Dáil Éireann Debate, Thursday - 9 October 2014
95. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the position regarding residency status in respect of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 24; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [38749/14]
View answer96. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the position regarding residency status in respect of a person (details supplied) in Dublin 24; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [38750/14]
View answer97. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Justice and Equality the position regarding the determination of residency status in the case of a person (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [38751/14]
View answerI propose to take Questions Nos. 95 to 97, inclusive, together.
I am advised by the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) of my Department that the first named person was granted permission to remain in the State as the Spouse of an EU National who was exercising their EU Treaty Rights in this State. This permission to remain was valid until 24th January 2012. This permission was not renewed as the person concerned failed to submit satisfactory evidence of the EU citizen exercising his EU Treaty Rights in the State for a continuous period of five years. The person concerned was notified of this decision by letter dated 9th July 2012. The matter is now being considered by the Removals Section of INIS under Regulation 20 of the European Communities (Free Movement of Persons Regulations) 2006 and 2008.
With regard to the second named person, the person concerned is a EU national. The person concerned is entitled to remain in the State, whilst he is exercising his EU Treaty Rights.
With regard to the third named person, I am advised that the person concerned is not documented on INIS records.
Queries in relation to the status of individual immigration cases may be made directly to the INIS of my Department by e-mail using the Oireachtas Mail facility which has been specifically established for this purpose. This service enables up to date information on such cases to be obtained without the need to seek information by way of the Parliamentary Questions process. The Deputy may consider using the e-mail service except in cases where the response from the INIS is, in the Deputy’s view, inadequate or too long awaited.
