Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 27 Nov 2012

Written Answers Nos. 239 - 262

Tax Code

Questions (239)

Dominic Hannigan

Question:

239. Deputy Dominic Hannigan asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 204 of 20 November 2012, if the employee of a contractor, whose company is based in another jurisdiction but is working on a State contract, stand liable for USC or income tax to the Revenue Commissioner; if so, does the Revenue check to make sure that the charge and taxes are paid; are there any checks with the social protection Departments of other jurisdictions to ensure that the employees are not receiving any payments from them; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52874/12]

View answer

Written answers

The position is that, in line with the position prevailing in many other jurisdictions -

(a) an individual who is tax resident in the State for a tax year is liable to Irish income tax and the USC on his or her worldwide income for that tax year, and

(b) an individual who is not resident here for tax purposes is liable to Irish income tax and the USC on his or her Irish source income and gains and on income attributable to duties of an employment exercised here.

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the obligation to deduct income tax and the USC from employment income rests with the employer regardless of the fact that the employer may be based in another jurisdiction. Compliance with the PAYE and USC obligations is an ongoing feature of the Revenue Commissioners’ normal compliance programmes. The entitlement of individuals to payments under the relevant social protection system of another jurisdiction is not a matter for the Revenue Commissioners. Finally, if the Deputy is aware of situations wherein income tax and the USC correctly due to the Exchequer is not being deducted and remitted, he should inform the Revenue Commissioners of the necessary details.

Financial Services Regulation

Questions (240)

Patrick O'Donovan

Question:

240. Deputy Patrick O'Donovan asked the Minister for Finance the options open to a person who has made a complaint to the Financial Services Ombudsman, when the Ombudsman refuses to investigate the matter; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52876/12]

View answer

Written answers

Firstly, I must point out that the Financial Services Ombudsman is independent in the performance of his statutory functions and it would not be appropriate for me to comment on his work. Part V11B of the Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland Act 2004 details the functions and powers of the FSO. The Financial Services Ombudsman's Bureau has informed me that, when a complaint is received, the Bureau will assess the complaint initially to ensure if falls within the Ombudsman. The Bureau consists of the Financial Services Ombudsman, his Deputy and Staff. However, a complaint may not be investigated by the Ombudsman if in his opinion:

it is vexatious or frivolous or not in good faith,

the subject matter is trivial,

the conduct complained of occurred at too remote a time to justify investigation (6 year rule)

other redress means were available

complainant had no interest or an insufficient interest in the conduct complained of.

Neither the Ombudsman nor I would advise people on what options are available if the Ombudsman refuses to investigate a complaint. However, the Ombudsman may advise the complainant to seek legal advice.

Pension Provisions

Questions (241, 242)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

241. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the reason the group pension deficit at Allied Irish Bank increased from €763 million at the end of December 2011 to €1,457 million at 30 June 2012. [52879/12]

View answer

Pearse Doherty

Question:

242. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the reason the group pension liabilities at Allied Irish Bank increased from €4,562 million at the end of December 2011 to €5,466 million at 30 June 2012; if this increase is due solely to 2,500 redundancies sought; and if he will confirm that the liabilities have increased by an average of €361,600 for each of the 2,500 redundancies. [52880/12]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 241 and 242 together.

I am informed that AIB sets out information on its pension deficit in the Bank’s annual and half yearly reports and accounts. The following is a summary of that disclosure.

As set out on Note 11 - Retirement Benefits - to the condensed consolidated interim financial statements of AIB Group at 30 June 2012, AIB Group‘s pension deficit is calculated under International Accounting Standard 19 for the purpose of financial reporting. At 30 June 2012 the deficit stood at €1,457 million compared to €763 million as at 31 December 2011. The increase of €694 million in the net deficit arose following the increase in retirement benefit liabilities by €904 million to €5,466 million while the fair value of schemes assets increased by €210 million to €4,009 million.

I understand that the defined benefit pension liabilities increased by €904 million to €5,466 million during the six months to 30 June 2012 due to a number of factors including:

- Changes in demographic and financial assumptions of €595 million. In particular the discount rate used to value the scheme’s liabilities fell significantly in the period which increased sharply the value of the liabilities

- An amount of €124 million has been included in respect of past service costs for those employees expected to opt for early retirement. This represented the best estimate of the amount required to meet the additional past service costs of the early retirement scheme based on the known facts and expectations at 30 June 2012.

- Interest cost of €113 million, being the unwind of the discount on the present value of the defined benefit obligation for the half year

- Experience losses on scheme liabilities of €45 million.

Pension Provisions

Questions (243)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

243. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance in view of the statement in Allied Irish Bank's report and accounts for the six months ending 30 June 2012 that the group pension deficit at that date was €1,457 million; if he will confirm the deficit that now exists in the AIB group pension scheme after the transfer of loan assets by AIB to the scheme, announced in August 2012, which have a book value of €1.1 billion. [52881/12]

View answer

Written answers

I have been informed by AIB that the bank reports the deficit under IAS 19 for financial reporting purposes twice a year, namely June and December after incorporating movements in the scheme liabilities including changes in actuarial assumptions and movement in the scheme assets. The December 2012 results will be announced in Quarter 1, 2013 and the deficit will take into account the loan assets transferred at fair value which will form part of the scheme assets.

Pension Provisions

Questions (244)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

244. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to reports that Allied Irish Bank has confirmed that the first tranche of €700 million book value of loan assets transferred to the group pension fund in August 2012 as part of the total transfer of €1.1 billion book value loan assets resulted in a loss on these loan assets of €300 million, if he will confirm the loss incurred on the transfer to the AIB group pension fund of the remaining tranche of €400 million book value loan assets. [52882/12]

View answer

Written answers

As disclosed in AIB’s half yearly financial report 2012, the first transfer of loans and receivables, which had a carrying value of €0.7 billion resulted in a loss of €0.3 billion. Any further disclosures in respect of the second transfer of loans and receivables will be disclosed in the Annual Report for 2012 due for release in Quarter 1 2013. I have been informed that all the assets transferred had been scheduled for deleveraging within the Group’s Non-Core portfolio. The discount levels on the transfers, conducted at fair value, were in line with the levels assumed as part of the PCAR exercise in 2011.

Banks Recapitalisation

Questions (245)

Mattie McGrath

Question:

245. Deputy Mattie McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the role of the public interest directors in the State funded banks; the way they are representing the taxpayer; the actions they can take or have they taken when a taxpayer has a grievance with their bank; the action that they have taken to review and reduce the remuneration and pension packages of bankers in the best interests of the taxpayer; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52895/12]

View answer

Written answers

The legal position is that any director appointed to the board of the covered institutions whether under the Credit Institutions (Financial Support) Scheme 2008 or otherwise is subject to the requirements of company law in relation to the discharge of their responsibilities as a company director. As such, the director is legally bound to act in what he or she believes are the interests of the separate legal entity that is the institution itself. To address the scope for actual and perceived conflicts between the fiduciary duties of the directors of financial institutions under company law and the wider public interest in circumstances where those institutions have received financial support from the State, legal clarity, not just to the role of the public interest director but to that of the entire boards of those institutions, was provided under Section 48 of the Credit Institutions (Stabilisation) Act 2010. It provides that the overriding duty of directors of the covered institutions relates to the public interest as set out in the Act.

The public interest directors have no particular role in dealing with individual taxpayer grievances with their bank. Individual taxpayers who have a grievance with their bank can have their issue dealt with through the normal channels, including if necessary the Financial Services Ombudsman. The Remuneration Committee of each bank is generally responsible for setting remuneration policy. The terms of reference of the Remuneration Committee are accessible on the website of each institution. These can be found at:

AIB: http://www.aib.ie/servlet/BlobServer/document.pdf?blobkey=id&blobwhere=1136826158582&blobcol=urlfile&blobtable=AIB_Download&blobheader=application/pdf&blobheadername1=Content-Disposition&blobheadervalue1=document.pdf

Bank of Ireland:

http://www.bankofireland.com/about-boi-group/corporate-governance/court-committees/terms-of-reference/

PTSB:

http://www.irishlifepermanent.com/corporate-responsibility/corporate-governance/board-committees.aspx

Although there is a public interest director on the Remuneration Committees of Bank of Ireland and PTSB the public interest director cannot act unilaterally to review and reduce the remuneration and pension packages of employees. There is currently no public interest director on the Remuneration Committee of AIB, following the resignation of Declan Collier from the Board in June 2012.

NAMA Staff Remuneration

Questions (246)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

246. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 228 of 6 November 2012, in which he stated that one National Asset Management Agency employee earned more than €500,000 gross salary, employer pension contribution and where applicable, other benefits and further to Parliamentary Question No. 200 of 20 November 2012, in which he stated that NAMA's chief executive officer's salary is €365,500 and in addition payments of circa €24,000 were made in respect of car and medical, if the NAMA employee referred to in both questions is the NAMA CEO; if so, if he will provide an explanation for the apparent discrepancy between remuneration of more than €500,000 and circa €390,000 of salary and car and medical insurance; and if he will reconfirm the breakdown of salary and additional benefits paid to the NAMA CEO. [52897/12]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by NAMA that there is no discrepancy between the two replies. Parliamentary Question No. 200 of 20 November 2012 sought information on the salary and taxable benefits paid to the NAMA Chief Executive in 2010 and 2011. This was provided as follows:

-

2011

2010

Salary

€430,000

€430,000

Taxable Benefits (car and health insurance)

€24,483

€23,036

The reply also stated that the Chief Executive agreed to a request from the Minister to a reduction of 15% in salary in respect of 2012, thereby bringing his 2012 salary to €365,500.

Parliamentary Question 228 of 6 November 2012 sought information on the total remuneration package, including pension costs. The reply was therefore prepared by reference not only to contractual salary and benefits but also to the actuarially-determined employer contribution to the NTMA superannuation scheme. Unlike most public pension schemes which are funded on a pay as you go basis, the NTMA superannuation scheme is a funded scheme. Pension contributions are not paid to individual employees – they are paid into the scheme. The level of potential pension payments to members is dependent on length of service, based on final salary or career average earnings, with 1/80th of salary accruing for each year of service.

NAMA Portfolio Value

Questions (247)

Joanna Tuffy

Question:

247. Deputy Joanna Tuffy asked the Minister for Finance the provisions being made by the National Assets Management Agency in relation to a social dividend from its portfolio of land; the way a community organisation should approach NAMA in relation to the delivery of social dividend; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52910/12]

View answer

Written answers

Consistent with its overriding commercial mandate as set out in Section 10 of the National Asset Management Agency Act 2009, NAMA has demonstrated its commitment and contribution to the achievement of wider social and economic policy objectives in line with Section 2 of the Act. This includes NAMA’s identification of over 3,800 residential units controlled by its debtors and receivers as being available and potentially suitable for social housing and its policy of giving first option to public bodies on the purchase of property in which may be suitable for their purposes. The Agency also works to facilitate engagement between interested parties, including community and sporting organisations, and its debtors/receivers/sales agents and this has led to a number of positive outcomes for both parties.

I am advised by NAMA that in the first instance community groups themselves are best positioned to identify specific properties related to a NAMA loan that may be suitable for their purposes. Such groups are therefore encouraged to make contact with the owners of property and to inform NAMA of their interest. It should be noted that, while NAMA is prohibited by its legislation and by the normal rules of banking confidentiality from disclosing the identity of debtors or details of their properties, the Agency ensures that debtors are aware of interest in their properties and encourages them to engage with potential purchasers. NAMA has published an information guide, which is available on its website, www.nama.ie and which has been circulated to all Oireachtas members, for community organisations and others who may have an interest in properties controlled by NAMA debtors and receivers.

Tax Code

Questions (248)

Brendan Ryan

Question:

248. Deputy Brendan Ryan asked the Minister for Finance if the recommended exemption in the Commission on Taxation Report 2009 for persons who paid high rates of stamp duty will be considered in the Government's proposed property tax; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52930/12]

View answer

Written answers

It is a longstanding practice of the Minister for Finance not to comment, in advance of the Budget, on any tax matters that might be the subject of Budget decisions. Having said that, the property tax forms an integral part of policy to broaden the tax base, to provide a stable funding base for local government and to assist the strengthening of democracy at local level. Due consideration will be given to a wide range of issues, including fairness, equity and ability to pay in any property tax measures brought forward in the Budget.

Tax Code

Questions (249, 250)

Brendan Griffin

Question:

249. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding the introduction of 131 and 132 registration plates on new vehicles sold here in 2013; if he intends to continue this form of licence plate in 2014 and beyond; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52931/12]

View answer

Brendan Griffin

Question:

250. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Finance his plans to restructure VRT; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52932/12]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 249 and 250 together.

I understand the Deputy’s question to refer to proposals contained in SIMI’s pre-Budget submission. Such proposals, together with a wide range of proposals submitted to my Department from a large number of interested parties in issues across all tax heads, are being considered in the context of the forthcoming Budget. I am sure the Deputy will appreciate that I cannot comment on what might or might not be included in the Budget speech on the 5th of December.

Tax Code

Questions (251, 252)

Brendan Griffin

Question:

251. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Finance if he will consider reducing the 13.5% VAT rate for car servicing as a road safety measure in view of the increasing number of older cars on our roads and the falling levels of servicing; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52933/12]

View answer

Brendan Griffin

Question:

252. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Finance if he will reduce or scrap VRT and VAT on optional additional safety equipment and potentially life saving technology in new cars; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52934/12]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 251 and 252 together.

VAT is charged on the supply of goods and services and the rate applying is subject to the requirements of EU VAT law with which Irish VAT law must comply. With regard to reducing the VAT rate applied to car servicing, under EU law it is not possible to reduce the VAT rate applying to car servicing below 12%. This is because car servicing, including many of the goods and services to which Ireland applies a reduced rate of VAT, is based on an EU derogation under Article 118 of the EU VAT Directive, which provides that as we applied a reduced rate to these items on 1 January 1991, we are entitled to continue to apply that reduced rate to those items, provided the rate is no less than 12%. Furthermore, while is it possible to reduce the VAT rate on car servicing to 12%, this could only be done through the application of a 12% VAT rate to all goods and services that currently apply at the 13.5%, and such a move would be very costly to the Exchequer. However, it must be noted that in the majority of EU Member States, where the derogation under Article 118 does not apply, the servicing of cars is subject to a higher VAT rate.

In addition, the EU VAT Directive does not make specific provision for a reduced or zero rate to apply to safety equipment in vehicles and potentially life saving technology in new cars, and as such they are subject to the standard VAT rate, which is currently 23%. With regard to the VRT on optional additional safety equipment and potentially life saving technology in new cars, VRT is charged on the Open Market Selling Price (OMSP) of a vehicle which for new vehicles is defined in Section 133 (2) of the Finance Act 1992 as

“(2) (a) For a new vehicle on sale in the State which is supplied by a manufacturer or sole wholesale distributor, such manufacturer or distributor shall declare to the Commissioners in the prescribed manner the price, inclusive of all taxes and duties, which, in his opinion, a vehicle of that model and specification, including any enhancements or accessories fitted or attached thereto or supplied therewith by such manufacturer or distributor, might reasonably be expected to fetch on a first arm's length sale thereof in the open market in the State by retail.”

There are no plans to reduce or scrap the VRT on optional additional safety equipment as they are "enhancements or accessories fitted or attached" and as such are included in the VRT charge.

Budget 2013

Questions (253)

Brendan Griffin

Question:

253. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Finance if he will focus revenue raising measures in Budget 2013 in higher earners and super wealthy citizens, including tax exiles, in an effort to protect lower and middle income earners, who have little or no disposable income at present; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52935/12]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware, it is a longstanding practice of the Minister for Finance not to comment, in advance of the Budget, on any tax matters that might be the subject of Budget decisions.

Promissory Note Negotiations

Questions (254)

Brendan Griffin

Question:

254. Deputy Brendan Griffin asked the Minister for Finance the position regarding the impending repayment of Anglo promissory notes; his views on whether will secure a positive outcome on this matter; the monetary and percentage of GDP savings he hopes to achieve; when he expects to have an agreement; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52936/12]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy is aware, the next instalment of the IBRC Promissory Note is scheduled for the end of March 2013. The Irish Government has been working extremely hard to secure a deal on the Irish bank debt and detailed work will continue to ensure that the positive moves in Europe are harnessed to maximise the benefit to the Irish taxpayer. A significant item on the agenda is the issue of the promissory notes. The discussions are considering all options in relation to the promissory notes (in terms of the source of funding, the duration of the notes, the interest rate applicable etc.) as well as potential avenues for the wider bank debt deal and the impact of these options on IBRC. This on-going work is one of the Government’s key priorities.

The terms sought by the Government are those which achieve the best possible outcome on behalf of the Irish taxpayer. It is not possible to give guidance on the timing or potential outcome of the discussions as to do so could impede our ability to achieve the best possible results for the Irish taxpayer, but every effort is being made to expedite the on-going process. I have previously stated that I am working to try and achieve a solution before the next scheduled instalment on the Promissory Note scheduled for next March.

Question No. 255 answered with Question No. 193.

Tax Code

Questions (256)

Arthur Spring

Question:

256. Deputy Arthur Spring asked the Minister for Finance if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the report on tax injustice by TASC, which found that several corporate entities based here pay no corporation tax here, through mechanisms such as the Dutch sandwich; his views on whether this may reinforce the risk of Ireland gaining a reputation as a tax haven. [52946/12]

View answer

Written answers

The relevant section - “Is the IFSC and Ireland a tax haven?” - of the TASC report referred to by the Deputy acknowledges that, by reference to the standards established by international organisations such as the OECD, Ireland is not a tax haven. The standards established by the OECD are the most widely accepted standards by which countries assess their tax systems and those of other countries. The OECD and the international community do not regard Ireland as a tax haven. The OECD identifies four key indicators of a tax haven: the first is having no taxes or only nominal taxes; the second is a lack of transparency; the third indicator is an unwillingness to exchange information with tax administrations of OECD member countries; and the fourth indicator is absence of a substantial activity requirement. None of these criteria apply to Ireland.

Ireland has a comprehensive taxation system covering income, capital and indirect taxes and has Double Taxation Relief Agreements with 68 other countries. The January 2011 Global Forum Peer Review Report on Ireland’s legal and regulatory framework for transparency and exchange of information found that Ireland has an effective system for the exchange of information in tax matters and is fully compliant with OECD standards. The Irish 12.5% corporate tax rate is a general rate for trading income that requires the trade to have real substance and activity. This rate does not distinguish between small and large enterprises or between enterprises that service the local economy and those that have a multinational focus. Ireland is bound by the same rules on State Aid, Code of Conduct on Business Taxation, and rulings of the Court of Justice as all EU Member States. Ireland does not support harmful tax competition and participates fully in the EU Code of Conduct Group, which addresses harmful tax competition, and in the OECD Forum on Harmful Tax Practices.

Tax Collection Forecasts

Questions (257)

Arthur Spring

Question:

257. Deputy Arthur Spring asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide an estimate for the increase in revenue that would accrue to the Exchequer if all loopholes and reliefs in corporation tax were eliminated, ensuring an effective net corporation tax rate of 12.5% for all corporations carrying out activities here. [52947/12]

View answer

Written answers

I wish to advise the Deputy that Ireland’s corporation tax regime is open and transparent and that companies are fully chargeable to corporation tax at the 12½% rate on profits arising from their trading activities here. A higher 25% rate applies in respect of investment, rental and other non-trading profits as well as profits from certain petroleum, mining or land trading activities, while capital gains are chargeable at a 30% rate. Companies are chargeable to corporation tax on their profits after taking account of allowable deductions and reliefs as provided for in the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997. Expenses that are incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the trade are deductible in computing trading profits, while allowances are available for capital expenditure on plant and machinery, industrial buildings and certain intangible assets used in the trade, with such allowances treated as a deductible trading expense. Companies are chargeable on their net profits after account is taken of any losses they have incurred.

There are certain reliefs available to companies, such as group relief and double taxation relief, which are standard features of corporation tax similar to those applying in other EU and OECD countries. I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that, based on corporation tax returns for 2010 accounting periods (the latest available), elimination of group relief and relief for double taxation would provide an estimated nominal yield of €408 million and €618 million respectively, assuming no behavioral change in response to such a measure. Clearly, however, it would not be an option to disallow double taxation relief. This would result in a double charge, imposing a disproportionate and unreasonable tax burden on companies and would also be in breach of tax treaties concluded with other countries. The availability of group relief recognizes the fact that the operations of the companies concerned are closely inter-related and that the group effectively comprises a single economic entity.

There are also specific tax reliefs for companies which are targeted at promoting investment in key areas of economic importance, including a 25% tax credit for expenditure on research and development, relief for start-up companies, accelerated allowances for investment in energy-efficient equipment, relief for investment in renewable energy and exemption of profits from commercial occupation of certain woodlands. Based on information derived from corporation tax returns for 2010 accounting periods, it is tentatively estimated that the nominal full year yield from eliminating these tax reliefs would be approximately €230 million in total, again assuming no significant behavioural change on the part of corporate taxpayers which would cause the expected increase in tax yield to fall below expectation.

I should emphasise that tax reliefs are continually monitored to ensure that they are properly focussed, provide value for money and that there are no loopholes that could be exploited for tax avoidance purposes. Certain tax reliefs, such as the exemption for patent royalty income and incentives for investment in property, have been abolished or significantly curtailed in recent years as these were not providing sufficient economic benefit relative to their Exchequer cost. Also, where a potential loophole emerges or concerns arise in relation to unintended use of a tax relief that the Revenue Commissioners are not in a position to address under existing legislation, amending legislation is introduced in the annual Finance Act to protect the tax base and ensure that the relief is not subject to any abuses.

Tax Code

Questions (258)

Arthur Spring

Question:

258. Deputy Arthur Spring asked the Minister for Finance the stance that he will be taking on the proposed action plan put forward by the European Commission to clamp down on tax evasion, through the agreement of a stricter definition of tax havens and the implementation of an anti-abuse clause to prevent double non-payment of corporation tax. [52948/12]

View answer

Written answers

As the incoming EU Presidency, Ireland will be working closely with fellow Member States and the European Commission on the Commission’s forthcoming Communication on Aggressive Tax Planning. We plan to devote a number of official level meetings to this topic during our Presidency. Ireland just like other Member States believes in fair tax competition but, building on the work of the Global Forum on Tax Transparency, unfair tax competition is an issue that needs to be examined. As the Communication has not yet been finalised or published, it would be inappropriate to comment on what it might or might not propose.

Company Closures

Questions (259)

Róisín Shortall

Question:

259. Deputy Róisín Shortall asked the Minister for Finance in relation to the future of a company (details supplied) in Dublin 12, if all credit balances will be reimbursed to customers of this company. [52955/12]

View answer

Written answers

I have been advised by the Central Bank that, on 16 April 2012, an official liquidator was appointed to the company mentioned by the Deputy. As such, it is the responsibility of the liquidator to establish the amounts owed to each customer of the company and to distribute accordingly. I have no role with regard to such distribution.

Mortgage Arrears Rate

Questions (260)

Arthur Spring

Question:

260. Deputy Arthur Spring asked the Minister for Finance the percentage of tracker mortgages that are in arrears; and the percentage that are in arrears of 90 days or more. [52958/12]

View answer

Written answers

The Central Bank of Ireland publishes quarterly arrears data in respect of all mortgage types on its website at www.centralbank.ie. The latest figures were published in June 2012 and the Central Bank has advised me that its next quarterly arrears publication for end quarter three will be published in December. However, the Central Bank has advised me that it does not collect the arrears data in the particular format requested by the Deputy.

Economic Data

Questions (261)

Joe McHugh

Question:

261. Deputy Joe McHugh asked the Minister for Finance the value of imported products (details supplied); if all such items on the Irish market are imported; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [52989/12]

View answer

Written answers

Ireland is generally considered to be a particularly open economy with imports accounting for over three quarters of GDP. A considerable share of spending by households and firms leaves the economy on imported goods and services, while at the same time a considerable share of the outputs of Irish firms is exported abroad leading to payment coming into Ireland. In relation to SITC 054.61 sweet corn (cooked or uncooked) frozen and SITC 054.69 other vegetables (cooked or uncooked), frozen - the total value of imports in the first eight months of 2012 amounted to €24.9 million, while the value of exports over the same period for these goods was €1.3 million. Official statistics do not outline the share of imports in final consumption of these goods.

Vehicle Registration Issues

Questions (262, 267)

Michael Healy-Rae

Question:

262. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Finance if he will confirm that there will be a second registration period for cars in 2013, that is, 131 in January and 132 in July; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [53031/12]

View answer

Michael Healy-Rae

Question:

267. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Finance with regard to proposed restructuring of the VRT, if he will ensure that any changes will not destabilise the market; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [53066/12]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 262 and 267.

I understand the Deputy’s question to refer to proposals contained in SIMI’s pre-Budget submission. Such proposals, together with a wide range of proposals submitted to my Department from a large number of interested parties in issues across all tax heads, are being considered in the context of the forthcoming Budget. I am sure the Deputy will appreciate that I cannot comment on what might or might not be included in the Budget speech on the 5th of December.

Top
Share