Skip to main content
Normal View

General Practitioner Services Provision

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 25 February 2015

Wednesday, 25 February 2015

Questions (1)

Billy Kelleher

Question:

1. Deputy Billy Kelleher asked the Minister for Health if he will provide an update on the introduction of free general practitioner care; when the scheme will commence for children under six years of age; when the Bill to provide free GP care to those over 70 years of age will be introduced; how he will address concerns that sick children who are older than six years will not see any benefit from this; if he will widen medical card eligibility to help these children; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [8305/15]

View answer

Oral answers (6 contributions)

I ask the Minister for Health for an update on the introduction of free general practitioner care. When does he expect the scheme to commence for children under six years? When will the Bill to provide for those over 70 years of age be introduced? How will he address the concerns that sick children who are older than six years will not see any benefit from this, and will he widen medical card eligibility to help these children?

The Government is committed to introducing a universal GP service without fees on a phased basis. The first phase will be for all children under six years of age and all persons aged 70 and over to have access to GP care without fees. These arrangements will come into operation in quarter 2 of 2015, subject to the conclusion of contractual discussions. I expect the Bill to extend GP services without fees to all over-70s to be published in March. These measures represent a major step on the way to universal health care. The Government recognises that different age groups have different health care needs and abilities to access services and that children and older people have particular needs in this regard.

The medical card system is fundamentally based on means, and this position has obtained for more than 40 years. However, the Government recognises that the health service needs to be responsive to the circumstances of people with significant medical needs. In November 2014 the Minister for Health and I announced a series of measures to enhance the operation of the medical card scheme and make it more sensitive to people's needs, especially where serious illness is involved. Where deemed appropriate in particular circumstances, the HSE may exercise discretion and grant a medical card even though an applicant's means exceed the prescribed threshold. Where a person does not qualify for a medical card, he or she may be provided with a GP visit card, appropriate therapy or other community supports or drugs and appliances under the long-term illness scheme, where the qualification criteria are met.

The HSE has recently established a clinical advisory group for medical card eligibility. The group will provide oversight and guidance to the operation of a more compassionate medical card system and will focus initially on the development of a framework for assessment and measurement of the burden of illness in this context.

The Government is reforming the system of health service eligibility that it inherited and is seeking to make it fairer. For many years we have had universal eligibility for acute hospital services, but free access to the first and most effective point of contact with the health service - that is, GPs - has only been provided on a public basis to those on very low incomes. The provision of universal GP access through greater public investment in primary care services is a critical reform in resolving inequities and rebalancing our services towards earlier prevention. The introduction of universal GP access for the youngest and oldest members of our community is an important step in the phased implementation of these reforms.

I thank the Minister of State for her reply. We could have this debate until we see the roll-out of universal free general practitioner care, but there is an interim period. As the Minister of State has limited resources and limited opportunity to introduce the various policies, she has to prioritise and make decisions in the context of what cohorts get the various resources. The Central Statistics Office publishes reports regularly, and one of these, which deals with life expectancy and health outcomes in the various socioeconomic groupings, has been commented on by the Irish Cancer Society and others. As late as this morning it was revealed that there is a widening gap between health outcomes in the various income groupings in Cork North-Central and parts of Cork South-Central. While we are talking about health outcomes in the context of the Department's reasoning for rolling out universal general practitioner care, the reality is that people from poor backgrounds with socioeconomic problems have poorer health outcomes. With regard to children under six years of age, how does one square that circle in terms of priority?

Inequality in general has an impact on health, and this is an issue for the entire Government, not just the Department of Health. I think the Deputy would agree with me on that. The system that is in place and which we hope to expand has ensured that the number of discretionary medical cards has increased enormously. There is a more compassionate way of looking at it. It is about the burden of illness. Even where people do not qualify through a means test, there is a recognition that illness brings an additional burden with it. We have increased the number of discretionary medical cards to over 70,000. The number of GP cards has increased to almost 85,500, and the figure for medical cards in general is over 1 million. A sizeable proportion of the population, therefore, are now covered by free access to a primary care medical card and, in many cases, GP access also. There is no shortage of people in need. We all understand that that is because of particular circumstances, but I am sure the Deputy understands that the general inequality in society is a much wider issue, which is the responsibility of more than just the Department of Health.

We do accept, in terms of the provision of medical care, that there is always an element of universality in some decisions, but when the Minister of State is making a decision to rule out further additional universality, this has an impact in other areas. There is no point in saying otherwise.

We should be clear. There has been a change in how the Department is assessing discretionary medical cards. There has been a substantial increase in the number of discretionary medical cards awarded. The reason is that the policy the Minister of State was pursuing until the U-turn was wrong. It was wrong, unfair and inhumane that we were taking medical cards from the most vulnerable and the sickest in our society while at the same time outlining plans to give free GP care to others. I have no problem giving it to the others, but those who deserve it most should get it first, and then, as resources allow, the roll-out must happen. At least the Minister of State is now acknowledging that the issue of discretionary medical cards is a central one. The awarding of medical cards to vulnerable sick people is humane, compassionate and fair.

The argument that we should not provide free GP care to healthy children when there are others in need is sometimes a false one. As SUN, or Scaling Up Nutrition, tell us - one sees it in all the advertisements now, but we have been looking at it for years - proper nutrition and proper care are essential in the first thousand days of a child's life. If a child does not get the essential nutrition within that first thousand days, this has an impact on the rest of its life. The Deputy and I know that there are certain groups of people to whom that essential nutrition is not being delivered, sometimes because it is not clear what it is.

Until the day when we have universal free access to GPs and health care in this country, there will always be hard cases.

I am astonished that we are doing it at a time we have to be extraordinarily careful about how we spend money, but the Fianna Fáil-led Government did not do so at a time when it was awash with money.

Top
Share