purposes in this country despite most advanced industrial countries having legislated for this; his views on the fact that this lack of legislation allows large multi-national companies to use Ireland to avoid paying tax on large profits that are booked in Ireland and instead filter them through tax havens like Bermuda and the Netherlands, and costs the Exchequer, as well as other countries, much needed tax revenue (details supplied); if he has costed the amount of money lost to the Exchequer each year due to lack of legislation in this area. [48162/12]

View answer

Written answers

Controlled foreign company legislation is considered necessary by countries where the opportunity exists for companies to set up subsidiaries in foreign jurisdictions that have very low, or no, corporate tax; to then accumulate tax-free profits in those foreign jurisdictions; and, in time, to repatriate those profits as tax-free dividends to the home country. Where such opportunities exist, controlled foreign company legislation enables the home country, subject to various conditions, to treat the subsidiary's profits as accruing directly to the parent company as chargeable profits of the parent company. Ireland does not exempt dividends, received by Irish parent companies from foreign subsidiaries, from corporation tax. While a common method of preventing double taxation, i.e. taxation in the source country and taxation in the receiving country, of dividends is for the receiving, or "residence", country to exempt the dividends concerned, Ireland relieves any double taxation, that would otherwise arise, by giving credit for the tax, if any, suffered in the source country against the Irish corporation tax on the dividends concerned. On that basis, where the dividends are received from a jurisdiction that has taxed neither the "underlying" profits nor the dividends used to repatriate them, those dividends will be fully chargeable to Irish corporation tax. There will not be the opportunity to accumulate tax-free profits in a foreign subsidiary and then to repatriate them as tax-free dividends, which controlled foreign company legislation seeks to address in other countries.

The Deputy's question appears to refer to structures that have been outlined in recent media reports. Where companies in foreign countries own valuable assets, such as patented intellectual property, it is reasonable that there should be full remuneration for the licensing of those assets to Irish companies. It would be incorrect to assume that the foreign companies concerned are subsidiaries of the Irish licensee companies. In the structures described in media reports the Irish companies would appear to be the subsidiaries of the intangible asset-owning foreign companies concerned. While it is appropriate, in any event, that Irish companies should pay for the licensed use of assets owned by companies resident in other jurisdictions, it is not clear what relevance controlled foreign company legislation could have in such circumstances.

Tax Reliefs Cost

Questions (241)

Arthur Spring

Question:

241. Deputy Arthur Spring asked the Minister for Finance the extra cost to the Exchequer that would arise if mortgage interest relief was extended to 50% for persons with net income of less than €30,000, and extended to 40% for person's with net income between €30,000 and €40,000. [48212/12]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that based on associating incomes and mortgage interest data for 2010, and applying derived ratios to the estimated cost of mortgage interest for 2012, the full year cost to the Exchequer of extending the rate of tax relief for mortgage interest paid by claimants with income of less than €30,000 to 50%, and of extending the corresponding rate for claimants with income between €30,000 and €40,000 to 40%, is tentatively estimated to be of the order of €145 million and €65 million respectively.

Bank Charges

Questions (242)

Brendan Griffin

Question:

242. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Finance his views on whether the new branch service charges (details supplied) in the banks are discriminating against older persons who are unable to use or avail of these online services; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48280/12]

View answer

Written answers

As Minister for Finance, I have no statutory role in relation to the issues raised by the Deputy. The issues raised are a commercial matter for the banking group concerned. However, I have been informed by the Central Bank that, as part of the group's model for delivering self service and automated arrangements for routine customer transactions, the group carried out a pilot scheme in this regard in a number of branches in June 2012, whereby these services would not be available in the branch. Alternative options such as internet/telephone banking, direct debit payments, lodgment and withdrawals at ATMs were available. The branches which took part in the pilot scheme advised that there were very few issues encountered and little or no adverse customer reaction.The banking group concerned then decided to roll out these changes with effect from 22 October 2012.

Customers were advised a minimum of 30 days in advance of the proposed changes through in-branch posters and leaflets detailing alternative options. All staff received training in advance of the rollout to enable them to deal effectively with customer queries. The decision to migrate these branch services to the alternative options mentioned is a commercial decision made by banking group. The group must ensure that the proposed changes are in line with the National Payments Strategy which states than any move towards electronic banking should not discriminate against older people or persons with disabilities.

EU Treaties

Questions (243)

Michael McGrath

Question:

243. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance his views on whether the ESM Treaty which has been ratified by Dáil Éireann provides a legal basis for the ESM to directly recapitalise eurozone banks or to buy equity stakes in eurozone banks from member states; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48333/12]

View answer

Written answers

Legislation was required for Ireland to ratify the ESM (European Stability Mechanism) Treaty, and the ESM Act (No 20 of 2012) passed all stages of the Oireachtas, and was then signed into law by the President on 3rd July 2012. Ireland deposited its instrument of ratification of the ESM Treaty on 1st August 2012. The ESM Treaty, at Article 48.1 provides that the ESM will enter into force when instruments of ratification, approval or acceptance have been deposited by signatories whose initial subscriptions represent no less than 90% of the total subscription. The ESM Treaty accordingly entered into force on 27th September 2012 following its ratification by 16 of the 17 Euro area member states, representing over 99.8% of its subscribed capital base. All 17 Euro Area Member States have now ratified the ESM Treaty.

As you will be aware, the Euro Area Summit Statement of 29th June affirmed that it is imperative that the vicious circle between banks and sovereigns be broken. The Statement of 29th June also stated that it has been agreed that when an effective single supervisory mechanism is established, involving the ECB, for banks in the euro area, the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) could have the possibility to recapitalise banks directly. This would rely on appropriate conditionality, including compliance with state aid rules, which should be institution specific, sector-specific or economy-wide and would be formalised in a Memorandum of Understanding.

The European Commission stated on July 2nd 2012 that the ESM Treaty does not need to be changed in order to allow the direct recapitalization of banks. They pointed out that Articles 14 - 18 of the Treaty set out the instruments that may be used to guarantee the Eurozone's financial stability, and that Article 19 provides that the Board of Governors may review that list of instruments and decide to make changes to it.

The ESM Treaty, therefore, provides for a review by the Board of Governors of the financial instruments available to it, and to make changes to that list. The decision on any such change would be made by the Board of Governors acting by mutual agreement, in accordance with Article 5 of the ESM Treaty.

Work is continuing at a technical level to put in place both the single supervisory mechanism, and the European Stability Mechanism's direct banking recapitalisation facility, at the earliest possible date. Ireland is participating constructively in these technical discussions. Any proposal to change the list of financial instruments provided in the ESM Treaty must be consistent with that Treaty.

The most recent European Council on 18/19 October 2012 concluded that:

"The Eurogroup will draw up the exact operational criteria that will guide direct bank recapitalisations by the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), in full respect of the 29 June 2012 euro area Summit statement. It is imperative to break the vicious circle between banks and sovereigns. When an effective single supervisory mechanism is established, involving the ECB, for banks in the euro area the ESM could, following a regular decision, have the possibility to recapitalize banks directly."

It is important from Ireland's perspective, that progress towards these goals is made as quickly as possible.

VAT Rates Application

Questions (244, 245)

John Paul Phelan

Question:

244. Deputy John Paul Phelan asked the Minister for Finance if VAT is payable on a used vehicle imported from the UK, noting that VAT had previously been paid in UK when purchased; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48336/12]

View answer

John Paul Phelan

Question:

245. Deputy John Paul Phelan asked the Minister for Finance if VAT is payable on a used vehicle imported from an EU member state, noting that VAT had previously been paid in the country of origin; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48337/12]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 244 and 245 together.

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the VAT treatment of motor vehicles is subject to European VAT law with which Irish VAT law must comply. Under EU law, the circumstances in which a particular supply is made will determine the VAT treatment to be applied to it.

The terms, 'used vehicle' or 'second-hand vehicle', apply generally to pre-owned vehicles, provided they are over 6 months old and have travelled over 6,000 km before they are supplied in the State. A motor vehicle which does not meet both of these conditions is regarded as a 'new means of transport', a specific concept in European VAT law.

There is no liability to VAT in Ireland where a private individual purchases a second-hand vehicle, as defined, from a motor dealer or a private individual in another Member State.

New means of transport, including those vehicles deemed second-hand but not qualifying under the definition above, are subject to Irish VAT at the standard rate, currently 23%. A person who purchases such a vehicle may, in certain circumstances, be able to claim a refund of the VAT paid in the Member State in which the vehicle was first supplied.

Detailed information including the rules relating to VAT on the supply of motor vehicles in Ireland is contained on the Revenue website at http://www.revenue.ie/en/tax/vat/leaflets/vat-and-vrt-on-motor-vehicles.html.

Regulation of Accountants

Questions (246)

Arthur Spring

Question:

246. Deputy Arthur Spring asked the Minister for Finance his views on whether the Revenue Commissioners, under current legislation, provide sufficient protection for the tax payer if incorrect accounts and information are submitted by the tax payer's accountant to the Revenue Commissioners without the taxpayer's agreement. [48350/12]

View answer

Written answers

As I informed you in my reply to you on the 18th September 2012 in relation to your earlier related question [Ref No: 48350/12], where a taxpayer engages the services of an accountant in relation to taxation matters, that contractual relationship is a private one between the taxpayer and the accountant – the Revenue Commissioners are not involved. Accordingly, it is considered that the appropriate forum for resolution of any dispute by a taxpayer regarding alleged negligence on the part of his or her accountant is either the accountant's relevant accountancy professional body or the Courts. I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that taxpayers are the persons legally responsible for filing their tax returns and accounts. Taxpayers can either prepare their tax returns and accounts personally or they can engage the services of an accountant to do so. It is reasonable to expect that a taxpayer would take any necessary steps to ensure the reliability of the accountant selected for this purpose – including that the accountant would only submit material to Revenue with the client's agreement.

Any taxpayer who submits incorrect accounts or information to the Revenue Commissioners, whether personally or through an accountant is, of course, obliged by law to correct the position, without delay. Errors corrected promptly may not have any impact on a taxpayer beyond possibly having to pay any additional tax liability due (but no more than would have been incurred if the correct accounts or information were submitted originally). However, if corrections are not made promptly an interest charge may be incurred and, depending on the nature of the incorrect accounts or information submitted, a penalty may also be incurred. In this regard, I explained in my earlier reply that the Revenue Commissioners will consider all factors leading to any adverse tax consequence, but it is important to note that the Revenue Commissioners will not relieve a taxpayer of an adverse tax consequence solely on the grounds that an accountant was in some way responsible.

I am satisfied that the Revenue Commissioners provide significant information in relation to the operation of the tax system and indeed the Revenue On-line System facilitates the calculation and filing of tax returns by taxpayers and their agents.

Budget Submissions

Questions (247)

Michael Healy-Rae

Question:

247. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Finance his views on a pre-budget submission (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48376/12]

View answer

Written answers

I have received a pre-Budget submission from the Society of St. Vincent de Paul. Its contents will be considered in the context of the forthcoming Budget and Finance Bill. As Deputies are aware it would not be appropriate for me to comment in advance of the Budget on possible Budget decisions.

Budget 2013

Questions (248)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

248. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide a breakdown of which taxes will make up to €300 million carry-over as a result of last year's budget measures. [48431/12]

View answer

Written answers

Last November's Medium-Term Fiscal Statement estimated that revenue raising measures of €1.25 billion would be required as part of the overall consolidation package in 2013 in order to adhere to the 2013 General Government deficit limit of 7.5% of GDP. It was estimated at that time that this would be made up of €0.95 billion in new revenue measures introduced in 2013 and €0.3 billion in carry-over from the measures introduced in 2012. There were however minor revisions to this estimate in Budget 2012 where the carry-over effect into 2013 of the revenue measures introduced in 2012 was estimated at €220 million. This information is set out on page D.17 of Budget 2012.

The estimated full year yields and/or costs of the tax revenue measures introduced in Budget 2012 are set out on pages B5 – B11 of the Summary of 2012 Budget and Estimates Measures Policy Changes section of the Budget 2012 book.

The difference between the estimated yield/cost of a measure in 2012 and in a full year is effectively the carry-over impact.

The biggest source of carry-over in 2013 is from the 2% standard increase in the VAT rate which it is estimated will yield an additional €110 million in 2013. The increase in carbon tax is expected to deliver an additional €29 million next year. The increase in the capital acquisitions tax (CAT) is also expected to deliver an additional €25 million in 2013 and the increase in DIRT an additional €15 million. These are the main sources of carry-over. For further details the Deputy should consult pages B5 – B11 of the Summary of 2012 Budget and Estimates Measures Policy Changes section of the Budget 2012 book.

In the context of producing the Budget 2013 tax revenue forecasts in the coming weeks, the Revenue Commissioners will advise my Department if the estimated full year costs and/or yields of the tax revenue measures introduced in Budget 2012 need to be revised further.

Universal Social Charge Payments

Questions (249)

Dan Neville

Question:

249. Deputy Dan Neville asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding universal social charge in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Limerick; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48436/12]

View answer

Written answers

The position is that for 2012 individuals are liable to pay the Universal Social Charge if their income exceeds the threshold of €10,036 per annum. As the taxpayer's gross income from a pension fund exceeds this threshold, the taxpayer is liable to pay Universal Social Charge of 2% on the first €10,036, and 4% on the balance of the taxpayer's gross pension.

Mortgage Arrears Rate

Questions (250)

Gerry Adams

Question:

250. Deputy Gerry Adams asked the Minister for Finance if figures exist in relation to the number of buy to let mortgages in the system here at present; and the percentage of these mortgages that are currently in arrears. [48519/12]

View answer

Written answers

The Central Bank has advised me that it will be formally publishing statistics on buy-to-let arrears before the end of this year. The Central Bank has stressed that the data it currently has on buy-to-let arrears are provisional and are based on best estimates at present. At the end June 2012, there were approximately 150,000 residential mortgage accounts for buy-to-let properties held in the State, to a value of €32 billion. Of this stock of accounts, approximately 38,000 (25%) were in arrears. The total value outstanding on these accounts was €11 billion. Approximately 30,000 accounts (20%) were in arrears of more than 90 days. The total value outstanding on these accounts was €9 billion.

Universal Social Charge Exemptions

Questions (251)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

251. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the number of people who would be affected if the universal social charge threshold was changed to take all those earning below the minimum wage out of the charge. [48520/12]

View answer

Written answers

The current minimum wage is €8.65 per hour. On an annualised basis, this is equivalent to €17,542 assuming a 39 hour working week. I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the additional numbers of income earners that would be exempted from the Universal Social Charge (USC) if the existing exemption threshold of €10,036 per annum was increased to €17,542 per annum would be of the order of 296,000 by reference to 2013 incomes .

This figure is an estimate from the Revenue tax-forecasting model using actual data for the year 2010 adjusted as necessary for income and employment trends in the interim. It is, therefore, provisional and may be revised.

Question No. 252 answered with Question No. 232.

North-South Implementation Bodies

Questions (253)

Gerry Adams

Question:

253. Deputy Gerry Adams asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide details of the type and frequency of North South engagement his Department undertakes; the current priorities in this area; the number of whole time equivalent staff assigned to these matters; the grades involved and the amount of time each grade spends on North South Activities as a proportion of their WTE employment; the co-ordination arrangements that have been put in place; if there are any current vacancies in North South Co-operation unites; the duration of this vacancy and the steps being taken to fill the vacancy. [48545/12]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy may be aware the North South Co-operation unit which was in the Department of Finance, transferred with its responsibilities, to the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform, when that department was established. Up until then Officials within my Department worked closely with the Department of Finance and Personnel (DFP) in Northern Ireland as joint sponsors of the Special EU Programmes Body, one of the North South implementation bodies established under the Good Friday Agreement. My Officials also worked closely with the Special EU Programmes Body and DFP with regard to the management and implementation of the EU co-funded cross border programmes, PEACE III and Interreg IVA. This work was undertaken within the framework of the North South Ministerial Council which I regularly attend meetings of.

Bullying in the Workplace

Questions (254, 255)

Martin Heydon

Question:

254. Deputy Martin Heydon asked the Minister for Finance if his attention has been drawn to any complaints of bullying, mis-selling or malpractice made against any of the executives of the pillar banks or their subsidiaries; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48559/12]

View answer

Martin Heydon

Question:

255. Deputy Martin Heydon asked the Minister for Finance if his attention has been drawn to any investigations of bullying, mis-selling or malpractice in Irish banks or their subsidiaries, which have been carried out while the institutions were in public ownership, and if he is satisfied with the findings or such report and its conclusions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48570/12]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 254 and 255 together.

As the Deputy will be aware under the Relationship Frameworks agreed between myself and the Covered Banks responsibility for the day-to-day operations of each Bank rests with the Board of the Bank. The Banks are obligated to notify me of a number of matters under the terms of their respective Relationship Frameworks. However some of the issues raised in your query are not notifiable to me.

I can inform the Deputy however that my attention has been drawn to current investigations regarding potential mis-selling of Payment Protection Insurance in the Covered Banks and to matters relating to the misreporting of customer data to the Irish Credit Bureau by both AIB and Permanent TSB. I have also been made aware from time to time of investigations and instances of overcharging and other related matters. I cannot provide any further information as such matters are commercially sensitive for the banks.

You will appreciate that customers of each of the banks can and do complain about mis-selling and malpractice of the respective banks to the banks themselves and to the Financial Service Ombudsman and in certain cases take legal actions. I may from time to time be aware of such actions.

My attention hasn't been drawn to any particular bullying of employees in the covered banks since they came into Government ownership as such matters would generally be dealt with on a confidential basis within each of the relevant institutions.

If the Deputy is aware of any instance of bullying, malpractice or mis-selling he should report it to the appropriate authority as a matter of urgency. If such matters fall within the notification requirement of the Relationship Framework I will be notified in due course.

NAMA Staff Numbers

Questions (256)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

256. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to parliamentary Question No. 311 of 18 September 2012, the number of staff recruited by the National Assets Management Agency, via the legal entity the National Treasury Management Agency, whose immediately prior employer was Irish Bank Resolution Corporation. [48602/12]

View answer

Written answers

The National Asset Management Agency informs me that since its inception it has, through the National Treasury Management Agency, recruited 227 staff, 14 of whom have been recruited directly from the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation or its predecessor entities.

Banking Sector Staff Issues

Questions (257)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

257. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance in respect of Bank of Ireland, if he will confirm the number of employees and total remuneration including benefits for the six months ending 30 June 2012 and for the 12 months ending 2011, 12 months ending 2012 and in the annual accounts for the previous two years. [48606/12]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by Bank of Ireland that the information the Deputy seeks is as follows:

Period

Staff Costs (€m) *

Reported Staff

Numbers at period end

6 Months ended 30 June 2012

443

13,397

Year ended 31 Dec 2011

862

13,234

12 month period ended 31 Dec 2010

1,003

14,235

9 month period ended 31 Dec 2009**

780

14,847

For the year ended 31 March 2009

1,197

15,487

* Staff costs includes, but is not limited to, the following:

* Wages and Salaries

* Pension Costs

* Social Security Costs

* Share Based Payment Costs

** Reflecting the change in the Group's year end.

All figures are as listed in the end of year Report and Accounts and the Interim Report for the 6 months ending June 2012, which are available on the Group's website.

Banking Sector Staff Issues

Questions (258, 259)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

258. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance in respect of Irish bank Resolution Corporation, the number of employees and total remuneration including benefits for the six months ending 30 June 2012 and for the 12 months ending 2011. [48607/12]

View answer

Pearse Doherty

Question:

259. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance in respect of Anglo Irish bank and Irish nationwide, the number of employees and total remuneration including benefits for the 12 months ending 2009 and 12 months ending 2010 and in the annual accounts for the previous two years. [48608/12]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 258 and 259 together.

I have been advised by the bank of the following information regarding the number of employees and remuneration for Anglo Irish Bank, Irish Nationwide and IBRC.

-

12 mths

12 mths

15 Mths

12 mths

12 mths

6 mths

-

Sep-07

Sep-08

Dec-09

Dec-10

Dec-11

Jun-12

Anglo / IBRC Staff Costs

€'m

€'m

€'m

€'m

€'m

€'m

- Salaries & Benefits

169

143

114

97

90

41

- Share based incentives

24

21

31

0

0

0

- Pension scheme payments

15

16

21

13

0

6

- Social Welfare

21

18

14

10

9

4

- Other staff costs

6

8

6

10

8

3

INBS Staff Costs

20.2

22.3

16.4

21.9

8.8*

n/a

TOTAL

255.20

228.30

202.40

151.90

107.00

54.00

Anglo/IBRC Headcount (average)

1714

1864

1681

1332

1186

1132**

INBS Headcount (average)

400

385

399

464

n/a

n/a

TOTAL

2114

2249

2080

1796

1186

1132

Note: INBS 2008 numbers are as at December

Note: *INBS 2011 staff costs are for H1 2011 only

Note: ** This number reflects average headcount for H1 2012. Actual headcount at 30 June 2012 was 1,031.

All figures reported are as per published IBRC, Anglo and INBS Annual Report & Accounts.

Top
Share