Skip to main content
Normal View

Wednesday, 10 Dec 2014

Written Answers Nos 31-50

Exceptional Needs Payment Data

Questions (31)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

31. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection the capacity of the emergency needs payment scheme to meet the growing and future demands on it, from persons who are struggling due to cuts made to other social welfare schemes and rates and the imposition of new taxes and charges such as the water charges, in view of the fact that spending on the scheme has been halved since she to took up office; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47086/14]

View answer

Written answers

Under the supplementary welfare allowance (SWA) scheme, the Department may make a single exceptional needs payment (ENP) to help meet essential, once-off and unforeseen expenditure which a person could not reasonably be expected to meet out of their weekly income. The Government has provided €31.3 million for the scheme in 2014.

In 2012 a Departmental working group made up of staff from the Community Welfare Service reviewed the existing ENP guidelines with a view to, in so far as possible, achieve standardisation and consistency of treatment of applications across the country. This review has been used as a basis for revised guidelines that issued to staff in 2012 and 2013. These guidelines assist Departmental staff administering the scheme and do not affect the discretion available to officers in issuing an ENP to assist an individual or household in any particular hardship situation which may arise.

While expenditure under the scheme has reduced in recent years, the scheme is demand led and continues to provide assistance to those with exceptional needs taking into account the requirements of the legislation and all the relevant circumstances of the case in order to ensure that the payments target those most in need of assistance.

Persons who consider that they have an entitlement to an ENP should contact the local officials in the Community Welfare Service administering the scheme.

Pensions Legislation

Questions (32)

Willie O'Dea

Question:

32. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection the actions she will take to increase pension coverage here; if she will provide an update on the operation of the provisions contained in the Social Welfare and Pensions (No. 2) Bill 2013; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47003/14]

View answer

Written answers

I requested the OECD to carry out a review of the Irish pension system in 2012. The OECD released its report (OECD Reviews of Pensions Systems – Ireland) in April 2013. One of the key recommendations in the report was to increase pensions coverage through a universal mandatory or quasi-mandatory employment based pension system. In line with this recommendation and with the Programme for Government, the 2014-2016 Statement of Priorities confirmed that during 2015 the Government will agree a roadmap and timeline for the introduction of a new, universal supplementary pension saving scheme.

The constituent factors involved in constructing an efficient and effective universal pension system are complex and diverse and it is of critical importance that any system chosen is correctly designed.

Therefore, development of the roadmap will involve detailed consideration of the range of models and options available and will include co-operation across a range of Government Departments and engagement with all sectoral interests.

In relation to the changes provided for in the Social Welfare and Pensions (No. 2) Act 2013, there was one scheme where the changes to section 50 of the Pensions Act were applied and I am glad to say that I have not received an application from the trustees of any defined benefits pension scheme seeking funding to meet a shortfall in scheme resources where the scheme was wound up and both the employer and the scheme was insolvent.

Rent Supplement Scheme Payments

Questions (33)

Clare Daly

Question:

33. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection if she will increase rent supplement levels by 25% in the areas which have experienced the sharpest rise in homelessness as a result of rising rents. [47002/14]

View answer

Written answers

There are currently approximately 71,800 rent supplement recipients for which the Government has provided over €344 million for 2014.

I am keeping the matter regarding rent limits under consideration and the review being undertaken by the Department will be finalised shortly.

The Department is in a position of both significant influence in the private rented market and responsibility. There is a real concern that increased rent limits may add to further rental inflation and impact, not alone on rent supplement recipients, but also on many lower income workers, their families and students. Increasing limits will yield only a very marginal increase in available supply for rent supplement recipients with the only certainty that raising limits will increase costs disproportionately for the Exchequer with little or no new housing available to new recipients.

The Department has put measures in place to ensure that the housing needs of rent supplement customers who are in danger of becoming homeless are being addressed by providing for increased flexibility within the administration of the rent supplement scheme. A notice reminding staff of their statutory discretionary power to award, on a case by case basis, a supplement for rental purposes, for example, when dealing with applicants who are at risk of losing their tenancy was circulated earlier in the year and further instruction has issued this week to ensure consistency throughout the country.

In light of a particular concentration of the homelessness problem in the Dublin area, the Department agreed a tenancy sustainment protocol with the Dublin local authorities and voluntary organisations so that families on rent supplement who are at risk of losing their accommodation can have more timely and appropriate interventions made on their behalf. Since the launch of this protocol in mid-June 2014, over 240 families have had their rent supplement payments increased by the Department.

I strongly advise that where a person in receipt of rent supplement is at risk of losing their tenancy should make contact with the Tenancy Protection Service provided by Threshold in Dublin on 1800 454 454 or their local Community Welfare Service throughout the country.

Child Poverty

Questions (34)

Willie O'Dea

Question:

34. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection the actions she will take to address the increasing child poverty rates here; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47005/14]

View answer

Written answers

Government policy around tackling poverty for children and families has recently been articulated in the National Policy Framework for Children and Young People: Better Outcomes, Brighter Futures, which adopted a child-specific social target for poverty reduction aiming to lift 70,000 children out of poverty by 2020, equivalent to a reduction of two-thirds on the 2011 rate.

The Department of Social Protection helps to prevent child poverty by providing income support for families through child benefit, qualified child increases for welfare recipients, family income supplement and the back to school clothing and footwear allowance, amounting to €2.3 billion in 2014. Through these and other social transfers, the at-risk-of-poverty rate for children is reduced from 45 per cent to 18.8 per cent, a poverty reduction effect of 59 per cent.

Ireland is amongst the best performing member states in the EU in this regard. In Budget 2015, the Government committed a further €96 million for children, including an increase of €5 per month in child benefit.

In order to break the cycle of child poverty where this arises, the Government invests in prevention and early intervention services targeted at disadvantaged children through the Area Based Childhood programme and the DEIS programme.

Of course a key way to tackle child poverty is to get parents back to work. Through Pathways to Work and the Action Plan on Jobs, the Government is putting people into real jobs. The family income supplement and new back to work family dividend - which I provided for in Budget 2015 - will support parents to take up and remain in employment, especially those furthest from the labour market.

Domiciliary Care Allowance Eligibility

Questions (35)

Thomas Pringle

Question:

35. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection her views on extending the period where a family can claim domiciliary care allowance for a child to 18 years rather than them going onto disability allowance at 16, as is currently the case; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47095/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Deputy will be aware that I commissioned two reports relating to the Domiciliary Care Allowance (DCA) scheme during 2012. One of these reports dealt specifically with the relationship between DCA and disability allowance (DA) for young adults. A proposal to extend the age limit for receipt of DCA to 18 years of age was made as a recommendation in both of these reports, which were published in April 2013.

The reports found that there was a strong rationale for raising the DCA age threshold to 18 years. The recommendation is that this change should be made from a specific date, with the age threshold for payment of DCA to increase to age 18 for all new and existing claimants aged 16 and under on that date. On this same date the age threshold for payment of DA would change to age 18, to apply to new claimants only.

However, the Deputy will be aware that there are differing views on the best way to proceed so as to provide support to the group of people in question. While the recommendations of the reports will be kept under consideration as part of ongoing review of the wider disability area, there are no plans to extend the age limit for receipt of DCA at this time.

Departmental Schemes

Questions (36)

Paul Murphy

Question:

36. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection if she has conducted an analysis of the cost and number of staff that will be required to administer the €100 water conservation grant; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47088/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Department of Social Protection will administer, on behalf of the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government, a €100 water conservation grant for households that complete a valid response to Irish Water’s customer registration process. The grant will be paid to the registered householders annually, in respect of their primary dwellings, with the first payment to be paid in September 2015 and each subsequent year up to and including 2018.

The water conservation grant replaces the tax rebate and social protection measures previously announced.

The Department of Social Protection is in consultation with the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government and the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform in regard to the staffing and funding required to administer the scheme. The administration and payment of this grant represents a significant project for the Department of Social Protection. The Department is currently carrying out a scoping exercise to explore the most effective and efficient approach to its implementation. This will include estimates of resources required to undertake the initial work involved and ongoing administration of the grant.

Homeless Accommodation Provision

Questions (37)

Ruth Coppinger

Question:

37. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection if she will provide Threshold with further power and resources to prevent homelessness, including in cases of repossessions. [47078/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Department of Social Protection is actively engaging with Threshold in implementing measures to ensure that the housing needs of rent supplement customers who are in danger of becoming homeless are being addressed by providing for increased flexibility within the administration of the rent supplement scheme.

I understand that the provision of resources for Threshold is a matter for the local authorities and the matter should be raised with my colleague, Mr. Alan Kelly T.D., Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government.

Carer's Allowance Eligibility

Questions (38)

Willie O'Dea

Question:

38. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection the criteria for granting the carers' allowance for persons who care for children with severe autism; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47006/14]

View answer

Written answers

I should state at the outset that eligibility for Carer’s Benefit or Allowance is not based on the type of impairment or disease but on the level of the care requirement consequent on the impairment.

The criteria for receipt of Carer’s Benefit or Allowance is that the recipient of care must be aged 16 or over and is so incapacitated as to require full-time care and attention or aged under 16 and getting a Domiciliary Care Allowance.

In relation to Domiciliary Care Allowance, the qualifying conditions for that scheme are that the child must be aged under 16, have a severe disability that is likely to last for at least 1 year, live at home with the person claiming the Carer’s allowance for 5 or more days a week, meet the medical criteria and be ordinarily resident in the State.

In a case where the child is 16 or over the child may apply for Disability Allowance in their own right and the person providing full-time care and attention may apply for Carer’s Benefit or Carer’s Allowance.

The person receiving care, over 16 years of age, is regarded as requiring full-time care and attention where he or she is so incapacitated as to require continuous supervision in order to avoid danger to him or herself or continual supervision and frequent assistance throughout the day in connection with normal bodily functions, and is so incapacitated as to be likely to require full-time care and attention for a period of at least 12 months.

Departmental Strategies

Questions (39)

Willie O'Dea

Question:

39. Deputy Willie O'Dea asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection her plans to transfer payments from her Department to an electronic system; if she has discussed this proposed change with the Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47004/14]

View answer

Written answers

Increasing the level of public service delivery to citizens through electronic channels is a key ingredient in creating a vibrant, modern and competitive Irish economy, offering scope to streamline processes and improve customer service. This objective is bedded into a range of Government initiatives including the Public Sector Reform Plan, e-Government Strategy and the Department’s Payment Strategy. That Strategy aims to facilitate greater use of electronic payments to provide wider payment options to our clients and build levels of financial inclusion, while also continuing to serve those who are more vulnerable in our society.

Last year, the cost of 42.7 million cash payments to clients was almost €73 million gross. By comparison, 37 million payments were issued by EFT at a cost of only €9 million. Reducing levels of cash payments can deliver real savings for Irish taxpayers and benefit welfare clients simultaneously. Efforts are also being progressed to gradually deplete the levels of cheques issued in support of the objectives of the recent e-Day initiative.

The Department of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources is fully briefed on the Department’s strategy. While matters relating to An Post are a matter for its Board to consider in consultation with my colleague the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, I was interested to note that An Post is itself making moves in the direction of electronic payments with its recent invitation to the market for electronic payment solutions and allied services. I am very conscious of the important role of post offices which offer financial and other services locally. This Government has consistently stated its commitment to maintaining the post office network in the Programme for Government and I was glad to play my part in that when, following an EU-wide procurement competition, I signed a new contract with An Post last December which is worth in excess of €50 million to it this year.

Rent Supplement Scheme Payments

Questions (40, 56)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

40. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection if she will determine a formula whereby tenants whose rent has increases substantially over the past 12 months may be offered partial rent support or increased rent support as may be necessary; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47328/14]

View answer

Terence Flanagan

Question:

56. Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection if rent allowance will be increased in line with increasing rental prices; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47440/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 40 and 56 together.

The purpose of the rent supplement scheme is to provide short-term income support to assist with reasonable accommodation costs of eligible people living in private rented accommodation who are unable to provide for their accommodation costs from their own resources. There are approximately 71,800 rent supplement recipients for which the Government has provided over €344 million for 2014.

I am keeping the matter regarding rent limits under consideration and the review being undertaken by the Department will be finalised shortly. The Department is in a position of both significant influence in the private rented market and responsibility. There is a real concern that increased rent limits may add to further rental inflation and impact, not alone on rent supplement recipients, but also on many lower income workers, their families and students.

Central to the current supply issue is that rent supplement policy must provide flexibility. I can assure the Deputies that officers administering rent supplement throughout the country have considerable experience and make every effort to ensure that accommodation needs are met including through the use of their discretionary statutory powers as necessary and, in Dublin, through the Interim Tenancy Sustainment Protocol (ITSP). A notice reminding staff of their statutory discretionary power to award, on a case by case basis, a supplement for rental purposes in exceptional cases, for example, when dealing with applicants who are at risk of losing their tenancy was circulated in July 2014. Further instructions are issuing this week to ensure that the necessary supports continue to be provided and that there is consistency throughout the country.

Rent supplement payments are being made in excess of the maximum limits throughout the county, including over 240 cases under the Interim Tenancy Sustainment Protocol, in order to maintain tenancies. The Department is reviewing the local arrangements in place to strengthen the existing framework.

I strongly advise that where a person in receipt of rent supplement is at risk of losing their tenancy they should make contact with the Tenancy Protection Service provided by Threshold on 1800 454 454 in Dublin or their local Community Welfare Service throughout the country.

Social Welfare Benefits Data

Questions (41)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

41. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection the number of applications for carer’s allowance, ophthalmic benefit or dental benefit, invalidity pension and disability allowance received in the past six months; the number approved, refused or pending; the way the figures compare with the previous 12 month period; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47329/14]

View answer

Written answers

The information requested by the Deputy is detailed in the following tabular statements. Please note that separate pending figures for dental benefit and optical benefit as requested are not available. Pending figures for treatment benefits as a whole are available, encompassing dental benefit, optical benefit and hearing aids. The treatment benefits pending figure at the end of May 2014 was 3,567. The treatment benefits pending figure at the end of November 2014 is not yet available but will be forwarded to the Deputy at the earliest opportunity.

Applications received, awarded, disallowed, withdrawn & pending June to November 2014

Scheme

Number Received

Number Awarded

Number Disallowed

Number Withdrawn

Number Pending(**)

Carer’s Allowance

9,264

6,887(*)

4,197

853

4,606

Disability Allowance

9,992

7,483(*)

6,996

517

5,929

Invalidity Pension

4,364

3,682(*)

2,729

761

2,171

Dental Benefit

164,849

150,970

11,367

n/a

n/a

Optical Benefit

80,071

75,974

3,192

n/a

n/a

(*) Please note that the number shown as awarded in each month includes any case which was awarded in that month following a review of a prior decision to disallow.

(**) Pending figures as of end November 2014

Applications received, awarded, disallowed, withdrawn & pending June 2013 to May 2014

Scheme

Number Received

Number Awarded

Number Disallowed

Number Withdrawn

Number Pending(**)

Carer’s Allowance

14,508

11,776(*)

6,589

1,673

3,479

Disability Allowance

19,998

13,662(*)

13,559

1,482

5,631

Invalidity Pension

9,420

7,950(*)

6,583

507

2,329

Dental Benefit

332,014

308,194

23,452

n/a

n/a

Optical Benefit

152,408

145,051

7,278

n/a

n/a

(*) Please note that the number shown as awarded in each month includes any case which was awarded in that month following a review of a prior decision to disallow.

(**) Pending figures as of end May 2014

Unemployment Data

Questions (42, 45)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

42. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection the extent to which unemployment alleviation measures continue to make a positive impact in respect of long-term and youth unemployment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47330/14]

View answer

Bernard Durkan

Question:

45. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection the extent to which the age profile of those on the live register continues to be monitored with a view to making any adjustments necessary to assist those most in need; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47333/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 42 and 45 together.

The Government’s primary strategy to reduce long-term and youth unemployment has been through policies to create the environment for a strong economic recovery by promoting competitiveness and productivity. Economic recovery will underpin jobs growth. This strategy is working. Employment has risen by about 85,000 since the recovery began in 2012. The unemployment rate, according to the most recent Live Register figures for November, is falling and is currently at 10.7%, the lowest rate in over 5 years – and is down from a peak of 15.1% in 2012.

The most recent QNHS figures for long term unemployment show that since the peak in Q1 2012 of 204,000, the numbers had fallen by 65,100 as of Q3 2014, a reduction of 31.9% (see Figure 1 below). The percentage of the labour force who are long-term unemployed (the long-term unemployment rate) rose from 8.2% in 2011 Q1 to 9.5% in Q1 2012 before falling over the last two years to a recent low of 6.4% in Q3 2014.

The most recent figures also show youth unemployment down by 11,400 year-on year to 48,400 in Q3 2014, equating to an unemployment rate of 23.2%.

Nevertheless, despite the progress that has been made, the Government recognises that both long-term unemployment and youth unemployment remain unacceptably high. People who are long-term unemployed account for 58% of total unemployment and within the overall number who are more than 12 months unemployed the number that are two and three years unemployed is particularly worrying. It is clear that some people who became unemployed at the height of the jobs crisis in 2009 have found it particularly difficult to find employment. Hence, the Government recognises the need for additional activation measures to ensure that as many as possible of the jobs created as the economy recovers are taken up by long-term and young Live Registrants. This is the rationale behind the Government’s Pathways to Work strategy and the Youth Guarantee, both of which are being led by the Department of Social Protection.

In Pathways to Work 2012, a target was set for the Department of Social Protection of moving 75,000 of those who were long-term live registrants at the end of 2011 into employment by the end of 2015. Up to the end of the third quarter of 2014, over 65,000 of this group had moved into, and remain in, employment. Given progress to date, the Department is on course to reach its 2015 target.

The latest iteration of the Pathways to Work Strategy - Pathways to Work 2015 - includes a wide range of programmes and services to help long term unemployed jobseekers back to employment. These include programmes such as JobBridge, JobsPlus and Momentum introduced by this Government and schemes such as Community Employment and Tús, where the Department has significantly increased the number of places available. JobsPlus is targeted specifically at encouraging employers to recruit people who are long-term unemployed. Almost 3,000 long-term unemployed people have been placed in employment as a result of JobsPlus and over 60% of these have been unemployed for 2 years or more.

Pathways to Work 2015 also includes arrangements to increase the level of systematic engagement of the employment services with those who are out of work for long periods. There is also a specific focus on employer engagement to encourage employers to recruit from the Live Register.

The most recent figures for participation on the main activation programmes are set out in the following table:

Activation Programmes (October 2013 and October 2014)

Live Register Activation Programmes (Number) by Type of Activation

Programme and Month

Oct 2013

Oct 2014

Back to Work payments

Back to work allowance scheme - employee strand

12

5

Back to work enterprise allowance scheme - self employed strand

10269

10897

Short-term enterprise allowance

708

516

Total back to work payments

10989

11418

Other activation programmes

DSP part-time job incentive

243

384

TUS - community work placement initiative

6849

7683

JobBridge

6174

6599

Total other activation programmes

13266

14666

Community employment schemes (excluding supervisors)

21806

22815

FAS full time training for unemployed people

9145

8434

Back to education courses

Vocational training opportunities scheme (VTOS)

5000

5000

Back to education allowance (BTEA)

24432

21201

Total back to education courses

29432

26201

Total activation programmes

84638

83534

Back to Work allowance scheme - Employee strand: This scheme was closed to new applications from 1st May 2009.

Short-term Enterprise Allowance: This scheme was introduced from 1st May 2009. It provides immediate support for someone in receipt of Jobseekers Benefit who wants to start a business.

FÁS Full Time Training for Unemployed People: Specific Skills Training/Local Training initiative/Traineeship/Return to Work

Breakdown became available for April 2012 Live Register release.

Vocational Training Opportunities Scheme (VTOS): VTOS figures are estimated at 5,000 each year.

Back to Education Allowance (BTEA): BTEA figures include all schemes but participants from JA & JB are not entitled to BTEA during the summer holidays

In addition, the Youth Guarantee initiative is specifically aimed at those under 25 who are unemployed with specific targeting of those who are either long-term unemployed or are most at risk of becoming long-term unemployed. The implementation of the Guarantee is a medium-term policy of the Irish Government. The guarantee of an offer of training, education or work experience for those aged less than 25 years after a four month period is currently being implemented on a phased basis. Processes and programmes are being progressively rolled out to ensure that all of those young unemployed people who need most support (i.e. are assessed as having a low probability of securing employment in the absence of support from the Public Employment Services) will receive a Youth Guarantee offer within four months. During 2014–2015 all long-term unemployed young people under 25 will be engaged by the Public Employment Service and will receive a Youth Guarantee offer if still unemployed after four months of this engagement process commencing.

With respect to evaluation of the impact of Pathways to Work and the Youth Guarantee, it cannot be precisely separated from the impact of other factors affecting the decline in long-term unemployment (such as the general improvement in the economy and the labour market resulting from the government’s overall economic and employment policies). A full evaluation of the Pathways to Work programme will be commissioned next year which will seek to quantify what aspects of Pathways to Work are most effective and the reasons for their effectiveness.

With respect to age profiling those on the live register, the Department of Social Protection keeps a detailed breakdown of the profiles of jobseekers. Data on each client’s age, past occupation, and his/her education, is collected at the point of registration for job-seekers’ payment; these and other relevant data are processed and the probability of exiting the live register is calculated (PEX). This is essentially a predictor of whether or not someone will become long-term unemployed. The roll-out of the profiling system at the Department’s ‘one-stop-shop’ Intreo offices implicitly involves age profiling of the long-term unemployed, as age is one of the main determining variables in predicting if someone will become long-term unemployed. In other words, if someone is in an age category that is more likely to experience long-term unemployment, s/he will, all other things being equal, receive more targeted assistance.

Summary statistical information on the clients’ age (under/over 25), duration of unemployment (under/over one year), and last held occupation together with other demographic and regional information is published on the Central Statistics Office website.

Graph

Anti-Poverty Strategy

Questions (43)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

43. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection the extent to which measures to alleviate poverty arising from budget 2015 continue to make positive impact; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47331/14]

View answer

Written answers

One of the key objectives of Budget 2015 was to assist unemployed families to return to work.

Through the new Back to Work Family Dividend scheme, long-term unemployed jobseekers with children who leave welfare to return to work can retain the child-related portion of their social welfare payment on a tapered basis over two years. This includes those who move to self-employment, such as the construction sector. It will also apply to One Parent Family Payment recipients who similarly go back into the workforce. The scheme will be worth €1,550 per child in the first year of employment or self-employment and half that amount again in the second year.

The Dividend will help increase the pace of the progress we are making in helping people back to work, thereby reducing poverty. It will help boost the recovery, reduce welfare expenditure in the long-run, and, most importantly, help the families in question to build a better financial future for themselves.

The Budget also provided for the expansion of JobsPlus to provide subsidies to employers to recruit and employ an additional 3,000 long-term unemployed jobseekers. This scheme has proven to be particularly successful with the longer-term unemployed (i.e. unemployed for more than two years.)

I was also pleased to be in the position to increase Child Benefit from €130 to €135 per month, which will benefit over 611,000 households with children. This will help all families with children but also has the additional benefit for unemployed families in that it is work neutral as it is retained in full when they return to the workforce.

I also announced, on Budget Day, a number of welfare initiatives which will benefit pensioners, carers and people with disabilities who are in receipt of a welfare payment. These initiatives included the re-introduction of a Christmas Bonus and an increase in the Living Alone Allowance.

The Christmas Bonus was abolished by the previous Government in 2009. I am pleased to say that I am in a position to partially restore the Bonus this year. A bonus of 25% was paid last week to long-term welfare recipients including all pensioners, people with disabilities, carers and long-term jobseekers. This will cost over €65 million and is in recognition of the position of vulnerable households.

There will be an increase in the living alone allowance of €1.30 per week from January, bringing the rate up from €7.70 to €9 for pensioners and people with disabilities. The living alone allowance is a payment made to pensioners and people with disabilities who live alone and was last increased in 1996.

As well as the measures mentioned above, all existing welfare payments and supports for pensioners will be maintained in 2015 – there will be no reductions.

Throughout the crisis, this Government protected core weekly welfare rates and maintained a massively strong social welfare safety net. That was a political choice which this Government made very deliberately; it is not one that was followed in other bailout countries. This is acknowledged by the ESRI, among others, which has pointed out that, unlike in other countries, income inequality has fallen in Ireland in recent years, largely because of the overall maintenance of the welfare system.

This is the first Budget where we have had the scope to make real positive improvement for welfare recipients. This is evidenced by the €65 million we are spending on the Bonus as well as €198 million of new welfare developments which I announced in the Budget and which will come into effect next year. It is hoped that with the continuing betterment of economic conditions, further resources will be freed up for future Budgets.

Social transfers play a crucial role in redistributing resources to those most in need. In 2012, social transfers (excluding pensions) reduced the at-risk-of poverty rate from 39 per cent to 16.5 per cent, thereby lifting one fifth of the Irish population out of income poverty.

Ireland is amongst the best performing EU countries in reducing poverty through social transfers (excluding pensions). Using comparable data from Eurostat from 2012, Ireland’s performance in reducing poverty at 60 per cent was far in excess of the EU-28 norm of 35 per cent.

Social impact assessment is an evidence-based methodology to estimate the likely distributive effects of policy proposals on poverty and social inequality, including the impact on family types, lifecycle groups and gender.

The Department published an integrated social impact assessments of Budgets 2013 and 2014 (using the ESRI SWITCH model) which included the main welfare and tax measures.

The Department is currently preparing a social impact assessment of the main welfare, tax and related measures for 2015. This will be finalised to take account of government decisions relating to water charges and affordability. It is intended to publish the analysis as soon as is feasible (when available). Furthermore, the Government has committed to carrying out a social impact assessment of the main taxation and welfare measures before the publishing of budgets by a cross-Department body led by the Departments of Finance, Social Protection and Public Expenditure and Reform.

Social Welfare Appeals Waiting Times

Questions (44)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

44. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection the extent to which she may continue to improve the time taken to process appeals in respect of various social protection payments; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47332/14]

View answer

Written answers

The average appeal processing time for 2012, 2013 and 2014 broken down by all social welfare scheme types is outlined in the tables below.

Appeal processing times peaked in 2011 when the average time for an oral hearing was 52.5 weeks and for a summary decision was 25.1 weeks. In 2012 the average processing time for an oral hearing dropped to 39.5 weeks and the time for a summary decision increased slightly to 27.8 weeks. Further improvements were achieved in 2013, when the average appeal processing time reduced to 33.9 weeks for an oral hearing and 25.8 weeks for a summary decision, and also in 2014. As at 30 November 2014, the average time taken to process an appeal requiring an oral hearing was 28.7 weeks and for a summary decision was 21.4 weeks.

Appeal processing times are calculated from the registration date of the appeal to the date of its finalisation. They include all activities during this period including time spent awaiting any clarification from the appellant, time in the Department for comments by the Deciding Officer on the grounds of appeal put forward by the appellant, and any further investigation, examination or assessment by the Department’s Inspectors and Medical Assessors that is deemed necessary. While this process carries an inherent delay in terms of finalising an appeal, it also crystalises the flexibility and accessibility of the appeals system. By its nature and because it is a quasi-judicial function, the processing of appeals takes time and reflects the fact that, by definition, the appeal process cannot be a quick one.

There has been a rapid and sustained increase in the number of appeals received in the Social Welfare Appeals Office since 2009 which has placed extraordinary pressure on the office. Up to 2009, the average number of appeals received was 15,000 per annum whereas in 2012, the number of appeals received peaked at 35,484, reducing to 32,777 appeals in 2013. In order to manage this increasing workload, significant resources and efforts have been put into reducing backlogs and improving appeals processing times for appellants, including the assignment of 15 additional Appeals Officers, in addition to 10 former Community Welfare Service Appeals Officers who joined the appeals office in 2011, bringing the total number of serving Appeals Officers to 41; reviewing and improving business processes; and implementing a new operating model within the appeals office.

In addition to the improvement in processing times, these measures have also led to a significant increase in the annual number of appeals finalised in the appeals office from 17,787 in 2009 to 38,421 in 2013. An additional 5,863 appeals were finalised in 2013 compared to 2012. Good progress has also been made in reducing the number of appeals on hand from 20,414 at 1 January 2013 to 9,769 at 1 December 2014.

In addition the Department has undertaken a process of reform in many of its scheme areas aimed at reducing the time taken to respond to requests for submissions in relation to appeals. It is anticipated that with these improvements, the processing times for appeals will continue to improve. Appeal processing times are kept under continual review in the Social Welfare Appeals Office.

The Social Welfare Appeals Office functions independently of the Minister for Social Protection and of the Department and is responsible for determining appeals against decisions in relation to social welfare entitlements.

2012 - Appeals Processing times by scheme 1/1/2012 - 31/12/2012

Average processing times (weeks)

Summary Decisions

Average processing times (weeks)

Oral Hearings

Adoptive Benefit

27.7

40.4

Blind Pension

24.4

34.7

Carers Allowance

33.5

42.5

Carers Benefit

27.3

35.3

Child Benefit

47.1

53.1

Disability Allowance

34.2

40.6

Illness Benefit

41.9

50.3

Domiciliary Care

32.5

41.4

Deserted Wives Benefit

27.6

45.4

Deserted Wives Allowance

24.5

39.5

Farm Assist

23.4

44.9

Bereavement Grant

29.0

-

Family Income Supplement

22.8

31.2

Invalidity Pension

38.8

48.7

Liable Relatives

33.9

69.7

One Parent Family Payment

29.4

44.6

Maternity Benefit

30.8

41.7

State Pension (Contributory)

33.2

59.4

State Pension (Non-Cont)

27.7

51.1

State Pension (Transition)

25.1

49.1

Occupational Injury Benefit

19.5

66.9

Occupational Injury Benefit (Medical)

78.7

87.4

Disablement Pension

35.7

46.0

Incapacity Supplement

14.2

48.8

Guardian's Payment (Con)

25.8

49.1

Guardian's Payment (Non-con)

32.0

58.8

Pre-Retirement Allowance

54.6

-

Jobseeker's Allowance (Means)

22.8

38.2

Jobseeker's Allowance

24.4

34.4

Jobseeker's Benefit

20.9

30.8

Respite Care Grant

28.5

37.3

Insurability of Employment

45.6

83.3

Supplementary Welfare Allowance

17.6

22.9

Treatment Benefits

19.0

-

Survivor's Pension (Con)

27.1

60.5

Survivor's Pension (Non-con)

30.9

39.1

Widows Parent Grant

23.2

-

All Appeals

27.8

39.5

2013 - Appeals processing times by scheme 01/01/2013 – 31/12/2013

Average processing times (weeks)

Summary Decisions

Average processing

times (weeks)

Oral Hearings

Adoptive Benefit

34.2

-

Blind Pension

24.6

16.1

Carers Allowance

27.9

33.5

Carers Benefit

22.5

27.4

Child Benefit

28.8

37.7

Disability Allowance

29.0

36.2

Illness Benefit

37.4

43.3

Domiciliary Care

27.6

34.4

Deserted Wives Benefit

31.6

26.1

Deserted Wives Allowance

12.2

-

Farm Assist

23.0

28.2

Bereavement Grant

26.7

12.4

Family Income Supplement

30.7

41.0

Homemaker

19.0

-

Invalidity Pension

35.0

42.5

Liable Relatives

30.1

42.9

One Parent Family Payment

29.4

38.3

Maternity Benefit

28.4

50.0

Partial Capacity Benefit

39.2

38.1

State Pension (Contributory)

26.4

44.5

State Pension (Non-Cont)

26.8

41.9

State Pension (Transition)

23.7

43.2

Occupational Injury Benefit

36.1

54.1

Disablement Pension

30.7

36.9

Incapacity Supplement

25.8

60.8

Guardian's Payment (Con)

21.9

44.9

Guardian's Payment (Non-con)

45.5

27.5

Jobseeker's Allowance (Means)

21.2

29.7

Jobseeker's Allowance

20.5

26.7

Jobseeker's Benefit

21.1

28.9

Jobseeker's Fraud Control

17.6

101.8

Respite Care Grant

28.6

33.1

Insurability of Employment

35.8

78.4

Supplementary Welfare Allowance

17.1

24.1

Treatment Benefits

27.7

-

Survivor's Pension (Con)

26.4

39.2

Survivor's Pension (Non-Con)

28.0

38.5

Widowed Parent Grant

26.3

-

All Appeals

25.8

33.9

Appeals processing times by scheme 01/01/2014 – 30/11/14

Average processing times (weeks)

Summary Decisions

Average processing

times (weeks)

Oral Hearings

Adoptive Benefit

17.1

-

Blind Pension

20.2

25.5

Carers Allowance

30.6

34.7

Carers Benefit

23.1

23.2

Child Benefit

23.6

33.1

Disability Allowance

20.9

27.0

Illness Benefit

29.7

34.8

Domiciliary Care Allowance

23.0

29.5

Deserted Wives Benefit

-

64.7

Deserted Wives Allowance

-

41.8

Farm Assist

23.6

28.5

Bereavement Grant

25.6

31.9

Family Income Supplement

26.5

32.7

Invalidity Pension

26.2

31.3

Liable Relatives

21.5

33.2

One Parent Family Payment

24.1

33.8

Maternity Benefit

23.1

44.7

Partial Capacity Benefit

48.5

47.5

State Pension (Contributory)

26.7

43.4

State Pension (Non-Cont)

20.2

29.8

State Pension (Transition)

27.0

35.1

Occupational Injury Benefit

31.4

33.0

Disablement Pension

23.8

31.1

Occupational Injury Benefit (Medical)

-

53.9

Incapacity Supplement

21.5

53.5

Guardian's Payment (Con)

25.9

24.9

Guardian's Payment (Non-con)

17.9

30.3

Pre Retirement Allowance

17.3

-

Jobseeker's Allowance (Means)

18.4

27.1

Jobseeker's Allowance

16.3

21.2

JA/JB Fraud Control

12.1

-

Jobseeker's Benefit

16.9

21.4

Treatment Benefit

20.8

-

Respite Care Grant

25.8

27.1

Insurability of Employment

44.6

66.5

Supplementary Welfare Allowance

14.6

22.4

Survivor's Pension (Con)

19.9

31.4

Survivor's Pension (Non-Con)

24.8

23.7

Widowed Parent Grant

24.4

-

All Appeals

21.4

28.7

Question No. 45 answered with Question No. 42.

Back to Work Allowance Data

Questions (46)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

46. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection the extent to which back to work applications have been approved in each of the past three years to date; the extent to which those previously self-employed and PAYE workers continue to benefit from the scheme; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47334/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Back to Work schemes, the Back to Work Enterprise Allowance (BTWEA) and the Short Term Enterprise Allowance (STEA) assist those on certain social welfare payments who wish to become self-employed.

The BTWEA is designed to provide a monetary incentive for people who are dependent on certain social welfare payments to develop a business while allowing them to retain a reducing proportion of their qualifying social welfare payment over two years from time of approval: 100% in year one and 75% in year two. In the case of jobseekers, the qualifying period required for access to the BTWEA is 12 months in receipt of a jobseekers payment, provided a person has an underlying entitlement to jobseeker’s allowance. Jobseekers who were previously self-employed, similar to PAYE workers, may access social welfare supports including BTWEA by establishing eligibility to jobseeker’s allowance.

The STEA provides immediate access to those who have lost their jobs and qualify for jobseekers’ benefit and wish to set up a business. Payment under the scheme is at the same rate and for the same duration as their entitlement to jobseeker’s benefit.

Information on accessing the scheme and supports for people considering starting their own business is available from DSP Intreo centres, local enterprise offices and local development companies. Further information is available on the Department’s website www.welfare.ie.

Information on the number of applications approved for Back to Work in each of the years 2012, 2013 and to date in 2014 is set out in the table below.

Number of Back To Work Applications Approved 2012-2014

Scheme

2012

2013

2014

(end of October)

Back To Work Enterprise Allowance

10,811

10,098

10,897

Short Term Enterprise Allowance

1,066

583

516

Total

11,877

10,681

11,413

Work Placement Programmes

Questions (47)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

47. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection the number of applications for various unemployment reliefs such as JobBridge that continue to be awarded; the extent to which the schemes are proving successful; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47335/14]

View answer

Written answers

JobBridge was introduced to provide opportunities for jobseekers to gain real workplace experience and is not an unemployment support payment. As at 4 December, 2014, 35,833 individual internships had commenced, and 6,729 individuals were actually on internships. An independent evaluation of the scheme found that 61% of interns had moved into employment 5 or more months after finishing their internship.

Social Welfare Benefits Data

Questions (48)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

48. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection the number of children whose parents heretofore were in receipt of domiciliary care allowance who are reaching 16 years of age qualified for invalidity pension or disability allowance thereafter in the past 12 months; the number of such applications rejected; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47337/14]

View answer

Written answers

In relation to disability allowance the number of children who qualified whose parents had previously been in receipt of domiciliary care allowance is 1064.

The number of applications rejected is 299. This is for the twelve month period up to 30/11/14.

Invalidity pension is a payment for insured people who are permanently incapable of work due to illness or incapacity. In order to qualify a person must have at least 260 paid PRSI contributions since entering social insurance and 48 contributions paid or credited in the last complete tax year before the date of claim. Therefore it is not possible for a sixteen year old to qualify for this scheme.

Exceptional Needs Payments

Questions (49)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

49. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection the degree to which adequate resources continue to be made available to her Department to meet exceptional needs payment requirements; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47338/14]

View answer

Written answers

Under the supplementary welfare allowance (SWA) scheme, the Department may make a single exceptional needs payment (ENP) to help meet essential, once-off and unforeseen expenditure which a person could not reasonably be expected to meet out of their weekly income. The Government has provided €31.3 million for the scheme in 2014.

In 2012 a Departmental working group made up of staff from the Community Welfare Service reviewed the existing ENP guidelines with a view to, in so far as possible, achieve standardisation and consistency of treatment of applications across the country. This review has been used as a basis for revised guidelines that issued to staff in 2012 and 2013. These guidelines assist Departmental staff administering the scheme and do not affect the discretion available to officers in issuing an ENP to assist an individual or household in any particular hardship situation which may arise.

While expenditure under the scheme has reduced in recent years, the scheme is demand led and continues to provide assistance to those with exceptional needs taking into account the requirements of the legislation and all the relevant circumstances of the case in order to ensure that the payments target those most in need of assistance.

Social Welfare Benefits Waiting Times

Questions (50)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

50. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Social Protection the extent to which backlogs have been addressed in respect of various headings and payments operated by her Department; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [47339/14]

View answer

Written answers

All scheme areas will have claims pending decision ‘on hand’ at any point in time, with the number of pending claims being dependent on the number of pending claims on hand at the start of a period, and the number of claims received versus the number of claims cleared during the period. The number of claims cleared in turn is largely dependent on the nature of the claims (claims requiring income assessment or assessment of medical conditions take longer to process) and the completeness of the information provided with the claim form. Therefore the fact that claims are on hand is not necessarily indicative of a backlog.

My Department measures the performance of each scheme area on a monthly basis including the measurement of the number of claims pending a decision at the end of each month. The table below shows the number of claims pending at the end of October 2013 and at the end of October 2014 for the scheme areas for which this information is available together with the total number of claims received during that period and the total number of claims in payment as at the end of October. As can be seen at the overall level, the number of claims pending a decision in my Department as a percentage of claims received during the period is 3.6% and the overall number of claims pending has reduced by 12.9% during the period.

Type of Payment

ranked by number of recipients

Recipients October 2013

Recipients October 2014

Claims Registered 1/11/13 to 31/10/14

Claims Pending at 31/10/13

Claims Pending at 31/10/14

Pending Claims as % of claims registered

Year-on-year change in pending claims

% change in pending claims year-on-year

Free Travel

781,757

809,155

7,918

33

49

0.6%

16

48.5%

Child Benefit

612,408

613,284

146,348

3,766

3,391

2.3%

-375

-10.0%

Household Benefits

419,828

413,019

69,141

2,449

609

0.9%

-1840

-75.1%

State Pension (Contributory)

326,992

344,566

40,039

2,355

2,511

6.3%

156

6.6%

Living alone/Over 80/Island Allowances

318,304

325,428

11,714

378

666

5.7%

288

76.2%

Jobseeker's Allowance

286,667

265,705

211,714

13,930

9,977

4.7%

-3953

-28.4%

Widow/er's or Surviving Civil Partner's Contributory Pension

117,269

118,403

7,409

573

498

6.7%

-75

-13.1%

Disability Allowance

104,831

111,301

19,429

5,162

6,122

31.5%

960

18.6%

State Pension (Non-Contributory)

95,759

95,417

9,011

2,028

2,038

22.6%

10

0.5%

One Parent Family Payment

78,516

70,317

12,548

2,815

1,750

13.9%

-1065

-37.8%

Carer's Allowance

56,907

58,871

14,574

2,658

5,049

34.6%

2391

90.0%

Illness Benefit

59,980

57,939

235,354

4,035

2,352

1.0%

-1683

-41.7%

Invalidity Pension

52,948

54,015

9,125

2,176

2,364

25.9%

188

8.6%

Family Income Supplement

41,989

49,084

67,098

4,409

3,141

4.7%

-1268

-28.8%

Jobseeker's Benefit

53,101

40,426

148,773

4,924

3,636

2.4%

-1288

-26.2%

Treatment Benefits

35,871

36,375

500,729

2,604

2,663

0.5%

59

2.3%

Domiciliary Care Allowance

25,442

27,020

5,323

553

998

18.7%

445

80.5%

Maternity Benefit

22,457

22,275

46,661

4,493

4,846

10.4%

353

7.9%

Supplementary Welfare Allowance

24,744

19,877

62,093

4,259

4,019

6.5%

-240

-5.6%

Disablement Benefit

14,199

12,388

531

1,664

1,042

196.2%

-622

-37.4%

State Pension (Transition)

13,441

3,361

5,466

1,647

747

13.7%

-900

-54.6%

Carer's Benefit

1,574

1,674

2,039

356

588

28.8%

232

65.2%

Interim Illness Benefit

350

361

13,417

247

181

1.3%

-66

-26.7%

Other schemes (some 2014 claims pending data not yet available)

99,537

167,321

n/a

486

15

n/a

n/a

-96.9%

Grand Total

3,644,871

3,717,582

1,646,454

68,000

59,252

3.6%

-8,277

-12.9%

Top
Share