I propose to take Questions Nos. 600 and 601 together.
One of the key concerns arising from public consultation processes on EirGrid’s Grid25 Strategy has been the extent to which undergrounding options have been explored, so as to allow ready comparison with overhead line solutions, for individual projects, including the North South (N/S) transmission line project.In January 2014, an Independent Expert Panel (IEP) was established to oversee the integrity of the process being undertaken by EirGrid to report on comprehensive, route-specific studies of overhead and underground options for both the Grid Link and Grid West projects. The studies are required to take account of environmental (including visual amenity) impacts, technical efficacy and cost factors. The IEP will comment on the completeness, objectivity and comparability of the studies and reports.
The Panel was also asked to consider what work it might usefully undertake to establish whether or not there has been parity of treatment between the N/S project and the Grid West and Grid Link projects, including route-specific studies of overhead and underground options. Having considered and discussed all of the material provided by EirGrid, in July 2014 the Panel provided its unanimous opinion that, in all material respects, what has already been done on the N/S project is compatible with the methodologies now being employed on the Grid West and Grid Link projects.
The N/S project is part of an on-going process which is expected to be subjected to rigorous assessment as part of the planning processes in both jurisdictions (Ireland and Northern Ireland). I understand that EirGrid, prior to submitting its planning application, will re-engage with communities in Meath, Cavan and Monaghan. I am advised that this will involve opening offices in Navan, Kingscourt and Carrickmacross and that EirGrid also intend to appoint dedicated community liaison officers to ensure all interested stakeholders are engaged with fully.