Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 17 Feb 2015

Written Answers Nos. 220-233

Departmental Legal Cases

Questions (220)

Terence Flanagan

Question:

220. Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Finance if his Department has set aside funds to defend any future legal challenges in relation to the Public Health (Standardised Packaging of Tobacco) Bill 2014; if his Department or any Government agency has made an estimate of the likely costs involved in defending such a case; if his Department or any Government agency has made an estimate of the possible compensation that might be paid out in the event of a successful legal challenge against the legislation; if his attention has been drawn to the comments made by the former Minister for Health, Deputy James Reilly, that the tobacco industry could sue for the equivalent of our gross domestic product (details supplied), if this Bill is enacted; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6908/15]

View answer

Written answers

The Public Health (Standardised Packaging of Tobacco) Bill 2014 and the issues surrounding it are a matter for my colleague the Minister for Health in the first instance.

Tax Code

Questions (221)

Seán Kyne

Question:

221. Deputy Seán Kyne asked the Minister for Finance with regard to the favourite nephew or niece clause, under capital acquisitions tax, his views that this unfairly favours nephews over nieces, as nephews are more likely to be working on the farm; if a niece who worked within the home, caring for their uncle as the uncle's sole carer, could be considered for such relief, or if a clarifying clause could be considered in the future to accommodate such situations; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6910/15]

View answer

Written answers

Capital Acquisitions Tax is the overall name for both gift and inheritance tax.

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that for the purposes of Capital Acquisitions Tax, the relationship between the person who provides the gift or inheritance (i.e. the disponer) and the person who receives the gift or inheritance (i.e. the beneficiary) determines the maximum tax-free threshold known as the Group threshold below which gift or inheritance tax does not arise.

There are, in all, three separate Group tax-free thresholds based on the relationship of the beneficiary to the disponer.

Group A: €225,000 - applies where the beneficiary is a child (including adopted child, step-child and certain foster children) or minor child of a deceased child of the disponer. Parents also fall within this threshold where they take an inheritance of an absolute interest from a child.

Group B: €30,150 - applies where the beneficiary is a brother, sister, a nephew, a niece or lineal ancestor or lineal descendant of the disponer.

Group C: €15,075 - applies in all other cases.

Any prior gift or inheritance received by a beneficiary since 5 December 1991 from within the same Group threshold is aggregated for the purposes of determining whether any tax is payable on the current benefit. Tax at the rate of 33% is payable on any excess received over the relevant tax-free threshold.

Ordinarily, a nephew or niece of a disponer is entitled to the Group B tax-free threshold of €30,150.

However, a nephew or niece who has worked substantially on a full-time basis for a period of five years prior to the gift or inheritance in carrying on, or assisting in the carrying on, the trade, business or profession, of the disponer is entitled to the Group A tax-free threshold of €225,000 for the purposes of computing the tax payable on any gift or inheritance received by him or her of those business assets.

This relief is known as favourite nephew or favourite niece relief and applies equally to a nephew or a niece who satisfies the conditions for the relief.  

In order for the nephew or niece to be deemed to be working substantially on a full-time basis in the business he or she must work at least:

(a) more than 24 hours per week at the place where the business, trade or profession is carried on; or

(b) more than 15 hours per week at the place where the business, trade or profession is carried on exclusively by the disponer, any spouse or civil partner of the disponer and the nephew or niece.

This specific relief is targeted at gifts or inheritances of business assets in circumstances where the nephew or niece has, by their continued presence on a weekly basis, placed their labour and expertise at the disposal of the disponer thereby ensuring that material benefit is conferred on the business. The relief is designed to ensure that, in those circumstances, the higher Group A tax-free threshold of €225,000 is available to the deserving nephew or deserving niece.

The relief applies to gifts and inheritances of business assets in the circumstances outlined above. I do not consider it appropriate that this relief should be available to a nephew or niece who cares for an uncle but who does not fulfil the substantial full-time working in the business requirement.

Proposed Legislation

Questions (222)

Michael McCarthy

Question:

222. Deputy Michael McCarthy asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide an update on draft legislation relating to when a regulated financial entity sells its loan book to an unregulated entity; his views on concerns raised by the Central Bank of Ireland regarding the draft legislation only applying to the credit servicing firms, to which management of these mortgages is outsourced, rather than the vulture funds that own them and control key decisions, such as interest rates and the treatment of borrowers in arrears; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [6936/15]

View answer

Written answers

The Consumer Protection (Regulation of Credit Servicing Firms) Bill 2015 was published in January and second stage of the Bill was taken in the Dáil on 4 February. 

Since then, my officials have been in contact with the Central Bank and with the Office of the Attorney General to further progress the legislation.

It remains my intention to ensure that borrowers whose loans are sold by a regulated entity to a currently unregulated entity maintain the same protections as they had prior to the sale.

The Bill will continue its progress through the legislative process and I look forward to further discussion of the Bill at Committee Stage.

Tax Credits

Questions (223)

Patrick O'Donovan

Question:

223. Deputy Patrick O'Donovan asked the Minister for Finance the reason a person (details supplied) in County Tipperary does not qualify for the single parent tax allowance. [6997/15]

View answer

Written answers

The Single Person Child Carer Credit (SPCCC) replaced the One Parent Family Tax Credit with effect from 1 January 2014.  The SPCCC is available only to the primary carer of the relevant child, subject to certain conditions, as set out on Revenue's website at www.revenue.ie/en/tax/it/credits/single-person-child-carer-credit.

 I am informed by Revenue that the person concerned has been in direct contact with them. Based on the information provided and, in particular, the fact that the person concerned does not appear to be the primary carer, he is not entitled to the credit.

Mortgage Interest Rates

Questions (224, 225, 226, 227)

Michael McGrath

Question:

224. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the number of mortgage holders potentially affected by the case which came before the Supreme Court recently, relating to customers of the Permanent TSB bank who switched from a tracker rate to a fixed rate and were prevented from moving back to a tracker rate when their fixed rate period ended; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [7023/15]

View answer

Michael McGrath

Question:

225. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if he expects a lump sum compensation payment to be made to customers of the Permanent TSB bank, who switched from a tracker rate to a fixed rate and were prevented from moving back to a tracker rate when their fixed rate period ended; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [7024/15]

View answer

Michael McGrath

Question:

226. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance the rate that will apply to customers of the Permanent TSB bank whose tracker mortgage has been restored, following the recent Supreme Court case, in circumstances in which their original loan document did not prescribe a margin over the European Central Bank rate; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [7025/15]

View answer

Michael McGrath

Question:

227. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if a regulatory sanction will be imposed on Permanent TSB for not allowing customers who switched from a tracker rate to a fixed rate to move back to a tracker rate when their fixed rate period ended; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [7026/15]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 224 to 227, inclusive, together.

I have been informed by permanent tsb ("PTSB") that it is currently subject to an Enforcement Investigation by the Central Bank in relation to the circumstances in which the bank refused to allow certain customers who had switched from a tracker rate mortgage to a fixed rate mortgage for an agreed term to revert to a tracker rate mortgage at the end of that term.  The bank based its refusal on the fact that these customers had not completed the agreed term of the fixed rate because they had chosen to break that term early in order to avail of lower variable rates available at the time.

PTSB has informed me that this Enforcement Investigation is ongoing and the bank is working with the Central Bank to identify relevant customers, to calculate the loss suffered by these customers, to agree an appropriate redress for those customers and to move these customers to the appropriate tracker rate.  While this investigation is ongoing it is not possible to state how many customers may be included in the exercise or what the total or average level of redress may be. 

The bank has made clear to my officials that it will do everything in its power to expedite this matter and ensure that all affected customers are identified and receive appropriate redress.  

I understand that as part of its Enforcement Investigation the Central Bank has the power to impose a regulatory sanction on the bank for its conduct in this matter but that is ultimately a matter for the Central Bank and it would not be appropriate for me to comment on that.

The bank has also been in contact with the Financial Services Ombudsman ("FSO") on this issue.  The bank has withdrawn an appeal which it had lodged in respect of a High Court decision in a case between the FSO and the bank.  The High Court found that the bank had acted in breach of the Consumer Protection Code on this matter by not specifically warning customers who broke the term of their fixed rate that they would lose the right to revert to a tracker rate at the end of the fixed rate term.  The bank has also indicated to the FSO that as part of its wider review, it wishes to review a number of similar cases which the FSO has received and which the FSO has not yet offered an opinion on pending the outcome of the Supreme Court Appeal.

Questions Nos. 228 to 230, inclusive, answered with Question No. 212.

Banking Sector Regulation

Questions (231)

Michael McGrath

Question:

231. Deputy Michael McGrath asked the Minister for Finance if Statutory Instrument No. 47 of 2015 has come into effect; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [7030/15]

View answer

Written answers

Statutory Instrument No. 47 of 2015 entitled, "Central Bank (Supervision and Enforcement) Act 2013 (Section 48) (Housing Loan Requirements) Regulations 2015", was signed by the Governor of the Central Bank of Ireland on 9 February 2015. The Regulations were subsequently laid before the Houses of the Oireachtas and are now in effect.

Insurance Industry Regulation

Questions (232)

Terence Flanagan

Question:

232. Deputy Terence Flanagan asked the Minister for Finance if he will address a matter (details supplied) regarding insurance providers; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [7078/15]

View answer

Written answers

The current legal and regulatory framework for the provision of insurance in the European Economic Area, and the supervision of that activity, is prescribed by European Union Law in the Life and Non-Life Insurance Directives. Following negotiations that were completed at European level in November 2013, a new regime known as Solvency II will commence on 1 January 2016.  This will strengthen the EU regulatory framework for insurance providers. The Solvency II EU Directive sets out new stronger EU-wide requirements on capital adequacy and risk management for insurers with the key aim of increasing policyholder protection.  The most essential features of the Solvency II Directive are the introduction of an economic/risk based approach to the measurement of assets and liabilities and a much greater focus on qualitative issues such as governance and the role of the supervisor.  Capital requirements will be determined by an evaluation of a company's level of risk using a consistent set of measurement principles, resulting in an appropriate level of capital for solvency purposes. This contrasts with the use of a simple set of factors for determining capital under Solvency I.  The new regime will also ensure greater cooperation between Member State national supervisors. 

The day to day responsibility for the supervision of the solvency of Irish authorised financial institutions is a matter for the Central Bank of Ireland which is statutorily independent in the exercise of its regulatory and supervisory functions. Under EU passporting rules, any insurer which has been authorised in another EU Member State may trade in Ireland on a freedom of services basis. In these cases, the financial position of the insurer is supervised by its home regulator rather than by the Central Bank of Ireland. However, the Central Bank is responsible for supervising the insurance provider in relation to conduct of business rules i.e. requirements under the consumer protection code.  Furthermore, EEA insurance regulators are members of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and are required to comply with the general protocol relating to the sharing of information between the insurance supervisory authorities of the member states of the European Union.

My Department and the Central Bank will in due course be reviewing the overall framework and will report to me on what lessons can be learned and how the framework can be strengthened.

Tax Data

Questions (233)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

233. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Finance if he will provide the effective tax rates paid by income earners in the €1,001 to €20,000, €20,001 to €32,800, €32,801 to €50,000, €50,001 to €70,000, €70,001 to €100,000, €100,001 to €125,000, €125,001 to €150,000, €150,001 to €175,000, €175,001 to €200,000, €200,001 to €250,000, €250,001 to €300,000, €300,001 to €400,000, €400,001 to €500,000, €500,001 to €1,000,000 and €1,000,001 to €2,000,000 ranges of income. [7088/15]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed by the Revenue Commissioners that the information requested by the Deputy, estimated by reference to the tax year 2015, is set out in the following table.

All Income Earners for Income Tax Year 2015

Range of Gross Income €

Estimated Effective Income Tax Rate %

1,001 - 20,000

0.61%

20,001 - 32,800

4.47%

32,801 -  50,000

9.69%

50,001 - 70,000

14.95%

70,001 - 100,000

18.69%

100,001 - 125,000

22.17%

125,001 - 150,000

24.27%

150,001 - 175,000

25.68%

175,001  200,000

26.54%

200,001 - 250,000

27.34%

250,001 - 300,000

28.16%

300,001 - 400,000

29.09%

400,001 - 500,000

29.97%

500,001 - 1,000,000

30.76%

1,000,001 - 2,000,000

29.57%

The average effective tax rates are calculated as the percentage of the Income Tax liability to gross income and do not include liability to USC or PRSI.

These figures are estimates for 2015 from the Revenue tax forecasting model using actual data for the year 2012 (the most recent year for which data are available) adjusted as necessary for income, self-employment and employment trends in the interim. They are provisional and may be revised.

Top
Share