Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 26 Sep 2013

Written Answers Nos. 81-93

NAMA Loans Sale

Questions (81)

Thomas P. Broughan

Question:

81. Deputy Thomas P. Broughan asked the Minister for Finance if he will make available specific details of asset sales made by the National Assets Management Agency; if he will further make available a list of the National Assets Management Agency's individual debtors and the amount they owe; if he will release details of the number of former employees who have left the National Assets Management Agency to work in the private sector since its establishment; if he will make available details of the safeguards that the National Assets Management Agency have in place to prevent the release of loan information by former employees showing the value of loans and the National Assets Management Agency acquisition price; if he will consider introducing a cooling off period of at least one year preventing former NAMA employees from working for any company who has direct or indirect dealings with the National Assets Management Agency; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40255/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by NAMA that it is precluded by the provisions of various Statutes and by banking confidentiality case law from disclosing details relating its debtors and assets, including property assets, securing its loans. However per latest published information for 31 March 2013, which is available on the NAMA website, www.nama.ie, NAMA debtors in aggregate owe close to €70 billion in par debt. All NAMA staff are employees of the NTMA and are assigned to NAMA by the NTMA. NAMA advises that, since inception, 59 staff assigned to it by the NTMA have left or are due to leave the Agency to take up employment elsewhere, including 53 who have returned or are returning to the private sector – 6 have moved to other businesses within NTMA. Some of those that have left were employed on short term contracts.

Under the NTMA business model, all employees are recruited on the basis of individually negotiated contracts. In addition to NAMA, the NTMA carries out a range of commercial asset and liability functions on behalf of Government and its ability to successfully perform these functions is critically dependent on its ability to attract employees – often with specialist skills – from the private sector, including those at middle and senior management level. That is the basis on which close to 300 staff have been recruited to NAMA from the private sector over the past three years and it would not have been possible to move from a standing start in December 2009 to become fully operational with a €32 billion balance sheet a year later without having that ability to recruit the appropriate expertise and experience from the private sector. Mobility with the private sector is a critical component of the NTMA model and it is important that the NTMA’s ability to attract employees from the private sector not be disrupted. In the case of NAMA, employees are recruited on the basis of specified purpose contracts – their employment lasts for as long as their function is required by NAMA only.

There are extensive safeguards in place to protect the confidentiality of information held by NTMA employees, including those assigned to NAMA. Employees assigned to NAMA by the NTMA, as is the case with all other NTMA staff, are subject to Section 14 of the National Treasury Management Agency Act, 1990 which prohibits an employee from disclosing any information obtained while carrying out their duties as employees of the NTMA. Employees assigned to NAMA are also subject to a prohibition on release of confidential data under Sections 99 and 202 of the NAMA Act 2009. NTMA employees, including those assigned to NAMA, are subject to the Official Secrets Act. Contravention of these prohibitions is a criminal offence. These protections do not cease at the point of resignation but rather apply indefinitely and extend to former employees.

The notice period for NTMA employees assigned to NAMA is typically three months. NTMA contracts for employees assigned to NAMA have a provision entitling the NTMA to place the employee on garden leave at any point during the notice period during the time the employee may not work for another employer.

Following a review of its policy in respect of notice periods and post-termination restrictions on employment, which was conducted on the NTMA’s behalf (as employer) by the law firm, Matheson, the NTMA is implementing a number of changes to its employment contracts, including the introduction of longer notice periods of 3 to 6 months (up from 1 to 3 months) for middle and senior management employees and garden leave provisions to be included in all new employment contracts. In addition, a new provision is being added in employment contracts, where relevant, that restricts departing staff from performing services for a new employer, during the first six months following the termination of their employment with the NTMA, relating to a transaction or other matter in respect of which they participated directly or substantially in the course of their employment with the NTMA and were in possession of confidential information as a result. In respect of NTMA employees assigned to NAMA, this provision has been introduced for all new employees and existing employees as they are promoted. As I pointed out above, the three-month notice period and garden leave provisions already apply to NTMA staff assigned to NAMA. Finally as I have stated previously I support interaction between the public and private sectors so as to bring fresh thinking and new ideas.

Tax Reliefs Cost

Questions (82)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

82. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide the most up to date list of discretionary tax reliefs and the revenue that would be saved, per measure, if these tax reliefs were standardised. [40268/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the deductions and reliefs which are allowable for tax at an individual’s marginal rate of income tax and for which estimates of cost can be provided are set out below together with estimated costs for the year 2010, the most recent year for which the necessary estimates are available. If relief for these deductions and reliefs was confined to the standard rate of income tax the saving to the Exchequer could be of the order of €800 million. This estimate does not take into account any possible behavioural change on the part of taxpayers as a consequence of such a change or the economic effect of such a change. This applies in particular to the BES, Film Relief and Capital Allowances regime. The standard rating of employee pension reliefs would also have an impact on workers’ take home pay.

It should be noted that there have been changes since this period, i.e. some schemes have been abolished or modified and others have been introduced. For instance, as the Deputy will be aware, the BES was re-launched as the Employment and Investment Incentive, with changes to the amount of relief payable and types of companies that can qualify.

Tax Relief Provision

Total 2010 Cost

Saving if Standard Rated

-

€m

€m

Person Taking Care of Incapacitated Taxpayer

6.9

2.8

Health Expenses (Nursing Homes)

21.0

5.0

Contributions Under Permanent Health Benefit Schemes, after Deduction of Tax on Benefits Received

3.9

1.6

Employees' Contributions To Approved Superannuation Schemes

598.5

283.5

Retirement Annuity Premiums

180.1

78.5

Personal Retirement Savings Accounts

73.0

26.4

Interest paid relating to borrowings for purposes such as acquiring an interest in a company or partnership or to pay death duties

17.5

7.6

Expenses Allowable to Employees under Schedule E

66.5

23.3

Retirement Relief for certain Sports Persons.

0.3

0.1

Revenue Job Assist allowance

0.5

0.0

Allowance for seafarers

0.3

0.1

Investment in Corporate Trades (BES)

24.0

12.3

Investment in Seed Capital

1.8

0.8

Stock Relief

2.0

0.6

Relief for expenditure on significant buildings and gardens

3.9

1.9

Donation of Heritage items

0.2

0.2

Donation of Heritage property to the Irish Heritage Trust

0.0

0.0

Donations to Approved Bodies (Income Tax only)

50.0

20.0

Donations to Sports Bodies (Income Tax only)

0.4

0.2

Capital Allowances (Income Tax only)

704.2

277.4

Rented Residential Relief- Section 23

22.9

11.7

Investment in Films

65.4

33.6

Total

1,843.1

787.6

Revenue Job Assist allowance is no longer available from 1 July 2013.

Tax Yield

Questions (83)

Michael McGrath

Question:

83. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the revenue that would be raised from extending betting tax to online bets; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40269/13]

View answer

Written answers

It was announced in Budget 2011 that the necessary arrangements are being made to ensure that bets placed on the internet by domestic punters are subject to the same level of betting duty as applies to high street betting shops. This will serve to broaden the tax base and increase betting duty receipts. The Finance Act 2011 provides for the taxation of bets that remote bookmakers enter into with persons in the State. This means, for example, that a business which engages in online bookmaking and which accepts bets from people in this country will be liable for betting duty on those bets, irrespective of where that business is based. The existing betting duty (1%) will be applied to such bets. The Finance Act also provides for the taxation of Betting Exchanges under the new arrangements; however the calculation of the tax will take account of their particular business model, in other words a 15% tax on the commission charged. In addition, excise duties are being applied to the granting and renewal of remote bookmakers’ and remote betting intermediaries’ licences.

The Betting (Amendment) Bill, which was published in July, will establish the regulatory framework for these licences. The tax changes provided for in the Finance Act can only be implemented once the Betting (Amendment) Bill is enacted.

It is estimated that the full year yield from the taxation of remote betting would be around €20 million.

Tax Yield

Questions (84)

Michael McGrath

Question:

84. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the revenue that would be raised from applying a 1% deduction to winning bets including online bets as recommended in the Indecon Report on the Irish Horse Racing Industry; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40270/13]

View answer

Written answers

It was announced in Budget 2011 that the necessary arrangements are being made to ensure that bets placed on the internet by domestic punters are subject to the same level of betting duty as applies to high street betting shops. This will serve to broaden the tax base and increase betting duty receipts. The Finance Act 2011 provides for the taxation of bets that remote bookmakers enter into with persons in the State. This means, for example, that a business which engages in online bookmaking and which accepts bets from people in this country will be liable for betting duty on those bets, irrespective of where that business is based. The existing betting duty (1%) will be applied to such bets. The Finance Act also provides for the taxation of Betting Exchanges under the new arrangements; however the calculation of the tax will take account of their particular business model, in other words a tax on the commission charged. In addition, excise duties are being applied to the granting and renewal of remote bookmakers’ and remote betting intermediaries’ licences.

The proposed Betting (Amendment) Bill, which was published in July will establish the regulatory framework for these licences. The tax changes provided for in the Finance Act can only be implemented once the Betting (Amendment) Bill is enacted.

I am hopeful that by including the high-growth area of the betting sector the tax base from betting will be boosted significantly.

To place the tax on winnings would effectively place the liability on punters. This would, I believe, be an incentive for punters to seek out unlicensed websites, thus increasing the possibility of tax avoidance.

It should be noted that the industry is in favour of continuing to bear the tax instead of it being placed on the punter.

Pension Provisions

Questions (85)

Michael McGrath

Question:

85. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the yield to date from allowing persons early access to pension as provided for in Budget 2013; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40271/13]

View answer

Written answers

Finance Act 2013 provides members of occupational pension schemes with a three-year window of opportunity from 27 March 2013 during which they can opt to draw down, on a once off basis, up to 30% of the accumulated value of additional voluntary contributions (AVCs). Administrators of AVC funds (including PRSA administrators) are required to provide, within 15 working days of the end of each quarter, commencing with the quarter ending on 30 June 2013, certain statistical information to Revenue in relation to AVC pre-retirement transfers or encashments made during the quarter in question.

The information for the first quarter ended 30 June 2013 has been received and the tax yield for that quarter amounted to €10.8 million. It is too early at this stage to comment on the outturn for the year. I have previously stated, however, that this measure enables rather than incentivises individuals to access part of their pension savings beyond their regular or compulsory pension contributions. It is also important that individuals continue to save and provide for their retirement and these are likely factors in the scale of the take-up to date.

Tax Yield

Questions (86)

Michael McGrath

Question:

86. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide in tabular form the yield in each year from 2005 to 2012 from stamp duty on share transactions on the Irish Stock Exchange; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40272/13]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the available information on the yield in the years 2005 to 2012 from Stamp Duty on transfers of shares, stocks and marketable securities is set out in the following table:

Year

€ million

2005

324

2006

406

2007

608.7

2008

419.4

2009

207.6

2010

181.7

2011

194.8

2012

171.5

The figures shown are the yields from transfers of stocks and marketable securities in Irish registered companies; they are not confined to companies listed on the Irish Stock Exchange.

Tax Yield

Questions (87, 88, 89, 90)

Michael McGrath

Question:

87. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the yield from abolishing tax credits for persons earning over €150,000; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40273/13]

View answer

Michael McGrath

Question:

88. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the yield from abolishing tax credits for persons earning over €200,000; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40274/13]

View answer

Michael McGrath

Question:

89. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the yield from reducing tax credits for persons earning over €100,000 by 50%; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40275/13]

View answer

Michael McGrath

Question:

90. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the yield from reducing tax credits for persons earning over €150,000 by 50%; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40276/13]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 87 to 90, inclusive, together.

I am advised by the Revenue Commissioners that the estimated full year yield to the Exchequer, estimated by reference to 2013 incomes, of abolishing the main personal and employee tax credits for income earners earning over €150,000, would be of the order of €165 million.

The estimated full year yield to the Exchequer, estimated by reference to 2013 incomes, of abolishing the main personal and employee tax credits for income earners earning over €200,000 would be of the order of €80 million.

The estimated full year yield to the Exchequer, estimated by reference to 2013 incomes, of reducing the main personal and employee tax credits for income earners earning over €100,000 by 50% would be of the order of €250 million.

The estimated full year yield to the Exchequer, estimated by reference to 2013 incomes, of reducing the main personal and employee tax credits for income earners earning over €150,000 by 50% would be of the order of €80 million.

It should be noted that the income ranges referred to above relate to Gross Income as defined in Revenue Statistical Report 2011.

These figures are estimates from the Revenue tax-forecasting model using actual data for the year 2010 adjusted as necessary for income and employment trends in the interim. They are therefore provisional and likely to be revised.

It should also be noted that a married couple who has elected or has been deemed to have elected for joint assessment is counted as one tax unit. Depending on the incomes of the couples concerned, they may be in a position to elect for separate assessment, which could result in their tax liability remaining unchanged by the proposals above.

Tax Yield

Questions (91)

Michael McGrath

Question:

91. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the revenue that would be raised by reducing the pension fund standard fund threshold to €1.2 million; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40279/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Standard Fund Threshold (SFT) is the maximum allowable pension fund on retirement for tax purposes which was introduced in Budget and Finance Act 2006 to prevent over-funding of pensions through tax-relieved arrangements. Information on the numbers and values of individual pension funds or on individual accrued benefits are not generally required to be supplied to the Revenue Commissioners by the administrators of pension schemes and personal pension arrangements. There is, therefore, no underlying data readily available to my Department or to the Revenue Commissioners on which to base reliable estimates of the savings that would arise specifically from a change to the SFT of the magnitude indicated in the question.

The Deputy will be aware of the announcement which I made in my Budget 2013 speech that changes to the SFT regime or other possible changes to give effect to the commitment in the Programme for Government to cap taxpayers’ subsidies for pension schemes which deliver pension income of more than €60,000 will be put in place in 2014. The extent of the changes required, which are still under consideration, may involve more than simply reducing the SFT and this examination also involves an analysis of data provided from various sources to establish as reliable an estimate as possible of the likely tax savings or yield to the Exchequer.

Tax Yield

Questions (92)

Michael McGrath

Question:

92. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the yield that would be raised from a 10% levy on alcohol sales in off licence premises; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [40316/13]

View answer

Written answers

The Deputy should be aware that EU Directive 92/93, which governs the structure of alcohol taxation, requires that such taxes are applied by reference to the nature and strength of the product rather than the means of packaging. It does not provide for different tax treatment of alcohol products depending on where the product is sold. Accordingly, the introduction of such a levy would not be possible.

Question No. 93 withdrawn.
Top
Share