Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 23 Sep 2014

Written Answers Nos. 218 - 235

Equine Industry

Questions (218)

John McGuinness

Question:

218. Deputy John McGuinness asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if his attention has been drawn to rule number 3.5.2 of the Show Jumping Ireland rule book and a newspaper article (details supplied); his views on the issues raised and the action he plans to take; if he plans to establish a database of such sport horses which have been imported; if he will introduce regulations for the importation and classification of sport horses; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35254/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am aware of the position whereby a horse that is imported into Ireland may, upon registration with Showjumping Ireland (SJI), be allocated a number of showjumping points in a situation where relevant supporting performance documentation is not provided by the owner. Showjumping Ireland is an independent sporting organisation and does not come under the remit of my Department. SJI is however an affiliate organisation of Horse Sport Ireland (HSI), the governing body for equestrian sport in Ireland.

The issue to which the Deputy refers was highlighted at a public consultation meeting of the HSI/Teagasc/RDS strategy group and I understand that HSI is pursuing the matter with SJI and that the Executive of SJI will consider changes to their rules next month with a view to such changes being applicable in 2015.

It is not envisaged that a separate database will be set up for horses to which the Deputy refers.

Animal Disease Controls

Questions (219)

Michael Healy-Rae

Question:

219. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will increase funding to compensate for losses incurred and income foregone under the national animal health TB, BVD and Johne's disease programmes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35929/14]

View answer

Written answers

The TB Eradication Scheme currently embodies a comprehensive range of measures for farmers who experience a disease breakdown, specifically, compensation for loss of reactors at market value, as well as other targeted income supports. The primary compensation measure available under the TB Eradication scheme is the On Farm Market Valuation scheme. In 2013, my Department paid €10.5m to 3,376 herd owners under this Scheme. In addition, herd owners may also qualify for additional payments under the Income Supplement, Hardship or Depopulation Grant schemes subject to compliance with the criteria applying in each scheme. Grants of €1.5m were paid to 934 herd owners under this scheme in 2013. My Department also paid €0.2m Depopulation Grants to 24 herd owners and €0.475m Hardship Grants to 1100 herd owners in 2013.

The Bovine Viral Diarrhoea (BVD) Eradication Programme currently embodies re-focused support arrangements for farmers faced with the removal of persistently infected (PI) calves from their herds. These measures provide for a €120 payment in respect of disposals of PI calves in suckler herds and payment of €75 towards the disposal of second and subsequent PI female calves born in dairy herds that are disposed of in a timely manner. Both measures are in respect of 2014 born calves and apply for one year only.

In the context of Johne’s Disease, my Department also provided significant additional funding towards the Animal Health Ireland’s Johne’s Disease Pilot Control Programme. One of the most important components of the programme is a veterinary on-farm risk assessment, the objective of which is to provide a framework for the herd owner and his/her nominated veterinary practitioner to identify any farm practices that might constitute a risk of introduction or spread of Johne’s Disease within the farm.

I am satisfied that the arrangements outlined above provide for appropriate compensation in the case of the various diseases and, given the current challenging budgetary situation, I do not foresee the availability of increased financial resources for the schemes.

Agriculture Scheme Expenditure

Questions (220)

Michael Healy-Rae

Question:

220. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will increase the capital funding allocation for the horticultural forestry and aquaculture sectors to achieve output targets and employment growth; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35930/14]

View answer

Written answers

The 2015 Estimate for my Department will be considered within the context of the annual gross expenditure ceilings that were provisionally allocated to all Departments at the time of budget 2014 and the comprehensive review of expenditure 2015-2017. The Government decision in relation to the expenditure ceilings was taken in order to strike a balance between needs and priorities on a multi-annual basis, to meet the requirements of the overall fiscal commitments which are firmly focused on returning the public finances to a sustainable path and to reduce the General Government Deficit by end 2015.

Preparations for the discussions on the 2015 Estimate are under way in the Department and all budget lines in the Vote, both capital and current will be examined as part of that process having regard to the funding constraints for next year. My intention is to ensure that all resources available to my Department will be managed to provide the optimum benefit to economic activity in the agricultural, food, fisheries and forestry sectors, including farm incomes, and to realising the potential which clearly exists for the sectors to contribute to the national economic recovery.

Disadvantaged Areas Scheme Payments

Questions (221)

Michael Healy-Rae

Question:

221. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if funding of €195 million for areas of natural constraint formerly disadvantaged area scheme to support farming in marginal areas will be provided; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35931/14]

View answer

Written answers

Pending the approval by the EU Commission of the 2014/2020 Rural Development Programme, I can confirm that funding for the 2014 Disadvantaged Areas Scheme/Areas of Natural Constraint Scheme has been maintained at €195 million. The draft 2014/2020 RDP, as submitted, envisages payment rates remaining unchanged, pending the introduction of the newly delineated Areas of Natural Constraints.

Beef Data Programme

Questions (222)

Michael Healy-Rae

Question:

222. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will provide funding of €52 million of the beef data and genomic scheme to support the suckler sector; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35932/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Beef Data and Genomics Programme has been developed as part of the draft Rural Development Plan submitted to the European Commission in July of 2014. It is currently the subject of discussion with the European Commission whose agreement is required to before the scheme and the RDP can come into force. The proposed Beef Data and Genomics Programme is intended to deliver an accelerated improvement in the quality and environmental sustainability of the beef herd through the application of genomics technology. This will help farmers to maximise productivity in a sustainable way, while supporting improved quality and traceability in the national suckler herd, as set out under the Food Harvest 2020 strategy.

The programme will provide support to farmers to take samples for genotyping from selected animals in their herds and to provide vital breeding data to support the development of a national cattle breeding databank. The data will provide farmers with the tools to select higher quality and more efficient breeding replacements through the use of cutting edge genomic technology. The data will allow the farmer to target animals based on ease of calving, high weight gain thereafter, and animals that can be finished earlier. The scheme will have a substantial environmental dividend while improving productivity, reducing input costs and improving margins for farmers.

In addition, data gained from the implementation of genomic selection in Irish dairy cattle since 2009 shows that genomic selection could increase genetic gain by up to 50%; this is dependent on good accuracy of selection for which the main requirement is individual animal performance data on a very large number of animals of known parentage.

Payments will, subject to the approval of the programme by the EU Commission, be paid to farmers for work carried out, including the development of a herd breeding plan, training and transaction costs. Among the activities being considered for the programme are the:

- recording of animal events;

- recording of a range of performance criteria;

- taking and sending for laboratory testing tissue (DNA) samples from selected animals; and

- selection of high quality replacement bulls and heifers over the period of their BDGP contract;

- Completion of an on-farm Carbon Navigator.

A budget of €295 million has been allocated in the draft proposal sent to the Commission. Officials in my Department are currently in discussions with the EU Commission on the final details of the programme.

TAMS Expenditure

Questions (223)

Michael Healy-Rae

Question:

223. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will provide funding of €30 million for a significant invest programme TAMs to improve on-farm efficiency across all sectors; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35933/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Rural Development Programme for the 2014-2020 period was submitted to the EU Commission for approval in July 2014. The following investments have been identified as priority areas which will be targeted in the initial stages:- (i) dairy equipment, (ii) low emission spreading equipment, (iii) animal welfare and farm safety (specifically beef and sheep handling facilities), (iv) pig and poultry investments in energy, water meters and medicine dispensers, (v) organic capital investment, and (vi) a young farmer capital investment scheme. TAMS II will subsequently be expanded to cover farm nutrient storage and animal housing. The level of funding allocated to TAMS II for next year will be determined in the context of the 2015 Estimates exercise which is currently under way.

Green Low-carbon Agri-environment Scheme

Questions (224)

Michael Healy-Rae

Question:

224. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will provide funding of €200 million for AEOS-GLAS programmes with the early opening of GLAS places for 30,000 in the first year and payments made in 2015; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35934/14]

View answer

Written answers

The new GLAS Scheme is currently with the European Commission for approval, as part of the Rural Development Programme 2014 – 2020. Once such approval is granted, my Department will move to open the Scheme for applications. I would hope to be able to do so before the end of the year, but this is entirely dependent on approval being secured in time from the EU. However, I am confident that the scheme will be open to applications in 2015 and I am making provision for up to 30,000 applicants in the first year. Payments for 2015 will be in respect of a part-year only, as is normal with the commencement of a new scheme like this, but contracts will then run for their full five year term from 2016. This means that entrants into GLAS next year will benefit from an additional part-payment in respect of 2015, on top of the usual five year contract.

Felling Licence Application Numbers

Questions (225)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

225. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will provide the list of felling licences issued after the February 2014 storms pertaining to Coillte woodlands of the 134 licences issued by the Forest Service in addition to the locations accompanied by the forestry inspectors' reports justifying the felling; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35351/14]

View answer

Written answers

To date, 469 felling licences have been issued to Coillte for its plantations that were damaged as a result of the February 2014 storms. For efficiency of processing, 399 of these licence applications were submitted as a batch while the remaining 70 applications were submitted individually. A list showing all Coillte felling licences issued as a result of storm damage follows. The list shows Licence number, Townland and County for each application. As the copying and collating of forestry inspectors’ reports for all 469 applications will take some time, these reports will be forwarded to the Deputy as soon as possible.

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Forestry Sector

Questions (226)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

226. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he will provide verification that the extraction methodology used in Gougane Barra is conducted manually using cabling (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35352/14]

View answer

Written answers

Coillte Teoranta was established as a private commercial company under the Forestry Act 1988 and day-to-day operational matters, such as the management of their forest estate and associated tasks, are the responsibility of the company.

With reference to the control measures implemented in Gougane Barra Forest Park, County Cork, following the confirmation of Phytophthora ramorum on Japanese larch trees there, the company has advised that manual felling and cable systems were used on up to 80% of the felling of the Phytophthora Sanitation Felling in Gougane. The company advises that the other 20% were felled with tracked harvesting machine and forwarder to bring material to the roadside. As this is quite a technical issue, I understand that the company is happy to discuss this matter further with the Deputy to explain in detail the way in which this operation was conducted.

Felling Licences Applications

Questions (227)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

227. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if a licence was issued for Gougane Barra extraneous clear-felling for the mature Sitka spruce, lodgepole pine and western hemlock, which Coillte claimed were damaged by the storm in February 2014; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35353/14]

View answer

Written answers

A general felling licence GFL CK27WB01 issued to Coillte in respect of clearfelling 4.9 hectares at Coomroe, Co. Cork, due to storm damage. The species licensed were Sitka Spruce, Lodgepole Pine (Northern Coastal), Birch and Japanese Larch. The application was referred to both Cork County Council and National Parks & Wildlife Service (NPWS) for their observations, prior to approval by the forestry inspector.

NPWS had no comments or observations regarding the proposed felling. Cork County Council asked that the contractor should contact the Council prior to commencement of works, to agree a designated haulage route, thereby ensuring that the condition of the roads network accessing the site is not compromised during operations.

Felling Licences Applications

Questions (228)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

228. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if a licence was issued for the storm tree felling in Jenkinstown wood in County Kilkenny; if so, if he will provide the inspector's reports necessary for both public amenity woodlands felling licences; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35354/14]

View answer

Written answers

The only felling licences issued in respect of tree felling in the townland of Jenkinstown were two General Felling licences issued to Coillte in 2009 and both of which expired in April 2014. There were no licences issued in respect of storm damaged trees in this townland.

Forestry Management

Questions (229)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

229. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the reason there are no management plans in place for the extremely valuable and vulnerable 0.002% of ancient woodlands, some of which are in the care of the National Parks and Wildlife Service; if his Department or the Forest Service expressed any concern at this precarious situation regarding these most valuable land based habitats and most important indigenous forest seed banks; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35355/14]

View answer

Written answers

The new draft forestry programme which will cover the period 2014 – 2020 includes a number of measures which may be used to conserve and protect the valuable habitats and ecosystem services provided by Ireland’s ancient woodlands.

1. Measure Number 6: The Native Woodland Conservation Scheme (NWS Conservation) supports the protection and enhancement of existing native woodlands, primarily to protect and enhance native woodland ecosystems. Specific forest types targeted by this scheme include;

- Woodlands designated as a cSAC, NHA, pNHA or SPA;

- Old Woodland Sites, whereby original 6 inch Ordnance Survey maps show continuous woodland/forest cover since the 1830s;

2. Measure 10: The Forest Genetic Reproductive Material Scheme calls for new suitable seed stand to be identified and registered in the National Catalogue of Seed Stands. These seeds stands may then be eligible for support under this scheme where aid will be provided to improve the management and protection of these important sites. Existing registered seed stand from which seed is not currently being collected will also be eligible for this support. The objective of this scheme will be to increase production of quality seed leading to better adapted, more resilient and productive forests.

3. Measure Number 11: Forest Management Plans. Support under this measure is primarily aimed at forests planted under the afforestation scheme. However, as part of the public consultation process consideration could be given to the suitability of this measure to include ancient woodlands.

The programme itself is now undergoing a second round of public consultation at which point careful consideration will be given to submissions made.

Forestry Management

Questions (230)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

230. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views on the new forestry programme's failure to focus on ancient woodland sites regarding biodiversity, genetic material security, climate mitigation measures; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35356/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Native Woodland Conservation Scheme (NWS Conservation) which is included in the new draft forestry programme 2014 – 2020, provides support for the protection and enhancement of existing native woodlands. Specific forest types targeted by this scheme include:

- Woodlands designated as a cSAC, NHA, pNHA or SPA;

- Old Woodland Sites, whereby original 6 inch Ordnance Survey maps show continuous woodland/forest cover since the 1830s.

The programme itself makes reference to a number of key environmental services provided by this scheme where ancient woodlands are an important feature:

-Supporting services: Supporting services have biodiversity as their bedrock, and involve ecosystem functions like soil formation and nutrient cycling. Ancient woodlands, with their exceptional biodiversity, including remnant populations of specialist fauna and flora, contribute very significant supporting services;

- Regulating services: Forests regulate water quality and the volume of water run-off. They also protect against soil erosion and stabilise riverbanks. Carbon sequestration is of increasing value given the need to mitigate emissions in climate change strategies;

- Provisioning services: The provisioning services of native woodlands provide us with ecosystem goods: not only timber, wood products and wood fuel, but also wild foods such as berries, mushrooms and venison. These are valued and utilised in many other European states and have considerable potential in Ireland too. An additional provisioning service, much utilised in Ireland, is the forage and shelter forests accord to farm animals, realising a significant benefit in reduced agricultural input costs;

- Cultural services: Woodlands make an important contribution to landscape quality. Their presence is valued for amenity use, providing physical and mental well-being, aesthetic and spiritual pleasure, and opportunities for the appreciation of birds and other wildlife. Ancient woodlands, in particular, also provide historical landscape value as they often contain archaeological features and evidence of past agriculture and settlement.

Possibilities for supporting ancient woodlands also exist in both the Forest Genetic Reproductive Material Scheme and the measure providing support for Forest Management Plans. The draft programme itself is undergoing a second round of public consultation at which point careful consideration will be given to submissions made. The closing date for submissions is 13th October 2014. Further details are available on the Department’s website www.agriculture.gov.ie.

Forestry Management

Questions (231)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

231. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he was alerted by the Forest Service to the vulnerability of ancient woodland seed banks in terms of disease threats, in view of the fact that a management plan in place it is very difficult to ensure the security of the sites as well as ability to control any potential outbreaks; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35357/14]

View answer

Written answers

Conservation and development of forest genetic resources are fundamental to realising national forest policy goals. Increasing emphasis on biodiversity conservation at ecosystem and genetic levels runs hand in hand with developing the genetic resource of native species and their expanding role as envisaged in the new forestry programme for the period 2014 – 2020.

Through the native woodland scheme (establishment and conservation) my Department is committed to promoting and encouraging the use of better adapted, home-collected forest reproductive material. To further progress this objective, the new draft Forestry Programme calls for new suitable seed stands to be identified and registered in the National Catalogue of Seed Stands. These seed stands may then be eligible for support under the Forest Genetic Reproductive Material Scheme where aid will be provided to improve the management and protection of these important sites. Existing registered seed stands from which seed is not currently being collected will also be eligible for this support. The objective of this scheme will be to increase production of quality seed leading to better adapted, more resilient and productive forests.

The detailed rules for the Forest Genetic Reproductive Material Scheme are currently being drafted and it is too early to state the exact terms and conditions of the scheme. However, there are clear benefits in having a forest management plan in place as part of having a registered seed stand.

Appointments to State Boards

Questions (232)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

232. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views that no conflict of interest has arisen with the appointment by Coillte of the former Secretary General of his Department with responsibility for forestry to its board on his retirement in 2010; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35358/14]

View answer

Written answers

I am taking it that the Deputy is referring to the appointment of a former Assistant Secretary General of my Department to the Board of Coillte with effect from 1 January 2010. It should be noted that, in accordance with the provisions of the Forestry Act 1988 under which Coillte was established, the person was appointed to the Board by the then Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food with the consent of the Minister for Finance, and not by Coillte itself.

As a State owned body, Coillte is subject to the Department of Finance ‘ Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies ’. In line with the Code, Board members are appointed to act on a fully informed basis, in good faith, with due diligence and care, and in the best interest of the State body, subject to the objectives set by Government. The Code outlines the procedures to be followed by the Members of the Boards of State bodies in relation to the disclosure of interests by Directors.

A relevant criterion, in making a board appointment, is to ensure that all of those appointed to State boards have the relevant mix of knowledge and expertise to contribute to the board. Knowledge of the forest sector and the corporate governance requirements applicable to State bodies would be appropriate in this context.

EU Funding

Questions (233)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

233. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the reason his Department repaid the EU forestry premiums that Coillte had drawn down before the European Court of Justice judgment against them; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35359/14]

View answer

Written answers

Coillte Teoranta received payment of afforestation premiums at the non-farmer rate from 1994 to 1999. The European Commission decided in August 1999 that Coillte was not eligible to receive such premiums as it did not consider Coillte to be a “private-law, natural or legal person” as defined in Regulation 2080/92. Ireland appealed this decision but, in late 2003, the European Court of Justice upheld the decision of the European Commission. 75% of the total amount paid to Coillte in premiums was paid by the European Commission and 25% by the Irish Exchequer. The State was obliged to return the EU element of the premium payment to the EU Commission.

EU Funding

Questions (234)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

234. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his views that the retention of €4.3 million of EU funding by Coillte is not in breach of EU state aid or EU competition rules; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35360/14]

View answer

Written answers

It should be noted that the payments in question to Coillte were made in good faith and all involved acted on the basis that Coillte was entitled to this money in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) 2080/92. However, in compliance with the decision of the EU Commission, as upheld by the Court of Justice, the EU element of the premium payments paid to Coillte by the Department was reimbursed to the EU.

The State Aid issue has been carefully considered. The advice received is that to constitute a State Aid, the aid paid out has to disrupt the market. The money received by Coillte in this instance, is not considered to constitute a State Aid, due to the fact that private firms in the same market were at all times entitled to seek and receive forestry premiums. There was no question of other third parties, being prevented from seeking and receiving aid, which would be a distortion of the market. It should also be noted that the ongoing loss of the forestry premium income, formerly received by Coillte, places it in a less advantageous position, compared to any of its competitors as far as State Aid issues go.

Forestry Sector

Questions (235)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

235. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if there has been any review of the Irish Forestry Unit Trust and its charity status; the way this charity status relates to Coillte; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35361/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Irish Forestry Unit Trust ( IForUT ) is a private entity. The registration of an entity as a charity does not fall within the remit of my Department. Coillte Teoranta was established as a private commercial company under the Forestry Act 1988 and day-to-day operational matters, such as the relationship between Coillte and the Irish Forestry Unit Trust (IForUT) , are the responsibility of the company.

I am advised that IForUT is a unit trust that was established in 1994 by AIB, Irish Life and Coillte to provide an investment vehicle to enable Irish pension funds and other Irish qualifying investors such as charities to invest in forestry. When the unit trust was first established in 1994, it consolidated the forestry investments of Irish Life Investment Managers and AIB Investment Managers with Coillte introducing semi-mature forests to ensure a balanced portfolio and to provide liquidity to the fund to cover operating costs. The transfer by Coillte involved only the right to harvest timber from one rotation of the forest crop; the underlying land was not sold and Coillte continues to manage and maintain the forests transferred on behalf of IForUT. Since 1994 , Coillte has gradually reduced its unit holdings in the fund as the original purpose for establishing the fund has been fulfilled. Coillte is no longer a unit holder in IForUT.

Top
Share