Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 30 Apr 2013

Written Answers Nos. 168 - 184

Banking Sector Issues

Questions (168)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

168. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to reports in a national newspaper that a property subject to a loan from Bank of Ireland, in which he owns 15% of the ordinary shares and €1.5bn of preference shares, was sold in January 2012 for circa STG £5 million and is now on the market with an asking price of STG £12.3 million, if he is satisfied that the sale in January 2012 maximised the return on the outstanding loan to Bank of Ireland. [20018/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Deputy is aware that I have no role in the day-to-day commercial and operational decisions of Bank of Ireland. These decisions are taken by the board and management of the institution. Notwithstanding the fact that the State is a minority shareholder in Bank of Ireland, I must ensure that the bank is run on a commercial, cost effective and independent basis to ensure the value of the bank as an asset to the State, as per the Memorandum on Economic and Financial Policies agreed with the EU Commission, the ECB and the IMF. The Relationship Frameworks with the banks provide that the State will not intervene in their day-to-day operations or their management decisions including with respect to pricing and lending decisions. These frameworks are published on the Department of Finance website at http://banking.finance.gov.ie/presentations-and-latest-documents.

IBRC Liquidation

Questions (169)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

169. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to a report in a Sunday newspaper on 21 April 2013 regarding the special liquidation of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation which claimed to quote a Department spokesperson telling the newspaper, if the value of the assets sold is not sufficient to compensate the National Asset Management Agency for the bonds it has issued, he will be required to reimburse NAMA for the shortfall, it will hit the national accounts, surplus-shortfall, it is not accounted for off balance, if he will confirm if this is correct; if so, if he will explain the apparent inconsistency with the response given by him to Parliamentary Questions Nos. 275 to 278, inclusive, of 16 April 2013 when he stated through the liquidation process, the proceeds from the disposal of IBRC's assets will be used to repay creditors in accordance with normal Companies Acts priorities and, consequently, preferred creditors will be paid first and then debt purchased by NAMA from the Central Bank will be paid; and if he will confirm if NAMA will bear any loss on its issuance of bonds and, if not, how any shortfall will be addressed. [20019/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am not aware of any inconsistency in my response of 16 April last. The debt purchased by NAMA from the Central Bank is a claim debt secured by a floating charge over the assets of IBRC. The sales proceeds received through the sale of the Company’s assets will be used to repay the creditors of the Company subject to the normal legal priorities, as set out in the Companies Act’s. Once the costs of the liquidation have been paid payments will be made to those creditors who are classified as preferential creditors. Section 285(7) of the Companies Act, 1936 (as amended) (“the Act”) provides that preferential debts shall “have priority over the claims of holders of debentures under any floating charge created by the company, and be paid accordingly out of any property comprised in or subject to that charge”.

If, after an independent valuation exercise, the value of the assets sold by the Special Liquidators is not sufficient to compensate NAMA for the amount it paid for the net IBRC debt owed to the Central Bank, then that shortfall will be compensated by the Exchequer which would impact the national accounts. It will not be possible to conclude whether the value of the assets to be sold by the Special Liquidator is sufficient to compensate NAMA until after the valuation has been concluded. If the value of the assets is greater than €12.928bn bonds issued by NAMA then the surplus will go to the liquidation for the benefit of other creditors of IBRC.

NAMA Loans Sale

Questions (170)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

170. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he will outline the procedure used by the National Asset Management Agency when approached by a potential buyer of loans controlled by the agency, and specifically the way it deals with a specific multi-million euro offer for loans; if NAMA has time targets for acknowledging or responding to such approaches; and if there is no acknowledgement or response, if potential buyers have alternative routes to convey offers to NAMA. [20020/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by NAMA that approaches by third parties in relation to possible loan sales are dealt with expeditiously by reference to the complexity of the offer received and the debtor connection and loan portfolio in question. In assessing any loan purchase offer, NAMA’s key criterion is whether the proposed transaction makes financial sense for the taxpayer. If so, and if NAMA believes that those making the offer have the financial capacity to deliver on it, NAMA then appoints loan sales brokers to market the loans and to deal with offers from the original bidder and other interested parties. The timing of a sales transaction will be geared towards ensuring that the Agency maximises the value of the loans and therefore the return to the taxpayer. I am advised that NAMA has, to date, sold loans with par balances of €2.5 billion and that parties interested in making serious and realistic bids for loan portfolios are welcome to submit offers to it. If the Deputy is aware of any serious and realistic loan purchase bid made by a credible investor which has been submitted to NAMA but not evaluated by the Agency, I would suggest that he brings it to the attention of the Head of Asset Recovery, NAMA.

Banking Sector Regulation

Questions (171)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

171. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Questions Nos 64 of 12 July 2012 and 251 of 16 March 2013, the power the Central Bank of Ireland has to compel banks to write down the value of problem loans to the value of underlying security if the bank changes its primary regulator, for example, if Ulster Bank changes its regulator to the Bank of England and the British Financial Services Authority. [20021/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Central Bank (CBI) has informed me that where a bank’s operations in this country are conducted under a licence granted by a regulator in another country (e.g. the UK in this example), the CBI does not have the prudential powers to set problem loan provisioning rules for that bank. The Central Bank’s Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears applies to mortgage lending activities with borrowers in respect of their principal private residence in the State. Compliance with the Code is mandatory on all mortgage lenders regulated by the Central Bank.

Banking Sector Issues

Questions (172)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

172. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 240 of 16 April 2013, if he will provide a reconciliation between the €3.2 billion, which now takes the form of our remaining 15% equity stake and preference shares with a nominal value of €1.8 billion, and the net cash position of nearer €1.1 billion showing coupons, dividends and ELG fees received by year. [20036/13]

View answer

Written answers

I submit the table showing the reconciliation between the net €3.2bn investment position in Bank of Ireland and the net cash position taking into account ELG fees recently received (Q4 2012) and the preference coupon received in February 2013.

Bank of Ireland – Reconciliation of State’s net cash position

-

€bn

Net Investment Position

Adjustments to get an overall “net cashflow” position

CIFS/ELG fees to Q4 2012

3.2

-1.3

All transaction fees received

-0.1

Preference coupons in cash (inc. Feb. 2013)

-0.6

Coco coupon (year to July 2012 and last five months of 2012

-0.1

Estimate of net cashflow position with BOI

1.0

Please note figures are rounded to their nearest hundred million.

State Banking Sector

Questions (173)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

173. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance further to Parliamentary Question No. 240 of 16 April 2013, if he will confirm the most recent valuation of the State's holding of preference shares in Bank of Ireland. [20037/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the National Treasury Management Agency, as manager of the NPRF that as at 31 March 2013 the Fund’s holding of preference shares in Bank of Ireland was valued at €1.7 billion, which is 92% of par. This value is consistent with the preliminary basis for valuation applied as at 31 December 2012. The final year end valuation will be reflected in the Fund’s audited financial statements for 2012, which will be published in July 2013.

Question No. 174 answered with Question No. 149.

Tax Yield

Questions (175)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

175. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if a breakdown will be provided on capital acquisitions tax in 2012 as to the percentage that came from inheritance and the percentage from gifts. [20057/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the net receipt of Capital Acquisitions Tax in 2012 was €283.2 million and a breakdown of that amount is as follows:

-

Amount - €m

% of total - %

Discretionary Trusts

2.9

1.0

Inheritance tax

254.3

89.8

Gift tax

25.8

9.1

Probate

0.2

0.1

Total

283.2

100.0

Tax Yield

Questions (176)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

176. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he will estimate the amount that would be raised for the Exchequer if the sale of principal residences were included under capital gains tax. [20058/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that, as information on the value of capital gains arising from the disposal of principal private residences is not required in capital gains tax returns, there is no dedicated basis for separately identifying the yield that would arise from applying capital gains tax to sales of principal private residences. Accordingly, the specific information requested by the Deputy is not available.

Tax Avoidance Issues

Questions (177)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

177. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the amount raised for the Exchequer in 2012 as a result of increased revenue auditing activity and a targeting of black market activity; and his views on whether this amount can be increased through further auditing targets and other measures to reduce tax evasion. [20059/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that Audit activity yielded €359m from 9,066 audit interventions. 154,952 risk management interventions, including in the PAYE sector, yielded €111m, and 373,803 assurance checks brought the total yield to €492m in 2012. These figures include results arising from a very specific focus on cash businesses including: Construction: 1,306 audits yielding €39.3m; Retailers: 848 audits yielding €22.4m; Landlords/Rental properties: 733 audits yielding €22.4m; Bars and Restaurants: 563 audits yielding €42m; Professionals: 466 audits yielding €13.4m; and Wholesalers: 387 audits yielding €18.4m.

These results are included in the Annual Report of the Revenue Commissioners published on Wednesday, April 24th. The report contains detailed statistics on all Revenue activities in 2012, including compliance activities in all its forms.

I am also advised by the Revenue Commissioners that its shadow economy /black market activity includes tackling the evasion of excise duties, such as those on oil, tobacco and alcohol. The Revenue Commissioners put a particular focus in 2012 on the risks associated with fuel laundering, with considerable success. Revenue have informed me that they detected and dismantled 11 oil laundries, and between 2011 and 2012 closed down 89 retail outlets trading in fuel in breach of licensing requirements. There has been large scale compliance with the new licensing provisions and the new monthly return. Revenue is actively pursuing the minority of traders who are trading while unlicensed and those who have not submitted a return. In addition, Revenue is now able to track product movements through the distribution chain and is in the process of identifying traders who pose tax risks for priority compliance/audit/enforcement intervention.

Revenue is also very active in relation to countering tobacco smuggling, and they have advised me that they had 8,105 seizures, amounting to 95.6 million cigarettes. While the latest survey results suggest that the penetration of the cigarette market by illicit products is being contained, Revenue have advised me that combatting this illegal activity will continue to be a high priority in 2013.

Revenue is responsible also for acting against the importation into the country of counterfeit goods, and works closely with right holders in this area. Revenue has advised me that during 2012, there were 5,580 seizures of counterfeit goods with an estimated value of €5,437,334. In the first quarter of 2013, there were 1,540 seizures of IPR infringing goods amounting to 13,685 items with a value of €819,684.

Revenue tackles the problem of the shadow economy through a range of compliance and audit interventions including targeted special projects and this work will continue in 2013. Finally, I am further advised by the Revenue Commissioners that they hold regular meetings with trade and representative bodies through The Hidden Economy Monitoring Group where the risks posed by shadow economy activities are discussed. This engagement will continue in 2013.

It is difficult to quantify the expected yield from all of Revenue’s compliance activities in 2013. Revenue, like all public sector bodies, is subject to Government policy on civil service numbers and public expenditure control. In this context, I am satisfied that the Commissioners are pursuing programmes to maximise voluntary compliance, to redesign processes in order to mitigate risk, and to optimise the impact their compliance interventions by using sophisticated risk analysis.

Tax Yield

Questions (178)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

178. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the amount that could be raised for the Exchequer from the introduction of a third rate of tax of 48% on an individual’s income in excess of €100,000 per annum. [20060/13]

View answer

Written answers

It is assumed that the threshold for the proposed new tax rate mentioned by the Deputy would not alter the existing standard rate band structure applying to single and widowed persons, to lone parents and married couples. On that basis, I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the estimated full year yield to the Exchequer, estimated by reference to 2013 incomes, of the introduction of a new 48% income tax rate would be of the order of €365 million. However, given the current band structures, major issues would need to be resolved as to how in practice such a new rate could be integrated into the current system and how this would affect the relative position of different types of income earners.

This figure is an estimate from the Revenue tax-forecasting model using latest actual data for the year 2010, adjusted as necessary for income and employment trends in the interim. It is, therefore, provisional and subject to revision.

Tax Yield

Questions (179)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

179. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the amount that would be raised for the Exchequer by raising the rate of capital gains tax from 33% to 40%. [20061/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the full year yield to the Exchequer, estimated in terms of expected 2013 gains, from increasing the CGT tax rate from 33% to 40% could be in the region of €109 million. This figure includes corporate gains. However, this estimate assumes no behavioural changes on the part of taxpayers, and increases in rates may have a significant behavioural impact and may not produce a corresponding increase in tax yield. In current economic conditions any estimate of additional yield must be treated with caution. In addition, increasing the rate could, in theory, lead to a reduction in yield from the tax.

Tax Yield

Questions (180)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

180. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the amount that would be raised for the Exchequer by raising the rate of capital acquisitions tax from 33% to 40% and lowering the thresholds to €187,000 for the child-parent category, €25,000 for the lineal ancestor category and €12,500 for the any other person category. [20062/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the estimated full year yield to the Exchequer from increasing the Capital Acquisitions Tax rate by 7% to 40%, based on the expected outturn in 2013, could be in the region of €63 million, assuming no change in the existing thresholds. The current group tax free threshold amounts for Capital Acquisitions Tax (CAT) are: €225,000 for group A (gifts/inheritances from parents to children), €30,150 for group B (gifts/inheritances from grandparents to grandchildren, from uncles/aunts to nieces/nephews, and between siblings) and €15,075 for group C (all other gifts/inheritances). I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the additional full year yield from existing taxpayers from reducing the thresholds for CAT to €187,000 for Group A, €25,000 for Group B, and €12,500 for Group C, as compared with the current thresholds, and applying the proposed rate of 40% to the additional amounts thus brought into charge is estimated to be of the order of €31 million.

Revenue do not receive information on gifts and inheritances which currently do not have to be declared so it is not possible to estimate the potential yield if such benefits were brought into the tax net.

It should be noted that these estimates are based upon an assumption that there would be no behavioural impact of these changes, which could lead to a less than expected impact on Exchequer yield. In addition, the realisation of any estimated yield from an increase in taxation on assets relating to property is subject to movements in the value of such assets, which are currently occurring in the economy.

Tax Yield

Questions (181)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

181. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide an estimate of the amount that would be raised for the Exchequer if the capital gains tax and capital acquisitions tax were applied to transfers between spouses. [20063/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that figures are not captured in such a way as to provide a dedicated basis for compiling estimates of the impact on the Exchequer from the measure proposed in this question. Accordingly, the specific information requested by the Deputy is not available.

Tax Reliefs Cost

Questions (182)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

182. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the amount that would be raised for the Exchequer if discretionary tax reliefs were standardised; and if he will provide a breakdown of the discretionary tax reliefs. [20064/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the deductions and reliefs which are allowable for tax at an individual’s marginal rate of income tax and for which estimates of cost can be provided are set out in the table together with estimated costs for the year 2009, the most recent year for which the necessary estimates are available. If relief for these deductions and reliefs was confined to the standard rate of income tax the saving to the Exchequer could be of the order of €1,000 million. This estimate does not take into account any possible behavioural change on the part of taxpayers as a consequence of such a change or the economic effect of such a change. This applies in particular to the BES, Film Relief and Capital Allowances regime. The standard rating of employee pension reliefs would also have an impact on workers’ take home pay.

It should be noted that there have been changes since this period, i.e. some schemes have been abolished or modified and others have been introduced. For instance, as the Deputy will be aware, the BES was re-launched as the Employment and Investment Incentive, with changes to the amount of relief payable and types of companies that can qualify.

Tax Relief Provision

Total 2009

Cost - €m

Saving if Standard

Rated - €m

Person Taking Care of Incapacitated Taxpayer

5.9

2.4

Health Expenses (Nursing Homes)

23.1

6.1

Contributions Under Permanent Health Benefit Schemes, after Deduction of Tax on Benefits Received

3.9

1.6

Employees' Contributions To Approved Superannuation Schemes

729.0

345.2

Retirement Annuity Premiums

237.2

105.6

Personal Retirement Savings Accounts

77.0

26.5

Interest paid relating to borrowings for purposes such as acquiring an interst in a company or partnership or to pay death duties

26.5

11.6

Expenses Allowable to Employees under Schedule E

73.7

27.4

Retirement Relief for certain Sports Persons.

0.2

0.1

Revenue Job Assist allowance

0.3

0

Allowance for seafarers

0.2

0

Investment in Corporate Trades (BES)

25.6

13.1

Investment in Seed Capital

2.9

1.2

Stock Relief

2.0

0.6

Relief for expenditure on significant buildings and gardens

4.6

2.2

Donation of Heritage items

0.7

0.6

Donation of Heritage property to the Irish Heritage Trust

0

0

Donations to Approved Bodies (Income Tax only)

51.11

19.8

Donations to Sports Bodies (Income Tax only).

0.6

0.2

Capital Allowances (Income Tax only)

1,004.9

395.9

Rented Residential Relief -Section 23

46.9

24.0

Investment in Films

42.0

25.6

Total

2,358.3

1,009.7

Tax Reliefs Cost

Questions (183, 187)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

183. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the range of tax reliefs available to business here; and if he will set out the cost of these tax reliefs individually in 2012 or the last available full tax year. [20065/13]

View answer

Pearse Doherty

Question:

187. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he will list all current tax reliefs and their individual cost to the Exchequer in the last available tax year. [20069/13]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 183 and 187 together.

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the total identifiable costs to the Exchequer which are currently available relate to income tax and corporation tax allowances, reliefs, exemptions and tax credits available as set out in the following tables for 2008 and 2009, the most recent year for which the necessary detailed historical information is available. Work is ongoing to update the costs to 2010 terms but this is not yet complete. Data is not yet available for 2011 as the tax returns for that year are currently being processed for statistical purposes. Tax returns from self-employed for 2012 are not due until the latter part of 2013.

It should be noted that there have been changes since this period, i.e. some schemes have been abolished or modified and others have been introduced. For instance, as the Deputy will be aware, virtually all of the area-based and property tax incentive schemes have ended and Finance Act 2012 provided for a cap on property-based Accelerated Capital Allowance Schemes (in line with the tax life of the particular scheme) to be introduced from 1 January 2015. Relevant notes relating to items in the tables are also included.

Tax reliefs available exclusively for business reasons such as Stock Relief, Exempt Rental Income from Leasing of Farm Land, Capital Allowances, Rate of 10% for Manufacturing and Certain Other Activities, Group Relief and Research & Development are included in the tables. A number of tax reliefs, credits and deductions (for example, personal credits, pension contributions, BES, Film relief and property based tax incentives), which are included in the tables are also available to self-employed and PAYE taxpayers, but are not exclusively available for business reasons.

Index of Tables and Notes

a) Note on the Cost of Tax Credits, Allowances and Reliefs 2008 and 2009

b) Table IT 6 showing Cost of Tax Credits, Allowances and Reliefs 2008 and 2009. Figures of cost in relation to corporation tax are included in the “Income Tax and/or Corporation Tax” section of this table.

c) Notes on Table IT 6

d) Note on Green Paper on Pensions

e) Estimate of cost of certain property-based tax incentives and incomes exempt from tax for 2008 and 2009.

f) Note on reliefs in respect of which costs are not currently quantifiable or are negligible or are not identifiable within total aggregates.

a) Cost of Tax Credits, Allowances and Reliefs 2008 and 2009

The following table IT 6 shows the estimated cost in terms of revenue forgone of the personal tax credits and the main reliefs and deductions allowable under the income tax system. A number of reliefs which apply both to individuals and companies is also included and the cost shown in relation to these reliefs covers income tax and corporation tax. An adjustment is included in the cost figures applying to income tax to compensate for incomplete numbers of tax returns on record at the time of compiling the estimates.

The tax credits and reliefs listed in the table serve varying purposes. Many are essentially structural reliefs through which individual tax liabilities are adjusted to reflect relative taxable capacity. The main personal tax credits are a good example of this since they may be regarded as part of the progressive income tax structure representing a band of income chargeable at a zero rate. Others, such as relief for interest paid in full or investment in corporate trades, are tax-based incentives in favour of specific groups or activities which are designed to promote certain aspects of public policy.

In computing taxable profits, account needs to be taken in some way of the depreciation of capital assets incurred in earning those profits. To this extent, the figures in the table of the “costs” of capital allowances should not be regarded as measuring a “loss of tax revenue” on profits. To compute such “loss”, regard would have to be had to the excess of the amount of the capital allowances at current rates over the amount of the normal allowances.

The figures shown for the basic personal tax credits (married, single and widowed) are the costs of these tax credits as if all other tax credits and the exemption limits did not apply. They do not include individuals who are not on Revenue records because their incomes are below the income tax thresholds. The cost figures for the exemption limits are based on the excess of the exemption limits over the basic personal tax credits.

The figures of cost are for 2008 and 2009 and all figures are based on tax due in respect of assessments for each year and not on tax receipts within that year.

The figure against each credit or allowance represents the additional tax which would become payable if the tax credit or allowance were withdrawn assuming no consequent change in the behaviour of taxpayers (for example, in relation to the reliefs for savings), or the amounts of payments (for example, interest payable on certain savings schemes might need adjustment to take account of the new tax liability).

The numbers of claimants of each credit or relief are shown for both years to the extent that they are available. The numbers included are the taxpayers who would be adversely affected by the withdrawal of the respective credit or relief.

In the calculations, each tax credit or allowance has been dealt with separately and on the assumption that the rest of the tax system remained unchanged. It would be therefore inaccurate to calculate the effect of withdrawing all the credits, reliefs and allowances by simply totalling the figures. For example, the costs shown for capital allowances and stock relief are also calculated on the basis of separate withdrawal of these reliefs. Their combined cost would be greater than the sum of the separate costs because allowances are not always fully set off against available profits. For instance, a person with €1,000 gross trading profits, €1,000 capital allowances and €1,000 stock relief would pay no tax if either of the reliefs were withdrawn but would pay tax on €1,000 profits if both reliefs were withdrawn. In this case, the cost of each relief separately is nil but the combined cost is tax on €1,000. Basic data is not available to enable an estimate of the combined cost of these reliefs to be made.

The figures for estimates based on tax returns have been grossed up to an overall expected level to adjust for incompleteness in the numbers of returns on record at the time the data was extracted for analytical purposes.

Apart from the artists exemption, these figures do not take account of the application of the restriction of reliefs originally provided for in section 17 of Finance Act 2006, which took effect from 1 January 2007. The restriction was extended by Section 23 Finance Act 2010.

Finally, the estimates shown in many cases are tentative and are subject to revision in the light of later information.

The figures shown include the amounts claimed in the year but exclude amounts carried forward into the year either as losses or capital allowances, and include any amounts of unused losses and/or capital allowances which will be carried forward to subsequent years.

Tax Incentive/Income Exemption 2008

Amount Claimed

Assumed maximum tax cost €m

Number of claimants

-

€m

€m

-

Urban renewal

230.8

87.0

3,367

Town Renewal

61.6

24.2

998

Seaside Resorts

16.1

6.4

1,091

Rural Renewal

88.4

35.7

2,803

Multi-storey car parks

16.8

6.6

134

Living Over the shop

6.4

2.6

81

Enterprise Areas

6.3

2.5

138

Park and Ride

1.8

0.7

21

Holiday Cottages

36.9

14.8

844

Hotels

305.5

116.4

1,996

Nursing Homes

48.4

19.8

734

Housing for the Elderly/infirm

7.4

3.0

179

Hostels

1.68

0.69

22

Guest Houses

0.29

0.12

10

Convalescent Homes

1.4

0.5

32

Qualifying Private Hospitals

30.2

12.3

342

Qualifying sports injury clinics

4.1

1.7

60

Buildings Used for certain child care purposes

30.3

12.2

519

Qualifying Mental Health Centres

0.1

0.0

3

Student Accommodation

60.0

23.5

814

Caravan Camps

1.5

0.6

10

Mid-Shannon Corridor Tourism Infrastructure

1.8

0.7

12

Exemption of profits or gains from Greyhounds

0.0

0.0

10

Exemption of profits or gains from Stallions

92.3

15.1

192

Exemption of profits or gains from Woodlands

51.0

13.6

2,492

Exempt Patents (Section 234, TCA 1997)

198.3

51.7

1,209

Totals

1,299.2

452.6

18,111

Tax Incentive/Income Exemption 2009

Amount Claimed

Assumed maximum tax cost €m

Number of claimants

-

€m

€m

-

Urban renewal

233.8

93.1

3410

Town Renewal

45.4

18.3

1,001

Seaside Resorts

13.3

5.3

875

Rural Renewal

70.0

28.0

2,653

Multi-storey car parks

13.2

5.2

130

Living Over the shop

4.1

1.7

66

Enterprise Areas

5.4

2.1

118

Park and Ride

2.0

0.8

20

Holiday Cottages

34.7

13.9

786

Hotels

263.2

102.1

1,906

Nursing Homes

54.4

21.6

750

Housing for the Elderly/infirm

6.8

2.8

145

Hostels

0.73

0.3

14

Guest Houses

0.24

0.1

8

Convalescent Homes

1.3

0.5

28

Qualifying Private Hospitals

30.5

12.5

346

Qualifying sports injury clinics

3.6

1.5

67

Buildings Used for certain child care purposes

30.8

12.5

527

Qualifying Mental Health Centres

0.1

0.0

1

Student Accommodation

48.3

19.1

751

Caravan Camps

0.6

0.2

2

Mid Shannon Corridor Tourism Infrastructure

0.6

0.2

2

Exemption of profits or gains from Greyhounds

0.0

0.0

5

Exemption of profits or gains from Stallions

2.0

0.4

32

Exemption of profits or gains from Woodlands

48.2

14.4

3,570

Exempt Patents (section 234, TCA 1997)

260.7

71.7

1,268

Other

52.6

19.5

635

Totals

1,226.6

447.8

19,116

These figures do not take account of the application of the restriction of reliefs originally provided for in section 17 of Finance Act 2006 and which took effect from 1 January 2007.The restriction was extended by Section 23 Finance Act 2010.

As the Deputy will be aware, virtually all of the area-based and property tax incentive schemes have ended and Finance Act 2012 provided for a cap on property-based Accelerated Schemes (in line with the tax life of the particular scheme) to be introduced from 1 January 2015.

Notes:

- The figures shown relate to the various reliefs/incentives and exemptions as specified in the 2008 and 2009 form 11 and CT1.

- There were concerns that in some instances the new, separately categorised data on property incentives may not have been correctly entered on the Tax returns. Revenue drew the attention of the relevant tax practitioner bodies to these deficiencies to rectify them in future returns and also increased awareness among its own staff involved in processing tax returns of the need to ensure, through closer examination of the returns, that they are correctly completed.

- The estimated costs have assumed tax foregone at the 41% rate in the case of income tax and 12.5% in the case of corporation tax. This means the figures shown correspond to the maximum Exchequer cost in terms of income tax and corporation tax. However, the actual Exchequer cost could be lower, particularly in relation to the exempt income items, as the income could be subject to deductions for allowable expenses and other costs thereby reducing the level of income that would be actually subject to tax.

- Some of the costs shown above are included in the costs shown for capital allowances and section 23 relief in Table IT6. However, exempt income included above is not part of capital allowances.

f) Note on reliefs in respect of which costs are not currently quantifiable or are negligible or are not identifiable within total aggregates.

Examples of this type of relief would include:

Relief from averaging of farm profits;

Exemption for income arising from payments in respect of personal injuries;

Exemption of certain payments made by Haemophilia HIV Trust;

Exemption of lump sum retirement payments;

Relief for allowable motor expenses;

Tapering relief allowable for taxation of car benefits in kind;

Reduced tax rate for authorised unit trust schemes;

Reduced tax rate for special investment schemes;

Exemption of certain grants made by Údarás na Gaeltachta;

Relief for investment income reserved for policy holders in life assurance companies;

Relief for various business related expenses such as staff recruitment, rent, legal fees, and other general expenses;

Exemption in certain circumstances on the interest on quoted bearer Eurobonds;

Exemption of payments made as compensation for loss of office;

Exemption of scholarship income;

Exemption for income received under Scéim na bhFoghlaimeoirí Gaeilge.

B Table IT 6 showing Cost of Tax Credits, Allowances and Reliefs 2008 and 2009
INCOME TAX AND CORPORATION TAX
Table IT6
Cost of Tax Credits, Allowances and Reliefs 2008 and 2009

Tax Relief Provision

(1) Estimated cost for 2008

-

(1) Estimated cost for 2009

-

INCOME TAX - Exemption limits:

€m

Numbers

€m

Numbers

General Exemption (2)

0

0

0

0

Child Addition (2)

0.3

900

0.2

800

Age Exemption (2)

90.8

57,700

82.4

54,900

Married Person's Credit (3)

2,944.90

853,100

2,853.20

835,000

Single Person's Credit (3)

2,406.80

1,503,300

2,088.20

1,316,900

Widowed Person's Credit (3)

184.3

81,100

184.8

81,100

Additional Credit to Widowed Person in Year of Bereavement

4.9

4,000

4.9

4,000

Additional Bereavement Credit to Widowed Parent

6.9

2,300

6.2

2,400

Additional Personal Credit for Lone Parent

197.4

116,700

174.1

103,600

Homecarer Credit

79.5

93,100

63.9

77,500

Additional Credit for Incapacitated Child

39

12,300

38

12,200

Employee (PAYE) Credit

3,253.80

1,710,200

2,995.20

1,560,600

Dependent Relative Credit

2

18,700

2.1

18,200

Tax Relief Provision

(1) Estimated cost for 2008

-

(1) Estimated cost for 2009

-

Person Taking Care of Incapacitated Taxpayer

5.8

1,260

5.9

1470

Age Credit

42.3

88,100

43.7

90,700

Blind Person's Credit (incl.Guide Dog Allowance)

2.1

1,320

1.9

1190

Medical Insurance Premiums (4)

321

1,322,400

589.6

1,233,900

Health Expenses

266.8

542,600

145.5

492,800

Contributions Under Permanent Health Benefit Schemes, after Deduction of Tax on Benefits Received (5)

4

29,200

3.9

27,300

Employees' Contributions To Approved Superannuation Schemes (6)

655

792,600

729

713,600

Employers' Contributions To Approved Superannuation Schemes (6)

165

362,700

153

342,200

Exemption of Investment Income and Gains of Approved Superannuation Funds (6)*

685

N/A

780

N/A

Exemption of employers' contributions from employee BIK (6)

595

362,700

558

342,200

Tax Relief on "tax free" lump sums (6)

140

N/A

140

N/A

Tax Relief Provision

(1) Estimated cost for 2008

-

(1) Estimated cost for 2009

-

Retirement Annuity Premiums

352.8

116,000

237.2

101,300

Personal Retirement Savings Accounts

73.8

53,900

77

56,200

Interest paid:

Tax Relief Provision

(1) Estimated cost for 2008

-

(1) Estimated cost for 2009

-

Loans relating to Principal Private Residence

704.6

778,100

486.3

782,700

Other (7)

48.5

5,400

26.5

5,000

Rent Paid in Private Tenancies

96.5

222,100

85.9

196,900

Expenses Allowable to Employees under Schedule E

75.2

835,900

73.7

744,300

Third Level Education Fees

19.9

36,000

20.6

34,700

Exemption of Certain Earnings of Writers, Composers and Artists

21.8

2,630

22.1

2,590

Dispositions (Including Maintenance Payments made to Separated Spouses)

22.33

7,820

19.5

6,840

Exemption of Interest on Savings Certificates, National Installment Savings & Index Linked Savings Bonds

88.1

N/A

138.2

N/A

Tax Relief Provision

(1) Estimated cost for 2008

-

(1) Estimated cost for 2009

-

Rent a Room

5.6

3,600

5.6

3,770

Exemption of Income of Charities, Colleges, Hospitals, Schools, Friendly Societies, etc. (8) (10)

35.8

N/A

40.7

N/A

Retirement Relief for certain Sports Persons.(9)

0.2

17

0.2

15

Exemption of Irish Government Securities where owner not ordinarily resident in Ireland (10) *

320.8

N/A

486.7

N/A

Exemption of Statutory Redundancy Payments (11)*

85.4

29,800

147.8

77,000

Service Charges

27.1

455,200

26.8

452,600

Top Slicing Relief - Reduced Tax Rate for Payments in Excess of Exemption Amounts Made as Compensation for Loss of Office

44.7

3,790

47.8

6,110

Revenue Job Assist allowance

0.2

330

0.3

390

Allowance for seafarers

0.3

160

0.2

150

Trade Union Subscriptions

26.4

341,900

26.7

345,800

Exemption From Tax of Certain Social Welfare Payments:

Tax Relief Provision

(1) Estimated cost for 2008

-

(1) Estimated cost for 2009

-

Child benefit *

435.3

401,200

390.7

372,900

Early childcare Supplement*

98.3

195,200

47.5

154,300

Maternity allowance *

18.2

23,420

19

23,300

Foster Care Payments

28.09

3,470

28.4

3,360

Exemption of Income arising from the Provision of Childcare Services

0.8

440

0.8

470

Approved Profit Sharing Schemes *

99

111,190

37.6

62,900

Savings-Related Share Option Schemes*

1.3

2,800

0.8

1,800

Approved Share Option Schemes*

0.1

280

0.5

370

Relief for New Shares Purchased by Employees

0.3

280

0.3

250

Investment in Corporate Trades (BES)

55.7

3,200

25.6

1,640

Investment in Seed Capital

1.7

56

2.9

77

Stock Relief *

2

N/A

2

N/A

Exempt Rental Income from Leasing of Farm Land

N/A

N/A

4.4

2,960

Table

Tax Relief Provision

(1) Estimated cost for 2008

-

(1) Estimated cost for 2009

-

Relief for expenditure on significant buildings and gardens

5.9

290

4.6

150

Donation of Heritage items

4.7

5

0.7

2

Donation of Heritage property to the Irish Heritage Trust.

3.6

4

0

0

INCOME TAX

AND/OR

CORPORATION TAX

(12)

-

Donations to Approved Bodies

52.4

131,100

54.1

155,100

Donations to Sports Bodies. (9)

0.3

850

0.7

2100

Employee Share Ownership Trusts*

8.4

29,200

1.3

16,400

Total Capital Allowances:(13)

2,176.60

270,200

2,281.60

298,800

of which Energy Efficient Capital Allowances

N/A

N/A

1.6

93

Rented Residential Relief - Section 23 (13) *

74.7

2,429

46.9

1,620

Rate of 10% for Manufacturing and Certain Other Activities (15)

160.9

1,046

340.6

1,370

Double Taxation Relief

596.5

18,000

589.1

18,900

Investment in Films*

32.8

3200

42

2,553

Group Relief

450.3

2430

390.5

2,507

Research & Development Tax Credit (16)

146

582

216.1

900

c) Notes on Table IT 6
(1) Figures accompanied by an asterisk * are particularly tentative and subject to a considerable margin of error.
(2) The cost figures for the exemption limits are based on the excess of the exemption limits over the basic personal tax credits. They include the cost of marginal relief for taxpayers whose incomes are not greatly in excess of the exemption limits.
(3) The figures shown for the basic personal tax credits (married, single and widowed) are the costs of these tax credits as if all other tax credits and the exemption limits did not apply. They do not include individuals who are not on Revenue records because their incomes are below the income tax thresholds.
(4) Arising from the change over to Tax Relief at Source the figures relate to the number of policies issued. These include policies where subscriptions were paid by businesses on behalf of their employees.
(5) Part of the cost of contributions to Permanent Health Benefit Schemes is not identifiable as a result of the move to a “net pay” basis for contributions by PAYE taxpayers from 6 April 2001.
(6) See the following note on “Green Paper on Pensions” for background commentary on the basis of the cost figures .
(7) “Other” relates to borrowings for purposes such as acquiring an interest in a company or partnership .
(8) The income on which the cost of exemption from income tax for charities, colleges, hospitals, schools, friendly societies, etc. is based includes dividend income on which income tax deducted at source has been repaid, other investment income, payments received under covenant, donations by the PAYE sector to approved bodies together with the associated tax relief and donations by the self-employed and corporate sectors to approved bodies and approved sports bodies. Information is not available about other income received gross.
(9) The cost figures for relief for certain Sports Persons are based on income tax self assessment returns and for donations to Approved Sports Bodies are based on income tax and corporation tax self assessment returns.
(10) In the absence of other information, tax has been assumed at the standard rate of income tax even though a different rate might be more appropriate.
(11) The costs and numbers for the Exemption of Statutory Redundancy Payments are based on external data. From 2009 the “numbers” indicate the numbers of claims received in the year and not the numbers of claims approved.
(12) The costs included for corporation tax are by reference to accounting periods which ended in the years 2008 and 2009.
(13) The cost shown for capital allowances does not include any cost associated with “unused capital allowances”, that is, capital allowances which are not absorbed by a company in the accounting period in which they arise because they exceed the amount of the company’s profits of that accounting period which are available for offset. Unused capital allowances can be offset as losses against taxable profits arising in the previous accounting period and against certain profits arising in future accounting periods and can be offset against the profits of another company in the same group of companies. It is estimated that €3587 million and €5373 million of unused capital allowances were claimed in respect of 2008 and 2009 accounting periods respectively but as the proportion of this item which is included in previous years losses and in group relief is not separately identifiable a reliable estimate of the cost of the capital allowance element cannot be provided.
(14) The tax cost shown for section 23 type relief is the estimated ultimate tax cost relating to the total allowable expenditure in respect of claims made in 2008 and 2009 tax returns for the first time. The cost shown is for income tax cases only.
(15) the cost shown for manufacturing relief for 2008 is compiled using the basic data available but for technical reasons associated with a system redesign it is understood to be understated by at least €100m. Manufacturing Relief expired at the end of 2010.
(16) The costs shown for R&D is for claims for R&D on corporation tax returns for accounting periods ending in 2008 and 2009. However, the cost for 2009 includes the amount of credit allowed against 2009 tax together with the amount offset against tax of previous accounting periods and as payable credits.
d) Note on Green Paper on Pensions - Review of estimates of cost
As part of the work on the Green Paper on Pensions, a review was carried out of the current regime of incentives for supplementary pension provision with a view to developing more comprehensive and reliable estimates of the cost of reliefs in this area. The review examined, among other things, the current reliefs and incentives for investment in supplementary pensions and the data available on which to base reliable estimates of the costs in revenue foregone to the Exchequer.
The review drew on newly available 2006 aggregate data on contributions to pension schemes by employers and employees arising from a P35 initiative introduced on foot of provisions that were included in Finance Act 2004 with a view to improving data quality. Estimates of the cost of tax for private pension provision updated for 2008 and 2009 are included in table IT6.
The breakdown and make-up of these estimated costs of reliefs differ from presentations of costs in this area for years PRIOR TO 2005 in a number of respects and are not directly comparable. further details on the cost of tax and other reliefs and the changes in the methodology are contained in pages 106 and 107 of the Green Paper on Pensions.
e) Estimate of cost of certain property-based tax incentives and incomes exempt from tax for 2008 and 2009
Certain property-based tax incentives and incomes exempt from tax - uptake and estimated potential cost to the Exchequer in terms of income tax and corporation tax forgone based on 2008 and 2009 tax returns
Provisions were included in the Finance Acts of 2003 and 2004 to enable new statistical data on the uptake of tax relief for certain property-based tax incentives and incomes exempt from tax to be obtained from tax returns. This information, derived from changes introduced by the Revenue Commissioners to income tax returns and corporation tax returns for 2008 and 2009, is set out in the following tables.

Departmental Expenditure

Questions (184)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

184. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance the contributions, if any, that have been made by this State to the OECD BEPS project which will be reporting back to the next G20 in June. [20066/13]

View answer

Written answers

The OECD published a report on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) by multinational corporations on 12th February 2013. The OECD will now prepare an action plan by June this year to examine next steps. Three focus groups have been established comprising of OECD members with the aim of developing the action plan. The OECD expects to present this action plan to the July G20 meeting. The report highlights that the only way to deal with BEPS is for countries to work together to consider how international rules can be amended to ensure fair levels of taxation are paid by all.

While the discussions of the OECD focus groups are at this point confidential I am pleased to inform the Deputy that Ireland, along with all other OECD members, is actively involved in the work of these focus groups.

Top
Share