Skip to main content
Normal View

Housing Provision

Dáil Éireann Debate, Thursday - 23 April 2015

Thursday, 23 April 2015

Questions (3)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

3. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the reason he considered it appropriate to allocate a target for social housing provision in all four Dublin local authorities that is below the national average target of 25% - 20% in Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown, 21% in Dublin City Council, 23% in Fingal County Council and 23% in South Dublin County Council - considering the crisis is at its worst in our capital city; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [15839/15]

View answer

Oral answers (10 contributions)

Figures were released earlier this week showing that there has been a disastrous 55% increase in the number of homeless families and children in the past year. Most of those are in Dublin - 911 children, or 411 families - on top of an already disastrous homelessness crisis in Dublin for individuals, families and young people. How can the Minister say he is taking serious action to deal with this crisis when what he promised goes nowhere near dealing with it, and the allocations he has made for new houses in Dublin are lower in percentage terms than the national average, according to his own figures?

I thank the Deputy sincerely for asking this question. Social housing is a key priority for the Government, and the social housing strategy targets the supply of 35,000 additional social housing units. I have managed to get €4 billion in the teeth of very difficult economic times. Even the Deputy, I hope, would acknowledge that that is a substantial amount of money to get in these difficult times. It is an absolute priority for me. The targets for local authorities that I announced recently are fully in line with those in the social housing strategy, which were developed having regard to the nature and scale of social housing need, as measured by the most recent statutory assessment of housing need. In total, some 22,900 units are targeted for delivery in the 2015-17 period, 7,500 through capital-funded schemes and 15,400 through current-funded programmes.

A key reason for the variation in the impact on local housing lists lies in the variation in the levels of housing need locally. Certain areas have lower numbers on housing lists, with a consequence that the targets set for such authorities have a relatively high percentage impact on the lists. Conversely, while other authorities had considerably higher targets set for them, including the Dublin local authorities, the impact is proportionally not as high given the number on the housing lists of those areas.

In overall terms, the targets I have announced for Dublin are extremely ambitious and challenging. I am determined that they will be achieved. Delivery on these targets will have a major impact on the housing waiting lists in the four local authorities concerned and reflect the fact that addressing social housing need is accorded the highest priority by the Government. In that regard, Dublin is ultimately the highest priority.

For the third time since I entered the Dáil in 2011, I have brought families, who were directly affected, into the Visitors Gallery. They are either now homeless, threatened with homelessness or have been on the housing waiting list for ten, 12 or 13 years. Many of them now sitting in the Visitors Gallery are in absolutely dire circumstances.

The figures released today by the Dublin Housing Executive show that the situation has become worse by 55% in the last year, despite all the announcements. Frankly, somebody is telling porkies about these figures. When the Minister says there is €3.8 billion extra it sounds like a lot, but it is €1.5 billion. The rest is coming from the existing social protection budget in the form of RAS and leasing. In other words, people will stay exactly where they are in precarious circumstances. Meanwhile, landlords are evicting people daily because they can get higher rents in the private market. It is bogus and a fantasy to say that there is this big extra injection of money.

A question please.

In these announcements, the Minister promised a national average 25% reduction in the housing list but it is not even being met in Dublin. The allocation is lower in Dublin where the housing crisis is at its worst. How can the Minister explain this?

More than €500 million will go to Dublin between now and the end of 2017. The Deputy can challenge the figures all he wants, but that is real money. I have some news for the Deputy concerning the targets he has so eloquently addressed. As regards the targets set for the four local authorities in Dublin, we asked them all what they wanted. We met with them and discussed it in detail. The Dublin social housing strategy is separate to everything else we do because of the issues in the capital. When we received their wish lists, I set higher targets for them than they had sought. That is how much we are putting into Dublin. Some €500 million is going into Dublin until the end of 2017.

As regards the Deputy's comments on homelessness, we have put together a huge package to help homeless people. Unfortunately, it would be impossible to have a utopian package that addresses everything immediately. However, if the Deputy asks Alice Leahy of Trust and many others whether they have seen a dramatic impact as a result of it, they will certainly tell him that they have.

In recent months, the grim facts of a dramatic increase in families, including children, being driven into homelessness speak for themselves. I will give an example concerning targets in my own area. In a letter sent to Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council, the Minister mentions a target of 681 new houses. When one breaks it down, however, there are only 300 new houses, or less. The rest are leases, RAS or HAPs, which are not new council houses. Much of it is not new money either.

The housing waiting list in Dún Laoghaire is growing by 100 per month. The Minister is going to give us 300 new houses over three years, when 1,200 people are joining the list in a year. That means the list will be a million miles longer in a few years if this is all the new social housing construction the Minister can provide. It is not even a drop in the ocean. We will not even be standing still and the crisis will get worse.

I have secured the largest budget for social housing in the history of the State. The Deputy referred to Dún Laoghaire. We have had a substantial engagement with the local council there. However, he omits the fact that there is a mix, including purchasing units in some cases. The Deputy has often spoken about boarded-up social houses, which we call voids. They are being turned around more quickly. We have a mix in each local authority based on their analysis of how many units can be turned around quickly through that combination, be it by building, purchasing, leasing or voids. This is real money and I resent the fact that the Deputy thinks it is not so.

Is it existing money?

This is real money that is fixed and ring-fenced for this purpose. It will have a dramatic impact. I want to see it being turned around as quickly as possible. We have weekly meetings with the Dublin housing taskforce and I also chair a monthly meeting with all the relevant parties to ensure that this situation is being turned around as quickly as possible.

The Deputy should remember that we inherited a situation where houses were not being built for decades. Ultimately, it takes time to turn that around.

Top
Share