Skip to main content
Normal View

Agrifood Sector

Dáil Éireann Debate, Tuesday - 31 March 2015

Tuesday, 31 March 2015

Questions (155)

Bernard Durkan

Question:

155. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his plans to ensure current and future opportunities for the agrifood industry in the wake of conflicting issues, such as opportunities arising for new beef markets and the abolition of milk quotas and constraints arising from carbon reduction measures at European Union and global level; the degree to which he expects to be in a position to continue to expand the industry here while at the same time maintaining good practice in respect of carbon emissions; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [12736/15]

View answer

Oral answers (10 contributions)

This question relates to similar questions raised by other Members. It attempts to emphasise the importance of achieving the targets for the dairy and beef industries and at the same time recognising the need to comply with carbon reduction measures to the greatest extent possible in the jurisdiction.

I thank the Deputy for asking the question. We have already had a discussion on it. When the Food Harvest 2020 targets were set and the policy was put in place by the previous Government, the three buzzwords were smart, green and growth. This is fundamentally what we are trying to do in agriculture. We are trying to get growth while ensuring it is based on innovation and new and better ways of doing things and in a way that is green and protects the environment, watercourses, biodiversity, rural life and rural incomes in the best way we possibly can with regard to reducing the emissions intensity of food production systems.

We are the only country in the world that is auditing farmers and how they run their farms from a sustainability point of view. This is what has been rolled out over the past two years on beef farms and what is being rolled out on dairy farms. Farmers sign up to outsiders coming in and auditing them once every 18 months. This is a sustainability audit system which has international certification.

We are planning growth and expansion between now and 2020. A group of people is planning for growth between now and 2025 to replace the Food Harvest 2020 strategy. The sector constantly needs a ten-year horizon for ambitions so that we all know where we are going and what we are trying to finance with regard to growth and strategy. By the middle of the summer we will launch a new 2025 strategy for agrifood expansion and growth and technological advancement. A major part of the challenge is sustainability. People should not simply state that as our target is to reduce emissions by 20%, agriculture must apply that 20% reduction. It is a much more complex argument than this. I assure the Deputy we will do everything we can and we will be a global leader in finding ways to reduce the emissions intensity of our food production systems, but we will allow the country to fulfil its full potential in terms of the volumes of food we are capable of producing from the national resources we have.

I thank the Minister for his reply. We do not doubt his intentions and his goodwill in this regard. Neither do we doubt the intentions of the agricultural Commissioner. It may well come to pass that another Commissioner with other intentions may decide to introduce a measure in the equation which could put pressure on the Minister and the agrifood sector in the country, particularly in the context of EU-US trade negotiations.

Arising from that, will it be possible to ensure we convince our colleagues throughout Europe to facilitate and take into account not only the measure about which the Minister has just spoken, but also the degree to which carbon reduction is in place in this country at present and has been for some considerable years, far in advance of most other European countries?

We have been making those arguments quite successfully. The EU plans to set very ambitious targets for 2030. I think it is right to do so. We have insisted that the complete picture from land use will be factored into those targets. We have had a very active afforestation programme, for example. This has essentially involved planting forests on agricultural land. That has a significant carbon sink value and should compensate for emissions coming from herds in other parts of agriculture. If targets are to be set for agriculture, those targets have to factor in agriculture and land use. They have to factor in the positives as well as the negatives with regard to emissions and carbon sinks, etc. Before Christmas, we successfully got that wording into the European Council decision on the setting of targets. We reaffirmed that recently at the Environment Council when one or two countries sought to remove the land use element from what is factored into the targets. The Commission has confirmed that it is very much there now. This is good news from an Irish perspective.

I welcome the Minister's comprehensive reply. If someone in some other commission has a brainstorm and tries to increase the area of wetlands in this country, perhaps in an attempt to create a European carbon sink, that will obviously have a detrimental impact on our agrifood sector. In view of our economy's high dependency on the agrifood sector, is the Minister completely satisfied that he will be in a position to ensure that sector continues to grow? Will he take account of the development of non-fossil alternative fuels in this jurisdiction to reinforce his argument and intensify the case on behalf of the Irish economy?

Agriculture faces and will continue to face challenges with regard to the sustainability, environmental consequences and management of food production. That is why we have special areas of conservation and we protect species like pearl mussels, breeding waders and hen harriers. The restrictions that are imposed on farmers to protect vulnerable species are very controversial in some parts of the country.

They are all in the west.

This is part of the challenge of farming in the European Union.

It is also part of the compensation package that we hope to be able to provide to farmers for those restrictions to protect valuable wildlife. That is an important part of farming here and people need to understand it. Having said that, I intend to take the significant opportunities that are available in the different sectors. Last week, we launched an energy crops support package for farmers who are willing to plant wood coppice, which is basically willow. It suits certain types of land and can produce a very profitable margin if it is grown correctly and in the right proximity to where it is to be used and burned. We are supporting all these sectors. Energy crops will be part of the agrifood story in Ireland.

Top
Share