Skip to main content
Normal View

Wednesday, 17 Dec 2014

Written Answers Nos. 197 - 206

Medical Card Eligibility

Questions (197)

Clare Daly

Question:

197. Deputy Clare Daly asked the Minister for Health further to Parliamentary Question No. 295 of 9 December 2014, in circumstances where a person aged over 70 years wishes to remain with his or her non-public sector general practitioner rather than parading around with his or her personal medical file to other GPs, if the non-public general practitioner's prescription will have the same recognition and equal status as that of a public sector GP, in other words, the prescription would be completed at the same cost at the pharmacy as would be the prescription of a public sector GP. [48759/14]

View answer

Written answers

A medical card, as issued by the Health Service Executive (HSE), confirms that the holder is entitled, free of charge, to a range of Health Services, including:

- A choice of General Medical Practitioner from those doctors who have a contract with the HSE; and

- The supply of prescribed approved medicines, aids and appliances, subject to prescription charges.

A GP visit card holder is also entitled to a choice of General Medical Practitioner, similar to a medical card holder but is not entitled to prescribed approved medicines free of charge.

GMS contract holders must provide prescriptions to their medical card patients on the relevant GMS prescription form in order for them to receive their medication free of charge, subject to any applicable prescription charges. GMS prescription forms are not available to non-GMS contract holders and, therefore, prescriptions written by General Medical Practitioners who do not hold a GMS contract are not reimbursable under the GMS scheme and are instead a private transaction matter between the patient and the pharmacist for which the relevant costs will apply.

The Drugs Payment Scheme significantly reduces the cost burden for families and individuals incurring ongoing expenditure on medicines. Under the scheme, no individual or family pays more than €144 per calendar month towards the cost of approved prescribed medicines.

Hospital Services

Questions (198)

Maureen O'Sullivan

Question:

198. Deputy Maureen O'Sullivan asked the Minister for Health further to Parliamentary Question No. 335 of 9 December 2014, if he will provide the full details of the care plan being arranged in St. Aloysius ward in the Mater Hospital, Dublin 7; if he will provide a comprehensive description of the suitable physicians who will take care of the person; and if he will provide a breakdown of the treatment available over the course of each week and detail the different modes of rehabilitation and care. [48762/14]

View answer

Written answers

As this is a service issue this question has been referred to the HSE for direct reply. If you have not received a reply from the HSE within 15 working days please contact my Private Office and they will follow up the matter with them.

Medical Card Applications

Questions (199)

Tom Fleming

Question:

199. Deputy Tom Fleming asked the Minister for Health if he will address the case of a person (details supplied) in County Cork in need of a medical card and issue same on hardship grounds; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48767/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Health Service Executive has been asked to examine this matter and to reply to the Deputy as soon as possible. The Health Service Executive operates the General Medical Services scheme, which includes medical cards and GP visit cards, under the Health Act 1970, as amended. It has established a dedicated contact service for members of the Oireachtas specifically for queries relating to medical cards and GP visit cards, which the Deputy may wish to use for an earlier response. Contact information has issued to Oireachtas members. If the Deputy has not received a reply from the HSE within 15 working days, please contact my Private Office who will follow up the matter with them.

International Agreements

Questions (200)

Niall Collins

Question:

200. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the actions his Department has taken to allow for the implementation of the Istanbul Convention; if his Department has any engagement with the Department of Justice and Equality on this matter; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48574/14]

View answer

Written answers

Ireland is not party to the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (the Istanbul Convention). Although my Department has an important role in relation to signing and ratifying international agreements, the necessary legislative or administrative measures required to implement them are for the line Department responsible for the subject matter of the agreement, in this case Department of Justice and Equality. My Department has been consulted by the Department of Justice and Equality on issues relating to the possible signature and ratification of the Convention. The Minister for Justice and Equality recently indicated that she intends to seek the approval of the Government to sign the Convention on behalf of Ireland as early as possible in 2015.

Middle East Issues

Questions (201)

Paul Murphy

Question:

201. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the steps he will take to recognise the state of Palestine following Dáil Éireann and Seanad Éireann passing motions in favour of Ireland's recognition of the state of Palestine; the expected timeframe for the full recognition of the state of Palestine; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48622/14]

View answer

Written answers

The Government’s approach to the question of recognition of Palestine was set out in detail during the course of the debate held in the Dáil on 9 and 10 December. Achieving and recognising a Palestinian state has always been the Government’s objective, and everything we do on the Middle East is directed towards that aim. While successive Governments have always seen recognition coming as part of an agreed peace, I have made clear that I have absolutely no difficulty in principle with the idea of early recognition, if I believe it can contribute to achieving a settlement of the conflict. The present stalemate is not acceptable to me, and I am open to any action that can move things forward positively. As you know, the EU at the last Foreign Affairs Council, prompted by Sweden’s action and with my own support, began a process of reflection among Ministers as to the implications and possibilities of recognition and I believe that is an important, responsible and reasonable approach to take. In parallel with this, I am also reflecting on the views expressed by all sides in the House during the recent debate on the issue, including the considerations set out for the House by my Ministerial colleagues, and on the motions passed by both the Seanad and the Dáil; along with the views and positions of other EU partners; and on what early recognition could mean both for Palestine and for Ireland’s influence on this critical issue.

I am not in a position to indicate a timeframe for conclusion of this process at present.

Northern Ireland

Questions (202)

Brendan Smith

Question:

202. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the issues discussed at the recent all-party talks in Northern Ireland; if progress was made on any of the issues under discussion; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48710/14]

View answer

Written answers

Since 16 October, when the Northern Ireland political talks were convened, in excess of 90 meetings have been held across the four streams of the talks. Those four streams relate to budgetary and financial issues; legacy issues (parades, flags and emblems, and dealing with the past); institutional issues including the functioning of the Northern Ireland Executive and Assembly; and, outstanding commitments from the Good Friday and St. Andrews Agreements.

The Taoiseach and the British Prime Minister attended the talks last week. Whilst some important gaps remain, good progress has been made on many of the most difficult but significant challenges, including in relation to legacy issues. On welfare reform and broader issues around budgets, a number of challenging decisions have still to be faces. I am determined that further progress be made on all issues so that a comprehensive agreement to address the divisive legacy of the past and to secure a prosperous future for the people of Northern Ireland can be achieved.

I will be in Belfast today and tomorrow for further talks. It is clear that compromises will be needed from all participants. There is now a very limited window of opportunity if agreement is to be reached. Political representatives must show the leadership required to secure an agreement for the benefit of people across this island.

Northern Ireland

Questions (203, 204, 205, 206)

Brendan Smith

Question:

203. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if the proposed bill of rights for Northern Ireland, the Irish Language Act and the establishment of the civic forum were discussed at the recent North-South Ministerial Council; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48711/14]

View answer

Brendan Smith

Question:

204. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if the outstanding issues arising from the Good Friday Agreement and the St. Andrews Agreement were discussed at the recent North-South Ministerial Council; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48712/14]

View answer

Brendan Smith

Question:

205. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade if tax issues, such as corporation tax, were discussed at the recent North-South Ministerial Council; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48713/14]

View answer

Brendan Smith

Question:

206. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the issues that were discussed at the recent North-South Ministerial Council; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48714/14]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 203 to 206, inclusive, together.

The nineteenth meeting of the North South Ministerial Council (NSMC) in plenary format was held in Armagh on 5 December 2014.

At the meeting, discussions covered economic and budgetary issues in both jurisdictions. The Council welcomed the broadly encouraging prospects while recognising that challenges remain. The recent announcement by the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer on Corporation Tax was also discussed. Both administrations reflected on their respective successes in attracting external investment while acknowledging that there is a key role to be played by indigenous companies in economic development. The opportunities to work together on Joint Trade Missions and on developing new markets were also recognised.

The Council noted that, following Ministerial consideration of a report on the feasibility of submitting a joint bid to host the Rugby World Cup in 2023, it had been agreed to support the IRFU’s bid, and indeed the Taoiseach, Tánaiste, First Minister, deputy First Minister and other Ministers had attended the launch of the bid in Armagh just before the Plenary meeting. The Council discussed the potential benefits hosting such an event would bring to both jurisdictions and agreed that the relevant Ministers should work closely together to ensure the strongest possible bid is submitted.

Ministers noted that the new draft PEACE and INTERREG Programmes are currently with the European Commission for consideration and it is hoped that the final Programmes will be launched in Spring 2015.

The Council welcomed the ongoing discussions between Ministers at NSMC meetings on the potential for collaboration to draw down EU funds and noted that there is active engagement between both jurisdictions on the opportunities available. The Council looked forward to a further progress report at its next meeting.

Ministers also noted the position on Sectoral Priorities and the North West Gateway Initiative and agreed to keep these matters on its agenda. They also discussed the Progress Report prepared by the NSMC Joint Secretaries on the work of the North South Bodies and in the other NSMC areas for co-operation and noted the current position on a North South Consultative Forum.

There was an in-depth discussion on Child Protection issues with a particular focus on e-Safety, and the good collaborative work already taking place, both within the NSMC structures and elsewhere was noted. Ministers recognised that issues such as these are cross-cutting and cross-jurisdictional and will require an ongoing collaborative approach between both administrations. The Council agreed that Ministers who have a remit in Child Protection and E-Safety related activities should engage with their counterparts in the opposite jurisdiction to explore whether there is potential for further collaboration. It was also agreed that this topic should be revisited at a future meeting.

The next plenary meeting of the NSMC is scheduled to take place in early summer 2015, and I am looking forward to continuing to work closely and constructively on all of these issues with our Northern colleagues in the North South Ministerial Council.

Strand Two of the Good Friday Agreement provided for the establishment of the North/South Ministerial Council and the North/South Implementation Bodies. It also provided that consideration be given to a North/South Consultative Forum and a North/South Parliamentary Forum. The St Andrews Agreement provided further that the Northern Ireland Executive would support the establishment of an independent North/South Consultative Forum.

With the establishment in 2012 of the North/South Inter-Parliamentary Association, which is in effect the North/South Parliamentary Forum envisaged in the Good Friday Agreement, the only Strand Two institution that remains outstanding is the North/South Consultative Forum. The Government continues to support the establishment of the Consultative Forum, and the Taoiseach has raised the Forum at each Plenary meeting of the North South Ministerial Council he has attended including the most recent meeting on 5 December.

The Bill of Rights for Northern Ireland, the Irish Language Act and the Northern Ireland Civic Forum were not discussed at the NSMC Plenary meeting as they are not Strand Two issues and are therefore not among the matters discussed at NSMC meetings. However, outstanding commitments of the Good Friday and St Andrews Agreements have been discussed at the political talks in Belfast convened by the Irish and British Governments, which began on 16 October. The Irish Government has strongly advocated progress on these matters in the current talks. The principles and values of the Good Friday Agreement and St. Andrews Agreement are essential to peace and reconciliation in Ireland and across these islands. Accordingly, the position of the Irish Government always has been, and continues to be, that all outstanding elements of the Agreements must be implemented.

Top
Share